ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05978687LIDPTERUpdated Aug 25, 2026

The Use of Lidocaine Gel Versus Subconjunctival Xylocaine Injection in Pterygium Excision

A Phase 4 interventional study of OPHTESIC LIDOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE 20MG/G and Xylocaine with Epinephrine in Pterygium, sponsored by Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Vrije Universiteit Brussel · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In pterygium excision procedures, the subconjunctival injection of xylocain is regarded as an uncomfortable and painful step in the procedure. While already being studied in other ophthalmic procedures such as glaucoma surgery (7), application of topical lidocaine gel is likely to minimize pain. The gel has a longer surface contact time due to its consistency, providing not only a longer anesthetic effect, but protecting the corneal surface against desiccation, when compared to eye drops.

The investigators hypothesize that Ophtesic 2% lidocaine gel is as effective as an anesthetic in pterygium excision as subconjunctival injection, while providing more comfort during surgery and less corneal dryness afterwards.

Our goal is to compare both the anesthetic and corneal surface effect of topical 2% lidocaine gel to subconjunctival injection of xylocaine 2% solution with 0.125 epinephrine in pterygium surgery:

  • Compare the patients pain during and after surgery
  • Compare corneal dryness after surgery.
  • Evaluate possible secondary events
Read the detailed description

Pterygia are known as fibrovascular degenerations in the outer layer of the eye. Usually, they cross the limbus onto the cornea. they develop over time and can cause symptoms such as redness, itching, irritation and decreased vision. In severe cases, pterygia can provoke binocular diplopia due to contraction of the Tenon's capsule. Risk factors are age, UV exposure and male gender.

Rezvan F. et al conducted a meta-analysis to study the prevalance of pterygia in the world. Their prevalence is estimated at 12% in the worldwide population, being higher in subtropical regions. They occur slightly more in men, 13% versus 12%, when compared to women. The highest prevalence is seen in patients over 80 years old (up to 19.5%).

The exact mechanism of pathogenesis is not clear. A pterygium consists of degenerated collagen tissue. Several previous studies have already proven the role of anti-apoptotic proteins such as p53, a tumor suppressor protein. Its expression is elevated when compared to normal conjunctival tissue. UV exposure is the most important risk factor. This theory is supported by histopathologic actinic changes, similar to actinic keratosis, seen in pterygia.

First line treatment for pterygia are conservative measures, like lubricants and sunglasses to protect against additional harmful UV radiation. Yet, these measures are only symptomatic and will not eliminate the cause. Surgery is regarded as an ideal solution in patients who would like a definitive improvement of esthetic and visual problems. Several surgery techniques are already known, but the most common is closure of the excised pterygium with a conjunctival auto graft. In this technique, conjunctiva from the superotemporal limbal part of the patient's eye is used to cover the excised pterygium area. A systematic review compared the risk of recurrence of this technique to the use of an amniotic membrane and concluded that the risk of recurrence was 46% percent less in the first group.

These days, subconjunctival injection of xylocaine 2% solution with 0.125 epinephrine is the most used anesthesia technique. The anesthesia is infero- or superotemporal administered 5-8mm from the limbus. While giving excellent anesthetic result, the pain and anxiety caused by this injection implied the need for new techniques. In chalazion and cataract surgery, lidocaine gel is already confirmed to have a sufficient anesthetic effect on patients while the amount of pain and anxiety during administration was decreased. In pterygium surgery, both and proves that pain was less during both anesthesia administration and post-operatively. Now that Ophtesic lidocaine gel is also on-label for pterygium excision, in many centers the gel is used as standard of care.

With Oksuz et al. (3) already having investigated the efficacy of lidocaine gel in pterygium surgery, there might be more advantages yet to be investigated. For example, the lidocaine gel has the advantage of having a viscous consistency. This allows the gel to protect the eye from desiccating during surgery. Our primary goal in this study is to compare the ef-fect on dryness and irritation in patients after pterygium surgery with both methods of an-aesthesia by using the OSDI score questionnaire and the Oxford Dry Scale. In addition to equal anaesthetic effect, this could push the standard of care in favour of the lidocaine gel.

In pterygium excision procedures, the subconjunctival injection of xylocaine is regarded as an uncomfortable and painful step in the procedure. Already proved to be equal, the gel has a longer surface contact time due to its consistency, providing not only a longer anesthetic effect, but protecting the corneal surface against desiccation, when compared to eye drops. Nowadays, it is already considered as the standard of care.

The investigators hypothesize that Ophtesic 2% lidocaine gel is as effective as an anesthetic in pterygium excision as subconjunctival injection, while providing more comfort during surgery and less corneal dryness afterwards.

Our goal is to compare both the anesthetic and corneal surface effect of topical 2% lidocaine gel to subconjunctival injection of xylocaine 2% solution with 0.125 epinephrine in pterygium surgery:

  • Compare the patients pain during and after surgery
  • Compare corneal dryness after surgery.
  • Evaluate possible secondary events (e.g. enophtalmitis or non-adherence of the graft)

Procedure Anesthesia In group A, all patients will receive topical Povidone- Iodine and 2% lidocaine gel prior to surgery. In group B, all patients will receive Povidone- Iodine and a subconjunctival injection with xylocaine 2% hydrochloride solution with 0.125 epinephrine will be injected with a 27-gauge needle. When asked for, patients will receive additional topical 1% lidocaine eye drops.

Operative technique A traction suture is applied at the superior limbus (Vicryl 6.0) with a Kocher. The head of the pterygium is separated from its body with scissors. Afterwards it is removed by blunt dissection. The subconjunctival tissue under the body of the lesion is removed. The conjunctival graft is separated from the Tenon's capsule for harvest by ballooning with SBSS in group A and by injection with 0.5 mL of 2% xylocaine in group B. The autograft is excised from the superior temporal side. Hereafter, the graft is secured to the recipient bed with sutures. The traction suture is removed. All operations are executed by the same surgeon.

Following outcomes will be assessed:

  • Pain The investigators will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The assessment is done intra- and post- operatively by a nurse of the department. During both assessments, the surgeon will leave the operating room.

Pain will be monitored at following moments:

  • Initial administration of anesthesia
  • At incision
  • Within 5 minutes after surgery
  • Day one post-operative consult

    • Dryness The dryness is assessed in two manners. The Oxford Dry Eye Scale (11) (Figure two) will be handled as an objective tool to grade dryness. The Ocular Surface Disease Index OSDI (12) (Figure three, four and five) is a subjective manner of assessing dryness. The questionnaire will be available in English, Dutch and French.

At following moments the dryness will be monitored:

  • Day one post-operative consult
  • Day 8 post-operative consult

Exclusion criteria:

  • History of auto-immune diseases such as Sjögren, Lupus, Graves, Graft-versus-host disease, rheumatoid arthritis.
  • History of deafness, anxiety disorders, communicative barrier, impossibility to comprehend the Visual Analogue Pain Scale or the OSDI questionnaire.
  • Patient who already had pterygium excision
02

Conditions studied

  • Pterygium

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lidocaine gel
  • Pterygium
  • Dryness
  • Irritation
03

In context

Pterygium

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Pterygium; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 60 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Pterygium.

Browse Pterygium studies →

Lead sponsor

Vrije Universiteit Brussel is the lead sponsor of 158 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Indication of pterygium excision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No history of auto-immune diseases such as Sjögren, Lupus, Graves, , rheumatoid artritis
  • No history of deafness, anxiety disorders, communicative barrier, impossibility to comprehend the Visual Analogue Pain Scale or the OSDI questionnaire.
  • Patient who already had pterygium excision
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GVHD (graft-versus-host disease)

After a transplant from a donor, the donor’s immune cells attack the recipient’s body, often the skin, gut or liver.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Topical lidocaine gel

    All patients will receive topical 2% lidocaine gel (Ophtesic lidocaine gel) prior to surgery

    Drug: OPHTESIC LIDOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE 20MG/G

  • Active comparator
    Subconjunctival xylocaine injection

    All patients will receive a subconjunctival injection with xylocaine 2% hydrochloride solution with 0.125 epinephrine will be injected with a 27-gauge needle

    Drug: Xylocaine with Epinephrine

Interventions

  • DrugOPHTESIC LIDOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE 20MG/G

    In group A, all patients will receive topical 2% lidocaine gel (ophtesic lidocaine hydrochloride 20 mg/G) prior to surgery. Operative technique A traction suture is applied at the superior limbus (Vicryl 6.0) with a Kocher. The head of the pterygium is separated from its body with scissors. Afterwards it is removed by blunt dissection. The subconjunctival tissue under the body of the lesion is removed. The conjunctival graft is separated from the Tenon's capsule for harvest by ballooning with SBSS in group A and by injection with 0.5 mL of 2% xylocaine in group B. The autograft is excised from the superior temporal side. Hereafter, the graft is secured to the recipient bed with sutures. The traction suture is removed. All operations are executed by the same surgeon.

    Also known as: Lidocain gel

  • DrugXylocaine with Epinephrine

    Drug pages: Lidocaine · Epinephrine

    In group B, all patients will receive a subconjunctival injection with xylocaine 2% hydrochloride solution with 0.125 epinephrine will be injected with a 27-gauge needle. When asked for, patients will receive additional topical 1% lidocaine eye drops. Operative technique A traction suture is applied at the superior limbus (Vicryl 6.0) with a Kocher. The head of the pterygium is separated from its body with scissors. Afterwards it is removed by blunt dissection. The subconjunctival tissue under the body of the lesion is removed. The conjunctival graft is separated from the Tenon's capsule for harvest by ballooning with SBSS in group A and by injection with 0.5 mL of 2% xylocaine in group B. The autograft is excised from the superior temporal side. Hereafter, the graft is secured to the recipient bed with sutures. The traction suture is removed. All operations are executed by the same surgeon.

    Also known as: Subconjucntival injection with xylocain injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in OSDI score POD8

    The Ocular Surface Disease Index OSDI (12) is a subjective manner of assessing dryness. The questionnaire will be available in English, Dutch and French. Our primary outcome is the difference in OSDI score between both groups after 8 days.

    Time frame: Post-op day 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary events

    Number of secondary events in absolute numbers (non-adherence of graft, endophtalmitis, ...)

    Time frame: Post-op day 8

  2. Change of OSDI score

    The Ocular Surface Disease Index OSDI (12) is a subjective manner of assessing dryness. The questionnaire will be available in English, Dutch and French. A secondary outcome is the mean difference of the OSDI score between both groups.

    Time frame: Post-op day 1 to 8

  3. Pain via Visual Analogue Pain Scale at administration of anesthesia

    We will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Per-operative at administration of anesthesia

  4. Pain via Visual Analogue Pain Scale at incision

    We will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Per-operative at incision

  5. Pain via Visual Analogue Pain Scale < 5 minutes after the operation

    We will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: <5 minutes after operation

  6. Pain via Visual Analogue Pain Scale 1 day after the operation

    We will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Post-op day 1

  7. Pain via Visual Analogue Pain Scale 8 days after the operation

    We will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: Post-op day 8

  8. Change in pain via Visual Analogue Pain Scale

    We will monitor pain assessment with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale. Patients will be asked to give a score from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: pre-operative, post-op day 1 and day 8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UZ Brussel
    Brussels, Brussels Capital 1090, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oksuz H, Tamer C. Efficacy of lidocaine 2% gel in pterygium surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Apr;83(2):206-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00404.x. PubMed 15799734 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 27 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 3, 2023
First posted
Aug 7, 2023
StartActual
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05978687
Responsible party
Karolien Termote, MD FEBOpht (Ophthalmologist, Vrije Universiteit Brussel) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Karolien Termote, Master
principal investigator · Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion