ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05976971SODISLEEPUpdated Jan 21, 2026

Microstructural and Sodium 7 Tesla Brain MRI in Idiopathic REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder

An interventional study of 7T MRI in REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder, sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

By 2030 the number of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) would increase by 56% affecting 1 out of 120 people older than 45 years-old. It is known that 10-15 years before the onset motor symptoms such as tremor, rigidity and akinesia, patients often experience a specific sleep trouble called REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD). Follow-up of those subjects showed there was a conversion rate to PD and related disorders (called synucleinopathies) over 80%.

The pathophysiology of RBD is poorly understood. The development of cutting-edge technologies such as 7 Tesla MRI and the optimisation of image processing methods made it possible to non-invasively explore in vivo small brain structures involved in sleep and movement disorders.

The investigators hypothesize that brain and brainstem microstructure, composition, sodium homeostasis and connectivity may change in 15 isolated RBD (iRBD) subjects compared with 15 healthy controls and that these changes may be correlated with clinical scores.

This study would help fill the gap in early diagnosis of synucleinopathies, by contributing to better targeting patients who could be included in therapeutic trials with a neuroprotective effect. Besides, the exploration of original pathophysiological pathways such as sodium homeostatis could provide the necessary arguments for the development of new target therapeutics.

02

Conditions studied

  • REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder

Keywords

  • 7T MRI
  • Parkinson's disease
  • synucleinopathies
03

In context

REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

101 studies on the registry are indexed under REM Sleep Behavior Disorder; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 42 across 50 interventional studies indexed under REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.

Browse REM Sleep Behavior Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille is the lead sponsor of 702 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion Criteria for patients with REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder :

  • Patient aged between 40 and 80 years old
  • Patient fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for RBD (International Classification of Sleep Disorders version 3, American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2014) with polysomnographic confirmation (which will be carried out as part of the routine work-up);
  • UPDRS Part III score under or equal to 5
  • The patient is enrolled in the French social security system
  • The patient understood and signed the consent to participate in the study.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria for control group :

  • Patient aged between 40 and 80 years old
  • Score under or equal 4 for the RBD screening questionnaire
  • UPDRS Part III score under or equal 5
  • The patient is enrolled in the French social security system
  • The patient understood and signed the consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria :

  • Patient / Subject with a history of central nervous system disease (e.g. PD, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, brain tumour, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.). If a doubt exist, this criterion will be left to the judgement of the principal investigator, who is a neurologist.
  • to 7T MRI: presence of a metal in the body or in the eye, patient with a pacemaker or neurostimulator, cochlear implants or any implanted electronic medical equipment in general, metallic heart valve, aneurysm clips.
  • Claustrophobia.
  • Test (MOCA) \< 25/30
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman or protected person (under guardianship, curatorship, deprived of liberty).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Patients with REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder

    Other: 7T MRI

  • Other
    Healthy volunteers

    Other: 7T MRI

Interventions

  • Other7T MRI

    Subjects will have a 7T MRI and questionnaires on the only day of clinical study.

    Also known as: Questionnaires

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3D cartography the rate of difference of atrophy between the idiopathic REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder (iRBD) and control subjects

    Voxel based morphometry evaluated with Matlab and SnPM

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  2. 3D cartography difference of neuromelanin between the iRBD and control subjects with T1 sequence

    Neuromelanin contrast ratio

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  3. 3D cartography difference of neuromelanin between the iRBD and control subjects with Magnetization transfert sequence

    Magnetization transfert contrast ratio

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  4. 3D cartography the rate of difference of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping between the iRBD and control subjects

    Iron load evaluation in ppb

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  5. 3D cartography difference of Mean diffusivity between the iRBD and control subjects

    Mean diffusivity in mm2/s

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  6. 3D cartography difference of Fractional anisotropy between the iRBD and control subjects

    Fractional anisotropy between 0 and 1

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. 3D cartography difference of total sodium concentration between the iRBD and control subjects

    total sodium concentration in mmol/L acquired with a specificic MRI coil

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  2. 3D cartography difference of structural brain connectivity between the iRBD and control subjects

    A network-based statistics analysis will be performed: from Diffusion tensor imaging, a connectivity matrix will be populated for each subject. A t-test contrasting the two groups (iRBD and control subjects) will then be computed for each pairwise association. Finally, permutation testing will be used to ascribe a p-value controlled for the family-wise error rate to each connected component based on its size.

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  3. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and demographic data

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the age and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  4. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and demographic data

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the sex and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  5. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and demographic data

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the laterality and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  6. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and demographic data, clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the MDS-UPDRS I (Movement disorders society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  7. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the MDS-UPDRS II scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  8. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the MDS-UPDRS III scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  9. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the SCOPA-AUT scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  10. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the HAD scale (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  11. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the RBD (Rem sleep behaviour disorder) and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  12. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and demographic data, clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the Pittsburgh sleep quality index and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  13. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the Starkstein motivation scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  14. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the non motor fluctuation scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  15. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the MoCA scale and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  16. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the phonemic and category fluencies and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  17. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the Benton judgement of lines and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  18. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the quality of life SF-36 and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  19. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the Miami Hallucinations questionnaire and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  20. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the treatement intake and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

  21. Rate of Dependency between MRI parameters and clinical scores/questionnaires

    Pearson, Spearman or logistic regression, depending on the blood pressure test and MRI parameters

    Time frame: Time of the Inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Assistance - Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
    Marseille, 13005, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 25 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2023
First posted
Aug 4, 2023
StartActual
Oct 30, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 9, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 9, 2025
Last update
Jan 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05976971
Collaborators
Aix Marseille Université
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2023
Start date
Oct 30, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 9, 2025
Completion
Dec 9, 2025
Last update
Jan 21, 2026

Study contacts

Francois Cremieux
study director · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion