ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05868135Updated Oct 22, 2026

Effects and Cost-effectiveness of e-Meistring - a Guided Internet-delivered Psychological Treatment

An observational study in Depression Moderate, Anxiety, Social and Panic Disorder, sponsored by St. Olavs Hospital. Completed at 4 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Primary conditionPanic DisorderRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Panic Disorder
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Panic Disorder, a narrower term within Anxiety Disorders.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by St. Olavs Hospital · Observational

Updated Oct 22, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational multicentre study is to address the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of providing a therapist guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) for common mental disorders in a routine healthcare setting.

Main research questions is 1) What is the effectiveness of guided internet based treatment for moderate depression, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder across clinics in routine care? 2) What is the cost-effectiveness of guided internet based treatment for moderate depression, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder across clinics? 3) Who benefits from guided internet-delivered treatment? 4) What are the predictors of drop-out from guided internet based treatment? 5) To what extent does user experiences of guided internet based treatment influence adherence and effectiveness? Participants will receive up to nine guided ICBT sessions (modules) and answer questionnaires covering symptoms severity, health related quality of life, work and social ability, user satisfaction and medication. All questionnaires are part of the standard patient follow up routines in the four treatment locations participating in the study. Analytical approach is to compare locations/clinics and subgroups of patients.

Read the detailed description

The therapist guided internet based cognitive therapy (ICBT) cover moderate depression, social anxiety disorder (SAC) and panic disorder (PD).

The eMeistring-program is standard treatment in all four hospitals/locations participating in the study. Patients are recruited through the ordinary clinical patient pathways. After a pre-treatment assessment, an initial face-to-face visit takes place (T1). Patients are given the opportunity to participate in the study based on informed concent. Next, participants in the depression program will receive eight guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy sessions or modules. Similarly SAC and PD patients will receive nine modules. Therapist guidance are provided at least once a week via a secure email system. When sessions are finished (T2), a new face-to-face visit with the therapist is offered.

Therapists are licensed health personnel e.g. psychologists, registered nurses and clinical social workers, working in the clinics.

Administrative data about covering organizational implementation of the eMeistring treatment program, personnel involved and level of treatment activity is collected separately.

Inclusion criteria's for eMeistring therapy: having moderate depression, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder as a primary disorder, and having computer and internet access.

Exclusion criteria: severe depression, suicidal impulses and thoughts, bipolar disorders, psychosis, substance abuse, unstable medication last month), severe reading or writing disabilities.

Adverse events are taken care of through routine follow-up according to the outpatient clinic responsibility. Any responses from patients indicating suicidal behaviour triggers email to the therapist with an urge to follow-up.

Planned statistical analyses include multivariate analyses of effectiveness (intention-to-treat and completers), predictor analyses of drop-out and adherence, and cost-effectiveness analyses based on health related quality of life, intervention costs and other health care and societal costs, analysing location specific differences stratified by patient groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression Moderate
  • Anxiety, Social
  • Panic Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Panic Disorder Reclassified

270 studies on the registry are indexed under Panic Disorder; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 800 is above the median of 200 across 50 observational studies indexed under Panic Disorder.

Browse Panic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Olavs Hospital is the lead sponsor of 171 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Compared within Panic Disorder, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Population living in the geographical areas in which provision of specialized health care services are the resonsibility of the four health enterprices/locations participating in the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Having moderate depression, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder as a primary disorder. Access to computer and internet.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Having severe depression, suicidal impulses and thoughts, bipolar disorders, psychosis, substance abuse, unstable medication last month, severe reading or writing disabilities.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with moderate depression

    Behavioral: eMeistring

  • Patients with social anxiety disorder

    Behavioral: eMeistring

  • Patients with panic disorder

    Behavioral: eMeistring

Interventions

  • BehavioraleMeistring

    Initial face-to-face visit, eight/nine sessions/modules of therapist guided ICBT, final face-to-face visit

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depression severity

    For moderate depression group: Depression severity assessed by PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 27. Higher score indicates more severe depression

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  2. Social phobia

    For social anxiety group: Social Phobia assessed by SPIN, Social Phobia Inventory score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 68. Higher score indicates more severe phobia.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  3. Panic disorder symptoms

    For panic disorder group: Panic disorder disorder symptoms assessed by PDSS-SR, Panic Disorder Severity Scale. Minimum raw score: 0, maximum raw score: 28. Composite scores range from 0-4. The composite score is the average of the seven items. Higher score indicates higher severity of panic disorder.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health Related Quality of Life

    For all patients: Health related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L index score, EuroQol-5Dimension-5Level index score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 1. Higher score indicates higher health related quality of life.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  2. Work and social adjustment

    For all patients: Work and social adjustment assessed by Work and Social Adjustment Scale score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 40. Higher score indicates worse level of social functioning.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  3. Anxiety severity

    For all patients: Anxiety severity will be assessed by GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21. Higher score indicates more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  4. System Usability

    For all patients: System usability will be assessed by the System Usability Scale Score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher SUS scores indicate better usability.

    Time frame: Up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2)

  5. Depression severity

    For social anxiety group an panic disorder group: Depression severity assessed by PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 27. Higher score indicates more severe depression

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  6. Cost of health care services

    Cost of health care services calculated as sum costs for hospital inpatient stays plus outpatient visits plus home care visits plus nursing home stays plus general practitioner visits plus physiotherapist visits plus other supportive care visits.

    Time frame: Period between pre treatment (T1) and up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), and to six months after post treatment (T3) and until two years (T4)

  7. Medication

    Patient reported use of medication, assessed by a separate questionnaire.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after T2 (T3) and after two years (T4)

  8. Work participation

    Work participation assessed by questionnaire: Currently employed or not.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after post treatment (T3) and after two years (T4)

  9. Sickness absenteeism

    Sickness absenteeism assessed by questionnaire: Number of days absent the last four weeks.

    Time frame: Pre treatment (T1), up to 14 weeks after treatment start (T2), six months after post treatment (T3) and after two years (T4)

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Helse Bergen HF
    Bergen, Norway
  • Sykehuset Innlandet HF
    Lillehammer, Norway
  • St. Olavs Hospital HF
    Trondheim, Norway
  • Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
    Tønsberg, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Ran from Sep 2021 to primary completion in May 2026, 56 months.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 22, 2026: primary completion Jul 2026 → May 2026 and completion Dec 2027 → Jun 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 21, 2023
First posted
May 22, 2023
StartActual
Sep 9, 2021
Primary completionActual
May 30, 2026was Jul 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2026was Dec 2027
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 22, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026→May 30, 2026 (actual)
Oct 22, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2027→Jun 30, 2026 (actual)
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Jul 31, 2026→May 30, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 31, 2027→Jun 30, 2026 (now actual)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05868135
Lead sponsor
St. Olavs Hospital
Collaborators
Haukeland University Hospital, The Hospital of Vestfold, Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2023
Start date
Sep 9, 2021
Primary completion
May 30, 2026
Completion
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Elin T Ulleberg, Master
principal investigator · St. Olavs Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion