CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05908955SCOREUpdated Feb 14, 2025

Quantitative Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

An interventional study of PVI and PVI+ quantitative SVCI in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-14.

Sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
290
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has limited success. The superior vena cava (SVC) has been identified as one of the most common non-pulmonary vein triggers for PAF. It is estimated that SVC isolation (SVCI) could improve the clinical results for patients with PAF. However, results from previous studies about SVCI remain controversial. It is possible that safety concerns for SVCI outweigh its benefits and lead to inadequate ablation. To address this issue, the introduction of a quantitative ablation index (AI) for SVCI may provide a solution.

The goal of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to test the efficacy and safety of quantitative SVCI in addition to PVI in PAF. Participants with PAF will be randomly assigned to either PVI group or PVI+ quantitative SVCI group in a 1:1 ratio and will be followed up for 12 months. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Evaluate the efficacy of PVI+SVCI guided by quantitative AI.
  2. Assess the safety of PVI+SVCI guided by quantitative AI.

The primary end point is treatment success at 3 months after the index ablation. The secondary end points include treatment success at 12 months, and safety outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for drug-refractory PAF and is recommended as first-line therapy by current guidelines. PVI is considered the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, despite persistent PVI, a subgroup of patients may experience recurrent AF due to focal ectopic discharges originating outside the pulmonary veins. Among the non-pulmonary vein triggers, the SVC stands out as a common culprit, making it a promising ablation target for maintaining sinus rhythm.

Nevertheless, results from previous studies that evaluate the efficacy of SVCI showed conflicting results. One possible explanation is that SVC is adjacent to critical anatomy structures (such as the sinus node and the phrenic nerve), which raises safety concerns and often leads to inadequate ablation.

Therefore, it is necessary to establish standardized ablation procedure for SVCI, ensuring both safety and efficacy. To address this issue, we proposed the concept of "quantitative ablation for SVCI." By introducing AI as a quantitative measure, it is possible to achieve precise catheter ablation while minimizing the risk of procedure-related complications.

The SCORE trial is single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aiming to enroll 290 patients with PAF. Participants with PAF will be randomly assigned to either PVI group or PVI+ quantitative SVCI group in a 1:1 ratio, and will be followed up for 12 months. The goal is to determine whether quantitative SVCI could improve clinical results for PAF when added to PVI. The key objectives are as follows:

  1. Evaluate the efficacy of PVI+SVCI guided by quantitative AI.
  2. Assess the safety of PVI+SVCI guided by quantitative AI.

The primary endpoint of the study is treatment success, defined as freedom from AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting longer than 30 seconds, at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints include treatment success at the 12-month follow-up and safety outcomes, including death, stroke/TIA, pericardial tamponade or effusion requiring drainage, pulmonary vein stenosis, superior vena cava stenosis, diaphragmatic nerve injury or paralysis, sinus node dysfunction, and atrial esophageal fistula.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Pulmonary vein
  • superior vena cava
  • clinical trial
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 290 is above the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic paroxysmal AF that are unresponsive to antiarrhythmic drugs (one or more than one).
  • Willing to undergo catheter ablation for AF.
  • Age: 40-75 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any type of catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias.
  • History of any type of thoracic surgery, including cardiac surgery.
  • History of malignant tumors.
  • History of permanent pacemaker implantation.
  • Peripherally inserted central catheter for long-term
  • Heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% or NYHA class III\~IV).
  • Sinus node dysfunction
  • Allergy to contrast agents.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Age: \<40yrs or >75yrs.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
290 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PVI

    Participants in this group will receive pulmonary vein isolation.

    Procedure: PVI

  • Experimental
    PVI+SVCI

    Participants in this group will receive superior vena cava isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation.

    Procedure: PVI+ quantitative SVCI

Interventions

  • ProcedurePVI

    pulmonary vein isolation

  • ProcedurePVI+ quantitative SVCI

    pulmonary vein isolation and superior vena cava isolation guided by quantitative ablation index

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm measured by 14-day Holter ECG at 3 months follow-up

    The proportion of patients that are freedom from AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia for longer than 30 seconds measured by 14-day Holter ECG at 3 months after the index ablation.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm measured by 14-day Holter ECG at 12 months follow-up

    The proportion of patients that are freedom from AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia for longer than 30 seconds measured by 14-day Holter ECG at 12 months after the index ablation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events post ablation

    Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events that include death, stroke/TIA, pericardial tamponade or effusion that requires drainage, pulmonary vein stenosis, superior vena cava stenosis, diaphragmatic nerve injury or paralysis, sinus node dysfunction, and atrial esophageal fistula.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Fuwai hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100051, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhou Z, Hu D. An epidemiological study on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Chinese population of mainland China. J Epidemiol. 2008;18(5):209-16. doi: 10.2188/jea.je2008021. Epub 2008 Sep 8. PubMed 18776706 ↗
  • Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, Piccini JP, Baloch KN, Monahan KH, Daniels MR, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, Rosenberg Y, Lee KL, Packer DL; CABANA Investigators. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Medical Therapy on Quality of Life Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1275-1285. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0692. Erratum In: JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2370. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7682. PubMed 30874716 ↗
  • Corrado A, Bonso A, Madalosso M, Rossillo A, Themistoclakis S, Di Biase L, Natale A, Raviele A. Impact of systematic isolation of superior vena cava in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation on the outcome of paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent atrial fibrillation ablation: results from a randomized study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jan;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01577.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1. PubMed 19732237 ↗
  • Miyazaki S, Takigawa M, Kusa S, Kuwahara T, Taniguchi H, Okubo K, Nakamura H, Hachiya H, Hirao K, Takahashi A, Iesaka Y. Role of arrhythmogenic superior vena cava on atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):380-386. doi: 10.1111/jce.12342. Epub 2014 Jan 6. PubMed 24320606 ↗
  • Santangeli P, Zado ES, Hutchinson MD, Riley MP, Lin D, Frankel DS, Supple GE, Garcia FC, Dixit S, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Feb;13(2):374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Oct 23. PubMed 26477712 ↗
  • Da Costa A, Levallois M, Romeyer-Bouchard C, Bisch L, Gate-Martinet A, Isaaz K. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Mar;108(3):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.10.005. Epub 2015 Feb 7. PubMed 25662699 ↗
  • Ejima K, Kato K, Iwanami Y, Henmi R, Yagishita D, Manaka T, Fukushima K, Arai K, Ashihara K, Shoda M, Hagiwara N. Impact of an Empiric Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation on the Outcome of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;116(11):1711-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 10. PubMed 26434513 ↗
  • Sharma SP, Sangha RS, Dahal K, Krishnamoorthy P. The role of empiric superior vena cava isolation in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;48(1):61-67. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0198-2. Epub 2016 Oct 14. PubMed 27743289 ↗
  • Higuchi K, Yamauchi Y, Hirao K, Marrouche NF. The importance of superior vena cava isolation in ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013 Jan;28(1):2-6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32835b099b. PubMed 23128496 ↗
  • Zhang T, Wang Y, Liang Z, Zhao H, Han Z, Wang Y, Wu Y, Ren X. Effect of Combined Pulmonary Vein and Superior Vena Cava Isolation on the Outcome of Second Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1845-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.030. Epub 2020 Apr 3. PubMed 32305224 ↗
  • Yamashita S, Tokuda M, Isogai R, Tokutake K, Yokoyama K, Narui R, Kato M, Tanigawa S, Inada K, Matsuo S, Miyanaga S, Sugimoto K, Yoshimura M, Yamane T. Spiral activation of the superior vena cava: The utility of ultra-high-resolution mapping for caval isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Feb;15(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.035. Epub 2017 Sep 22. PubMed 28943481 ↗
  • Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Kusa S, Uchiyama T, Hirao K, Iesaka Y. Conduction recovery after electrical isolation of superior vena cava--prevalence and electrophysiological properties. Circ J. 2013;77(2):352-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0951. Epub 2012 Oct 23. PubMed 23090663 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05908955
Lead sponsor
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Responsible party
Jun Liu,MD (Principal Investigator, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2023
Start date
Mar 17, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 14, 2025

Study contacts

Wenchi Guan, MD, PhD
Contact
wenchi.guan@outlook.com
+8613521270747
Jun Liu, MD, PhD
Contact
liujundoctor@163.com
+8615810319596
Jun Liu, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion