CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05941702Updated Sep 19, 2024Results posted

Body Signal Integration Training: A Case Series

An interventional study of Body Signal Integration Training in Functional Neurological Disorder, sponsored by University of Manchester. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by University of Manchester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about an intervention package in individuals with Functional Neurological Disorder (FND). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the intervention package acceptable to and feasible to deliver to individuals with FND?
  • Does the intervention package improve symptoms of FND?

Participants will be asked to engage in 8 weekly sessions of an intervention aimed to improve the perception of signals coming from the body (interoception). Participants will be asked to complete tasks between session practising tuning into signals from the body. Participants will also be asked to complete questionnaires measuring their psychological wellbeing, FND symptoms and interoception.

Read the detailed description

The designed intervention is derived from the Integrative Cognitive Model (ICM) of medically unexplained symptoms and Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures, (Brown, 2004; Ven den Bergh, Witthoft, Petersen, \& Brown, 2017; Brown \& Reuber, 2016). This model suggests that conscious body perceptions are interpretations of bottom-up signals influenced by top-down factors such as attention, beliefs, fears and emotional states. The model suggests that Functional Neurological Disorders are distortions in body awareness that arise when normal bodily signals are misinterpreted as noxious, due to a combination of top-down factors and the bodily signals themselves being weak. The proposed intervention targets several factors identified as important in this model, including imprecise bodily signals, poor emotion recognition and regulation, anxious beliefs and fears about symptoms and symptom-focussed processing. The intervention aims to sharpen signals from the body by reducing avoidance and misinterpretation of those signals and thereby improve body perception and interoceptive accuracy. If acceptable, feasible and effective, the proposed intervention would contribute to the literature for the Integrative Cognitive Model of FND and inform future interventions for individuals with FND.

Participants will be offered 8, 1-hour, online sessions, delivered weekly via Microsoft Teams. The psychological intervention will focus on developing skills to improve attunement to the signals from the body to the brain.

  • The sessions will involve engaging in various exercises tuning into the body under different circumstances. Participants will be asked to tune into how particular objects feel in their hands. Participants may be presented with images or scenarios to make them feel a little happy or sad and then will be asked to tune into how the body feels in response to them.
  • Participants will be asked to complete weekly measures online via Qualtrics survey, they will be asked to do this in the 10-15 minutes prior to their session commencing.
  • A full manual of the intervention plan will be uploaded to documents.
  • Following the final session of treatment, a date to complete a one-month follow up will be arranged with the participant.

Follow-Up:

  • One month following the end of psychological therapy, a session will be attended remotely via Microsoft Teams by participants.
  • During this session, all pre-treatment, weekly and post-treatment measures will be re-administered including questionnaires measuring satisfaction with therapy.
02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Neurological Disorder

Keywords

  • Intervention
  • Interoception
  • Body Awareness
03

In context

Nervous System Diseases

974 studies on the registry are indexed under Nervous System Diseases; 252 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 48 across 623 interventional studies indexed under Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Manchester is the lead sponsor of 194 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently experiencing FND symptoms, as measured on items 34-47 on the SOMS-7 (excluding seizures and hallucinations). The study is aiming to investigate the feasibility of an intervention for individuals with FND.
  • Confirmation of diagnosis of FND (through letter from medical doctor) to ensure participants have a diagnosis of FND and are therefore the target audience for the intervention
  • Willing and able to participate in remote therapy. The intervention will be delivered remotely so participants must be willing to engage with remote therapy.
  • Able to converse in English proficiently without support from a link worker. The study will not be using interpreters and so an ability to converse proficiently in English to be able to engage with the intervention is needed.
  • Residing in the UK for the duration of the study, this is in order to develop crisis and risk management plans for participants should they experience any negative effects from therapy or any risks be expressed throughout the course of the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently undergoing any other psychological therapy
  • Previous experience of a mindfulness-based intervention targeting FND.
  • Individuals with symptoms of epilepsy and loss of consciousness.
  • Symptoms of psychosis (as assessed on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State, CAARMS).
  • Diagnosis of any type of Personality Disorder
  • Active plans of self-harm and/or suicide. Potential participants will be asked to complete the risk items on the CORE-OM and will be interviewed around these. This is to ensure the safety of participants engaging in novel therapy and to manage the risks of any potential adverse side-effects of therapy
  • History of prior suicide attempts, to manage the risks of causing negative side effects of therapy
  • Any difficulties with alcohol or substance misuse.
  • Individuals with active symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) i.e., having current symptoms of nightmares and flashbacks.
  • Individuals with symptoms of an eating disorder.

Rationale for exclusion criteria is described in the study protocol

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Full session plan of the 8 sessions is uploaded to documents. This arm will consist of weekly 1 hour 1:1 sessions with Trainee Clinical Psychologist doing exercises aimed at improving interoception. Exercises will include tuning into the body under different circumstances e.g., while having a drink, looking at pictures to induce a positive mood state.

    Behavioral: Body Signal Integration Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralBody Signal Integration Training

    Information and protocol uploaded to documents.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants That Complete 80% of the Intervention

    This is a measure of adherence to the intervention. 80% of participants attending 80% of sessions offered will be considered acceptable adherence

    Time frame: 8 weeks (span of intervention delivery)

  2. Number of Participants Rating the Therapy as Acceptable on Questionnaire of Therapy Satisfaction

    Measure of acceptability of intervention

    Time frame: 8 weeks (span of intervention delivery)

  3. Number of Serious Adverse Reactions as Evidenced by Significant Increase in Distress or Symptom Rating on Euroqol Health Questionnaire (EQ5D), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) or FND Questionnaire

    Number of serious adverse reactions will be a measure of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention

    Time frame: 8 weeks (span of the intervention delivery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Showing a Reliable Change Reduction in Core FND Symptoms as Measured by Screening for Somatic Symptom Disorders (SOMS-7)

    Measure of treatment efficacy

    Time frame: Approximately 3 months - measure will be from baseline measure completion to end of therapy

  2. Number of Particip

    Number of Participants with a Clinically Significant Change of Interoception Measuring Treatment Efficacy

    Time frame: Approximately 3 months - measure will be from baseline completion until end of therapy

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention
Started8
Completed7
Not completed1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants That Complete 80% of the Intervention

This is a measure of adherence to the intervention. 80% of participants attending 80% of sessions offered will be considered acceptable adherence

Time frame:
8 weeks (span of intervention delivery)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Complete 80% of the Intervention
ParticipantsIntervention
Number of Participants That Complete 80% of the Intervention7
PrimaryNumber of Participants Rating the Therapy as Acceptable on Questionnaire of Therapy Satisfaction

Measure of acceptability of intervention

Time frame:
8 weeks (span of intervention delivery)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Rating the Therapy as Acceptable on Questionnaire of Therapy Satisfaction
ParticipantsIntervention
Number of Participants Rating the Therapy as Acceptable on Questionnaire of Therapy Satisfaction7
PrimaryNumber of Serious Adverse Reactions as Evidenced by Significant Increase in Distress or Symptom Rating on Euroqol Health Questionnaire (EQ5D), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) or FND Questionnaire

Number of serious adverse reactions will be a measure of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention

Time frame:
8 weeks (span of the intervention delivery)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Serious Adverse Reactions as Evidenced by Significant Increase in Distress or Symptom Rating on Euroqol Health Questionnaire (EQ5D), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) or FND Questionnaire
ParticipantsIntervention
Number of Serious Adverse Reactions as Evidenced by Significant Increase in Distress or Symptom Rating on Euroqol Health Questionnaire (EQ5D), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) or FND Questionnaire0
SecondaryNumber of Participants Showing a Reliable Change Reduction in Core FND Symptoms as Measured by Screening for Somatic Symptom Disorders (SOMS-7)

Measure of treatment efficacy

Time frame:
Approximately 3 months - measure will be from baseline measure completion to end of therapy
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Showing a Reliable Change Reduction in Core FND Symptoms as Measured by Screening for Somatic Symptom Disorders (SOMS-7)
ParticipantsIntervention
Number of Participants Showing a Reliable Change Reduction in Core FND Symptoms as Measured by Screening for Somatic Symptom Disorders (SOMS-7)3
SecondaryNumber of Particip

Number of Participants with a Clinically Significant Change of Interoception Measuring Treatment Efficacy

Time frame:
Approximately 3 months - measure will be from baseline completion until end of therapy
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Particip
ParticipantsIntervention
Number of Particip5

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIntervention
Psychological DistressSocial circumstances1/8

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intervention
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years8
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention
Mean36 ± 11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention
Female7
Male1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Intervention
White British4
Caribbean1
Black/Black British/Caribbean1
Mixed Ethnicity1
White European1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Krishna Panchmatia
    Manchester, M13 9NT, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 6, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Feb 8, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05941702
Lead sponsor
University of Manchester
Responsible party
Krishna Panchmatia (Trainee Clinical Psychologist, University of Manchester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 12, 2023
Start date
Sep 19, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 26, 2024
Completion
Feb 26, 2024
Results posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Krishna Panchmatia
principal investigator · University of Manchester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion