ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05869851Updated Nov 24, 2025

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Observation vs. Bracing

An interventional study of Pavlik Harness in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Hip Dysplasia and Hip Dysplasia, Congenital, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged Up to 12 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-24.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
514
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 12 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common childhood hip condition. When caught early, bracing is the most frequently used treatment; however, the brace can disrupt important mother-baby bonding time in the newborn period and present challenges to daily living. In babies with mild DDH, some studies have suggested that their hips may improve naturally as they grow and develop. This study will look at whether careful monitoring can be just as good as bracing for babies diagnosed with mild DDH less than 3 months of age, potentially avoiding unnecessary treatment. This will be the first study to look at this question with babies being treated at different hospitals in seven different countries, so the results will make an impact on children and families worldwide.

Read the detailed description

Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is critical to optimize outcomes and minimize long-term disability and impact on quality of life for the child and family. The burden of disease is significant, with a DDH diagnosis in 15-20/1000 live births. Even when treated, DDH is a leading cause of early hip replacement or development of osteoarthritis in young adults, with DDH reportedly accounting for 10-92% of all hip replacements. Consideration must also be given, however, to potential overtreatment of infants, particularly in more mild cases of hip instability or radiological dysplasia. The hip joint is immature during infancy, and many cases of mild-to-moderate DDH can spontaneously resolve as the hip joint matures through development. Brace treatment for approximately six weeks is common to address this radiological dysplasia; however, it is unclear whether this approach provides significant benefit above careful observation by ultrasound. While a conservative, less costly approach, brace treatment is not without potential complications and drawbacks. There are still substantial healthcare costs and resources associated with brace treatment, but there is potentially an under-recognized psychosocial cost in regard to preventing or disrupting mother-infant bonding in the newborn period. Coping with the difficulties of brace treatment can be stressful for families, particularly mothers of newborns, but the ultimate psychosocial impact has been under-researched to date. There is evidence to suggest that events occurring during establishment of breastfeeding may impact the mother's ability to breastfeed. The UK Hip Trial (2005) also found that maternal anxiety and worries about their infant's hip were increased with early brace treatment, but were not elevated by ultrasound monitoring in isolation. Further, bracing can present challenges to daily family life, including dressing, mobility, and the need for specialized furniture, car seats and other equipment. If observation alone is non-inferior to bracing for radiological dysplasia, unnecessary treatment may be avoided, potentially decreasing both the psychosocial impact of disrupted mother-infant bonding and needed healthcare resources and costs.

The investigators propose to utilize the existing collaborations and infrastructure of the Global Hip Dysplasia Registry (GHDR) and leverage their collaboration with a group in the Netherlands performing a similar Treatment with Active Monitoring (TRAM) trial to determine whether observation alone is sufficient for infants with clinically stable radiologically abnormal hips. Specifically, the investigators aim to:

  1. Determine whether observation is non-inferior to bracing for infants with radiological dysplasia
  2. Provide a strong recommendation for management of this subset of DDH patients
  3. Compare findings to those of the Netherlands trial, which is being carried out in older patients (10-16 weeks at diagnosis)

This study will utilize the established infrastructure of the GHDR. GHDR was established in 2016, aimed at collecting longitudinal data on infants and children across the entire DDH spectrum. This specific trial will function as a targeted sub-study within the more extensive registry, and is a multi-centre, international prospective randomized non-inferiority trial designed to evaluate the necessity to treat infants with radiological hip dysplasia. In total, 14 of the centres currently contributing data to GHDR have agreed to participate and randomize eligible patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
  • Hip Dysplasia
  • Hip Dysplasia, Congenital
  • Hip Dysplasia, Developmental
03

In context

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 514 is above the median of 59 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Browse Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,339 studies on the registry; 259 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 12 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients presenting with radiological dysplasia of a clinically stable hip under three months (12 weeks) of age
  • Radiological dysplasia will be defined as a centred hip with an alpha angle between 43 and 60 degrees and a percent coverage of the femoral head (FHC) greater than 35%, as measured on ultrasound exam

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with radiological dysplasia older than three months (12 weeks) of age
  • Patients presenting with clinical hip instability (Ortolani or Barlow positive)
  • Patients with known or suspected neuromuscular, collagen, chromosomal or lower-extremity congenital abnormalities or syndromic-associated hip abnormalities
  • Patients who received prior treatment (i.e. Pavlik harness) for DDH
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
514 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brace Treatment

    Patients randomized to the brace treatment group will be treated with a Pavlik harness for a minimum of six weeks.

    Other: Pavlik Harness

  • No intervention
    Active Monitoring

    Patients randomized to the control group will undergo observation only.

Interventions

  • OtherPavlik Harness

    The Pavlik harness is an abduction brace used for treatment of hip dysplasia in infants. It keeps the hips in proper alignment to allow for appropriate growth and development of the joint.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acetabular Index

    A measure of the steepness of the acetabular roof assessed on radiograph.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Alpha Angle

    This angle is measured via ultrasound and refers to the angle between the acetabular roof and vertical cortex of the ilium.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Beta Angle

    This angle is measured via ultrasound and refers to the angle formed between the vertical cortex of the ilium and the triangular labral fibrocartilage (echogenic triangle).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Percent Femoral Head Coverage

    Measured via ultrasound and assesses the percentage of the femoral epiphysis covered by the acetabular roof.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Number of Participants that Experienced Complications

    Including development of femoral nerve palsy or avascular necrosis, progression of hip dysplasia, and need for further treatment.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Parent/Guardian Perception Questionnaire

    A survey assessing parent/guardian perceptions of caring for and bonding with their child. Each question is scored on a 7-point likert scale from 3 (strongly agree) to -3 (strongly disagree) with total scores ranging from 33 to -33.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. EuroQoL-5D

    A survey assessing parent quality of life. Only the VAS portion of the questionnaire will be asked at each visit. The VAS is scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health.

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years

  7. Parent/Guardian Satisfaction

    Assessed using a VAS scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years

  8. Healthcare Resource Use Questionnaire

    Parent/guardian reported questionnaire to collect information about visits to health care professionals, imaging, medication use, additional treatments related to the diagnosis of DDH, and out of pocket costs.

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years (Canadian centres only)

Other outcomes

  1. Centre Edge Angle

    To be assessed for participants who elect to take part in the Global Hip Dysplasia Registry and have available data. Measured on x-ray, it is the angle formed between the vertical axis of the pelvis and a line from the centre of the femoral head to the lateral edge of the acetabulum.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zomar BO, Bone JN, Nguyen V, Mulpuri K, Kelley S; GHD Study Group; Schaeffer EK. Comparison of brace to observation in stable, radiological developmental dysplasia of the hip: a protocol for a global multicentre non-inferiority randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 8;14(7):e084738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084738. PubMed 38977361 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — While we will not make individual participant data available for this study, we do intend to disseminate study results to participants, researchers and the broader public. Our team works closely with patient partners, healthcare personnel, our collaborators and the broader medical/scientific community to determine appropriate ways to disseminate study results. We intend to prepare plain language summaries and visual/video abstracts of study results, which will be emailed to participants (those whom provided consent for email contact). These visual abstracts will also be posted to our lab's social media accounts, as well as that of our supporter, the I'm a HIPpy Foundation, who works closely with our patient and family community.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 41 months after the start.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 10, 2023
First posted
May 22, 2023
StartActual
Apr 25, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2028
Last update
Nov 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05869851
Responsible party
Kishore Mulpuri (Professor, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2023
Start date
Apr 25, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 24, 2025

Study contacts

Emily Schaeffer, PhD
Contact
emily.schaeffer@cw.bc.ca
604-875-2359
Bryn Zomar, PhD
Contact
bryn.zomar@cw.bc.ca
604-875-2359
Kishore Mulpuri, FRCSC
principal investigator · University of British Columbia
Emily Schaeffer, PhD
study director · University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion