CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05894291PROPOSEUpdated Jun 12, 2026

Comparaison of Two Prone Position Techniques on Occurence of Pressure Sores in ICU

An interventional study of Swimmer Prone Position and Prone position with arms alongside the body in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Pressure Ulcers Stage III, sponsored by University Hospital, Tours. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Tours · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
334
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a diffuse inflammation of the lungs that occurs in a variety of diseases. According to the Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by diffuse lung damage in patients with predisposing factors. Understanding the physiology of ARDS has led to improved ventilatory management, which must be protective to ensure adequate oxygenation and CO2 clearance. Prone position (PP) is a technique that can reduce mortality in patients with severe ARDS. PP results in a more homogeneous distribution of pulmonary stress and strain, helping to protect the lung against ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). It also increases the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, improves the pulmonary ventilation-perfusion ratio, decreases PaCO2 and promotes ventilation of the dorsal lung regions. This technique should be offered to all patients with severe ARDS for 16 consecutive hours, to improve survival and weaning success from mechanical ventilation. However, PP has adverse effects. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of pressure sores, possibly linked to generalized acute inflammation associated with significant cytokine discharge and diffuse lesions of the vascular endothelium. PP also increased the risk of obstruction and displacement of the endotracheal tube. Final positioning in PP, (i.e., the position imposed on the patient for the duration of the PP session) varies from one ICU to another, and is rarely described in scientific articles. There are two main variants:

  1. prone , with arms alongside the body
  2. prone, swimmer's position

The aim of our study is to show that the "swimmer" PP reduces the occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure sores, compared with the "arms alongside the body" PP (standard care) at Day 28 post inclusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Pressure Ulcers Stage III

Keywords

  • ARDS
  • Pressure Sores
  • Pressure Ulcer
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Prone Position
  • Swimmer Position
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 334 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Tours is the lead sponsor of 304 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Intubated patient on invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the BERLIN classification with a P/F ratio \< 150, requiring prone position.
  • Express consent of the patient or representative or in the absence of this, emergency inclusion procedure
  • Health insurance coverage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with 2 (or more) Prone position sessions
  • Patient in whom one of the two positions could not be achieved: (Joint limitation; Neck size that would prevent head rotation; Orthopaedic spinal or segmental trauma; BMI greater than 45)
  • Presence of stage 2 or higher pressure ulcers on the anterior parts of the body at screening
  • Presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Patient already included in the study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient under legal protection
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
334 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Swimmer Prone Position

    Other: Swimmer Prone Position

  • Active comparator
    Prone position with arms alongside the body

    Other: Prone position with arms alongside the body

Interventions

  • OtherSwimmer Prone Position

    Patients will be positioned with the head rotated. This rotation is followed by shoulder elevation/abduction, then 90° elbow flexion for the arm opposite to the head rotation. The hand is placed flat on the bed. A 60° to 90° flexion is performed on the hip homolateral to head rotation, combined with knee flexion. The position is changed to the mirror position every 4 hours.

  • OtherProne position with arms alongside the body

    The head will be positioned either straight or rotated to one side, depending on ICU habits. The arms are positioned symmetrically along the body, palms up. The lower limbs are positioned symmetrically and parallel, knees extended or slightly flexed if a cushion is used on the front of the feet. Head rotation, if applicable, is performed every 4 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure ulcers

    Percentage of patients who acquired at least one stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer between day 1 (randomization) and day 28 according to the revised pressure injury staging system (Edsberg, J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs, 2016). Death and resolution of ARDS will be considered as events in competition with the occurrence of a Stage 3 or higher pressure ulcer.

    Time frame: Day 28 after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality at day 28

    Mortality rate at day 28

    Time frame: Day 28 after randomization

  2. In-hospital Mortality at day 90

    In-hospital Mortality rate at day 90

    Time frame: Day 90 after randomization

  3. Number of days without mechanical ventilation at D28

    Ventilator Free days at day 28

    Time frame: Day 28 after randomization

  4. Length of stay in intensive care unit (censored at Day 90)

    Length of stay in intensive care unit after randomization (censored at D90)

    Time frame: Day 90 after randomization

  5. Length of hospital stay (censored at D90)

    Length of hospital stay after randomization (censored at D90)

    Time frame: Day 90 after randomization

  6. Presence of ICU acquired weakness at discharge from ICU

    Rate of patients with ICU acquired weakness defined by MRC score less than 48 at ICU discharge

    Time frame: Day 28 after randomization

  7. Occurrence of scapulohumeral joint dislocation during prone period

    Number of patients with at least one radiologically proven scapulohumeral dislocation during a prone position period

    Time frame: Day 28 after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UHT of Orléans
    Orléans, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. PubMed 22797452 ↗
  • Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20. PubMed 23688302 ↗
  • Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, Blackwood B, Boulanger C, Brett SJ, Calvino-Gunther S, Chaboyer W, Coyer F, Deschepper M, Francois G, Honore PM, Jankovic R, Khanna AK, Llaurado-Serra M, Lin F, Rose L, Rubulotta F, Saager L, Williams G, Blot SI; DecubICUs Study Team; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Trials Group Collaborators. Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;47(2):160-169. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PubMed 33034686 ↗
  • Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L, Richard JC, Guerin C; Proseva trial group. The impact of patient positioning on pressure ulcers in patients with severe ARDS: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial on prone positioning. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar;40(3):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3188-1. Epub 2013 Dec 19. PubMed 24352484 ↗
  • Sud S, Friedrich JO, Taccone P, Polli F, Adhikari NK, Latini R, Pesenti A, Guerin C, Mancebo J, Curley MA, Fernandez R, Chan MC, Beuret P, Voggenreiter G, Sud M, Tognoni G, Gattinoni L. Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1748-1. Epub 2010 Feb 4. PubMed 20130832 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05894291
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Tours
Collaborators
University of New Orleans
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 8, 2023
Start date
Nov 24, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2025
Completion
May 22, 2025
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion