CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05725265Updated Oct 18, 2024

LLLT for BCRL: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

An interventional study of Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure) and Conventional low-level laser therapy in Breast Cancer Lymphedema, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to female participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-18.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is conducted to compare between efficacy of large and small area of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treatment of post mastectomy lymphedema. The change of severity of BCRL will be measured by the difference of circumference and skin thickness, detected by ultrasound. The influence on clinical symptoms, such as pain, shoulder mobility and hand function, are also investigated in the study.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is common complication after cancer treatment. The incidence of BCRL around is 16.6% (95% CI 13·6-20·2) after the diagnosis and higher among the group receiving the sentinel biopsy or axillary lymph dissection. The lymphedema arises from the accumulation of protein-rich lymph fluid in the interstitial spaces then results in chronic inflammation with symptoms of fibrosis, pain, limited range of motion or paresthesia. The BRCL is chronic and progressive condition, and the severity also changes over time. The definition and cut points of BCRL using inter-limb volume or arm circumference varied across the studies by different measure method. Currently, the International Society of Lymphology suggests calculating arm volume from circumferences through the truncated cone formula to qualify the severity. On the other hand, previous research found the skin and subcutis were thickened in the ipsilateral arm of patients with BCRL. Thus, the measurement of skin thickness using ultrasound may also practical to detect the progression of lymphedema. Except for physical change of upper limb, the symptoms of BCRL are also concerned. One of the most common morbidity is pain, mostly presenting 1 month after surgery (56.6%). Furthermore, BCRL might decrease shoulder range of motion. Previous study demonstrated that shoulder mobility was usually restricted at 1 month postoperatively and abduction and forward flexion were limited at first. Thus, functional disability may occurred and life of quality may be influenced. To evaluate the ability to perform functional activities, the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) is an useful tool to assess the patients with BCRL.

Currently, although complete decongestive therapy (CDT) has been the standard therapy, there is still various type of noninvasive treatment on BCRL, for example, low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), also named photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), is a conservative therapy through utilizing wave lengths of red or near infrared light between 650 and 1000 nm to stimulate wound healing and reduce inflammation, edema, and pain. Moreover, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the LLLT for treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema in November 2006. Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of LLLT on BCRL with comparison to physical therapy or placebo. However, there is still limited data about the LLLT with different light area on improvement of severity and symptoms of BCRL. Therefore, this study is conducted to compare between efficacy of large and small area of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treatment of post mastectomy lymphedema.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Lymphedema

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer Lymphedema
  • Lymphedema
  • Breast cancer
  • Low level laser therapy
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female subjects, 20 years age or older, suffered from unilateral breast cancer with ipsilateral lumpectomy or mastectomy and lymph node dissection (sentinel biopsy or axillary dissection)
  • Stage I or II unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema(as defined by the International Society of Lymphology)
  • Girth≥ 2 cm circumferential difference compared with the uninvolved upper extremity at any 4 cm segment
  • Able to commit to a long-term follow-up schedule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastatic cancer(stage IV)
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of other extremity lymphedema (primary or secondary)
  • History of deep vein thrombosis
  • Pacemaker
  • Artificial joints, implant or tattoo(area≥4 cm2) at the involved upper extremity
  • Previous treatment with low-level laser therapy (within 3 months)
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35 (morbid obesity)
  • High bleeding tendency(hemophilia)
  • Receiving long-term steroid treatment (oral or systemic)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Large-area low-level laser therapy

    Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure) was administered at proximal forearm, upper arm and axillary region of affected side. The wavelength was 980±15nm, average dose was 10-40nm/cm2 and maximal output was 1000mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.

    Device: Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure)

  • Placebo comparator
    Conventional low-level laser therapy

    Conventional low-level laser therapy was administrated on antecubital fossa and the axilla of affected side. The wavelength was 808nm and maximal output was 60 mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.

    Device: Conventional low-level laser therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceLarge-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure)

    The wavelength was 980±15nm, average dose was 10-40nm/cm2 and maximal output was 1000mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks; for a total of 12 sessions

  • DeviceConventional low-level laser therapy

    The wavelength was 808 nm and maximal output was 60 mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks; for a total of 12 sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper arm

    Record the circumference of arm and forearm of involved and uninvolved upper extremity at 4 cm segment from cubital fossa and calculate the circumference discrepancy.

    Time frame: Day 30 (change of circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper limbs, comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  2. Circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper arm

    Record the circumference of arm and forearm of involved and uninvolved upper extremity at 4 cm segment from cubital fossa and calculate the circumference discrepancy.

    Time frame: Day 60 (change of circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper limbs, comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  3. Circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper arm

    Record the circumference of arm and forearm of involved and uninvolved upper extremity at 4 cm segment from cubital fossa and calculate the circumference discrepancy.

    Time frame: Day 120 (change of circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper limbs, comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

Secondary outcomes

  1. visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Record visual analogue scale (VAS) to rate the severity of pain. The total score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  2. Range of motion of involved shoulder

    involved upper extremity.

    Time frame: Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  3. Skin thickness

    Use ultrasound to measure the skin thickness of arm and forearm of involved upper extremity.

    Time frame: Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  4. QuickDASH

    QuickDASH(Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder \& Hand) is a questionnaire for patients presenting with self-reported disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand. The QuickDASH contains 11-items; the score of each item ranges from 1 to 5 and total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater level of disability and severity.

    Time frame: Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):500-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7. Epub 2013 Mar 27. PubMed 23540561 ↗
  • Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Dec;77(6):1009-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.022. PubMed 29132848 ↗
  • Eyigor S, Cinar E, Caramat I, Unlu BK. Factors influencing response to lymphedema treatment in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2705-10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2633-9. Epub 2015 Feb 8. PubMed 25663541 ↗
  • Mellor RH, Bush NL, Stanton AW, Bamber JC, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Dual-frequency ultrasound examination of skin and subcutis thickness in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast J. 2004 Nov-Dec;10(6):496-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21458.x. PubMed 15569205 ↗
  • Swenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, Swenson L, Lee MW, Tuttle TM. Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Oct;9(8):745-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02574496. PubMed 12374657 ↗
  • Verbelen H, Gebruers N, Eeckhout FM, Verlinden K, Tjalma W. Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2846-5. Epub 2014 Feb 5. PubMed 24496928 ↗
  • Lee D, Hwang JH, Chu I, Chang HJ, Shim YH, Kim JH. Analysis of factors related to arm weakness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2584-6. Epub 2015 Jan 10. PubMed 25576430 ↗
  • Smile TD, Tendulkar R, Schwarz G, Arthur D, Grobmyer S, Valente S, Vicini F, Shah C. A Review of Treatment for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Paradigms for Clinical Practice. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;41(2):178-190. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000355. PubMed 28009597 ↗
  • Robijns J, Censabella S, Bulens P, Maes A, Mebis J. The use of low-level light therapy in supportive care for patients with breast cancer: review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):229-242. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2056-y. Epub 2016 Aug 19. PubMed 27539464 ↗
  • Wang Y, Ge Y, Xing W, Liu J, Wu J, Lin H, Lu Y. The effectiveness and safety of low-level laser therapy on breast cancer-related lymphedema: An overview and update of systematic reviews. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr;37(3):1389-1413. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03446-3. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34779937 ↗
  • Levenhagen K, Davies C, Perdomo M, Ryans K, Gilchrist L. Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther. 2017 Jul 1;97(7):729-745. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx050. PubMed 28838217 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05725265
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2023
Start date
Oct 24, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2024

Study contacts

Ying-Chun Chen, MD
Contact
yasandy2000@gmail.com
23123456 ext. 55177
Chueh-Hung Wu, PHD
study chair · Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion