CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05977868COPATUpdated Aug 26, 2025Results posted

Comparing Oral Versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, cefpodoxime, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin, delafloxacin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, linezolid and Ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, dalbavancin, daptomycin, ertapenem in Endovascular Infection, Bone and Joint Infection and Skin and Soft Tissue Infection, sponsored by West Virginia University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-26.

Sponsored by West Virginia University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
DSMB recommendation based on safety benefit in Experimental (oral) arm
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an investigator initiated multisite pragmatic randomized controlled trial designed to demonstrate equivalent effectiveness with improved safety of early transition from intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy to complex outpatient oral antimicrobial therapy (COpAT) across various infectious diseases (endovascular, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary infections).

All patients referred for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) will be evaluated by the research team with respect to inclusion/exclusion criteria. If determined eligible for enrollment, patients will be approached by a study investigator who will present the COPAT Trial. Once informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomized 2:1 using computer software into experimental or control (standard of care) group, respectively: Experimental: COpAT only on hospital discharge; Control: Conventional OPAT, OPAT transitioned to COpAT later in outpatient setting, or long-acting parenteral lipoglycopeptides. Both groups will be followed by an ID physician on the research team with in-person or telemedicine ID Clinic standard of care visits at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after hospital discharge. At the 6-week ID Clinic follow-up, patients will be asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey. The following 2 primary outcomes will be assessed: cure at 3 months using clinical (resolution of infection) and laboratory (improvement in inflammatory markers) parameters and adverse events related to antimicrobial therapy/vascular access complication or readmission at 3 months. The following secondary outcome will be assessed: patient satisfaction at 6 weeks. The experimental group is being compared to standard of care in current clinical practice.

As this is a pragmatic clinical trial, patients will not undergo additional invasive testing or procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endovascular Infection
  • Bone and Joint Infection
  • Skin and Soft Tissue Infection
  • Pulmonary Infection
  • Gastrointestinal Infection
  • Genitourinary Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • COpAT
  • Oral antimicrobial therapy
  • OPAT
  • Parenteral antimicrobial therapy
  • Intravenous antimicrobial therapy
  • Implementation science
03

In context

Soft Tissue Infections

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Soft Tissue Infections; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is below the median of 120 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Soft Tissue Infections.

Browse Soft Tissue Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

West Virginia University is the lead sponsor of 155 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • English speaking
  • The patient is hospitalized at J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital, United Hospital Center, Berkeley Medical Center, Wheeling Hospital, or Camden Clark Medical Center
  • The patient has been diagnosed with ≥ 1 of the following: endovascular, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary infection
  • The patient is being transitioned to 2-8 weeks of IV antibacterial therapy on hospital discharge
  • The patient has capacity to participate in routine OPAT/COpAT follow-up (telephone check-ins, laboratory monitoring, and in-person or telemedicine ID Clinic follow-up)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion (may not meet any of the following):

  • The patient is not appropriate for OPAT (active injection drug use, lack of infusion resources, and/or unstable outpatient environment)
  • The patient is not appropriate for COpAT (unable to receive PO medication or lack of an effective PO antimicrobial option based on susceptibility testing)
  • The patient is unable to give informed consent
  • The patient is a prisoner, pregnant, and/or mentally handicapped
  • The patient is determined unsafe for enrollment at the primary team's discretion
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1 (Experimental)

    COpAT (oral antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge

    Drug: Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, cefpodoxime, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin, delafloxacin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, linezolid

  • Active comparator
    Group 2 (Control)

    Standard of care (IV antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge

    Drug: Ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, dalbavancin, daptomycin, ertapenem

Interventions

  • DrugAmoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, cefpodoxime, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin, delafloxacin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, linezolid

    COpAT (oral antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge

    Also known as: metronidazole, moxifloxacin, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

  • DrugAmpicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, dalbavancin, daptomycin, ertapenem

    Standard of care (IV antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge

    Also known as: meropenem, oritavancin, oxacillin, penicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline, vancomycin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cure/Control at 3 Months

    Number of patients with cure/control using clinical (resolution of infection - e.g., wound healed) and laboratory (improvement in inflammatory markers - e.g., CRP normalization) parameters as adjudicated by 2 ID faculty blinded to study arm

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  2. Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy

    Number of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to antimicrobial therapy (e.g., thrombocytopenia)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after hospital discharge

  3. Adverse Events Related to Vascular Access

    Number of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to vascular access complication (e.g., deep venous thrombosis)

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after hospital discharge

  4. Overall Readmission

    Number of participants readmitted for any reason up to 3 months after discharge from the hospital

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey

    Patient satisfaction using the COPAT Trial Patient Satisfaction Survey at 6 Weeks, which is a short questionnaire (with the overall satisfaction question incorporating a Likert scale 1= Very Dissatisfied, 5= Very Satisfied) designed to assess overall patient satisfaction. Overall satisfaction totaled from participants answering 4= Satisfied and 5= Very Satisfied.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after hospital discharge

  2. Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question "Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)"

    The number of participants who expressed a preference to be in the other study arm (i.e., answers 'Yes' to the survey question "Would you have preferred to be in the other study arm? Yes or No").

    Time frame: 6 weeks after hospital discharge

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Our trial was unblinded for pragmatic reasons. Assessment of clinical cure/control by 2 ID physicians blinded to study arm minimized potential bias. More patients in Experimental group had a procedure for source control. At least two ID physicians select oral regimens to optimize safety. Patients with active SUD/IDU were excluded. All patients were followed through OPAT and COpAT programs. Study results may not be generalizable to institutions/practices without these programs.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Started6430
Completed6228
Not completed22
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject12
Withdrew: Transitioned to comfort care10

Outcome measures

PrimaryCure/Control at 3 Months

Number of patients with cure/control using clinical (resolution of infection - e.g., wound healed) and laboratory (improvement in inflammatory markers - e.g., CRP normalization) parameters as adjudicated by 2 ID faculty blinded to study arm

Time frame:
3 months after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cure/Control at 3 Months
ParticipantsGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Cure/Control at 3 Months6128
PrimaryAdverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy

Number of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to antimicrobial therapy (e.g., thrombocytopenia)

Time frame:
Up to 3 months after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy
ParticipantsGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy44
PrimaryAdverse Events Related to Vascular Access

Number of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to vascular access complication (e.g., deep venous thrombosis)

Time frame:
Up to 3 months after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse Events Related to Vascular Access
ParticipantsGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Adverse Events Related to Vascular Access07
PrimaryOverall Readmission

Number of participants readmitted for any reason up to 3 months after discharge from the hospital

Time frame:
Up to 3 months after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Readmission
ParticipantsGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Overall Readmission177
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey

Patient satisfaction using the COPAT Trial Patient Satisfaction Survey at 6 Weeks, which is a short questionnaire (with the overall satisfaction question incorporating a Likert scale 1= Very Dissatisfied, 5= Very Satisfied) designed to assess overall patient satisfaction. Overall satisfaction totaled from participants answering 4= Satisfied and 5= Very Satisfied.

Time frame:
6 weeks after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey
participantsGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey6027
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question "Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)"

The number of participants who expressed a preference to be in the other study arm (i.e., answers 'Yes' to the survey question "Would you have preferred to be in the other study arm? Yes or No").

Time frame:
6 weeks after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question "Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)"
participantsGroup 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)
Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question "Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)"121

Adverse events

Collected over Until study completion, for a duration of up to three months after hospital discharge. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental1/64 (1.6%)18/64 (28.1%)4/64 (6.3%)
Control0/30 (0%)7/30 (23.3%)8/30 (26.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventExperimentalControl
ReadmissionGeneral disorders7/642/30
ReadmissionSurgical and medical procedures6/641/30
ReadmissionCardiac disorders1/642/30
ReadmissionInfections and infestations3/641/30
ReadmissionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/641/30
ReadmissionVascular disorders0/641/30
MortalityNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/640/30
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventExperimentalControl
Line Related Adverse EventVascular disorders0/647/30
Antibiotic Side EffectGeneral disorders3/642/30
Antibiotic Side EffectInfections and infestations1/641/30
Antibiotic Side EffectRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/641/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Median57.5 (49 to 69)61.5 (51.5 to 70)60 (50 to 70)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Female25833
Male372057
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
United States622890
Length of Hospital Stay
Length of Hospital Stay(days)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Median8 (6 to 11)10 (7 to 11)9 (6 to 11)
Comorbidities
Comorbidities(participants)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Obesity391756
Diabetes331144
Cardiac181331
Pulmonary10515
Renal606
Infection Type
Infection Type(Participants)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Endovascular8513
Bone and Joint462066
Other8311
Bacteremia
Bacteremia(Participants)Group 1 (Experimental)Group 2 (Control)Total
Count of participants301343

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • West Virginia University
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Iversen K, Ihlemann N, Gill SU, Madsen T, Elming H, Jensen KT, Bruun NE, Hofsten DE, Fursted K, Christensen JJ, Schultz M, Klein CF, Fosboll EL, Rosenvinge F, Schonheyder HC, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Helweg-Larsen J, Tonder N, Moser C, Bundgaard H. Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312. Epub 2018 Aug 28. PubMed 30152252 ↗
  • Li HK, Rombach I, Zambellas R, Walker AS, McNally MA, Atkins BL, Lipsky BA, Hughes HC, Bose D, Kumin M, Scarborough C, Matthews PC, Brent AJ, Lomas J, Gundle R, Rogers M, Taylor A, Angus B, Byren I, Berendt AR, Warren S, Fitzgerald FE, Mack DJF, Hopkins S, Folb J, Reynolds HE, Moore E, Marshall J, Jenkins N, Moran CE, Woodhouse AF, Stafford S, Seaton RA, Vallance C, Hemsley CJ, Bisnauthsing K, Sandoe JAT, Aggarwal I, Ellis SC, Bunn DJ, Sutherland RK, Barlow G, Cooper C, Geue C, McMeekin N, Briggs AH, Sendi P, Khatamzas E, Wangrangsimakul T, Wong THN, Barrett LK, Alvand A, Old CF, Bostock J, Paul J, Cooke G, Thwaites GE, Bejon P, Scarborough M; OVIVA Trial Collaborators. Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):425-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710926. PubMed 30699315 ↗
  • Pries-Heje MM, Wiingaard C, Ihlemann N, Gill SU, Bruun NE, Elming H, Povlsen JA, Madsen T, Jensen KT, Fursted K, Schultz M, Ostergaard L, Christensen JJ, Christiansen U, Rosenvinge F, Helweg-Larsen J, Fosbol EL, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Tonder N, Moser C, Iversen K, Bundgaard H. Five-Year Outcomes of the Partial Oral Treatment of Endocarditis (POET) Trial. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):601-602. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2114046. No abstract available. PubMed 35139280 ↗
  • Staples JA, Ho M, Ferris D, Hayek J, Liu G, Tran KC, Sutherland JM. Outpatient Versus Inpatient Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy: A Population-Based Observational Cohort Study of Adverse Events and Costs. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 30;75(11):1921-1929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac298. PubMed 35439822 ↗
  • Rivera CG, Mehta M, Ryan KL, Stevens RW, Tucker KJ, Mahoney MV. Role of infectious diseases pharmacists in outpatient intravenous and complex oral antimicrobial therapy: Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists insights. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2021;4:1161-1169. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1473
  • Juskowich JJ, Ward A, Spigelmyer AE, Howard CA, Slain D, Guilfoose JA, Edmond MB, Sarwari AR. Complex Outpatient Oral Antimicrobial Therapy (COpAT) Program at a Rural Academic Medical Center: Evaluation of First 100 Patients. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(2): S418-S419. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.843
  • Freling S, Wald-Dickler N, Banerjee J, Canamar CP, Tangpraphaphorn S, Bruce D, Davar K, Dominguez F, Norwitz D, Krishnamurthi G, Fung L, Guanzon A, Minejima E, Spellberg M, Spellberg C, Baden R, Holtom P, Spellberg B. Real-World Application of Oral Therapy for Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 11;77(5):672-679. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad119. PubMed 36881940 ↗
  • Juskowich JJ, Thompson JM, Bage SD, Palmateer KM, Guilfoose JA, Lastinger AM, Smith CL, Arcega VA, Stanley JE, Summerfield HM, Fisher-Duda C, Nepal M, Wen S, Sarwari AR. Using the Comparing Oral versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (COPAT) Clinical Trial to Influence Institutional Practice Transformation Towards Earlier Transition to Oral Antibiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 2026 Apr 30;82(4):e674-e681. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf707. PubMed 41419216 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 2, 2025
  • Informed consent form · Jun 12, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05977868
Lead sponsor
West Virginia University
Responsible party
Joy J. Juskowich, MD (Assistant Professor, West Virginia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2023
Start date
Aug 4, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 14, 2025
Completion
Feb 14, 2025
Results posted
Aug 26, 2025
Last update
Aug 26, 2025

Study contacts

Joy J. Juskowich, MD
principal investigator · West Virginia University
Arif R. Sarwari, MD, MSc, MBA
principal investigator · West Virginia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion