ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05827354Updated Apr 9, 2024

Incidence and Factors Associated to the Development of PICS-F Among ICU Relatives: A Longitudinal Exploratory Study

An observational study in Post Intensive Care Syndrome, Family Members and Caregiver Burden, sponsored by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Status unknown at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-09.

Sponsored by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2024), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
175
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The constellation of long-term psychological, physical, and cognitive impairments arising after a critical illness among family members of ICU survivors has been labeled as "Post Intensive Care Syndrome - Family" (PICS-F). Despite PICS-F awareness, the long-term issues faced by ICU family members remain poorly understood with several gaps in knowledge remaining such as the role of protective psychosocial factors, caregiver burden, or family satisfaction in the development of the syndrome.

This single-center, longitudinal exploratory study, aims to determine the incidence of each PICS-F impairment (psychological, physical, and cognitive) and to identify factors (during ICU stay and after hospital discharge) associated with the development or prevention of the PICS-F impairments among family members of ICU survivors of a public hospital in Chile.

Read the detailed description

During the last decades, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates have significantly decreased but not without adverse health-related consequences for patients and their family members. Admission to an ICU is often a stressful and traumatic experience for family members, leading to adverse psychosocial outcomes lasting beyond 12 months after hospital discharge.

The constellation of long-term psychological, physical, and cognitive impairments arising after a critical illness among family members of ICU survivors, has been labeled as "Post Intensive Care Syndrome - Family" (PICS-F). PICS-F is now being recognized as a public health burden with substantial associated costs. Despite PICS-F awareness, the long-term issues faced by ICU family members remain poorly understood with several gaps in knowledge remaining unanswered.

First, PICS-F evidence (incidence and related factors) is focused predominantly on psychological impairments with few studies exploring physical and cognitive impairments. Equally, studies on the influence of psychosocial resources (e.g., resilience, social support), which could offset PICS-F-related stress, are limited. Second, while up to 80% of the ICU family members become caregivers after the patient's hospital discharge, the effect of caregiver burden on PICS-F has received little attention. Third, is not clear the extent to which the family member´s evaluation of the ICU experience, known as family satisfaction, or other variables measured in this period can influence PICS-F.

The aim of this study is two-fold, one cross-sectional and one longitudinal aim. Among family members of ICU survivors of a public hospital in Chile, this study aims:

  1. To determine the incidence of each PICS-F impairment (psychological, physical, and cognitive).
  2. To identify factors associated with PICS-F impairments during ICU stay and after hospital discharge.
02

Conditions studied

  • Post Intensive Care Syndrome
  • Family Members
  • Caregiver Burden
  • Critical Illness
  • Mental Health
  • Physical Health
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Family Satisfaction
  • Resilience
  • Social Support
03

In context

postintensive care syndrome

49 studies on the registry are indexed under postintensive care syndrome; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 175 is below the median of 200 across 23 observational studies indexed under postintensive care syndrome.

Browse postintensive care syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile is the lead sponsor of 222 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Family members of ICU survivors in a public hospital in Santiago, Chile who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All adult family members (≥ 18 years old) identified as the patient´s representative, Spanish speakers, and likely to become responsible for providing and/or coordinating patient care after hospital discharge will be eligible.

Besides, the patient must have between 48 hours and 10 days in the ICU, be > 18 years old, and receive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, or invasive mechanical ventilation).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Family members of ICU patients with a high impending death risk (including end-of-life care / only comfort measures) or likely to be discharged from the ICU in the following 24 hours will be excluded.

Subjects (family members) will be withdrawn from the study at any point if the patient dies.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
175 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Family Members

    Family members of patients admitted to the ICU between the 1st of May 2025 and the 30th of May 2023, who survived ICU stay and are still alive up to 6 months after hospital discharge.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of psychological impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression (1) or Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (2) (1 or 2): 1. Anxiety and depressive symptoms measured using the 4-item version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ - 4), summed score range from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). Presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression if summed PHQ - 4 score ≥ 6. 2. PTSD symptoms measured using the 6-item version of the Impact of Event Scale (IES - 6), summed score range from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Presence of PTSD symptoms if averaged IES - 6 score ≥ 1.75.

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  2. Incidence of psychological impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression (1) or Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (2) (1 or 2): 1. Anxiety and depressive symptoms measured using the 4-item version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ - 4), summed score range from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). Presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression if summed PHQ - 4 score ≥ 6. 2. PTSD symptoms measured using the 6-item version of the Impact of Event Scale (IES - 6), summed score range from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Presence of PTSD symptoms if averaged IES - 6 score ≥ 1.75.

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

  3. Incidence of physical impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Symptoms of clinically significant fatigue. Clinical fatigue measured using 4 items of the "energy/fatigue" subscale (Vt) of the Short Form Health Survey (SF - 36). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst): Presence of clinical fatigue if averaged SF - 36 Vt score \< 45.

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  4. Incidence of physical impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Symptoms of clinically significant fatigue. Clinical fatigue measured using 4 items of the "energy/fatigue" subscale (Vt) of the Short Form Health Survey (SF - 36). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst): Presence of clinical fatigue if averaged SF - 36 Vt score \< 45.

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

  5. Incidence of cognitive impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Cognitive impairment measured using the memory, fluency, and orientation (MEFO) test. Summed score range from 13 (best) to 0 (worst). Presence of cognitive impairment if summed MEFO test score \< 9.

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  6. Incidence of cognitive impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Cognitive impairment measured using the memory, fluency, and orientation (MEFO) test. Summed score range from 13 (best) to 0 (worst). Presence of cognitive impairment if summed MEFO test score \< 9.

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in family members of ICU survivors

    Anxiety and depressive symptoms measured using the PHQ - 4, summed score range, 0 (best) to 12 (worst)): Presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression if summed PHQ - 4 score ≥ 6.

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission

  2. Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in family members of ICU survivors

    Anxiety and depressive symptoms measured using the PHQ - 4, summed score range, 0 (best) to 12 (worst)): Presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression if summed PHQ - 4 score ≥ 6.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  3. Symptoms of PTSD in family members of ICU survivors

    PTSD-related symptoms measured using the IES - 6, summed score range from 0 (best) to 24 (worst)): Presence of PTSD symptoms if averaged IES - 6 score ≥ 1.75.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  4. Physical impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Symptoms of clinically significant fatigue. Clinical fatigue measured using 4 items of the "energy/fatigue" subscale (Vt) of SF - 36. Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst): Presence of clinical fatigue if averaged SF - 36 Vt score \< 45.

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission

  5. Physical impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Symptoms of clinically significant fatigue. Clinical fatigue measured using 4 items of the "energy/fatigue" subscale (Vt) of SF - 36. Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst): Presence of clinical fatigue if averaged SF - 36 Vt score \< 45.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  6. Cognitive impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Cognitive impairment measured using the MEFO test. Summed score range from 13 (best) to 0 (worst). Presence of cognitive impairment if summed MEFO test score \< 9.

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission

  7. Cognitive impairment in family members of ICU survivors

    Cognitive impairment measured using the MEFO test. Summed score range from 13 (best) to 0 (worst). Presence of cognitive impairment if summed MEFO test score \< 9.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  8. Perceived Social Support in family members of ICU survivors

    Perceived social support measured using the modified 8-item version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS - SSS). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission

  9. Perceived Social Support in family members of ICU survivors

    Perceived social support measured using the modified 8-item version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS - SSS). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  10. Perceived Social Support in family members of ICU survivors

    Perceived social support measured using the modified 8-item version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS - SSS). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  11. Perceived Social Support in family members of ICU survivors

    Perceived social support measured using the modified 8-item version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS - SSS). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

  12. Resilience in family members of ICU survivors

    Resilience measured using the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS). Summed score range from 20 (best) to 4 (worst). Presence of low resilience if summed BRCS score ≤ 13.

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission

  13. Resilience in family members of ICU survivors

    Resilience measured using the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS). Summed score range from 20 (best) to 4 (worst). Presence of low resilience if summed BRCS score ≤ 13.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  14. Resilience in family members of ICU survivors

    Resilience measured using the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS). Summed score range from 20 (best) to 4 (worst). Presence of low resilience if summed BRCS score ≤ 13.

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  15. Resilience in family members of ICU survivors

    Resilience measured using the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS). Summed score range from 20 (best) to 4 (worst). Presence of low resilience if summed BRCS score ≤ 13.

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

  16. Family Satisfaction in family members of ICU survivors

    Family satisfaction measured using the Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit - 24 (FS ICU - 24). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission

  17. Family Satisfaction in family members of ICU survivors

    Family satisfaction measured using the Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit - 24 (FS ICU - 24). Averaged score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst).

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  18. Caregiver Burden in family members of ICU survivors

    Caregiver Burden measured using the 7-item version of the ZARIT Burden Interview (ZBI). Summed score range from 7 (best) to 35 (worst). Presence of intense caregiver burden if summed ZBI score ≥ 17.

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  19. Caregiver Burden in family members of ICU survivors

    Caregiver Burden measured using the 7-item version of the ZARIT Burden Interview (ZBI). Summed score range from 7 (best) to 35 (worst). Presence of intense caregiver burden if summed ZBI score ≥ 17.

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

  20. Functional Independence in ICU survivors

    Patient´s functional independence using the Barthel Index (BI). Summed score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst)

    Time frame: Between the 3rd - 7th day of ICU admission (prior ICU admission status)

  21. Functional Independence in ICU survivors

    Patient´s functional independence using the Barthel Index (BI). Summed score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst)

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after ICU discharge

  22. Functional Independence in ICU survivors

    Patient´s functional independence using the Barthel Index (BI). Summed score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst)

    Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

  23. Functional Independence in ICU survivors

    Patient´s functional independence using the Barthel Index (BI). Summed score range from 100 (best) to 0 (worst)

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Clinico Dra. Eloisa I. Diaz
    La Florida, RM, Chile
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van Beusekom I, Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Keizer NF, Dongelmans DA, van der Schaaf M. Reported burden on informal caregivers of ICU survivors: a literature review. Crit Care. 2016 Jan 21;20:16. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1185-9. PubMed 26792081 ↗
  • Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive Care Syndrome: an Overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017 Jun 30;5(2):90-92. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2016-0016. eCollection 2017 Jun. PubMed 28721340 ↗
  • Kean S, Smith GD. Editorial: surviving critical illness: intensive care and beyond. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Mar;23(5-6):603-4. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12555. No abstract available. PubMed 24589228 ↗
  • Davidson JE, Harvey MA. Patient and Family Post-Intensive Care Syndrome. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;27(2):184-6. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016132. No abstract available. PubMed 27153307 ↗
  • Johnson CC, Suchyta MR, Darowski ES, Collar EM, Kiehl AL, Van J, Jackson JC, Hopkins RO. Psychological Sequelae in Family Caregivers of Critically III Intensive Care Unit Patients. A Systematic Review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):894-909. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-540SR. PubMed 30950647 ↗
  • Choi J, Tate JA, Hoffman LA, Schulz R, Ren D, Donahoe MP, Given BA, Sherwood PR. Fatigue in family caregivers of adult intensive care unit survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Sep;48(3):353-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.09.018. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed 24439845 ↗
  • Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):618-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236ebf9. PubMed 22080636 ↗
  • Cameron JI, Chu LM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Chan L, Thomas C, Friedrich JO, Mehta S, Lamontagne F, Levasseur M, Ferguson ND, Adhikari NK, Rudkowski JC, Meggison H, Skrobik Y, Flannery J, Bayley M, Batt J, dos Santos C, Abbey SE, Tan A, Lo V, Mathur S, Parotto M, Morris D, Flockhart L, Fan E, Lee CM, Wilcox ME, Ayas N, Choong K, Fowler R, Scales DC, Sinuff T, Cuthbertson BH, Rose L, Robles P, Burns S, Cypel M, Singer L, Chaparro C, Chow CW, Keshavjee S, Brochard L, Hebert P, Slutsky AS, Marshall JC, Cook D, Herridge MS; RECOVER Program Investigators (Phase 1: towards RECOVER); Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. One-Year Outcomes in Caregivers of Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 12;374(19):1831-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511160. PubMed 27168433 ↗
  • Nadig N, Huff NG, Cox CE, Ford DW. Coping as a Multifaceted Construct: Associations With Psychological Outcomes Among Family Members of Mechanical Ventilation Survivors. Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):1710-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001761. PubMed 27065467 ↗
  • Haines KJ, Denehy L, Skinner EH, Warrillow S, Berney S. Psychosocial outcomes in informal caregivers of the critically ill: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):1112-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000865. PubMed 25654174 ↗
  • Padilla Fortunatti C, De Santis JP, Munro CL. Family Satisfaction in the Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Concept Analysis. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2021 Oct-Dec 01;44(4):291-305. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000360. PubMed 33624988 ↗
  • Beesley SJ, Hirshberg EL, Wilson EL, Butler JM, Oniki TA, Kuttler KG, Orme JF, Hopkins RO, Brown SM. Depression and Change in Caregiver Burden Among Family Members of Intensive Care Unit Survivors. Am J Crit Care. 2020 Sep 1;29(5):350-357. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020181. PubMed 32869070 ↗
  • Padilla-Fortunatti C, Rojas-Silva N, Cortes-Maripangue S, Palmeiro-Silva Y, Rojas-Jara V, Nilo-Gonzalez V, Cifuentes-Avendano B, Morales-Morales D, Garces-Brito N. Incidence and factors associated with post-intensive care syndrome among caregivers of intensive care unit survivors: Protocol for a cohort study. PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0324013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324013. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40378139 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2025, 29 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 29, 2023
First posted
Apr 25, 2023
StartActual
Jun 27, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2025
CompletionEst.
Nov 2025
Last update
Apr 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05827354
Collaborators
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Responsible party
Cristobal Padilla (Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2023
Start date
Jun 27, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 9, 2024

Study contacts

Cristobal Padilla F., PhD
Contact
cfpadill@uc.cl
+56964587104
Cristobal Padilla F., PhD
principal investigator · Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion