ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05725694STROKELABEDUpdated Mar 15, 2023

Acute Ischaemic STROKE: From LAboratory to the Patient's BED

An observational study in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Reperfusion Injury and Cerebral Edema, sponsored by Istituto di Neuroscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-15.

Sponsored by Istituto di Neuroscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2023), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Recanalization strategies have radically changed the outcome in a significant part of stroke patients. The unpredictable occurrence of cerebral edema (CE) and hemorrhagic transformation (HT) are frequent events in patients affected by ischemic stroke, even when an effective vessel recanalization has been achieved. These complications, related with blood brain barrier (BBB) disruption, remain difficult to prevent or treat, and antagonize the beneficial effect of successful recanalization, leading to poor outcome.

Aim: to shed light on the reperfusion injury biological bases, this study aims at evaluating the effects of circulating and imaging biomarkers in relation to CE and HT both in stroke patients and in a coherent murine stroke model. A close interaction between clinical and preclinical research could lead to a broader understanding of the results deriving from the individual lines of activity, allowing a deeper interpretation of the underlying phenomena.

Methods: The clinical setting is a retrospective observational study enrolling consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation territory, treated with reperfusion therapies, at Careggi University Hospital in Florence (Italy) from October 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020. In this cohort, the investigators will apply a new approach to assess the presence of CE and HT after stroke in CT scans, through the quantification of anatomical distortion (AD) (induced by fluid extravasation in brain tissue) at 24 hours. A large panel of blood biomarkers related to inflammation, endothelial dysfunction , and fibrin resistance to lysis, will be measured as blood samples are taken from each patient before and 24 hours after thrombolysis or thrombectomy. The role of both AD and blood biomarkers as predictors of 3 months functional outcome, assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS), will be estimated.

Using a translational approach the investigators will develop a new mouse model of light-induced occlusion/reperfusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) to better reproduce the human setting. Then, the investigators will assess functional impairment induced by stroke with and without recanalization at different time points and the investigators will assess through ex vivo experiments the insurgence of BBB alterations 24 hours after the lesion. Finally, the investigators will characterize the stroke volume and the inflammation one week after stroke.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the project is to evaluate the correlation of circulating biomarkers related to blood brain barrier disruption with the development of cerebral edema, hemorrhagic transformation and the extension of the ischemic area investigated with modern neuroimaging techniques, in order to identify predictors of reperfusion injury in patients undergoing revascularization therapies.

In parallel with the clinical study, the investigators will investigate mechanistic aspects on the correlation between neuronal degeneration and the alteration of vascular permeability. To this end, the investigators will use a combination of advanced microscopy techniques and vital fluorescent markings in a novel mouse model of ischemic stroke.

  • Clinical setting: This is a monocentric retrospective observational study of patients with acute ischemic stroke who have undergone revascularization therapies (systemic thrombolysis, endovascular treatment) at the Stroke Unit of the Careggi University Hospital from 1 October 2015 to 31 May 2020. Patients' data will be entered in a dedicated register: demographics and clinical data as well as haematochemical and neuroimaging parameters covered by this study. Available circulating biomarkers and neuroimaging collected at hospital arrival and repeated 24 hours after interventions will be included in the analysis, as well as the clinical/functional outcome assessed 3 months after stroke according to the modified Rankin scale by visit or phone interview.

Laboratory protocol:

In our university hospital, in acute ischemic stroke patients blood samples are routinely collected before and 24 hours after reperfusion treatment (either intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy). The investigators could retrieve blood samples already used for a previous study (Piccardi et al. 2018) and still correctly stored and available in our biological bank: blood is collected in tubes both with anticoagulant and without anticoagulant. Tubes are then centrifuged at room temperature at 1500 x g for 15 minutes, and the supernatant is stored in aliquots at -80° C.

Neuroimaging protocol:

Baseline neuroimaging assessment, including Non-Contrast CT (NCCT), CT-Angiography (CTA) and CT-Perfusion (CTP) has been performed before acute interventions when indicated according to guidelines in place at the time of treatment. A 24 hours follow-up NCCT has been performed in all patients.

After 24 hours, as per international guidelines, all patients undergo a control head CT or brain MRI to determine the presence of hemorrhagic transformation, cerebral edema and the volume of the ischemic area. The re-reading of the images already acquired will be carried out on DICOM format. The data collected will be recorded in a special section of the electronic register.

Two expert neurologists will separately evaluate each patient's baseline and 24-hour CT and record the presence of cerebral edema classified according to the SITS-ISTR criteria: COED1 = focal brain swelling up to one third of the hemisphere, COED2 = focal brain swelling greater than one third of the hemisphere, COED3 = brain swelling with midline shift, NONE = absence of cerebral edema. The two independent neurologists will also create a manual mapping ("mask") of the ischemic lesion visible on the 24-hour CT scan. Any discrepancies will be resolved by an experienced neuroradiologist. For this process, FSLeyes will be used, a software included in the FSL software (FMRIB Software Library v6.0, Created by the Analysis Group, FMRIB, Oxford, UK) which offers the possibility to generate a three-dimensional lesion mask for each patient , covering the infarct tissue on all CT sections. Previous ischemic outcomes (already present on baseline CT) will not be included in the masks.

Anatomic distortion (AD) will be assessed by comparing the baseline CT with the 24-hour CT. The steps required to obtain this measurement include delineating the ischemic lesion visible at 24 hours using a "mask" (described before) and registration, a procedure that allows to accurately compare different images of the brain, even at different times and individuals. AD can be calculated by comparing the two possible registration approaches and in particular by quantifying the difference between the lesion masks processed through Linear and Non-Linear registration according to the method described by Harston et al. in 2018. All image processing and analysis will be carried out using FSL software (FMRIB Software Library v6.0, Created by the Analysis Group, FMRIB, Oxford, UK), a free access software developed by a research group of the University of Oxford.

3 month outcome: All patients treated with systemic thrombolysis or endovascular treatment are followed-up 3 months after the ictal event with an evaluation of the clinical-functional outcome according to the modified Rankin Scale, directly in the out-patient clinic or by telephone interview.

This data must therefore be acquired from outpatient reports. Only if the data is missing will a telephone interview be carried out.

  • Pre-clinical setting: The preclinical research group will characterize a novel mouse model of occlusion/reperfusion of the MCA. All procedures involving mice will be performed in accordance with regulations of the Italian Ministry of Health authorization n. 723/2019.

Mice will be anesthetized with ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (9 mg/kg). Body temperature will be maintained at 37°C with a heating pad. Mice will be placed on a surgery pad, lying on one side. The mouse hairs between the eye and the ear will be removed and then the skin will be cleaned with betadine and ethanol. Then, local anesthetic lidocaine 2% will be applied. The skin over the squamosal bone will be cut with a blade, the muscle will be detached from the skull and gently pushed down to expose the bone.

Then, a dental drill (Silfradent, Italia) will be used to create a small craniotomy to expose the distal branch of the middle cerebral artery. Once removed the flap bone, a photosensitive dye, Rosebengal (0.2 ml, 10 mg/ml solution in Saline Solution; Sigma Aldrich, USA) will be intraperitoneally injected. Five minutes after the injection, a 532 nm laser (Laser Diode CPS532, Thorlabs, Germany) will be focused upstream of the MCA branching for twenty-five minutes to induce the formation of a stable clot. Thirty minutes after the occlusion of the distal branch of the MCA, in order to promote the disruption of the clot and the consequent recanalization of the blood vessel, the investigators will illuminate the same region with a 365 nm UV LED (High-Power LED SOLIS-365C, Thorlabs, Germany) for fifteen minutes. After the UV irradiation period, the distal branch of the MCA result recanalized. At the end of the procedure, the muscle will be replaced over the bone and the skin sutured.

During the experimental time window the investigators will characterize the functional impairment induced by the occlusion of the distal branch of the MCA with and without recanalization.

To this aim the investigators will use the neurodeficit score modifying the protocol applied by Balbi and collaborators in 2019, based on a standardized qualitative assessment for measuring the degree of motor impairment (Bederson et al. 1986) employing a panel of five motor tests to evaluate strength, balance, and adduction and flexion capability.

In a subgroup of mice the investigators will investigate the emergence of blood-brain barrier alterations 24 hours after distal MCA occlusion.

To this aim, the investigators will inject in the mouse tail vein 0.20 mL of Evans Blue dye (0.20 mg/mL), at the end of the surgery to occlude the distal branch of the MCA. 24 hours after the injection the animal will be anesthetized with an overdose of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (9 mg/kg) and then perfused with 100 mL of PBS in order to remove the blood from the brain tissue. The brain will be then extracted and incubated in PFA 4% for one hour. Then the brain will be sectioned with a brain matrix producing approximately 15 slices 1 mm thick.

In another subgroup of mice the investigators will characterize lesion extension and astrocytes recruitment 7 days after stroke induction.

To this aim, animals will be anesthetized with an overdose of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (9 mg/kg) and then transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were cut using a vibrating-blade vibratome (Leica, Germany) to obtain 100 µm thick coronal sections for immunostaining of Neuronal marker, NeuN (1:1000, anti-NeuN chicken, Millipore, Germany), and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, GFAP (1:1000, anti-GFAP rabbit, Abcam, United Kingdom).

The NeuN immunostaining will be performed to quantify stroke lesion volume 7 days after photothrombosis. The stroke volume for each animal will be calculated by summing up all damaged areas and multiplying the number by section thickness and by 4 (the spacing factor). Images will be acquired with a (Stemi 508, Carl Zeiss). The total volume in mm3 will be given as the mean ± standard error of all analyzed animals.

The number of Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein (GFAP) positive neurons will be analyzed using a confocal fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE 300, Tokyo, Japan) with a Nikon Plan EPO 60X objective (NA 1.4, oil immersion Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The investigators will focus our investigation on 4 regions of interest, i.e. the peri-infarct area (ischemic border zone), a region in the ipsilesional hemisphere distant to the stroke core (ipsilesional remote zone), a region contralateral to the peri-infarct area (contralateral ischemic border zone), and a region in the healthy hemisphere contralateral to the ischemic core (contralateral ischemic core).

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Reperfusion Injury
  • Cerebral Edema
  • Hemorrhagic Transformation Due to Acute Stroke
  • Animal Model

Keywords

  • Anatomical Distortion
  • Blood biomarkes
  • Translational Stroke Research
  • Mouse ischemia/reperfusion stroke model
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 300 across 771 observational studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto di Neuroscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This is a retrospective observational hospital-based study that will include all patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation territory, consecutively treated either with systemic thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy in Careggi University Hospital, Florence, from 1 October 2015 to 31 May 2020, with available head CT scan in DICOM format performed in Careggi at baseline (before the Acute phase treatment) and follow up (approximately 24 hours).

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (ethics committee registration number: Comitato Etico Area Vasta Centro [CEAVC] 16923_oss).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with acute ischemic stroke consecutively treated (according to guidelines: Jauch et al, stroke 2013; Powers et al, Stroke 2015) either with systemic thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy in Careggi University Hospital, Florence, from October 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020
  • With available head CT scan in DICOM format performed in Careggi at baseline (before the acute phase treatment) and at 24 hrs follow up;
  • With stroke in the anterior circulation territory (according to Bamford et al, 1991);
  • With to data processing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who deny their consent to data processing;
  • Baseline and follow-up clinical and radiological data consistent with stroke in the posterior circulation;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Age \<18 years;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3 month clinical-functional outcome

    All stroke patients are followed-up 3 months after the ictal event in the out-patient clinic of Careggi University Hospital, and their functional outcome is assessed according to the modified Rankin Scale. The Modified Rankin Scale is a 6 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe disability). A separate category of 6 is used for patients who expire.

    Time frame: For each patient enrolled in the study the functional outcome is assessed 3 months after the ictal event

  2. The occurrence of Cerebral Edema

    Defined according to Cerebral Edema Classification used by the Helsinki Stroke Thrombolysis Registry Group (Strbian et al. 2013) on 24h Non-enhanced CT brain scan. \[CED1= Focal brain swelling up to one-third of the hemisphere; CED2= Focal brain swelling greater than one-third of the hemisphere; CED3= Brain swelling with midline shift\]

    Time frame: Non-enhanced CT brain scans acquired at 24 hours after the ictal event

  3. The occurrence of Haemorrhagic Transformation

    Defined according to the ECASS (European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study) II radiographic classification of hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke (Larrue et al. 2001) on 24h Non-enhanced CT brain scan. \[HI1: Hemorrhagic infarction type 1; HI2: Hemorrhagic infarction type 2; PH1: Parenchymal hematoma type 1; PH2: Parenchymal hematoma type 2.\]

    Time frame: Non-enhanced CT brain scans acquired at 24 hours after ictal event

  4. The occurrence of relevant Haemorrhagic Transformation

    The presence and grading of Haemorrhagic Transformation defined as haemorrhagic infarction type two or any type of parenchymal haemorrhage (PH1 and PH2) according to ECASS II classification (Larrue et al, 2001) on 24h Non-enhanced CT brain scan. \[PH1: Parenchymal hematoma type 1; PH2: Parenchymal hematoma type 2.\]

    Time frame: Non-enhanced CT brain scans acquired at 24 hours after ictal event

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anatomical Distortion (AD) volume (ml)

    A novel approach to evaluate brain swelling induced by cerebral edema and haemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke on Non-enhanced CT scans, through the quantification of the Anatomical Distortion obtained by the comparison of Non-enhanced CT scans acquired at 24 hours and at admission, according to the method described by Harston et al. in 2018.

    Time frame: Non-enhanced CT brain scans acquired at 2 timepoints: 1) Baseline = before rtPA administration or thrombectomy, 2) Follow-up at 24 hours

  2. Corrected infarct volume (ml)

    Corrected infarct volume will be obtained by subtracting Anatomical Distortion from the total (or uncorrected) lesion. \[Corrected infarct volume= total lesion volume - AD\]

    Time frame: Non-enhanced CT brain scans acquired at 2 time points: 1) Baseline = before rtPA administration or thrombectomy, 2) Follow-up at 24 hours

  3. Relative Anatomical Distortion (AD) volume (ml)

    To adjust for ischemic lesion dimensions, the Relative AD volume will be obtained by dividing AD by the corrected infarct volume. \[Relative AD = AD/corrected infarct volume\].

    Time frame: Non-enhanced CT brain scans acquired at 2 time points: 1) Baseline = before rtPA administration or thrombectomy, 2) Follow-up at 24 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Piccardi B, Arba F, Nesi M, Palumbo V, Nencini P, Giusti B, Sereni A, Gadda D, Moretti M, Fainardi E, Mangiafico S, Pracucci G, Nannoni S, Galmozzi F, Fanelli A, Pezzati P, Vanni S, Grifoni S, Sarti C, Lamassa M, Poggesi A, Pescini F, Pantoni L, Gori AM, Inzitari D. Reperfusion Injury after ischemic Stroke Study (RISKS): single-centre (Florence, Italy), prospective observational protocol study. BMJ Open. 2018 May 24;8(5):e021183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021183. PubMed 29794101 ↗
  • Harston GWJ, Carone D, Sheerin F, Jenkinson M, Kennedy J. Quantifying Infarct Growth and Secondary Injury Volumes: Comparing Multimodal Image Registration Measures. Stroke. 2018 Jul;49(7):1647-1655. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020788. Epub 2018 Jun 12. PubMed 29895538 ↗
  • Bamford JM, Sandercock PA, Warlow CP, Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989 Jun;20(6):828. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.6.828. No abstract available. PubMed 2728057 ↗
  • Balbi M, Vanni MP, Vega MJ, Silasi G, Sekino Y, Boyd JD, LeDue JM, Murphy TH. Longitudinal monitoring of mesoscopic cortical activity in a mouse model of microinfarcts reveals dissociations with behavioral and motor function. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Aug;39(8):1486-1500. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18763428. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PubMed 29521138 ↗
  • Bederson JB, Pitts LH, Tsuji M, Nishimura MC, Davis RL, Bartkowski H. Rat middle cerebral artery occlusion: evaluation of the model and development of a neurologic examination. Stroke. 1986 May-Jun;17(3):472-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.17.3.472. PubMed 3715945 ↗
  • Strbian D, Meretoja A, Putaala J, Kaste M, Tatlisumak T; Helsinki Stroke Thrombolysis Registry Group. Cerebral edema in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Int J Stroke. 2013 Oct;8(7):529-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00781.x. Epub 2012 Mar 9. PubMed 22405327 ↗
  • Larrue V, von Kummer R R, Muller A, Bluhmki E. Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke. 2001 Feb;32(2):438-41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.2.438. PubMed 11157179 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2015 to primary completion in May 2020, 55 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2023
First posted
Feb 13, 2023
StartActual
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
May 31, 2020
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Mar 15, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05725694
Lead sponsor
Istituto di Neuroscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Collaborators
Careggi Hospital, University of Florence
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2023
Start date
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completion
May 31, 2020
Completion
Mar 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 15, 2023

Study contacts

Marzia Baldereschi, MD
principal investigator · Istituto di Neuroscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion