ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05825261ENBEDUpdated Jun 13, 2025

Exploring Novel Biomarkers for Emphysema Detection

An observational study in Copd and Emphysema, sponsored by Maastricht University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-13.

Sponsored by Maastricht University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether voice or capnometry, alone or in combination with other (non invasive) biomarkers can be used to detect emphysema on chest CT-scan in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Can a machine-learning based algorithm be developed that can classify the extent of emphysema on chest CT scan from patients with COPD, based on voice and/or capnometry.

Participants will:

  • perform different voice-related tasks
  • perform capnometry twice (before/after exercise)
  • perform a light exercise task between tasks ( 5-sit-to-stand test)
  • undergo one venipuncture
Read the detailed description

This is a cross sectional, single center study. At the clinic, patients with COPD will be invited to perform several voice related tasks (paced reading, sustained vowels, cough, quiet breathing) and will be instructed to perform capnometry measurements. These measurements will be performed before and after a light exercise task (5-STS: 5-sit-to-stand test).

Clinical characterisation of patients including pulmonary function tests (spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion capacity) and CT scans have been performed in all patients as a part of routine workup in the COPD care pathway. Emphysema will be quantified as low attenuation areas with a density below -950 Hounsfield units (HU) using Syngovia (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).

The primary outcome will fit a simple machine learning classification model (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify logistic regression model for the outcome of emphysema (>25% vs ≤ 25%) from speech features and capnometry. with explanatory variables of speech features. Similar classification methods with incremental models using capnography features will be explored. Prior to carrying out the above analyses, data has to be pre-processed, including merging data, quality control, handling of missing data and feature extraction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Copd
  • Emphysema

Keywords

  • vocal biomarkers
  • speech
  • emphysema
  • capnometry
  • chest CT
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 856 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 158 across 1,497 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht University is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The source population (primary dataset) consists of COPD patients in whom a chest CT was performed within 12 months before inclusion into the study.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged over 18 years
  • current respiratory smptoms (any dyspnea, cough or sputum)
  • spirometry confirmed diagnosis of a non-fully reversible airflow obstruction, defined as a post bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume at one second/Forced Vital Capacity (/FVC ratio) \< 0.7 and/or emphysemateus abnormalities on CT imaging.
  • presence of risk factors or causes associated with
  • chest CT scan performed in the past 12 months prior to inclusion to the study
  • able to understand, read and write Dutch language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute exacerbation of within 8 weeks of start of the study
  • comorbidities affecting speech or breathing coordination (neuromuscular disease, CVA\< > 40)
  • comorbidities affecting speech characteristics of dyspnea (severe heart failure, interstitial lung disease)
  • comorbidities affecting respiratory system including but not exclusive to asthma or cystic fibrosis
  • comorbidities that significantly interfere with interpretation of speech (audio signals), such as Parkinson's disease, bulbar palsy, or vocal cord paralysis.
  • Medical history of lobectomy or endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR)
  • inability to carry out a capnography recording.
  • investigator's uncertainty about the willingness or ability of the patients to comply with the protocol requirements.
  • participation in another study involving products. Participation in observational studies is allowed.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • COPD and/or emphysema

    COPD is defined according to COPD Gold 2023 guidelines. Emphysema defined acording to Fleischner criteria (2024)

    Other: voice sampling · Other: capnometry

Interventions

  • Othervoice sampling

    Patients with COPD will perform several voice-related tasks and capnometry at rest. Thereafter a 5-STS will follow and the voice-related task/capnometry will be repeated

  • Othercapnometry

    Patients with COPD will perform several voice-related tasks and capnometry at rest. Thereafter a 5-STS will follow and the voice-related task/capnometry will be repeated

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. percentage of participants having moderate to severe emphysema on a chest CT (defined as > 25%)

    A baseline chest CT scan from each participant will be analysed using a lung parenchyma analysis software with automated 3-D quantification of emphysema. Emphysema will be defined as low attenuation areas with a density below -950 Hounsfield units. Patients will be either classified as having low emphysema (less or equal to 25% of emphysema on chest CT scan) or moderate to high emphysema (more than 25% of emphysema on chest CT scan)

    Time frame: baseline

  2. number of (non-linguistic) inhalations per syllable from sustained vowel

    Participants will perform a sustained vowel (saying 'a') at rest and after light exercise from which several measurements can be obtained: Syllables per breath group, speaking rate, articulation rate, mean frequency, mean intensity, pitch variability, mean center of gravity, inhalations, non-linguistic inhalations, ratio voice/silence intervals. Based on previous research (Merkus J, 2020) HNR, shimer, vowel duration en number of (non-linguistic) inhalations per syllable were putative vocal biomarkers in COPD. First key determinant therefore is the number of (non-linguistic) inhalations per syllable during sustained vowel of each participant. This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  3. harmonics-to-noise-ratio from sustained vowel

    Participants will perform a sustained vowel (saying 'a') at rest and after light exercise from which several measurements can be obtained: Syllables per breath group, speaking rate, articulation rate, mean frequency, mean intensity, pitch variability, mean center of gravity, inhalations, non-linguistic inhalations, ratio voice/silence intervals. Based on previous research (Merkus J, 2020) HNR, shimer, vowel duration en number of (non-linguistic) inhalations per syllable were putative vocal biomarkers in COPD. Second key determinant therefore is the harmonics-to-noise ratio during sustained vowel. This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  4. vowel duration from sustained vowel

    Participants will perform a sustained vowel (saying 'a') at rest and after light exercise from which several measurements can be obtained: Syllables per breath group, speaking rate, articulation rate, mean frequency, mean intensity, pitch variability, mean center of gravity, inhalations, non-linguistic inhalations, ratio voice/silence intervals. Based on previous research (Merkus J, 2020) HNR, shimer, vowel duration en number of (non-linguistic) inhalations per syllable were putative vocal biomarkers in COPD. Third key determinant therefore is the vowel duration (in seconds) during sustained vowel. This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  5. shimmer from sustained vowel

    Participants will perform a sustained vowel (saying 'a') at rest and after light exercise from which several measurements can be obtained: Syllables per breath group, speaking rate, articulation rate, mean frequency, mean intensity, pitch variability, mean center of gravity, inhalations, non-linguistic inhalations, ratio voice/silence intervals. Based on previous research (Merkus J, 2020) HNR, shimer, vowel duration en number of (non-linguistic) inhalations per syllable were putative vocal biomarkers in COPD. Fourth key determinant therefore is shimmer (in Hz) during sustained vowel. This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  6. end-tidal CO2 from capnography (ETCO2)

    Participation perform a quiet breathing (tidal volume) at rest and after light exercise to measure CO2 during exhalation (capnogram) from which several parameters can be measured, of which end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), phase 2 slope and phase 3 slope are most distinctive for COPD phenotyping (Pereira 2016). First key determinant from capnography is therefore end-tidal CO2 (in mm Hg). This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  7. phase-2 slope from capnography (slp2)

    Participation perform a quiet breathing (tidal volume) at rest and after light exercise to measure CO2 during exhalation (capnogram) from which several (more than 80) parameters can be measured, of which end-tidal CO2 (etCO2), phase 2 slope and phase 3 slope are most distinctive for COPD phenotyping (Pereira 2016). Second key determinant from capnography is therefore phase-2 slope (in mm Hg/L). This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  8. phase-2 slope from capnography (slp3)

    Participation perform a quiet breathing (tidal volume) at rest and after light exercise to measure CO2 during exhalation (capnogram) from which several parameters can be measured, of which end-tidal CO2, phase 2 slope and phase 3 slope are most distinctive for COPD phenotyping (Pereira 2016). Third key determinant from capnography is therefore phase 3 slope (in mm Hg/L). This will be used as input for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. serum sRAGE

    Serum soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) from peripheral blood will be determined in each participant. Serum sRAGE is considered a blood biomarker for emphysema (Klont 2022). Serum sRAGE levels (in ng/mL) from each participant will be used as input variable for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  2. ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) on body plethysmography

    Emphysema can be measured using body plethysmography. Several variables can be measured with body plethysmography: total lung capacity (TLC), inspiratory capacity (IC), functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV), ratio of IC/TLC, ratio FRC/TLC and ratio RV/TLC. The ratio of RV/TLC might be the most sensitive measure for airtrapping as the first sign of emphysema and is therefore chosen as the key outcome measure of body plethysmograpy. RV/TLC ratio (expressed as Z-score) from each participant will be used as input variable for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  3. diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide

    Diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of the lungs ability to transfer gas from air to the blood stream and a decrease in DLCO is associated with the extent of emphysema in chest CT scans. DLCO (expressed a Z-score) in each participant will be measured and used as input variable for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

  4. forced expiratory volume in one second

    Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is a measure of severity of the underlying COPD. postbronchodilator FEV1 (expressed a Z-score) in each participant will be measured via spirometry. according to ERS/ATS guidelines. FEV1 (Z-score) will be used as input variable for machine learning classification models (e.g. using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests and/or decision tree) to classify emphysema on CT scan (\>25% vs ≤ 25%)

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
    Maastricht, Limburg 6202 AZ, Netherlands
    Recruiting
  • Laurentius Ziekenhuis
    Roermond, Limburg 6043 CV, Netherlands
    Not yet recruiting
    • Ragnar Lunde, MD · Contactr.lunde@lzr.nl · +31-(0)475 382 222
    • · Contact+31-(0)475 382 222
    • Martijn Cuijpers, Msc · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05825261
Lead sponsor
Maastricht University
Collaborators
Roche Pharma AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2023
Start date
Sep 7, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 13, 2025

Study contacts

Sami Simons, MD PhD
Contact
sami.simons@mumc.nl
+31 043 3876543
Sami Simons, MD PhD
principal investigator · Maastricht University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion