An interventional study of Mad Dog cooking class series in Spinal Cord Injuries, Multiple Sclerosis and Diet, Healthy, sponsored by Brock University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-07.
Sponsored by Brock University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Spinal cord injury (SCI) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are both conditions characterized by chronic inflammation as indicated by elevated levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. These cytokines can have a wide array of negative impacts such as increasing the risk of depression and the intensity and frequency of neuropathic pain.
Recent work in the investigator's laboratory has shown that a 3-month anti-inflammatory diet is not only effective in reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also in reducing depression and neuropathic pain, by approximately 55% and 40%, respectively. However, a one-year follow-up study from the investigator's lab showed such adherence to be very challenging and therefore, strategies are required to address barriers to healthy eating in those with neurological disability.
Accordingly, the investigators have developed a modified anti-inflammatory diet (Mad Dog diet) that is more palatable, less expensive and less demanding, as well as a 2-part pre-diet consultation that effectively increased self-efficacy for dietary adherence, and actual adherence one month post-consult. Still, participant feedback suggests that further efforts are needed to help ensure long term adherence to anti-inflammatory diets for those with neurological disability.
As such, the investigators have developed the 6-week Mad Dog cooking series. This series consists of a once-weekly cooking class and educational session where a group of individuals with neuromuscular disability can come together to learn about the health benefits of an anti-inflammatory diet, receive instruction on how to cook selected anti-inflammatory recipes, and experiment with various pieces of accessible kitchen equipment that may increase their meal preparation skills.
The purpose of this study is to test the 6-week Mad Dog cooking series in individuals with neuromuscular disability to gauge consumer satisfaction and make preliminary measures on self-efficacy for adhering to the Mad Dog anti-inflammatory diet, as well as actual adherence 6 months after the series has been completed. The investigators will also determine if the series has any effect on depressive symptoms.
As mentioned above, the Mad Dog cooking series consists of 6 once-weekly cooking classes and educational sessions where a group of individuals with neuromuscular disability can come together to learn about the health benefits of an anti-inflammatory diet, receive instruction on how to cook selected anti-inflammatory recipes, and experiment with various pieces of accessible kitchen equipment that may increase their meal preparation skills. These classes will take place in the kitchen in the Brock Research and Innovation Centre (130 Lockhart Drive) which is a completely accessible building. The classes will be led by a Brock University graduate student and take approximately 90 minutes each, and each class will have a different theme (See below). This series will also allow participants to share a meal together once per week which the investigators expect (based on past feedback) to foster a sense of community and belonging, improve mood and increase the likelihood of long term adherence to the anti-inflammatory diet.
Schedule:
Week 1: Introduction to Anti-Inflammatory Eating (Veggies and Pita with Mad Dog Hummus, Mad Dog Thai Curry, Mad Dog Nut Mix) Week 2: Focus on Breakfast (Chocolate Protein Smoothie, Poached Eggs Potato Hash and Wilted Kale, Overnight Oats) Week 3: Healthy Flavors of the Globe (Baked Plantain and Sweet Potato Chips, Lentil Tacos with rice and beans, Sugarless Sticky Toffee Pudding) Week 4: Tribute to Canada (Split Pea Soup, Chicken Tourtière with roasted veggies, Nanaimo Bars) Week 5: Anti-Inflammatory Powerhouses (Green Juice, Chicken Breast with Kale and Wild Rice Salad, Turmeric Coconut Bites) Week 6: Protein Positive (White Bean Dip with veggies and crackers, Vegetarian Chili, Sweet Potato Protein Pudding)
3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 14 is below the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.
Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →Brock University is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
This 6-week series consists of a once-weekly cooking class and educational session where a group of individuals with neuromuscular disability can come together to learn about the health benefits of an anti-inflammatory diet, receive instruction on how to cook selected anti-inflammatory recipes, and experiment with various pieces of accessible kitchen equipment that may increase their meal preparation skills. This series will also allow participants to share a meal together once per week.
Other: Mad Dog cooking class series
The control group will be given the Mad Dog recipes but will not take part in the Mad Dog cooking class series.
This 6-week series consists of a once-weekly cooking class and educational session where a group of individuals with neuromuscular disability can come together to learn about the health benefits of an anti-inflammatory diet, receive instruction on how to cook selected anti-inflammatory recipes, and experiment with various pieces of accessible kitchen equipment that may increase their meal preparation skills. This series will also allow participants to share a meal together once per week.
Custom-designed task self-efficacy questionnaire
Confidence in one's abilities to adhere to the anti-inflammatory diet. This is a 4-item questionnaire that asks how confident participants are about adhering to the diet for certain amounts of time at certain percentages of adherence. Each item is scored from 1 (not confident at all) to 7 (completely confident). The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline (for the intervention group and the control group)
Custom-designed task self-efficacy questionnaire
Confidence in one's abilities to adhere to the anti-inflammatory diet. This is a 4-item questionnaire that asks how confident participants are about adhering to the diet for certain amounts of time at certain percentages of adherence. Each item is scored from 1 (not confident at all) to 7 (completely confident). The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: 6-week timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Custom-designed task self-efficacy questionnaire
Confidence in one's abilities to adhere to the anti-inflammatory diet. This is a 4-item questionnaire that asks how confident participants are about adhering to the diet for certain amounts of time at certain percentages of adherence. Each item is scored from 1 (not confident at all) to 7 (completely confident). The minimum score is 4 and the maximum score is 28, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: 6-month follow-up timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Custom-designed barrier self-efficacy questionnaire
Confidence in one's ability to overcome the barriers associated with adhering to anti-inflammatory diet. This is a 5-item questionnaire that asks participants how confident they are about overcoming the barriers associated with adhering to the anti-inflammatory diet. Each item is scored from 1 (not confident at all) to 7 (completely confident). The minimum score is 5 and the maximum score is 35, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline (for the intervention group and the control group)
Custom-designed barrier self-efficacy questionnaire
Confidence in one's ability to overcome the barriers associated with adhering to anti-inflammatory diet. This is a 5-item questionnaire that asks participants how confident they are about overcoming the barriers associated with adhering to the anti-inflammatory diet. Each item is scored from 1 (not confident at all) to 7 (completely confident). The minimum score is 5 and the maximum score is 35, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: 6-week timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Custom-designed barrier self-efficacy questionnaire
Confidence in one's ability to overcome the barriers associated with adhering to anti-inflammatory diet. This is a 5-item questionnaire that asks participants how confident they are about overcoming the barriers associated with adhering to the anti-inflammatory diet. Each item is scored from 1 (not confident at all) to 7 (completely confident). The minimum score is 5 and the maximum score is 35, and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Time frame: 6-month follow-up timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Adherence to the anti-inflammatory diet
Participants will complete a 7-day food log. Food logs are then analyzed for the number of servings the participant ate that were approved on the anti-inflammatory diet, the number of servings that were not allowed (cheats) and the total servings eaten over the 7 days. Adherence rates are then determined by calculating \[(servings allowed/total servings) \* 100.
Time frame: Baseline (for the intervention group and the control group)
Adherence to the anti-inflammatory diet
Participants will complete a 7-day food log. Food logs are then analyzed for the number of servings the participant ate that were approved on the anti-inflammatory diet, the number of servings that were not allowed (cheats) and the total servings eaten over the 7 days. Adherence rates are then determined by calculating \[(servings allowed/total servings) \* 100.
Time frame: 6-week timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Adherence to the anti-inflammatory diet
Participants will complete a 7-day food log. Food logs are then analyzed for the number of servings the participant ate that were approved on the anti-inflammatory diet, the number of servings that were not allowed (cheats) and the total servings eaten over the 7 days. Adherence rates are then determined by calculating \[(servings allowed/total servings) \* 100.
Time frame: 6-month follow-up timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Custom-designed consumer satisfaction questionnaire
Consumer satisfaction with the Mad Dog cooking class series will be measured on a custom designed questionnaire containing 10 items scored on a 7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree; ex: I feel that I learned new and helpful information in the Mad Dog cooking class series). The minimum score on this questionnaire is 10 and the maximum score is 70, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: 6-week timepoint (for the intervention group only)
Depression as determined by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression (CES-D)
Depression as determined by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression (CES-D) This is a 20-item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their depressive symptoms over the last 7 days, and each item is scored from 0-3. The minimum score for the questionnaire 0 and the maximum score is 60, with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptomology. Any score above 15 is indicative of clinical depression, but should not be taken as a diagnosis by itself.
Time frame: Baseline (for the intervention group and the control group)
Depression as determined by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression (CES-D)
Depression as determined by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression (CES-D) This is a 20-item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their depressive symptoms over the last 7 days, and each item is scored from 0-3. The minimum score for the questionnaire 0 and the maximum score is 60, with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptomology. Any score above 15 is indicative of clinical depression, but should not be taken as a diagnosis by itself.
Time frame: 6-week timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Depression as determined by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression (CES-D)
Depression as determined by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression (CES-D) This is a 20-item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their depressive symptoms over the last 7 days, and each item is scored from 0-3. The minimum score for the questionnaire 0 and the maximum score is 60, with higher scores indicating worse depressive symptomology. Any score above 15 is indicative of clinical depression, but should not be taken as a diagnosis by itself.
Time frame: 6-month follow-up timepoint (for the intervention group and the control group)
Plan to share: No — Available upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Brock University