ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05907356Updated Aug 27, 2024

Effect of Sciatic Nerve Slider Technique in Different Positions in Low Back Pain Patients

An interventional study of sciatic nerve slider technique in slump lying position and sciatic nerve slider technique in supine position in Low Back Pain and Sciatica, sponsored by European University of Lefke. Completed at 1 site in Palestinian Territory, occupied. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-27.

Sponsored by European University of Lefke · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neural mobilization is a technique that plays an important role in repairing the neural tissue's ability to respond to stress or tension by triggering the reconstruction of normal physiological functioning, pain reduction, and functional improvement. The study aims to examine the effect of the sciatic nerve slider technique in different positions and which of the most common positions is more effective in the application of neural mobilization in low back pain with sciatica.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders, accounting for a significant portion of disability. It's a severe healthcare burden that has large societal costs, according to estimates, LBP can affect anywhere between 22% and 65% of people within a year. Additionally, back pain-related absences from work result in prolonged periods of sick leave, which has an adverse effect on workplace productivity.

Sciatica is the name given to a collection of symptoms caused by compression and irritation of the sciatic nerve, including pain, numbness, muscular weakness, and difficulty moving or controlling the legs. The lower back, buttocks, and multiple dermatomes of the leg and foot are typically where symptoms appear. Sciatica can be caused by a disc bulge or herniation, lumbar canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, trauma, piriformis syndrome, or spinal tumors. It affects women more than men and people who lead sedentary lifestyles more than active ones. It might arise quickly or gradually with physical activity, and it is usually unilateral.

The slider and tensioner are two distinct types of neural mobilization procedures. There are clinical improvements and positive therapeutic benefits after treatment with different neural mobilization techniques, but the slider technique is safer, involves less stretching and strain of the nerves, and has a more significant effect than the tensioner technique.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Sciatica

Keywords

  • low back pain
  • Neuromobilization
  • Sciatic nerve Slider technique
  • Positions
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 2,364 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

European University of Lefke is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age range between 40 - 65 years,
  • Both genders,
  • Diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging to confirm disc lesion,
  • LBP with radicular pain for more than 12 weeks up to 1 year with no acute episodes in the last 4 weeks, and a numeric pain rating score (NPRS) greater than 4/10.
  • Positive SLR test with reproduction of neurological symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sciatica due to other pathologies (e.g. lumbar canal stenosis or piriformis syndrome),
  • Having any physiotherapy before 6 months.
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Vertebral fracture or trauma,
  • Negative SLR test,
  • pregnant.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study Group One

    sciatic nerve slider technique in a slump lying position in combination with Conventional physiotherapy

    Other: sciatic nerve slider technique in slump lying position · Other: Conventional physiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Study Group Two

    sciatic nerve slider technique in a supine position in combination with Conventional physiotherapy

    Other: sciatic nerve slider technique in supine position · Other: Conventional physiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Control Group

    Conventional physiotherapy alone

    Other: Conventional physiotherapy

Interventions

  • Othersciatic nerve slider technique in slump lying position

    The patient will be sitting at the edge of the couch with the posterior aspect of the knee at the edge, the thighs parallel to each other, and flexion at the thoracic and lumbar spines (slouch position). The therapist will be standing at the bedside of the patient with a proximal arm over the patient's shoulder and one hand guiding the neck movements of the patient and the other hand guiding the knee movements, passively performing cervical neck flexion with knee flexion (stretching the nerve proximally and relaxing at the distal end) and then moving into cervical extension with knee extension. Provide five sets in every session: the first: 10 repetitions, the second: 15 repetitions, the third: 20 repetitions, the fourth: 25 repetitions; and the fifth: 30 repetitions. The end position is held for 5 seconds, and the rest between sets is 1-2 minutes

  • Othersciatic nerve slider technique in supine position

    .The patient will be in a supine position. The therapist will hold the patient's limb passively and then move the hip into flexion with the ankle in plantar flexion and the knee in extension, stretching the nerve at the hip and relaxing at the ankle, Then reversing the movement with the hip into extension, maintaining the knee in extension and the ankle in dorsiflexion, relaxing the nerve at the hip and stretching at the ankle. Provide five sets in every session; the first: 10 repetitions, the second: 15 repetitions, the third: 20 repetitions, the fourth: 25 repetitions, and the fifth: 30 repetitions. The end position is held for 5 seconds, and the rest between sets is 1-2 minutes.

  • OtherConventional physiotherapy

    The patient will receive conventional physiotherapy, which includes: a moist hot pack, TENS, and back strengthening exercises (as a home program).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    A numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) will be used to evaluate pain intensity. The scale has a length of 10 cm and a range of 0-10, Here, a score of zero (zero) denotes the absence of pain, a score of one to three (1-3) denotes mild pain, a score of three to five (moderate pain), and a score of six to ten (severe pain)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    The disability caused by low back pain will be measured via the Arabic version of the Oswestry Disability Index. The patient will fill out the questionnaire in about 5 minutes, and then the therapist will score it in about 1 minute. The patient marks the most relevant answer for each question as accurately as they can. The scoring system employs a numerical scale from 0 to 5, with the first possible answer being 0 and the last possible answer being 5. The maximum possible score for each section is 5. All the scores will be added together and divided by the total number of possible points to calculate the total score

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Modified Schober test

    Lumbar flexion flexibility will be measured by the modified Schober test. The patient will be standing, and the examiner will mark the L5 spinous process by drawing a horizontal line across the patient's back. A second line is marked 10 cm above the first line. The patient is then instructed to flex forward as if attempting to touch his/her toes, and the examiner remeasures the distance between two lines with the patient fully flexed. The difference between the measurements in the erect and flexion positions indicates the outcome of the lumbar flexion.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Hand-held dynamometry

    The hand-held dynamometer has good to excellent reliability and validity for most measures of muscle strength, it portable device that is an appropriate and convenient method to assess lower limb muscle strength. to Assessment of isometric muscle strength and power will be performed with the participants in three positions (seated, supine, and prone); hip flexors, knee extensors, and knee flexors were assessed in a seated position; ankle plantar flexors, ankle dorsiflexors, hip abductors, and hip adductors in a supine position; hip extensors in a prone position

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Flexible ruler

    The lumbar lordosis will be measured by a flexible ruler. It is commonly used to measure the degree of spinal curvature of the lumbar lordosis in the sagittal plane. It is a safe, easy-to-use, and inexpensive tool.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Princess Alia Governmental Hospital
    Hebron, West Bank, Palestinian Territory, occupied
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05907356
Lead sponsor
European University of Lefke
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2023
Completion
Dec 25, 2023
Last update
Aug 27, 2024

Study contacts

Beliz Belgen Kaygisiz, PT, PhD
principal investigator · European University of Lefke

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion