ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05899582Updated Mar 28, 2025

Extracranial-intracranial Bypass Surgery for Symptomatic Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion: the CMOSS-2 Trial

An interventional study of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery and Medical treatment alone in Symptomatic Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion and Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-28.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
420
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The CMOSS-2 trial is a government-funded, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. It will recruit symptomatic chronic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in patients with severe hemodynamic insufficiency. Only high-volume center with a proven track record will be included. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to best medical treatment alone or medical treatment plus bypass surgery. Primary outcome is ischemic stroke in the territory of the target artery within 24 months after randomization.

Read the detailed description

Middle cerebral artery occlusion is an important cause of ischemic stroke, and there are currently two treatment methods: medical treatment alone and extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery (EC-IC bypass surgery). Previous studies have shown that the optimal medical treatment has an annual stroke recurrence rate of up to 10%, and patients with concomitant hemodynamic disorders can also increase by 7.3 times.

The CMOSS study was the first trial in China to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EC-IC bypass surgery on patients with ICA or MCA occlusion combined with hemodynamic insufficiency evaluated with CT perfusion. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the risk of stroke or death between the bypass group and the medical group, but there was a significant difference in ipsilateral ischemic stroke between 30 days and 2 years after randomization, with only 2.0% in the surgery group and 10.3% in the medical group; In addition, subgroup analysis found that for patients with MCA occlusion or severe hemodynamic insufficiency, bypass surgery has a potential beneficial trend over medical treatment alone.

The CMOSS-2 trial is a government-funded, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. It will recruit symptomatic chronic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in patients with severe hemodynamic insufficiency. Only high-volume center with a proven track record will be included. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to best medical treatment alone or medical treatment plus bypass surgery. Primary outcome is ischemic stroke in the territory of the target artery within 24 months after randomization. The CMOSS-2 trial will be conducted in 13 sites in China.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
  • Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery

Keywords

  • middle cerebral artery occlusion
  • stroke
  • TIA
03

In context

Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery

40 studies on the registry are indexed under Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 420 is above the median of 42 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery.

Browse Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 363 studies on the registry; 230 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age of 18-65 years;
  2. Confirmed as chronic occlusion of unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA). Other cerebral artery stenosis should be less than 50%.
  3. CT perfusion demonstrates severe hemodynamic insufficiency in the territory of the qualifying MCA with MTT (symptomatic side) ≥ 6s or rCBF (symptomatic side/contralateral side) ≤ 0.8;
  4. mRS score is 0-2 points;
  5. A history of ischemic events (including\<1/2 cerebral infarction in the middle cerebral artery supply area, or [TIA]) related to the qualifying artery within 12 months ;
  6. The onset of acute stroke should be more than 1 month;
  7. CT or MRI excludes large cerebral infarction (infarction>1/2 of the territory of the qualifying middle cerebral artery);
  8. Patients or their guardians voluntarily participate of the study and sign the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, or extradural hemorrhage within 6 weeks;
  2. Unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure within 6 months;
  3. Women who are pregnant or lactating;
  4. Coagulation dysfunction or hemorrhagic tendency (e.g. > 1.5 and/or count \< 100,000 mcL);
  5. Other diseases with a of less than 2 years
  6. Previous treatment with EC-IC bypass surgery
  7. Known allergy or to aspirin or clopidogrel or other antiplatelet drugs.
  8. Known cardiac conditions that may lead to cardiogenic embolism: including prosthetic valves, infective endocarditis, left atrial or left ventricular thrombosis, atrial fibrillation, sick sinus node syndrome, atrial mucinous tumor or cardiomyopathy, \<25%;
  9. Allergy to iodine or x-ray contrast, blood creatinine > 3.0 mg/dl or other contraindications to arteriography
  10. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with fasting blood sugar (FBS) >16.7 mmol/L
  11. Uncontrolled hypertension with a sitting systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or a sitting diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg;
  12. Persistent worsening of neurological symptoms within 72 hours;
  13. Severe liver dysfunction, defined as serum (ALT) and/or glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (AST) > 3 times the ;
  14. Active peptic ulcer disease;
  15. Having received a clinical trial drug or device within 30 days prior to screening, or being enrolled in another clinical trial;
  16. Other diseases or medical history that, in the judgment of the investigator, may affect the efficacy or safety evaluation of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
420 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Surgery

    The patients in the surgical group will be treated with direct extracranial to intracranial bypass surgery plus best medical treatment.

    Procedure: Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery

  • Active comparator
    Medical treatment

    The patients will receive medical treatment alone according to the AHA/ASA Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) Stroke Prevention Guidelines (2021 edition).

    Other: Medical treatment alone

Interventions

  • ProcedureExtracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery

    Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery plus medical treatment

  • OtherMedical treatment alone

    Best medical treatment alone according to current clinical guidelines, including antiplatelet drugs (e.g. aspirin) and risk factor controls.

    Also known as: Best medical treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with ischemic stroke in territory of qualifying artery

    Number of participants with ischemic stroke in territory of qualifying artery within 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with any stroke or death

    Number of participants with any stroke or death within 30 days after randomization

    Time frame: 30 days after randomization

  2. A composite of any stroke or death within 30 days, or ischemic stroke in territory of qualifying artery beyond 30 days to 2 years after randomization

    Number of participants with any stroke or death within 30 days, or ischemic stroke in territory of qualifying artery beyond 30 days to 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: within 2 years after randomization

  3. Number of participants with any stroke

    Number of participants with any stroke within 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: within 2 years after randomization

  4. Number of participants with disabling stroke (mRS>3)

    Number of participants with disabling stroke within 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: within 2 years after randomization

  5. Number of participants with fatal stroke (death caused by a stroke)

    Number of participants with fatal stroke within 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: within 2 years after randomization

  6. Number of participants with death

    Number of participants with death within 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: within 2 years after randomization

  7. Number of participants with any stroke or death

    Number of participants with any stroke or death within 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: within 2 years after randomization

  8. Functional outcomes of participants

    Functional outcomes of participants such as modified Rankin scale (mRS) or the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

  9. Anastomosis patency of participants in surgical group

    Anastomosis patency of participants in surgical group at 2 years after randomization

    Time frame: 2 years after randomization

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2025, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 23, 2023
First posted
Jun 12, 2023
StartActual
Sep 15, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Mar 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05899582
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 12, 2023
Start date
Sep 15, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 28, 2025

Study contacts

Yan Ma, MD
Contact
leavesyan@sina.com
13810669502
Tao Wang, MD
Contact
wangtao_dr@sina.com
18810302298
Liqun Jiao, MD
principal investigator · Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion