ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05862025ET-AUREUSUpdated Nov 21, 2023

Evaluation of the Usefulness of Echocardiography in Patients With Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia (ET-AUREUS Study).

An interventional study of Echocardiography evaluation in Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis, sponsored by Puerta de Hierro University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-21.

Sponsored by Puerta de Hierro University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
470
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective interventionist cohort study is to assess the prevalence of infective endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at low risk of this complication.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Determine whether the risk of infective endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteriemia identified as low-risk, using the VIRSTA score, is low enough to safely omit transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography.
  • Determine whether the risk of infective endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteriemia in patients with no identifiable risk factor is low enough to safely omit transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography.
  • Calculate a cost-benefit estimate of omitting echocardiographic testing in patients identified as low-risk by means of the above methods.

Participants will undergo mandatory transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography during the first 2 weeks from Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia onset.

Read the detailed description

2- Hypothesis: Prospective evaluation of a cohort of patients with OAB, who undergo TEE, TTE, will provide insight into the actual risk of IE in those patients at low risk.

3- Objectives:

  • Main objective:
  • To estimate the prevalence of IE, defined by the modified Duke criteria, in patients with low risk according to the VIRSTA scale.
  • To determine whether the risk of IE in patients with OAB identified as low risk using the VIRSTA scale is low enough to safely omit transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography using this scale.
  • Secondary objectives
  • To determine whether the risk of IE in patients with SAAB identified as low risk using the PREDICT or POSITIVE scales is low enough to safely omit transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography.
  • To identify risk factors for IE in patients with SAAB.
  • Determine whether the risk of IE in patients with no risk factors is low enough to safely omit transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography.
  • Estimate the number of echocardiographies that could be avoided by these approaches.
  • Estimate the cost-benefit of omitting echocardiographic testing in patients identified as low risk by the above methods.

    3- Material and methods:

    *Design: Multicenter prospective cohort study.

    *Project execution sites: Hospitals with the capacity to detect AFB, contact the patient within 72-96h and the possibility of performing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the center itself. Currently 13 collaborating centers plus the sponsoring center (Hospital Puerta de Hierro).

    * Sample size calculation: Sample size calculation was performed in order to estimate the prevalence of IE in patients with OAB identified as low risk using the VIRSTA scale. For a confidence level of 95%, with a loss rate of 10%, precision of 2% and an expected proportion of 2% of IE in low-risk patients, a sample size of 210 VIRSTA-negative patients was calculated. Given that at inclusion it will be unknown whether the patient is VIRSTA negative and that, among the objectives of the study is the identification of other subgroups of low-risk patients, taking into account that approximately 45% of patients with AFB are VIRSTA negative, a total sample size of 470 patients with AFB is estimated.

    • Intervention:

Systematic performance of TTE and TEE in all included patients. TTE will be performed and reported first, followed by TEE (same or different days). Both tests should be performed within 10 days of the patient's inclusion in the study.

The studies will be performed in each of the centers participating in the project with the latest generation echocardiographic equipment commonly used in each center. All echocardiograms will be anonymized and assigned a correlative patient number.

The acquisition of the images of the vegetation or infectious complication will be zoomed and 3 consecutive cardiac cycles will be recorded and sent in DICOM format (both cine and image) to the centralized imaging laboratory, where interpretation will be performed by at least two cardiologists with expertise in echocardiography.

The cardiologists interpreting the echocardiograms centrally will be blinded to any clinical, microbiological and other complementary test data of the patient, as well as to the local interpretation of the images. The cardiologist interpreting the TTE will be blind to the TEE and vice versa.

  • Definitions of positive echocardiographic findings for IE:

Echocardiograms with at least one of the following findings will be considered positive or suggestive of IE:

  • Vegetation: echogenic mass, usually mobile attached to an endocardial surface or intracardiac device. Most frequently attached to a valve and with independent movement. They are usually located on the ventricular side of ventriculo-arterial valves and on the atrial side of atrioventricular valves.
  • Perivalvular abscesses/infection: areas of inhomogeneous perivalvular thickening, may be echodense or echolucent, usually located in the valve annuli.
  • Fistula: communication between two adjacent cavities, the Doppler-color passes from one cavity to another depending on the pressure in both.
  • Pseudoaneurysm: pulsatile perivalvular cavity, without echoes inside, into which flow enters, detected by doppler-color.
  • Perforation: Destruction of the valvular surface that causes acute valvular insufficiency; the valvular defect is usually seen by 2D and the insufficiency that passes through it, which is usually eccentric. Multiple perforations may coexist in the same valve.
  • Endocarditis on prosthetic valve: in addition to all of the above, images compatible with paravalvular leak of new appearance, detected with color Doppler, or valve dehiscence will be considered.

    • Predefined cutoff points to reasonably rule out IE:

IE will be considered reasonably ruled out when the estimated risk of IE is low enough that the costs and risks of the tests needed for diagnosis (TTE or TEE) outweigh the benefits.

In defining cutoff points for this low risk of IE, we consider several recent publications that estimate the risk of IE above which a patient benefits from such evaluations (8,24), as well as the usefulness of the negative likelihood ratio (LR(-) or likelihood ratio (-)) in predicting this risk, as has been reported by other authors (25). In line with these studies, the following cut-off points are predefined:

  1. If the risk of IE was less than 0.5% and the CP(-) of the scale less than 0.05, IE would be considered reasonably ruled out without the need for any echocardiographic assessment;
  2. If the risk of IE was between 0.5-2% or the CP(-) of the scale between 0.05-0.10, IE would be considered reasonably ruled out without the need for TEE when a negative TTE with good visualization of the heart valves is available.
  3. If the risk of IE was between 2-5% or the CP(-) of the scale between 0.10-0.20, IE could be considered reasonably ruled out with a negative TTE (without the need for TEE) only if the prevalence of IE after TTE was less than 1%. Otherwise, the use of TEE would be considered necessary.
  4. If the risk of IE was greater than 5% or the CP(-) of the scale was greater than 0.20, TEE would be considered necessary to safely rule out IE.

    • Variables to be studied:

Demographic data, comorbidities, mode of acquisition and primary focus of bacteremia, clinical, microbiological, echocardiographic and evolution data from patients' medical records, as well as echocardiographic findings will be collected. Data will be collected from the electronic history of each center and included in an anonymized form in an online medical database platform (eCDR).

*Statistical analysis: Quantitative variables will be presented as median and 25th and 75th percentiles; and qualitative variables by absolute and relative frequencies.

An interval estimation (95%) of the prevalence of IE in patients identified as low risk will be performed using the VIRSTA, PREDICT and POSITIVE scales. The prevalence of IE in patients without any of the identified factors will also be estimated using secondary analyses (see below). The diagnostic validity indices sensitivity, specificity, negative (PC-) and positive (PC+) likelihood ratios, and negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) vs. the gold standard (modified Duke criteria) will be estimated. With these data, we will estimate the risk of IE in an identified low-risk patient from a population with a prevalence similar to ours. Echocardiography (TTE and/or TEE) will be considered dispensable in patients with SAAB when the estimated risk of IE in patients identified as low risk and the CP(-) of the scale is below the aforementioned predefined cut-off points.

For the study of IE risk factors, univariate inferential analysis will be performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables and with the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test when necessary for qualitative variables. Those variables that are clinically and statistically significant will be included in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Finally, the number of echocardiographic tests, both TTE and TEE that could have been safely omitted using the different approaches will be estimated. For the cost-benefit study, the following risks will be taken into account: increased mortality due to nondiagnosis of IE: 15% (2), increased mortality due to TEE: 0.1% (3), increased mortality due to TTE: 0%. The costs of performing tests are estimated following the catalog of public prices of the Community of Madrid (Order 727/2017): cost TEE: €80.

Bilateral p-values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses will be performed using the SPSS version 25 software package.

02

Conditions studied

  • Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
  • Infective Endocarditis

Keywords

  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • bacteremia
  • infective endocarditis
  • risk factors
  • echocardiography
03

In context

Endocarditis

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Endocarditis; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 470 is above the median of 92 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Endocarditis.

Browse Endocarditis studies →

Lead sponsor

Puerta de Hierro University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous episode of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients younger than 18 years old.
  • High estimated probability of death during 72 hours of study inclusion.
  • Patients with of transesophageal echocardiography, including: esophageal varices, other serious esophageal diseases (including tumors, perforation, diverticulum and previous esophageal surgery), severe coagulopathy ( count lower than 50.000 cel/mL or I.N.R above 4), low consciousness, recent upper gastroesophageal bleeding, serious espinal vertebrae pathology (previous radiotherapy, active spondylodiscitis, severe spondylarthrosis)
  • Abscense of written or patient's negative to undergo echocardiography evaluation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
470 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Echocardiography intervention

    Patients will undergo mandatory transthoracic echocardiography during assessment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Later, they will also undergo mandatory transesophageal echocardiography. Both test will be performed during the first 14 days from bacteremia onset.

    Diagnostic Test: Echocardiography evaluation

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testEchocardiography evaluation

    Patients will undergo mandatory transthoracic echocardiography during assessment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Later, they will also undergo mandatory transesophageal echocardiography. Both test will be performed during the first 14 days from bacteremia onset.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in low-risk patients according to VIRSTA score

    If the prevalence of infective endocarditis is lower than 0.5% it would be considered that no echocardiography is needed to exclude infective endocarditis. If the prevalence is greater than 5%, a transesophageal echocardiography will be considered needed. If the prevalence is between 0.5-5%, transesophageal echocardiography will be consireded needed unless the prevalence of those patients with negative transthoracic echocardiography is below 1%.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in low-risk patients according to PREDICT score

    If the prevalence of infective endocarditis is lower than 0.5% it would be considered that no echocardiography is needed to exclude infective endocarditis. If the prevalence is greater than 5%, a transesophageal echocardiography will be considered needed. If the prevalence is between 0.5-5%, transesophageal echocardiography will be consireded needed unless the prevalence of those patients with negative transthoracic echocardiography is below 1%.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in low-risk patients according to POSITIVE score

    If the prevalence of infective endocarditis is lower than 0.5% it would be considered that no echocardiography is needed to exclude infective endocarditis. If the prevalence is greater than 5%, a transesophageal echocardiography will be considered needed. If the prevalence is between 0.5-5%, transesophageal echocardiography will be consireded needed unless the prevalence of those patients with negative transthoracic echocardiography is below 1%.

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in patients with no identifiable risk factor

    If the prevalence of infective endocarditis is lower than 0.5% it would be considered that no echocardiography is needed to exclude infective endocarditis. If the prevalence is greater than 5%, a transesophageal echocardiography will be considered needed. If the prevalence is between 0.5-5%, transesophageal echocardiography will be consireded needed unless the prevalence of those patients with negative transthoracic echocardiography is below 1%.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be shared upon reasonable request for other researchers after completion of the study and publication of results.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: IPD will be shared upon reasonable request for other researchers after completion of the study and publication of results.

Access criteria: IPD will be shared upon reasonable request for other researchers after completion of the study and publication of results.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2025, 23 months after the start.

Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Endocarditis, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 7, 2023
First posted
May 17, 2023
StartActual
Sep 4, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Nov 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05862025
Lead sponsor
Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Collaborators
Hospital Rafael Mendez, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Hospital Infanta Sofia, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Hospital de Alava, Hospital de Donosti, Hospital de Basurto, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Hospital Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Responsible party
Antonio Ramos Martinez (Dr., Puerta de Hierro University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 17, 2023
Start date
Sep 4, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion