An interventional study of FiO2 titration using electronic alert system in Hyperoxia, sponsored by Ohio State University. Suspended at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-11.
Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Among 27 studies in Hyperoxia with a site in United States — 4 open to participants now, 7 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Hyperoxia · United States.
Among the 27 studies in Hyperoxia with a site in United States, this one is the 3rd largest by planned enrollment of the 19 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2024, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 24th registered.
115 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperoxia; 13 are open to participants now.
Browse Hyperoxia studies →4 of the 27 studies in Hyperoxia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
University of Florida · Sites in United States
Ohio State University · Sites in United States
VA Office of Research and Development · Sites in United States
Washington University School of Medicine · Sites in United States
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 7 Hyperoxia studies recruiting now, 3 (43%) set no upper age limit and 1 (14%) stop at 75 or younger; 0 take children under 18; 3 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
27 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 1 · Phase 2 3 · Phase 3 3 · Phase 4 3
First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2024.
This study's planned enrollment of 936 is above the median of 48 across 82 interventional studies indexed under Hyperoxia.
Median enrollment 48 across the 19 interventional studies, 256 across the 8 observational. Of the 16 that completed or were terminated, 7 (44%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
2 of 27 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Ohio State University is the lead sponsor of 663 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.
Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (73%) have results posted.
Ohio State University has 2 studies filed under Hyperoxia — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
1 of the studies in Hyperoxia with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT02703220VA Office of Research and DevelopmentSleep Apnea in Elderly | 2027-07-30 |
Among the 27 studies in Hyperoxia with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
OPTI-Oxygen is a single center, stepped wedged, cluster-randomized, un-blinded, pragmatic, comparing the use of a combined inspired oxygen (FiO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) titration strategy utilizing electronic health records (EHR) based electronic alerts (e-alerts) for respiratory therapists in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. All eligible mechanically ventilated patients, FiO2 titration and SpO2 goal range will be based on the correlation between SpO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). E-alerts will be sent in the intervention arm as reminders for FiO2 titration. In the control arm, patients will have oxygen titrated per current standard of care (SpO2=88-92%, titrate FiO2 at least every 4 hours).
We will conduct a single center, stepped wedged, cluster-randomized, un-blinded, pragmatic, comparing the use of a combined inspired oxygen (FiO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) titration strategy utilizing electronic health records (EHR) based electronic alerts (e-alerts) for respiratory therapists in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. The participating intensive care units (ICU) will be medical, cancer, surgical (general surgery and trauma) and coronary critical care at the Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital (128 beds). In this stepped wedge design, there will be nested randomization. A 12-13 bed pod within each of the 4 ICU's will be randomized as "step". Each 12-13 bed pod, geographically located within a unit will serve as a cluster and transition from control to intervention will occur every 6 weeks, with an initial 2 week implementation period. All intubated patients meeting inclusion criteria in a particular cluster will be in the intervention or control group per the assignment of that cluster. In the intervention arm, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) will be initially noted. Based on the correlation between the SaO2 and SpO2 the optimal oxygenation range will be determined. Then E-alerts will be used to monitor oxygenation for patients in the intervention arm, based SpO2 values generated by the patient due to the FiO2 given to the patient through the ventilator. E-Alerts search for SpO2 and FiO2 values every minute to evaluate if they meet criteria for optimal oxygenation. If in a 45 minute period 80% of values for both SpO2 and FiO2 values are do not meet target range then an e-alert (text message) is sent to the respiratory therapy cisco phones recommending that oxygen needs to be titrated. Once an e-alert is sent, the respiratory therapist has 45 minutes for adjusting oxygen. Then the e-alert continues to monitor FiO2 and SpO2 values in this manner for every 45 minute period until the ventilator is attached to the patient. (Details in study procedures, section 5). In the control arm, FiO2 titration will be assessed by the optimal oxygenation criteria by current standard of care. This is done by following the ICU ventilator management guidelines. Per the ventilator management guidelines assessment for FiO2 titration is recommended at least once in 4 hours to maintain oxygenation with the optimal range. Treatment allocation (SpO2 and FiO2 targeted titration) will cross over to a new cluster at the conclusion of each period. Protocol adherence will be monitored. Data will be collected until hospital discharge. The study will be carried about with waiver of consent, because the target ranges studied are used as part of routine clinical care in the ICU, and are interventions to which patients would be exposed even if not participating in the study. There is clinical equipoise, i.e. have inadequate prior data to suggest the superiority of one approach over the other. Additionally, patients in the trial would be expected to receive similar oxygen therapy in an unstructured manner if they were not in the trial.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
All eligible mechanically ventilated patients, FiO2 titration and SpO2 goal range will be based on the correlation between SpO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). E-alerts will be sent in the intervention arm as reminders for FiO2 titration.
Other: FiO2 titration using electronic alert system
In the control arm, patients will have oxygen titrated per current standard of care (SpO2=88-92%, titrate FiO2 at least every 4 hours). Physician place oxygen titration orders in EMR and respiratory therapists conduct FiO2 titration without electronic alerts.
In the intervention arm, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) will be initially noted. Based on the correlation between the SaO2 and SpO2 the optimal oxygenation range will be determined. E-alerts will then be used to monitor oxygenation for patients in the intervention arm, based on SpO2 values generated by the patient due to the FiO2 given to the patient through the ventilator. Once an e-alert is sent, the respiratory therapist has 45 minutes for adjusting oxygen. Then the e-alert continues to monitor FiO2 and SpO2 values in this manner for every 45 minute period until the ventilator is attached to the patient.
Proportion of time during mechanical ventilation spent within the target range, SpO2 of 90-94% (conservative) or SpO2 of 93-97% (liberal) at any FiO2 in respective algorithms.
Percent time during mechanical ventilation in target range.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Proportion of time with SpO2 > 94% or SpO2 > 97% with FiO2 ≤ 0.4 in respective algorithms.
Percent time during mechanical ventilation above target range.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Proportion of time with time with SpO2 < 90% or SpO2 < 93% in respective algorithms.
Percent time during mechanical ventilation below target range.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Length of ICU stay
Total number of days in the ICU.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Length of hospital stay
Total number of days in the hospital.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Hospital mortality
Dead or alive at hospital discharge.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Ventilator-Free Days
Alive and free from ventilator support at day 28.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Vasopressor-Free Days
Alive and free from vasopressor support at day 28.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
ICU-Free Days
Alive and out of the ICU at day 28.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
New onset arrhythmia when SpO2<90%
Arrhythmia onset during hypoxemia.
Time frame: through study completion, average of 28-30 days
Change to comfort care status (DNRCC) and time to DNRCC after enrollment.
Change to comfort care status after enrollment will be recorded and analyzed as a dichotomous outcome. Time to DNRCC after enrollment will be evaluated in an exploratory nature using appropriate time-to-event models. Hospital mortality while in comfort care status will also be examined as an exploratory endpoint.
Time frame: until hospital discharge or death befoe hospital discharge, upto 60 days
Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified dataset will be shared after the completion of data analysis of the last patient is enrolled.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form
Time frame: 1 year after enrollment of the last patient. Data will be available for 5 years
Access criteria: To be determined
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2025, 19 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is suspended, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.