CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05782374ReWIPretroUpdated Feb 3, 2026

Real World Data on Ibrutinib Use in PCNSL Rel/Ref

An observational study in PCNSL, sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-03.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PCNSL is a rare and aggressive subtype of B lymphoma that has been recognized as a distinct disease entity in the latest edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissue and is defined as DLBCL that develops exclusively in the brain parenchyma, spinal cord, leptomeninges and eye. In patients under 70 years of age without severe comorbidities, first-line treatment with induction chemo-immunotherapy according to the MATRix scheme (Methotrexate, Cytarabine, Tiothepa, Rituximab) and subsequent consolidation with HDCT followed by ASCT achieved the best results in terms of PFS and OS. Data on patients enrolled in a randomized phase 2 study showed an OS of 70% at a median FU of 88 months. In patients> 70 years of age or with low KPS, the prognosis remains significantly lower in the younger population. Several population studies have shown a stable increase over the past 30 years in terms of PFS and OS in patients aged under 70 years, while in patients over 70 years or with KPS \<70%, the survival curves are not satisfactory. in part because these patients are often referred to BSC alone, despite the benefit in PFS and OS demonstrated with HD-MTX-based treatments (≥1 g / m2) combined with oral alkylating agents or cytarabine in high doses.

Read the detailed description

Historically, HDCT followed by ASCT has not been considered a feasible option for elderly patients, although recent data collected in the "real life" setting and a pilot study conducted in Germany demonstrate that maintenance of the dose intensity of HD-MTX and treatment completion with HDCT / ASCT-based consolidation are similar to those in clinical studies. However, 20 to 50% of newly diagnosed PCNSL patients do not achieve a complete response with currently available treatment regimens, highlighting the need for improved induction strategies. Furthermore, even after a complete response, patients with PCNSL may experience relapse, especially in the elderly. First-line treatment failure usually occurs (70-75% of cases) within the first two years and the prognosis of this population is extremely poor as demonstrated in a retrospective study of more than 250 patients with PCNSL R / R who reported median PFS and OS at first relapse / progression of 2.2 and 3.5 months, respectively. Similar results have also been highlighted in several prospective studies in which the PFS and OS curves are equivalent. There is currently no standard of treatment for the treatment of patients with PCNSL R/R. Data extrapolated from the long-term FU of a randomized phase 2 trial suggests that patients with relapses more than 36 months after the end of first-line methotrexate-based immuno-chemotherapy could benefit from a rechallenge with the same treatment. On the other hand, for patients refractory or with relapses within 36 months or not eligible for HD-MTX, the best therapeutic choice is represented by enrollment in a clinical trial. In the absence of this option, the therapeutic choice is based on the experience of phase 2 studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • PCNSL

Keywords

  • PCNSL
  • R-CHOP
03

In context

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Raffaele is the lead sponsor of 443 studies on the registry; 234 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory PCNSL who in the period between August 2020 and May 2022 were candidates for treatment with ibrutinib alone or in combination with R-CHOP or R-CHOP like (in compassionate use, or off- label).

Inclusion criteria

  • Histological or cytological diagnosis of DLBCL
  • Disease localized exclusively in the CNS (brain, meninges, cranial nerves, eyes and / or spinal cord) both at first diagnosis and at failure
  • Progressive or recurrent disease
  • Previous treatment with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy ± WBRT
  • Age 18 - 80 years
  • ECOG performance status 0-3
  • Adequate hematopoiesis (platelets> 25,000 / mm3, hemoglobin> 8 g / dL, ANC> 1,000 / mm3), renal (serum creatinine \<2 times UNL and creatinine clearance ≥40 mL / min), cardiac (VEF ≥50% ) and liver function (SGOT / SGPT \<3 times UNL, bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase \<2 times UNL).
  • Patients who have been given treatment with ibrutinib, alone or in combination with immunochemotherapy, and who have or have not received the same.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with concomitant extra-CNS disease at presentation or relapse
  • Symptomatic coronary heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias not well controlled with drugs, or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months (New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease)
  • Any other serious medical condition that could compromise the patient's ability to adhere to treatment.
  • Presence of any psychological, family, sociological or geographical condition that may hinder compliance with the study protocol and the follow-up program.
  • In therapy with strong CYP3A inhibitors
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients diagnosed with r/r PCNSL

    Adult patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory PCNSL who in the period between August 2020 and May 2022 were candidates for treatment with ibrutinib alone or in combination with R-CHOP or R-CHOP like (in compassionate use, or off- label).

    Drug: Ibrutinib

Interventions

  • DrugIbrutinib

    ibrutinib alone or in combination with R-CHOP or R-CHOP like

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the efficacy in terms of overall rate of responses in patients treatment

    To evaluate the efficacy in terms of overall rate of responses to treatment (ORR = sum of complete responses \[CR\] + partial responses \[PR\]) according to the IPCG 2005 criteria in a retrospective cohort of patients with relapsed / refractory PCNSL undergoing treatment with ibrutinib given as monotherapy or in combination with R-CHOP immuno-chemotherapy.

    Time frame: 6MONTH

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness in terms of overall survival (OS);

    Evaluate the overall survival (OS) after the treatment

    Time frame: 6MONTH

  2. Evaluate the effectiveness in terms of progression-free survival (PFS);

    Verify the no progression of the lymphoma after the treatment

    Time frame: 6MONTH

  3. Verification of the safety of the ibrutinib monotherapy and in combination with R-CHOP

    To evaluate the safety of ibrutinib administered alone and in combination with R-CHOP in the PCNSL R / R patient population;

    Time frame: 6MONTH

  4. To evaluate the role of consolidation therapy with high-dose chemotherapy

    To evaluate the role of consolidation therapy with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplant or radiotherapy (ASCT or RT) and of ibrutinib maintenance therapy;

    Time frame: 6MONTH

  5. Frequency of invasive fungal infections after prophylactic antifungal therapy

    Assess the frequency of invasive fungal infections and the effectiveness of prophylactic antifungal therapy in the patients treated with R-CHOP

    Time frame: 6MONTH

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ospedale San Raffaele
    Milan, Italy 20132, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins C, Ng HK, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G, Soffietti R, von Deimling A, Ellison DW. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. PubMed 34185076 ↗
  • Ferreri AJM, Cwynarski K, Pulczynski E, Fox CP, Schorb E, Celico C, Falautano M, Nonis A, La Rosee P, Binder M, Fabbri A, Ilariucci F, Krampera M, Roth A, Hemmaway C, Johnson PW, Linton KM, Pukrop T, Gorlov JS, Balzarotti M, Hess G, Keller U, Stilgenbauer S, Panse J, Tucci A, Orsucci L, Pisani F, Zanni M, Krause SW, Schmoll HJ, Hertenstein B, Rummel M, Smith J, Thurner L, Cabras G, Pennese E, Ponzoni M, Deckert M, Politi LS, Finke J, Ferranti A, Cozens K, Burger E, Ielmini N, Cavalli F, Zucca E, Illerhaus G; IELSG32 study investigators. Long-term efficacy, safety and neurotolerability of MATRix regimen followed by autologous transplant in primary CNS lymphoma: 7-year results of the IELSG32 randomized trial. Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1870-1878. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01582-5. Epub 2022 May 13. PubMed 35562406 ↗
  • Schorb E, Fox CP, Kasenda B, Linton K, Martinez-Calle N, Calimeri T, Ninkovic S, Eyre TA, Cummin T, Smith J, Yallop D, De Marco B, Krampera M, Trefz S, Orsucci L, Fabbri A, Illerhaus G, Cwynarski K, Ferreri AJM. Induction therapy with the MATRix regimen in patients with newly diagnosed primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system - an international study of feasibility and efficacy in routine clinical practice. Br J Haematol. 2020 Jun;189(5):879-887. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16451. Epub 2020 Jan 29. PubMed 31997308 ↗
  • Kaji FA, Martinez-Calle N, Bishton MJ, Figueroa R, Adlington J, O'Donoghue M, Smith S, Byrne P, Paine S, Sovani V, Auer D, James E, Bessell EM, Grainge MJ, Fox CP. Improved survival outcomes despite older age at diagnosis: an era-by-era analysis of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma treated at a single referral centre in the United Kingdom. Br J Haematol. 2021 Nov;195(4):561-570. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17747. Epub 2021 Aug 8. PubMed 34368948 ↗
  • Sieg N, Naendrup JH, Godel P, Balke-Want H, Simon F, Deckert M, Gillessen S, Kreissl S, Brockelmann PJ, Borchmann P, von Tresckow B, Heger JM. Treatment patterns and disease course of previously untreated Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Feasibility of MTX-based regimens in clinical routine. Eur J Haematol. 2021 Aug;107(2):202-210. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13639. Epub 2021 May 26. PubMed 33960535 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05782374
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Raffaele
Responsible party
Andrés José Maria Ferreri (LYMPHOMA UNIT DIRECTOR, IRCCS San Raffaele) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2023
Start date
Aug 10, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2023
Completion
Aug 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion