ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05966038Updated May 20, 2026

ALS/MND Natural History Study Data Repository

An observational study in ALS, PLS and MND (Motor Neurone DIsease), sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Recruiting at 18 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-20.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2015; still recruiting 11 years 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 20 studies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis by Massachusetts General Hospital — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · Massachusetts General Hospital.

Planned enrollment
Largest of 10
5,000 · median 130
Started
2015
with 3 others
Observational
10 of 20
2 open now
Registered
17th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis by Massachusetts General Hospital, this one has the largest planned enrollment of the 10 observational ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2015, is one of 10 observational ones, and was the 17th registered.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

980 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 279 are open to participants now.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 20 studies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis by Massachusetts General Hospital are open now, in 3 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 193 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies recruiting now, 118 (61%) set no upper age limit and 23 (12%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 55 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 90 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis by Massachusetts General Hospital, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a data repository for multi-site multi-protocol clinic-based Natural History Study of ALS and Other Motor Neuron Disorders (MND).

All people living with ALS or other MNDs who attend clinics at the Study hospitals (sites) are offered to participate in the Study.

The Sites collect so-called Baseline information including demographics, disease history and diagnosis, family history, etc. At each visit, the Sites also collect multiple disease-specific outcome measures and events. The information is captured in NeuroBANK, a patient-centric clinical research platform.

The Sites have an option to choose to collect data into 20+ additional forms capturing biomarkers and outcome measures. Captured data after its curation are anonymized (all personal identifiers and dates are being removed), and the anonymized dataset is shared with medical researchers via a non-exclusive revocable license.

Funding Source - Biogen, Inc.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America; FDA OOPD.

Read the detailed description

Most people with ALS or MND who are seen clinically by the PI or PI designees at participating sites will be recruited into this study. This well-established framework provides an opportunity to offer to a large proportion of people with ALS/MND a chance to participate in a clinical research project.

Upon obtaining consent, the following is done:

People with ALS/MND are assigned a Neurological Global Unique Identifier (NeuroGUID) and its study-specific derivative, NeuroSTAmP, which is used to link this Study's information to biological samples, images, and clinical data obtained from those individuals in this Study and other studies/trials, in which these patients participate(d).

The following information is captured in NeuroBANK platform:

Baseline information

  • Longitudinal clinical and phenotypical data from routine clinical visits
  • Longitudinal clinical and historical phenotypical data transcribed from electronic health records and notes
  • Any other observational data that are of interest to the Investigator may be captured or linked to information in NeuroBANK.

Other Key Features

The site should track numbers of patients who declined participation. The site should have a mechanism in place to include an offer of participation to each patient in clinic (consenting does not require immediate data entry) Regular Data Quality checks may be performed at the site. Site personnel who intend to have access to NeuroBANK are trained and certified prior to given access.

Several registries, both cross-sectional and longitudinal, currently exist in ALS. NeuroBANK is distinct from other current registries in that it is a patient-centered platform that is designed to function as a data repository of patient data from clinical visits and multiple clinical research projects as well as linking these data to biorepository for tissue, imaging, and other biological information. This natural history study can act as a clinical research framework that may link clinical and clinical research data from current and past studies with biological specimens and image collections.

With obtained consents, biological specimens may be collected with bar-coded labels containing patient assigned study specific NeuroSTAmPs, printed from within NeuroBANK, and scanned into NeuroBANK's virtual distributed BioRepository module. Imaging studies are de-identified with NeuroSTAmPs and linked to clinical and phenotypical information. Anonymized clinical data obtained through this protocol are available to other researchers.

Study Population

Individuals who are seen during their clinical care visits are asked to allow their data to be uploaded and captured for clinical research. The NeuroBANK platform is located at and managed by the Center for Innovation and Bioinformatics (CIB), Neurological Clinical Research Institute (NCRI) of Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA).

Consent Process

Every participant in the ALS clinic is approached to participate in this study. A signed informed consent form is obtained before any data are recorded for study purposes.

03

Conditions studied

  • ALS
  • PLS
  • MND (Motor Neurone DIsease)
  • Kennedy Disease
  • PMA - Progressive Muscular Atrophy
  • PBP - Progressive Bulbar Palsy
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All people living with ALS/MND at participating multidisciplinary ALS/MND clinics

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • A clinical diagnosis of El Escorial of suspected, possible, probable, or definite ALS or
  • Other motor neuron disorders, including but not limited to Spinal-Bulbar Muscular Atrophy (SBMA, Kennedy's disease), Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), Primary Lateral Sclerosis (PLS), Progressive Muscular Atrophy (PMA), and Progressive Bulbar Palsy (PBP)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Disease does not meet criteria for any motor neuron disorder
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R)

    The ALS Functional Rating Scale revised is a 12-item rating scale that measures the progression of disability in patients with ALS. The ALSFRS-r assesses patients' levels of self-sufficiency in areas of feeding, grooming, ambulation and communication. The higher the score, the earlier in the disease progression. It consists of 12 questions with a maximum score of 48 points.

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  2. Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)

    Slow vital capacity test normalized to age, sex, and height

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  3. Survival

    Patient survival or survival equivalent (time to ventilator or feeding tube). Survival equivalent is assessed during routine clinical visits, while mortality event may be reported when becomes known to the treating clinician..

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vital Signs

    Vital Signs (Weight, BP, HR). Both systolic and diastolic pressure are measured.

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  2. Neurological Examination

    Neurological exam that tests for abnormality various areas, from general assessment to coordination and cerebellar function, to sensation and reflexes, to cranial nerves and plantar

    Time frame: Through study completion, annually up to 5 years

  3. El Escorial Criteria

    The El Escorial criteria are diagnostic criteria for ALS. They classify patients into categories of possible, probable, or definite ALS, based on signs of degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons in different body regions.

    Time frame: Through study completion, annually up to 5 years

  4. Handheld Dynamometry

    Handheld Dynamometry for quantitative strength testing of 18 muscles that is a reliable and reproducible measure of decline in ALS

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  5. Grip Strength Testing

    Grip Strength Testing

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  6. Rasch Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS)

    Rasch Overall ALS Disability Scale, the ROADS provides a normed total score on 28 items from 0-146 to capture overall disability level in a linearly-weighted manner, with lower scores indicating disease progression

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  7. 5 Times Sit to Stand

    5 Times Sit to Stand Test

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  8. 10 Meter Walk Test

    10 Meter Walk Test

    Time frame: Every 3-4 months up to 5 years

  9. Physical Examination

    Physical Examination that includes the following test areas for abnormality and clinical significance: respiratory, cardio, gastrointestinal, genitourinary. and musculoskeletal

    Time frame: Through study completion, annually up to 5 years

07

Study locations

18 of 18 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized IPD are being shared with data requestors upon submission of the research proposal online. Data Access Committee reviews submissions and upon approval and execution of the Data Sharing Agreement, the dataset is provided to the data requestor.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: 10-30 days from the initial request's online submission

Access criteria: ALS/MND Natural History Consortium's Data Access committee reviews the merits of the requestors' research proposals and approves or denies data access

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2015 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2030, 188 months after the start.

Of 128 non-industry observational studies under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 125. This study's planned 188 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 137 studies reached it within 64 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 114.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 15, 2023
First posted
Jul 28, 2023
StartActual
Apr 1, 2015
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
May 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05966038
Responsible party
Alexander Sherman (Director, Center for Innovation and Bioinformatics, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2026

Study contacts

Natalia Tarasenko
Contact
ntarasenko@mgh.harvard.edu
1617240346
Alexander Sherman
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion