ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05739812Updated Jul 14, 2023

The Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Domestic Surgical Robot System in Urological Telesurgery

An interventional study of telesurgery by domestic surgical robot in Renal Cell Carcinoma, Adrenal Tumor and Nonfunctioning Kidney, sponsored by The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-14.

Sponsored by The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2024, 2 years 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A single-arm clinical trial was designed in this study. The surgeon will perform urological telesurgery for patients using Chinese domestically produced "MicroHand S" surgical robot system. The "MicroHand S" surgical robot system consists of two physically separated subsystems named the "surgeon console" and the "patient side cart". The surgeon console includes a stereo image viewer, two master manipulators, a control panel and several foot pedals. The patient side cart includes a passive arm that can slide in the up-down direction and be adjusted forward and backward, a swivel head that can rotate around the vertical axis, and three slave arms. In addition, surgical instruments and sterile bags are the essential accessories for the "patient side cart". The principle of the telesurgery is as follows: the surgeon console takes the surgeon's input and translates manipulation into a control signal. After network transmission, the signals will be received by the patient side cart and will be used to control the slave robot to manipulate the instruments to perform the operation within the patient's cavity. The 3D images captured by the endoscopic camera will be simultaneously sent back to the screen of the surgeon console as visual feedback. Data between the surgeon console and the patient side cart will be transmitted through a 5G network or other advanced network networking scheme. The surgeon remotely manipulates the slave arms and performs surgeries for patients in remote areas. The safety and efficacy of the robot system in remote clinical treatment will be verified by the primary and the secondary evaluation criteria. One hundred patients with urological diseases will be enrolled in the clinical trial.

Primary evaluation criterion:

The success rate of the surgery. Surgery success is defined as that all surgeries are performed remotely and safely without transfering to other types of surgery, such as open surgery or normal robot-assisted surgery.

Secondary evaluation criteria:

Operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, preoperative adjusting time, hospitalization time, average network latency, task load, peer recognition, anxiety index.

Patient enrollment:

This experiment aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the domestic robot system in clinical urological surgery under the current network networking scheme. It is planned that 100 patients with urinary system diseases will participate in the clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Objective: This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of telesurgery for patients with urological tumors using Chinese independently developed "MicroHand S" Surgical Robot System under the current advanced network networking scheme.

Content: A single-arm clinical trial was designed in this study. The product is domestically produced "MicroHand S" surgical robot system (Shandong Weigao Surgical Robot Co., Ltd, China). The patients will be fully informed and the written informed consent will be signed before the clinical study, According to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, the researchers will conduct a detailed screening to determine whether the patients are suitable for the clinical study. Telesurgery will be conducted for patients who meet the inclusion criteria using the "MicroHand S" surgical robot system. Data between the "surgeon console" and the "patient side cart" will be transmitted through the current advanced network networking scheme. Fifty telesurgeries has been performed for patients with renal tumor, adrenal tumor, or nonfunctional kidney disease in 2021. All the surgeries were completed successfully, which made an positive social influence. In order to explore other indications, 100 subjects will be enrolled in the clinical trial. All diseases will be included if it is applicable to be treated by telesurgery, such as, adrenal tumor, renal tumor, renal cyst, duplex kidney, renal calculi, ureteral calculi, ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), nonfunctional kidney, renal pelvis tumor, ureteral tumor, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, pelvic tumor, penile cancer, etc. The safety and efficacy of remote clinical treatment using the domestic robot system will be verified according to the primary evaluation criterion, secondary evaluation criteria, and safety evaluation index.

Network connection plan: Two network connection plans were designed in advance to transmit data between the two sites (the master and the slave) in telesurgery. Plan A: Both signals (the control signals and the video signals) were transmitted in a VPN encryption mode under 5G wireless network or other advanced network networking scheme. Plan B: Both signals were transmitted through the dedicated line. When 5G network or other advanced network networking scheme was unstable and the surgery was affected, Plan A could be switched to Plan B to ensure the success of telesurgery. The two sites were also connected through a video conference system for real time communication and coordination.

Primary evaluation criterion: The primary evaluation criterion is the success rate of the surgery.

Secondary evaluation criteria: Secondary evaluation criteria include operative time, intraoperative blood loss, assembly time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, time to first flatus, average network latency, task load index, patient acceptance of telesurgery, peer surgeon acceptance of telesurgery, patient anxiety index, surgeon anxiety index.

Safety evaluation index: (1) Organ and vascular injury events related to the robot, including the following injury events: a. Whether there is adjacent organ injury caused by the robot functional failure during the operation, including liver, spleen and intestinal injury; b. Whether there is hemorrhoea caused by vascular injury caused by the robot functional failure during the operation. (2) Adverse events during the study. (3) Instrument malfunction. a. The communication between the "surgeon console" and the "patient side cart" is strongly disturbed, the slave arms fail to move and malfunction cannot be eliminated after reset and restart. b. by surgical instruments cannot be loosened after the tissue is clamped. c. An alarm sounds when install the instruments. d. Instruments lose efficacy or they are damaged. (4) Vital signs (body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate). (5) Laboratory examination: blood routine, liver and kidney function, electrolyte.

Researcher selection: In order to strictly ensure the homogeneity and uniformity of researchers, operators are required to have certain qualifications. All surgeons must have at least 5 years of experience in laparoscopic general surgery and at least 1-year experience in robotic surgery. The surgeon will be trained in delay simulation training before the trial. Meanwhile, product training is also required before the trial, and each surgeon must complete at least 20 surgeries with the tested robot. All the trainings above are to help surgeons cross the learning curve.

Background: With the combination of robotic and network communication technology, telesurgery has become a reality. On the one hand, telesurgery can conserve and optimize medical resources, providing high-quality medical services to unbalanced areas, such as rural areas, stricken areas and battlefields. On the other hand, telesurgery can reduce the time spent by patients waiting for treatment and thus prevent diseases from worsening. In recent years, the rapid advancements of the fifth and sixth generation network communication technologies and surgical robotic devices have again boosted the development of telesurgery since the Lindbergh operation and the research of Anvari et al. Especially in a country as vast as China, where the difference of the level of medical care between developed cities and rural areas is huge and the need for telesurgery is enormous. The demand for telemedicine has also risen significantly, particularly since the outbreak of COVID-19. However, as the most challenging components of telemedicine, telesurgery has still developed slowly, and most studies of it are limited to single-center experiences and as such have some inherent limitations. Based on this background, we have successfully conducted preliminary studies in which we verified the safety and feasibility of multiple network plans for telesurgery such as 5G network slicing technology and heterogeneous multilink network converged transmission technology.

In 2021, our research group carried out a multicenter prospective study evaluating efficacy and safety of telesurgery for upper urological tumors using the "Micro Hand S" system robot and a 5G network in Shandong Province, China.

With the prevalence of telesurgery, indications should not limited in upper urological diseases. More indications should be explored. On such basis, this clinical trial was designed and performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Adrenal Tumor
  • Nonfunctioning Kidney
  • Renal Pelvis Carcinoma
  • Ureteral Tumor
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Pelvic Tumor
  • Renal Cyst
  • Duplex Kidney
  • Renal Calculi
  • Ureteral Calculi
  • Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
  • Penile Cancer
03

In context

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

2,037 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell; 395 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 43 across 1,564 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell.

Browse Carcinoma, Renal Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University is the lead sponsor of 149 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-80 years.
  • was 18-30 kg/m2.
  • The (ASA) classification was I, II, or III.
  • Patients with adrenal tumor that need radical or partial adrenalectomy (nonfunctioning adenoma, \< 5cm in diameter).
  • Patients with renal cell carcinoma that need radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy.
  • Patients with renal cyst that need decompression surgery.
  • Patients with duplex kidney that need radical nephroureterectomy.
  • Patients with renal calculi that need intrasinusal pyelolithotomy.
  • Patients with ureteral calculi that need ureterolithotomy.
  • Patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) that need pyeloplasty.
  • Patients with urological diseases (such as, pelvic segment disease of the ureter, or duplex kidney) that need ureteral reimplantation.
  • Patients with nonfunctioning kidney that need radical nephrectomy.
  • Patients with renal pelvis carcinoma that need radical nephroureterectomy.
  • Patients with ureteral tumor that need radical nephroureterectomy.
  • Patients with bladder cancer that need radical or partial cystectomy.
  • Patients with prostate cancer that need radical prostectomy.
  • Patients with penile cancer that need Ilioinguinal lymph node dissection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women in pregnancy or lactation
  • A history of epilepsy or mental illness
  • Previous relevant operation history (all abdominal operations that may increase difficulty in telesurgery)
  • Patients with a severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease with (NYHA) classification III-IV and pulmonary insufficiency who cannot tolerate the operation
  • Liver cirrhosis, kidney failure and other severe liver and kidney dysfunction ( and AST exceeded 3 times of the value, Cr exceeded 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal value)
  • Patients with general hemorrhagic diseases and coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin activity, PTA \<25%)
  • Patients with active hepatitis and AIDS
  • Patients with uncorrected diabetes (random blood glucose, RBG >11.1 mmol/L) and hypertension (≥160/100 mmHg)
  • Patients with severe allergic constitution and suspected or confirmed alcohol, medicine or drug addiction
  • Patients with abdominal infection, peritonitis or diaphragmatic hernia
  • Patients with severe systemic infection or disease
  • Patients who are unable to voluntarily participate and sign
  • Other circumstances under which the investigator considers it is inappropriate to participate in this clinical trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Urological disease group

    Patients with urological diseases (renal cell carcinoma, nonfunctioning kidney and adrenal tumor, renal pelvis carcinoma, ureteral tumor, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, pelvic tumor) will be treated by telesurgery.

    Device: telesurgery by domestic surgical robot

Interventions

  • Devicetelesurgery by domestic surgical robot

    telesurgery of urological diseases by domestic surgical robot

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. success rate of the telesurgery

    The success of the telesurgery is the robot-assisted telesurgery without transfering to other types of surgery, such as open surgery or normal robot-assisted surgery. The number of the success divided by the total number is the success rate.

    Time frame: after the study is completed, up to 2 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    The operative time is from the time the robot is assembled till the incision is sutured.

    Time frame: after each procedure is completed, all data will be collected within 4 months

  2. Intraoperative blood loss

    Intraoperative blood loss is the total amount of blood loss from the beginning of the operation (after the robot is assembled) to the incision is sutured. The blood loss is estimated by weight. Estimated blood loss (g) = the weight of the gauze wiping up all the blood - the weight of the dry gauze. And 1g = 1ml.

    Time frame: after each procedure is completed, all data will be collected within 4 months

  3. Postoperative pain

    Postoperative pain is assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) with a range from 0 point (no pain) to 10 points (maximum pain) at 24±2 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: at 24±2 hours after each procedure is completed, all data will be collected within 4 months

  4. Assembly time

    The assembly time is from the time the robot starts to the time the trocar is connected to the robot arm.

    Time frame: from the time the robot starts to the time the trocar is connected to the robot arm during each procedure, all data will be collected within 4 months

  5. Hospital stay

    The hospital stay is the total number of days from the admission to the discharge of patients.

    Time frame: from admission to discharge for each patients, all data will be collected within 4 months

  6. Average network latency

    Average network latency is monitored by specific software in real time during the telesurgery.

    Time frame: during the whole procedure in each telesurgery, all data will be collected within 1 months

  7. Task load

    Task load will be evaluated through NASA-TLX questionnaire filled by the surgeons.

    Time frame: after each procedure is completed, all data will be collected within 4 months

  8. Patient acceptance

    Patient acceptance of telesurgery will be assessed through TPSQ questionnaire filled by the patients 1 day before operation.

    Time frame: one day before the telesurgery, all data will be collected within 4 months

  9. Peer surgeon acceptance

    Peer surgeon acceptance of telesurgery will be systematic reviewed through TAKA questionnaire filled by peer surgeons.

    Time frame: one day before the telesurgery, all data will be collected within 4 months

  10. Patient anxiety index

    Patient anxiety index will be assessed through TP-SAS questionnaire filled by patients.

    Time frame: one day before or after the telesurgery, all data will be collected within 4 months

  11. Surgeon anxiety index

    Surgeon anxiety index will be assessed through TP-SAS questionnaire filled by operating surgeons and assistant surgeons.

    Time frame: one day before or after the telesurgery, all data will be collected within 4 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen H, Pan X, Yang J, Fan J, Qin M, Sun H, Liu J, Li N, Ting DSW, Chen Y. Application of 5G Technology to Conduct Real-Time Teleretinal Laser Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):975-982. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2312. PubMed 34236391 ↗
  • Tian W, Fan M, Zeng C, Liu Y, He D, Zhang Q. Telerobotic Spinal Surgery Based on 5G Network: The First 12 Cases. Neurospine. 2020 Mar;17(1):114-120. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938454.227. Epub 2020 Mar 31. PubMed 32252160 ↗
  • Nguan C, Miller B, Patel R, Luke PP, Schlachta CM. Pre-clinical remote telesurgery trial of a da Vinci telesurgery prototype. Int J Med Robot. 2008 Dec;4(4):304-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.210. PubMed 18803341 ↗
  • Sterbis JR, Hanly EJ, Herman BC, Marohn MR, Broderick TJ, Shih SP, Harnett B, Doarn C, Schenkman NS. Transcontinental telesurgical nephrectomy using the da Vinci robot in a porcine model. Urology. 2008 May;71(5):971-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.027. Epub 2008 Mar 4. PubMed 18295861 ↗
  • Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, Smith M, Vix M, Simone M, Mutter D. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002 Apr;235(4):487-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00005. PubMed 11923603 ↗
  • Yi B, Wang G, Li J, Jiang J, Son Z, Su H, Zhu S, Wang S. Domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system "Micro Hand S" is applied to clinical surgery preliminarily in China. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4945-3. Epub 2016 May 18. PubMed 27194259 ↗
  • Yao Y, Liu Y, Li Z, Yi B, Wang G, Zhu S. Chinese surgical robot micro hand S: A consecutive case series in general surgery. Int J Surg. 2020 Mar;75:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PubMed 31982634 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05739812
Responsible party
Haitao Niu, MD (Professor Haitao Niu (the department of Urology), The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2023
Start date
Feb 5, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 14, 2023

Study contacts

Haitao Niu, MD
Contact
niuht0532@126.com
18661803117
Haitao Niu, PhD
study chair · The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion