An interventional study of Standardized breakfast in Lipodystrophy, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion. Completed at 1 site in Reunion. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-06.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Dunnigan's syndrome is a partial familial lipodystrophy due to a mutation in the Lamine A LMNA gene. This very rare syndrome is 20 times more common in Réunion compared to the rest of Europe with several families suffering from a unique variant of LMNA, the p.(Thr655Asnfs*49) variant known as the "Reunion variant", the appearance of which in Reunion dates back to the 17th century. This variant is expressed in homozygous and heterozygous form and has only been identified in subjects from Reunion. Clinically, patients with Dunnigan's have an absence of subcutaneous fatty tissue which mainly affects the lower part of the body and leads to severe insulin resistance responsible for early diabetes. To detect these metabolic complications as early as possible, an annual follow-up of the subjects is recommended with the performance of an OGTT test annually in non-diabetic subjects. This problem is identical for patients with cystic fibrosis leading to the same recommendation. However, whether in our experience of monitoring patients with Dunningan's lipodystrophy, in subjects at risk of diabetes or in subjects with cystic fibrosis, the OGTT test and even more so its repetition is poorly accepted, which can lead to lack of patient follow-up. An alternative solution to the OGTT is therefore justified.
In the literature, different avenues have been explored. First, given oral glucose intolerance, replacement with a standardized breakfast has been explored in several studies. Another alternative tested in the population of subjects with cystic fibrosis is the use of an interstitial glucose sensor for screening for carbohydrate abnormalities.
In view of the literature, we formulate several hypotheses that will be tested in our study:
139 studies on the registry are indexed under Lipodystrophy; 10 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 54 is above the median of 46 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Lipodystrophy.
Browse Lipodystrophy studies →Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Aged 18 to 75 Having given their .
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Standardized breakfast to replace in fine oral induced hyperglycemia test
Diagnostic Test: Standardized breakfast
Standardized breakfast to replace in fine oral induced hyperglycemia test
standardized breakfast test resuslt compare to oral induced hyperglycemia test
To assess the concordance between the standard breakfast-induced hyperglycemia test and the classic oral induced hyperglycemia test (gold standard) on the diagnosis of glycemic abnormalities at 120 minutes (min) in patients with Dunnigan's Lipodystrophy in Reunion. It is considered good if \> 80%
Time frame: 2 hours after standardized breakfast
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion →