ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05886842Updated Aug 14, 2025

Reliability (Test-retest) of 30 Seconds Sit-to-stand and Timed Up and Go in Adults With Long Covid

An observational study in Long COVID, sponsored by European University Cyprus. Completed at 1 site in Cyprus. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-14.

Sponsored by European University Cyprus · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to test the reliability (with a test-retest process) of 30 seconds Sit to Stand and Timed Up and Go in an adult population with long-covid, hospitalised in a rehabilitation center.

Read the detailed description

Since December 2019, Covid-19 has affected millions of people worldwide, leaving many of them with symptoms such as fatigue, (muscle) weakness and dyspnoea, even months after their infection (long covid). Rehabilitation centers were established to aid this new group of patients. This study's aim is to test the reliability of 2 outcome measures for patients with long covid. 30 seconds Sit-To-Stand and Timed Up And Go tests are not specific to a disease but they evaluate functionality, mobility and endurance. They are easy to perform in a clinical setting as they do not require specific equipment. The reliability of the above tests has yet to be established in people with long covid.

A sample size of 19 people will be used. A difference in reliability of 0.9 and 0.7 at 80% power and a 5% level of significance using two ratings was set. Based on two testing sessions, an x value of 0.05, and a power of 0.80, a minimal sample size of 19 patients was identified (Karagiannis et al., 2020).

19 patients with long covid from the rehabilitation center will take both tests in a single day and 3 days later they will take the tests again with no physical therapy intervention in between the measurements.

For the statistical analysis, ICC (Intra-class correlation coefficients), SEM (standard error of measurement) and Bland-Altman plot will be used. These tests evaluate test-retest reliability, through the identification of the agreement of patient's scores between the 2 measurements and they evaluate the measurement precision (Savva et al, 2014).

02

Conditions studied

  • Long COVID

Keywords

  • Test-retest
  • Reliability
  • 30 seconds Sit to Stand
  • Timed up and Go
03

In context

Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome

604 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; 201 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 150 across 173 observational studies indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome.

Browse Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

European University Cyprus is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adults with a diagnosis of long-covid hospitalised in a rehabilitation center

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults who were infected with COVID-19 virus in the last 6 months and were diagnosed with long-covid
  • Patients must be willing to give written consent for participation in the study
  • Negative rapid test for COVID-19

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People under 18 years of age
  • Significant cognitive and psychiatric impairments (inability to follow simple commands or give consent)
  • Refuse to give consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Test-retest

    A group of 19 patients will be tested using the 30 seconds Sit-to-stand and Timed up and go tests. Each test will be repeated 3 times and the best score will be used. There is going to be 3 days waiting period before the re-tests.

    Other: Test-retest

Interventions

  • OtherTest-retest

    Test-retest

    Also known as: Reliability

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reliability of 30 seconds Sit to stand

    Test-retest that assess the reliability of 30 seconds Sit to Stand

    Time frame: Two occasions within approximately three days to establish intra rater reliability

  2. Reliability of Timed Up and Go

    Test-retest that assess the reliability of Timed Up and Go

    Time frame: Two occasions within approximately three days to establish intra rater reliability

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Eden resort wellness rehabilitation
    Larnaca, 7562, Cyprus
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Figueiredo PHS, Veloso LRS, Lima MMO, Vieira CFD, Alves FL, Lacerda ACR, Lima VP, Rodrigues VGB, Maciel EHB, Costa HS. The reliability and validity of the 30-seconds sit-to-stand test and its capacity for assessment of the functional status of hemodialysis patients. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Mar 4. PubMed 34391227 ↗
  • Hansen H, Beyer N, Frolich A, Godtfredsen N, Bieler T. Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the 6-minute walk test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test in patients with severe and very severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 18;13:3447-3457. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S174248. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30425474 ↗
  • Ozcan Kahraman B, Ozsoy I, Akdeniz B, Ozpelit E, Sevinc C, Acar S, Savci S. Test-retest reliability and validity of the timed up and go test and 30-second sit to stand test in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;304:159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Jan 15. PubMed 31980271 ↗
  • Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002 Feb;82(2):128-37. doi: 10.1093/ptj/82.2.128. PubMed 11856064 ↗
  • Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):441-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060404. PubMed 3629046 ↗
  • Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:13.0.co;2-e. PubMed 9463853 ↗
  • Karagiannis C, Savva C, Korakakis V, Matheou I, Adamide T, Georgiou A, Xanthos T. Test-Retest Reliability of Handgrip Strength in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. COPD. 2020 Oct;17(5):568-574. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1808604. Epub 2020 Aug 19. PubMed 32814452 ↗
  • Savva C, Giakas G, Efstathiou M, Karagiannis C. Test-retest reliability of handgrip strength measurement using a hydraulic hand dynamometer in patients with cervical radiculopathy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(3):206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11. PubMed 24630769 ↗
  • Shechtman O, Gestewitz L, Kimble C. Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer. J Hand Ther. 2005 Jul-Sep;18(3):339-47. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.04.002. PubMed 16059855 ↗
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. PubMed 2868172 ↗
  • Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):309-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem214. No abstract available. PubMed 17702826 ↗
  • Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Sep;7(3):301-17. doi: 10.1177/096228029800700306. PubMed 9803527 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05886842
Lead sponsor
European University Cyprus
Collaborators
Eden Resort Wellness Rehabilitation Center
Responsible party
Marina Kloni (Marina Eleni Kloni, BSc, MSc, MA, European University Cyprus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 2, 2023
Start date
Dec 21, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2024
Completion
Dec 21, 2024
Last update
Aug 14, 2025

Study contacts

Marina E Kloni
principal investigator · European University Cyprus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion