CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05857787Updated Jun 9, 2026

Validation of Educational Effect of Nerve Tracking Function Mounted on the Ultrasound

An interventional study of Ultrasound with nerve track function and Ultrasound without nerve track function in Healthy, sponsored by Seoul National University. Completed at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.

Sponsored by Seoul National University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the nerve track function is helpful in distinguishing appropriate anatomical structures for beginners using ultrasound.

Read the detailed description

2nd, 3rd, 4th year medical school students and 1st, 2nd, 3rd year residents of anesthesiology who voluntarily signed a consent form for participation in the study are investigated for the history of previous ultrasound use and other details of the subjects before the lecture and ultrasound practice.

Well-trained pain physicians provides anatomical education on the brachial plexus supraclavicular level and the median nerve at wrist level. At this time, an ultrasound cross-sectional image of the corresponding nerve is provided. After anatomical education, research subjects (students and residents) are randomly assigned to group A or B after receiving basic education in a 1:1 ratio.

Subjects receive training for about 10 minutes to find the brachial plexus (supraclavicular level) and median nerve (carpal tunnel level) through a live demo method that directly uses ultrasound. At this time, group A receives training in the live demo method with the nerve track function, and group B receives training in the live demo method without the nerve track function.

After a 5-minute intermission, both groups A and B were asked to find the brachial plexux and median nerve without the nerve track function in the instructor's left upper limb. Each nerve is to be found within 5 minutes, and it is considered a failure after 5 minutes.

After activating the nerve track function in both groups without intermission, the educator shows the nerves corresponding to the brachial plexus at supracalvicualr level and median nerve at wrist level in the left upper limb, and conducts the same 5-minute training on finding them.

After a 5-minute intermission, with the nerve track function turned off again, ask the educator to find the brachial plexus and median nerve in the right arm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 2nd, 3rd, 4th year students at Seoul National University College of Medicine
  • 1st, 2nd, 3rd year residents of anesthesiology at Seoul National University Hospital
  • Those who voluntarily consented

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have previously identified the brachial plexus at supraclavicular level and median nerve at wrist level using ultrasound
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    With nerve track function(group A)

    trained in the live demo method with nerve track function

    Device: Ultrasound with nerve track function

  • Active comparator
    Without nerve track function(group B)

    trained in the existing live demo method without nerve track function

    Device: Ultrasound without nerve track function

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound with nerve track function

    The nerve track function installed in some ultrasound devices is software that accumulates ultrasound data obtained from humans and uses ultrasound to identify the target nerve through deep learning. Well-trained pain physicians use this feature to educate subjects before seeking brachial plexus and median nerve.

  • DeviceUltrasound without nerve track function

    The nerve track function installed in some ultrasound devices is software that accumulates ultrasound data obtained from humans and uses ultrasound to identify the target nerve through deep learning. Well-trained pain physicians use ultrasound alone without this feature to educate subjects before seeking brachial plexus and median nerve.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate (%) of accurately locating a nerve in the first round in groups A and B

    The subjects search for the median nerve and brachial plexus after ultrasound live demo training according to the group. If each nerve is found within 5 minutes, it is considered a success.

    Time frame: 5 minutes after starting to find the nerve using ultrasound

Secondary outcomes

  1. Success rate (%) of accurately locating a nerve in the second round in groups A and B

    After completing a first round of finding nerves, the subjects are trained using the nerve track function common to both groups, and are then asked to find nerves again. It is considered a success if each nerve is found within 5 minutes.

    Time frame: 5 minutes after starting to find the nerve using ultrasound

  2. Subjects' assessment of the educational effect of the nerve track function

    After completing all the procedures, the subjects expressed their satisfaction with the educational effect of nerve track function on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will be asked to use a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5, for their responses. Regarding the assessment of nerve track function, the scale is explained as follows: 1 point representing "not at all helpful", 2 point representing "slightly helpful", 3 point representing "neutral", 4 point representing "somewhat helpful", and 5 point representing "very helpful".

    Time frame: 5 minutes after the second round of finding nerves

  3. Medical students and anesthesiology residents success rate (%)

    Among the subjects, the success rate was calculated by dividing the students of the medical school and the residents of the department of anesthesiology. Similarly, finding a nerve within 5 minutes is considered a success. Each round is calculated separately.

    Time frame: 5 minutes after starting to find the nerve using ultrasound at first round and second round

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, South Korea
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bhatia A, Brull R. Review article: is ultrasound guidance advantageous for interventional pain management? A systematic review of chronic pain outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):236-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828f5ee4. Epub 2013 Apr 16. PubMed 23592606 ↗
  • Narouze SN, Provenzano D, Peng P, Eichenberger U, Lee SC, Nicholls B, Moriggl B; American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine; European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy; Asian Australasian Federation of Pain Societies. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, and the Asian Australasian Federation of Pain Societies Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided interventional pain procedures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;37(6):657-64. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318269c189. PubMed 23080347 ↗
  • Bodenham AR. Editorial II: Ultrasound imaging by anaesthetists: training and accreditation issues. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):414-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael032. No abstract available. PubMed 16549625 ↗
  • Mendiratta-Lala M, Williams T, de Quadros N, Bonnett J, Mendiratta V. The use of a simulation center to improve resident proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided procedures. Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.010. Epub 2010 Jan 25. PubMed 20097583 ↗
  • Kwon SY, Hong SH, Kim ES, Park HJ, You Y, Kim YH. The Efficacy of Lumbosacral Spine Phantom to Improve Resident Proficiency in Performing Ultrasound-Guided Spinal Procedure. Pain Med. 2015 Dec;16(12):2284-91. doi: 10.1111/pme.12870. Epub 2015 Aug 3. PubMed 26234900 ↗
  • van Eerd M, Patijn J, Sieben JM, Sommer M, Van Zundert J, van Kleef M, Lataster A. Ultrasonography of the cervical spine: an in vitro anatomical validation model. Anesthesiology. 2014 Jan;120(1):86-96. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000006. PubMed 24141229 ↗
  • McVicar J, Niazi AU, Murgatroyd H, Chin KJ, Chan VW. Novice performance of ultrasound-guided needling skills: effect of a needle guidance system. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):150-3. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000209. PubMed 25642909 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05857787
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University
Responsible party
Jeeyoun Moon (Professor, Seoul National University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2023
Start date
Jul 12, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 8, 2025
Completion
Aug 8, 2025
Last update
Jun 9, 2026

Study contacts

Jee Youn Moon, MD, PhD
study director · Seoul National University Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion