ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05784285Updated Oct 16, 2023

Downstream Effects of Personalized 'Top-down' Participation-based Interventions Among Youth With Physical Disabilities

An interventional study of Engagement in a 8-week community-based activity program in Spinal Cord Injuries, Spina Bifida and Musculoskeletal Disorder, sponsored by McGill University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-16.

Sponsored by McGill University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Participation in community-based activities is essential to the health and well-being of youth with physical disabilities; yet, it is extremely restricted. Emerging treatment approaches aimed at improving participation have shifted from focusing only on impaired body functions towards the performance of functional meaningful activities within the youth's natural environment. Investigators' initial results from studies in Quebec show that targeting intervention at the activity/participation level can result in improvement of impaired body functions (e.g., balance, attention, anxiety) - important components to address in rehabilitation. Investigators' team aims to continue studying the impact of participation by launching a larger more rigorous study. Investigators have partnered with major organizations providing rehabilitation services for youth as well as key community-based stakeholders including youth, clinicians, and managers, and together investigators plan to further examine whether engaging in an 8-week community-based activity individually chosen by the youth (e.g., sledge hockey, drawing, playing a musical instrument) can lead to a significant improvement in three key body functions: motor, behavioral and emotional. One hundred and fifty youth with physical disabilities living in Quebec and Ontario will participate and engage in an activity of choice. Changes in their body functions (e.g., movement, attention, mood) will be measured multiple times before, during and after engagement in the chosen activity. Findings of this study can guide clinicians, families and policy-makers to select effective approaches that not only promote participation but also facilitate additional motor and mental benefits from a single intervention. Such 'real-world' treatment approaches involving activities of choice can also increase motivation, compliance and reduce burden on the healthcare system and on the youth and families.

Read the detailed description

Youth with physical disabilities experience restrictions to participation in community-based activities, leading to poor health outcomes. Typical treatment approaches focusing on remediation of impaired body functions ('bottom-up' or upstream approach) have failed to translate into improved participation. As such, reverse 'top-down' participation-based approaches, implemented in one's natural environment, are emerging; yet, their downstream effects have not been established. Specifically, it is unclear whether enhancing participation in self-chosen real-life activity that is meaningful to the youth (e.g., sledge hockey) can simultaneously improve both body functions (e.g., grip strength, attention, anxiety) and activity performance - two key outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation.

Supported by CIHR (2013-17), investigators first proved the effectiveness of PREP intervention (Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation) in promoting youth's community participation; then, through SPOR (2017-18) and CIHR Project Grant (2020-23), investigators successfully tested an innovative pragmatic clinical trial to improve body functions through participation. Investigators' promising findings inform the design of this proposed larger more rigorous cross-provincial study called BEYOND, generating sound evidence with widening impact which will serve to support a paradigm shift in clinical practice.

Using PREP, investigators aim to determine the effectiveness of youth engagement in self-chosen 8-week community- based activity program (e.g., drawing, swimming) on change in 3 underlying body functions: motor (using the Functional Reach Test, Trunk Impairment Scale, and dynamometers), behavioral and emotional (using the Behavior Assessment System for Children), and activity performance (via the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure). A 22-week interrupted time series design with multiple baselines across 150 youth with physical disabilities (e.g., cerebral palsy, spina bifida) stratified by sex and severity, aged 12 to 18 living in Quebec and Ontario will be employed. Body functions relevant to each activity will be measured multiple times throughout the entire study and during follow-up, resulting in 450 trajectories of change in body functions (150 youth X 3 functions) and 150 trajectories representing change in activity performance. Mixed-effects models will be used to estimate an intervention effect across youth. Investigators' interdisciplinary team, comprised of researchers in the field of childhood disability and transition-aged youth (occupational therapy, physical therapy, psychology, biostatistics), has partnered with CIUSSS West- Central Montreal and Empowered Kids Ontario, and is well-positioned to accomplish the study objectives.

This novel patient-oriented study will permit drawing firm conclusions to support a shift towards personalized 'top-down' approaches in clinical practice. It will build knowledge that can guide clinicians, families and policy-makers in appraising the benefits of participation-based therapies on improving both functional capacities and performance in meaningful life activities. Demonstrating the multiple benefits generated by one single intervention can facilitate efficient youth-engaging therapies, contributing to the provision of pediatric rehabilitation services. Findings can also enhance knowledge of pragmatic clinical trials for testing complex individual-based interventions that are most appropriate and beneficial for rehabilitation research and practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Spina Bifida
  • Musculoskeletal Disorder
  • Juvenile Arthritis
  • Amputation
  • Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

  • participation
  • environmental barriers
  • youth
  • disabilities
  • body functions
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

McGill University is the lead sponsor of 249 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • a physical disability (e.g., due to cerebral palsy, spina bifida, spinal cord injury, non progressive musculoskeletal disorders, juvenile arthritis);
  • restricted mobility, such as an inability to navigate all surfaces and stairs independently and safely without the use of aids, physical assistance, or external support;
  • youth with various diagnoses will be eligible;
  • youth with cognitive and communication issues and/or intellectual delay will be included and a proxy version of self-reported assessments will be used.
  • living in the province of Quebec or Ontario

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • youth who are recovering within the first year following a severe brain injury or an orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin treatment 6 months prior or anticipated during the study period
  • youth with degenerative disorders
  • youth with a severe untreated mental health condition will also be excluded based on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Community-based activity program

    Engagement in 8-week community-based activity program.

    Behavioral: Engagement in a 8-week community-based activity program

Interventions

  • BehavioralEngagement in a 8-week community-based activity program

    Participants engage in a 8-week community-based activity program of their choice. In order to engage in the selected activity, an Occupational Therapist (OT) will meet with each youth in their home. Using the PREP 5 steps (Make goals; Map out a plan; Make it happen; Measure the process and outcomes; Move forward) the youth will choose a community program. The OT will then search for the appropriate program, identify and remove potential environmental barriers for participation in that activity (e.g., accessibility, equipment) and educate program instructors regarding the youth's specific needs. This process, which includes up to 12 hours of working with the OT, will set the stage for enrolment of the youth in a community program for a period of 8 weeks - the actual intervention phase.

    Also known as: Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Behavioral Assessment System for Children

    Evaluates the behavioral and emotional aspects of body functions using a 4-point scale. T-scores range from 0 to 120 in which lower scores indicate greater behavioral and emotional body functions.

    Time frame: 22 weeks

  2. Trunk Impairment Scale

    Assesses trunk control and includes 3 sub-scales; static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance and coordination. It contains 17 items rated on a 2-, 3- or 4- point scale. Total score measures motor body functions in terms of trunk control. Total score ranges from 0 (low performance) to 23 (high performance).

    Time frame: 22 weeks

  3. Functional Reach Test

    Assesses motor body functions in terms of reaching. The maximum distance in inches the participant can reach forward while standing/sitting in a fixed position is measured; units: inches.

    Time frame: 22 weeks

  4. Jamar/Handheld micro Force Evaluation and Testing 2 (microFET2) Dynamometers

    Measures motor body functions in terms of maximal grip, pinch strength and isometric muscle strength; units: pounds of force. Scores range from 0 to 200 pounds.

    Time frame: 22 weeks

  5. Goniometer

    Measures active range of motion of specific joints relevant to the activity and based on the task analysis; units: degrees of range of motion.

    Time frame: 22 weeks

  6. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

    A gold-standard 10-point scale that measures activity performance. Score ranges from 1 (unable to perform) to 10 (performs extremely well).

    Time frame: 22 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    An 8-item tool that measures levels of satisfaction of a program/service using a 4-point scale that takes 3-8 minutes to complete. Overall scores range from 8-32, higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed once after the intervention (week 22).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay Rehabilitation Center of CIUSSS West-Central Montreal (Mackay site)
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J5, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05784285
Lead sponsor
McGill University
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), McMaster University, Drexel University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2023
Start date
Nov 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2023

Study contacts

Dana Anaby, PhD
Contact
dana.anaby@mcgill.ca
15143984400
Dana Anaby, PhD
principal investigator · McGill University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion