ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05744596INCREASEUpdated Mar 9, 2026

Assessment of the Role of Incisura Biopsy in the Staging of Chronic Gastritis

An observational study in Chronic; Gastritis, Atrophic, sponsored by Clinical Hospital Colentina. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-09.

Sponsored by Clinical Hospital Colentina · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective multicenter study investigates the added benefit of incisura biopsy to correct identification of patients with high-risk chronic gastritis (OLGA stages III-IV). It compares a biopsy protocol with and without a single incisura biopsy in a non-inferiority design. Anonymized photo and videodocumentation according to institution practices will constitute a databank for lesion recognition, quality improvement, and potential AI development.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will perform a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of 2 different gastric biopsy protocols. The hypothesis is that a gastric mapping protocol not including the incisura biopsy ("I-": 2 biopsies from the antrum, 2 from the corpus) is non-inferior to the conventional 5-biopsy approach ("I+": 2 biopsies from the antrum, 2 from the corpus, 1 from the incisura). The primary endpoint of this study is to assess the sensitivity of the "I-" protocol in diagnosing high-risk precancerous chronic gastritis (OLGA/OLGIM stages III or IV) compared to the assumed gold standard of histology based on the "I+" protocol.

In designing the study, the investigators opted for a non-inferiority paired design with high-risk chronic gastritis as a primary binary outcome and a non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 5 % (two-sided 95% CI). The non-inferiority margin was established according to clinical judgement, taking into consideration the significance of a missed diagnosis of high-risk preneoplastic condition and previous estimates of the added value offered by the added incisura biopsy. With a power of 80% and a 2-sided α-level set at 0.05, it is estimated that 370 subjects are needed to show non-inferiority. Finally, 400 subjects will be enrolled to compensate for eventual exclusions or protocol deviations.

Cohen's kappa will be used to rate intra and inter-observer concordance for pathologists.

An intermediary analysis for futility is scheduled after 100 patients (25%) are enrolled.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic; Gastritis, Atrophic

Browse trials for

03

In context

Gastritis, Atrophic

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastritis, Atrophic; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is below the median of 509 across 54 observational studies indexed under Gastritis, Atrophic.

Browse Gastritis, Atrophic studies →

Lead sponsor

Clinical Hospital Colentina is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients over 18 years undergoing upper GI endoscopy are considered eligible for this study, regardless of gender, age or indication.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • indication to perform upper GI endoscopy for diagnosis or surveillance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of , previously diagnosed advanced gastric cancer, incomplete endoscopy, surgically altered stomach
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Incisura biopsy +

    this arm has the incisura biopsy scored and added in the OLGA final stage

    Other: Incisura biopsy analysis

  • Incisura biopsy -

    this arm only has corpus and antrum biopsies scored for OLGA staging

Interventions

  • OtherIncisura biopsy analysis

    a pathologist blinded to the other biopsies analyzes the biopsy from the incisura

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. prevalence of OLGA III-IV

    number of patients with confirmed OLGA III-IV

    Time frame: at time of enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. prevalence of OLGIM III-IV

    number of patients with confirmed OLGIM III-IV

    Time frame: at time of enrollment

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized data and images from endoscopy and pathology are shared between participating centers according to the protocol.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: The data will be available during the study period, after enrollment of all participants. Possible usage of the anonymized database will be discussed by study investigators.

Access criteria: reasonable request

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 45 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2023
First posted
Feb 27, 2023
StartActual
Mar 23, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Mar 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05744596
Lead sponsor
Clinical Hospital Colentina
Collaborators
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia, Francisco Gentil, Porto
Responsible party
Andrei Voiosu (Principal investigator, Clinical Hospital Colentina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2023
Start date
Mar 23, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 9, 2026

Study contacts

Andrei Voiosu
Contact
andreivoiosu@gmail.com
+40213173245

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion