CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05721573Updated Oct 1, 2026Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 for Inclusion Body Myositis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of ABC008 in Inclusion Body Myositis, sponsored by Abcuro, Inc.. Completed at 45 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Abcuro, Inc. · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 1, 2026Results postedPrimary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis

Read the detailed description

A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Detailed Description: A Phase II/III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of ABC008 in the Treatment of Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis Detailed Description: This is a Phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel multicenter study with 3 parts.

The study will include a sentinel cohort (Part A) of 30 subjects who will receive first three doses of the study drug. Safety data from subjects in the sentinel cohorts will be evaluated by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) before further dosing of the sentinel cohort, as well as initiation of enrollment in the double-blind safety and efficacy cohort (Part B). After completion of Part A or Part B, subjects have the option of enrolling in an open-label long-term extension study or progressing to the pharmacodynamics (PD) recovery cohort (Part C), to evaluate the recovery of the depletion of killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1)+ cells after the end of treatment with ABC008.

Efficacy, safety, HRQoL, and HRU assessments will be conducted. Blood samples will be obtained to evaluate the serum PK, PD, and immunogenicity of ABC008 throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inclusion Body Myositis

Keywords

  • Muscular Diseases
  • Inflammatory Myopathy
  • Myositis
  • Neuromuscular Diseases
  • Nervous System Disease
03

In context

Myositis, Inclusion Body

49 studies on the registry are indexed under Myositis, Inclusion Body; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 272 is above the median of 27 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Myositis, Inclusion Body.

Browse Myositis, Inclusion Body studies →

Lead sponsor

Abcuro, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult males and females age >40 years at the time of the first dose of study medication;
  • Weight >40 and \<150 kg;
  • Diagnosis of either clinico-pathologically defined IBM, clinically defined IBM, or probable IBM according to the European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) IBM 2011 research diagnostic criteria (Rose et al., 2013). Documented histopathology results must be available prior to Baseline (Day 1) to confirm eligibility;
  • Able to arise from a chair (with armrests), with use of their arms but without support from another person or device (e.g., cane, walking stick), at Screening and Baseline (Day 1);
  • Able to walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down, with or without assistive device. Once arisen from the chair, subject may use any walking device but cannot be supported by another person, furniture, or a wall;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other form of myositis or myopathy other than IBM, e.g., metabolic or drug-induced myopathy, drug-induced myositis, anti-synthetase syndrome, polymyositis or dermatomyositis, cancer-associated myositis (myositis diagnosed within 3 years, either before or after), myositis in overlap with another autoimmune disease (e.g., systemic lupus, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis), or muscular dystrophy;
  • Any condition, e.g., severe degenerative arthritis with limited range of motion, which precludes the ability to quantitate muscle strength or perform functional assessments (e.g., mTUG), in the Investigator's opinion;.
  • Presence of another autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease other than indication under study, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthropathy, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Subjects with Sjogren's syndrome, T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia (T-LGLL), or well-controlled thyroid disease are permitted;
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
272 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    0.5 mg/kg ABC008

    Part A - ABC008 N=12 Part B - ABC008 N= 67

    Drug: ABC008

  • Active comparator
    2.0 mg/kg ABC008

    Part A - ABC008 N=12 Part B - ABC008 N= 67

    Drug: ABC008

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Part A - Placebo N= 6 Part B - Placebo N= 67

    Drug: ABC008

Interventions

  • DrugABC008

    Given by subcutaneous injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.

    Time frame: Up to Week 80

  2. Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL)); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).

    Time frame: Up to Week 80

  3. Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.

    Time frame: Up to Week 80

  4. Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) Total Score at Week 76

    The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 76

  5. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 80

  6. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified CTCAE criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental ADL); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 80

  7. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 80

  8. Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in the IBMFRS Total Score at Week 76

    The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 76

  9. Part C: Time to PD Recovery

    Recovery was defined as the return of KLRG1+ cell counts toward baseline levels during the PD follow-up period.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    A TESAE was defined as a serious AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and met seriousness criteria per protocol (including death, life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or other medically important event).

    Time frame: Up to Week 80

  2. Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs With Onset Within 24 Hours From the Start of Any Study Medication Administration

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug, with onset assessed within 24 hours following the dosing.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours following each dose, Up to Week 80

  3. Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation

    A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug that led to discontinuation of study.

    Time frame: Up to Week 80

  4. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  5. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocytes

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocytes. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  6. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  7. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  8. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  9. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hematocrit

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Hematocrit. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  10. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aldolase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: ALT, Aldolase, AST, GGT and Lactate Dehydrogenase. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  11. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Albumin and Protein

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Albumin and Protein. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  12. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alkaline Phosphatase and Creatine Kinase (CK)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Alkaline Phosphatase and CK. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  13. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, and Urea. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  14. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  15. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter - pH

    Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameter: pH. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  16. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter- Specific Gravity

    Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameters- specific gravity. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  17. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - C3 and C4

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameters included C3 and C4. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  18. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - Hemolytic Complement Filtration (CH50)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameter- hemolytic complement filtration (CH50). Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  19. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in C Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameter- CRP. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  20. Part A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

    Vital signs were planned to be measured after 5 minutes of rest and taken in the same position throughout the study. Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and respiration rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for abnormal values (or clinically significant worsening from baseline) as determined by the Investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Week 76

  21. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate

    Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-baseline visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  22. Part A and B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

    Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76

  23. Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant partaking in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. AESIs included injection site reactions, systemic injection reactions (e.g., hypersensitivity, systemic inflammatory response), and infection.

    Time frame: Up to Week 80

  24. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing - 12 (MMT-12) Score at Week 76

    Manual Muscle Testing - 12 assessed the muscle strength across the muscle groups that included neck flexion and both right and left shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, elbow extension, wrist extension, wrist flexion, flexor pollicis longus, hip flexors, hip abduction, hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Scores were calculated by summing the outcomes, with the Investigator providing the score, on a scale of 0 (no contraction) to 5 (normal strength), which is then converted by a standard procedure to a Kendall score equivalent on a scale of 0 to 10. Individual scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 60. A higher score reflects better muscle strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

  25. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Hand Grip Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76

    Grip strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer which provided a precise measurement of the force that a muscle can exert and reflects muscle strength of the hand. Positive values indicated increased grip strength and negative values indicated decreased grip strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

  26. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Quadriceps Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76

    Quadriceps strength was measured using a dynamometer which provided the applied force of leg extension and reflects muscle strength of the dominant leg. Positive values indicated increased strength and negative values indicated decreased strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

  27. Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Timed Up and Go Test (mTUG) at Week 76

    The mTUG assessed functional mobility by measuring the time required for a participant to rise from a standard armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down (assistive devices permitted after standing, but no support from a caregiver, or a wall). Negative values indicated faster performance and positive values indicated slower performance. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76

07

Results

Posted Oct 1, 2026

Participant flow

A total of 272 participants were enrolled from multiple sites in United States, Canada, UK, Europe, and Australia.

Part A (Sentinel/DB Cohort,Upto Week 72)
Participant flow — Part A (Sentinel/DB Cohort,Upto Week 72)
MilestonePart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up
Started917170000
Completed917170000
Not completed0000000
Part B (DB Treatment,Week 20 to Week 72)
Participant flow — Part B (DB Treatment,Week 20 to Week 72)
MilestonePart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up
Started0007775770
Completed0007173750
Not completed0006220
Withdrew: Adverse event0002100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0002010
Withdrew: Death0001010
Withdrew: Other0001100
Part C (PD Recovery and Safety FollowUp)
Participant flow — Part C (PD Recovery and Safety FollowUp)
MilestonePart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up
Started0000004
Completed0000000
Not completed0000004
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0000004

Outcome measures

PrimaryPart A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.

Time frame:
Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)81717
PrimaryPart A: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL)); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).

Time frame:
Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Mild (Grade 1)234
Moderate (Grade 2)41010
Severe (Grade 3)243
Life-threatening (Grade 4)000
Death (Grade 5)000
PrimaryPart A: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.

Time frame:
Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug31513
PrimaryPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) Total Score at Week 76

The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) Total Score at Week 76
score on a scalePart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS) Total Score at Week 76-2.7 (-4.8 to -0.7)-2.4 (-3.9 to -0.9)-2.2 (-3.7 to -0.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Part A: Placebo vs Part A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kg · Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) · p = 0.7805 · Least square mean difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -2.2 to 2.9
  • Part A: Placebo vs Part A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg · Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) · p = 0.6767 · Least square mean difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -2.0 to 3.0
PrimaryPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs
ParticipantsPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs767574
PrimaryPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and was graded by severity per protocol-specified CTCAE criteria: Grade 1, Mild (asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated); Grade 2, Moderate (minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limited age-appropriate instrumental ADL); Grade 3, Severe or medically significant (medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care ADL); Grade 4, Life-threatening (threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated); and Grade 5, Death (death related to an AE).

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs by Severity
ParticipantsPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Mild (Grade 1)203216
Moderate (Grade 2)403341
Severe (Grade 3)131016
Life-threatening (Grade 4)100
Death (Grade 5)201
PrimaryPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant participating in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug. An AE with missing relationship to study drug was considered as related to study drug.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug
ParticipantsPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Study Drug283951
PrimaryPart B: Mean Change From Baseline in the IBMFRS Total Score at Week 76

The IBMFRS was used as an ordinal rating scale to determine participant's assessments of their capabilities. It included 10 measures (swallowing, handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils, fine motor tasks, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed and adjusting covers, changing position from sitting to standing, walking, and climbing stairs) graded on a Likert scale (a psychometric tool) from 0 (being unable to perform) to 4 (normal). The sum of the 10 items provided a value between 0 and 40, with a higher score representing less functional limitation or better functional status. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in the IBMFRS Total Score at Week 76
score on a scalePart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part B: Mean Change From Baseline in the IBMFRS Total Score at Week 76-2.4 (-3.1 to -1.8)-1.6 (-2.2 to -0.9)-2.0 (-2.6 to -1.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Part B: Placebo vs Part B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kg · Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM · p = 0.0644 · Least square mean difference: 0.9 · 95% CI -0.1 to 1.8
  • Part B: Placebo vs Part B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg · Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) · p = 0.4063 · Least square mean difference: 0.4 · 95% CI -0.5 to 1.3
PrimaryPart C: Time to PD Recovery

Recovery was defined as the return of KLRG1+ cell counts toward baseline levels during the PD follow-up period.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Median · hours
Part C: Time to PD Recovery
hoursPart C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up
Part C: Time to PD RecoveryNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPart A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

A TESAE was defined as a serious AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug and met seriousness criteria per protocol (including death, life-threatening event, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or other medically important event).

Time frame:
Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)2231669
SecondaryPart A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs With Onset Within 24 Hours From the Start of Any Study Medication Administration

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug, with onset assessed within 24 hours following the dosing.

Time frame:
Within 24 hours following each dose, Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs With Onset Within 24 Hours From the Start of Any Study Medication Administration
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs With Onset Within 24 Hours From the Start of Any Study Medication Administration21012213645
SecondaryPart A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation

A TEAE was defined as an AE that first occurred or worsened after initiation of study drug that led to discontinuation of study.

Time frame:
Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Study Discontinuation000200
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Absolute Neutrophil Count, Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, and Platelets
10^9 cells per literPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Absolute Neutrophil Count-0.030 ± 1.7759-0.995 ± 1.9932-0.432 ± 0.8482-0.255 ± 1.0776-0.537 ± 1.5477-0.753 ± 1.3915
Basophils-0.002 ± 0.0307-0.010 ± 0.0326-0.005 ± 0.0200-0.005 ± 0.0242-0.010 ± 0.0324-0.010 ± 0.0301
Eosinophils0.073 ± 0.1119-0.082 ± 0.0888-0.068 ± 0.1037-0.002 ± 0.1153-0.041 ± 0.0872-0.067 ± 0.1131
Leukocytes0.11 ± 2.165-1.59 ± 2.187-0.91 ± 1.179-0.42 ± 1.157-1.03 ± 1.647-1.48 ± 1.603
Lymphocytes0.067 ± 0.3163-0.454 ± 0.5320-0.453 ± 0.4102-0.083 ± 0.3666-0.410 ± 0.4602-0.611 ± 0.5058
Monocytes0.000 ± 0.1928-0.049 ± 0.16470.040 ± 0.0929-0.067 ± 0.1582-0.026 ± 0.1258-0.047 ± 0.1680
Neutrophils-0.030 ± 1.7759-0.995 ± 1.9932-0.432 ± 0.8482-0.251 ± 1.0784-0.540 ± 1.5367-0.753 ± 1.3915
Platelets4.7 ± 26.35-14.4 ± 40.46-7.2 ± 18.35-5.2 ± 31.09-16.1 ± 36.35-15.9 ± 33.30
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocytes

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocytes. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells per liter
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocytes
10^12 cells per literPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocytes0.07 ± 0.421-0.04 ± 0.245-0.06 ± 0.213-0.02 ± 0.2610.05 ± 0.2910.00 ± 0.245
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · gram per liter (g/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration
gram per liter (g/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Hemoglobin2.1 ± 10.43-2.3 ± 7.11-1.4 ± 6.16-1.4 ± 8.001.1 ± 10.960.4 ± 6.34
Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration-6.2 ± 10.49-4.9 ± 7.420.9 ± 3.48-0.6 ± 8.43-1.4 ± 8.102.5 ± 7.78
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: Hemoglobin and Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · picograms per cell
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
picograms per cellPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin0.1 ± 0.93-0.1 ± 0.990.2 ± 0.66-0.2 ± 0.86-0.1 ± 1.310.2 ± 1.03
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · femtoliter (fL)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume
femtoliter (fL)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume1.9 ± 4.080.6 ± 2.690.4 ± 1.67-0.3 ± 2.430.2 ± 3.10-0.1 ± 2.81
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter Hematocrit. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · percent by volume [%(v/v)]
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hematocrit
percent by volume [%(v/v)]Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters - Hematocrit0.017 ± 0.0361-0.001 ± 0.0237-0.004 ± 0.0213-0.003 ± 0.02580.005 ± 0.0318-0.002 ± 0.0217
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aldolase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: ALT, Aldolase, AST, GGT and Lactate Dehydrogenase. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · units per liter (U/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aldolase, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
units per liter (U/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
ALT-7.7 ± 9.12-12.8 ± 10.60-4.1 ± 7.79-5.7 ± 11.55-1.2 ± 12.40-4.0 ± 11.29
Aldolase-1.06 ± 2.130-1.89 ± 2.159-1.82 ± 2.455-1.17 ± 2.237-0.26 ± 2.115-0.88 ± 2.989
GGT-2.9 ± 16.86-2.6 ± 11.52-2.2 ± 10.820.7 ± 19.761.7 ± 27.412.9 ± 22.16
Lactate Dehydrogenase-36.7 ± 24.85-17.3 ± 38.47-20.6 ± 32.82-12.7 ± 47.090.6 ± 35.86-11.1 ± 54.65
AST-7.6 ± 7.23-8.6 ± 8.17-2.9 ± 7.12-4.6 ± 11.27-0.4 ± 9.67-2.4 ± 8.68
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Albumin and Protein

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Albumin and Protein. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · gram per litre (g/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Albumin and Protein
gram per litre (g/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Albumin-0.9 ± 2.09-0.5 ± 2.43-0.5 ± 2.400.1 ± 2.270.4 ± 2.400.8 ± 1.88
Protein-0.3 ± 3.321.4 ± 3.770.8 ± 3.15-0.5 ± 3.850.2 ± 3.860.8 ± 3.41
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alkaline Phosphatase and Creatine Kinase (CK)

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters Alkaline Phosphatase and CK. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · International units per liter (IU/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Alkaline Phosphatase and Creatine Kinase (CK)
International units per liter (IU/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Alkaline Phosphatase-1.7 ± 11.212.4 ± 12.630.7 ± 9.250.8 ± 17.561.1 ± 13.951.8 ± 12.38
CK-76.9 ± 128.55-192.6 ± 205.91-140.2 ± 189.53-89.6 ± 190.75-69.9 ± 179.03-134.1 ± 271.63
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, and Urea. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bicarbonate, Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium and Urea
millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Bicarbonate-2.6 ± 2.01-1.6 ± 3.50-1.3 ± 1.88-1.5 ± 2.53-1.5 ± 2.17-1.9 ± 2.25
Calcium-0.047 ± 0.1092-0.058 ± 0.0948-0.008 ± 0.0748-0.048 ± 0.0813-0.024 ± 0.1016-0.022 ± 0.0749
Chloride-0.9 ± 3.22-1.0 ± 3.46-0.5 ± 1.94-0.5 ± 3.050.0 ± 2.41-0.5 ± 2.82
Glucose0.14 ± 1.2010.15 ± 1.236-0.59 ± 1.620-0.09 ± 1.394-0.28 ± 1.420-0.14 ± 1.222
Potassium-0.03 ± 0.418-0.19 ± 0.4350.04 ± 0.4110.00 ± 0.347-0.12 ± 0.463-0.08 ± 0.346
Sodium-1.1 ± 1.83-1.1 ± 4.02-0.4 ± 2.42-1.1 ± 2.75-0.1 ± 2.26-0.3 ± 2.86
Urea0.817 ± 1.6766-0.680 ± 1.6260-0.024 ± 0.9662-0.077 ± 1.78050.001 ± 1.60920.198 ± 1.4200
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameters: Bilirubin, Creatinine, and Urate. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · micromoles per liter (umol/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Blood Chemistry Parameters - Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate
micromoles per liter (umol/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Bilirubin-0.7 ± 2.29-0.4 ± 3.26-0.6 ± 2.55-0.2 ± 2.67-0.1 ± 2.820.4 ± 4.30
Creatinine-8.0 ± 3.00-8.9 ± 8.00-8.5 ± 4.45-6.3 ± 10.77-6.4 ± 6.20-5.8 ± 8.09
Urate-34.3 ± 66.95-32.5 ± 67.70-11.1 ± 50.37-19.9 ± 68.33-6.3 ± 45.681.4 ± 68.00
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter - pH

Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameter: pH. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · potential of Hydrogen
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter - pH
potential of HydrogenPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter - pH-0.06 ± 1.102-0.03 ± 0.892-0.03 ± 0.6240.14 ± 0.8990.26 ± 0.8880.07 ± 0.794
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter- Specific Gravity

Urine samples were collected for the analysis of Urinalysis parameters- specific gravity. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio of urine density to water density
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter- Specific Gravity
Ratio of urine density to water densityPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Urinalysis Parameter- Specific Gravity-0.0021 ± 0.01129-0.0010 ± 0.007450.0014 ± 0.007270.0002 ± 0.00711-0.0002 ± 0.00542-0.0007 ± 0.00540
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - C3 and C4

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameters included C3 and C4. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · milligram per liter (mg/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - C3 and C4
milligram per liter (mg/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Complement C348.6 ± 263.59136.7 ± 288.89142.1 ± 328.6929.2 ± 123.3326.1 ± 146.3442.4 ± 210.70
Complement C421.6 ± 47.6528.4 ± 64.4638.6 ± 96.91-2.1 ± 29.74-0.4 ± 30.40-1.7 ± 34.41
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - Hemolytic Complement Filtration (CH50)

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of complement parameter- hemolytic complement filtration (CH50). Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · units per milliliter (U/mL)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - Hemolytic Complement Filtration (CH50)
units per milliliter (U/mL)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Complement Parameters - Hemolytic Complement Filtration (CH50)0.0 ± 0.50-0.3 ± 3.31-0.3 ± 3.600.9 ± 7.41-0.6 ± 1.660.1 ± 1.80
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in C Reactive Protein (CRP)

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of blood chemistry parameter- CRP. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · milligram per liter (mg/L)
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in C Reactive Protein (CRP)
milligram per liter (mg/L)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in C Reactive Protein (CRP)-1.8 ± 7.33-2.7 ± 5.740.3 ± 2.311.0 ± 10.38-0.2 ± 3.230.6 ± 10.00
SecondaryPart A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

Vital signs were planned to be measured after 5 minutes of rest and taken in the same position throughout the study. Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and respiration rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for abnormal values (or clinically significant worsening from baseline) as determined by the Investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Week 76
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs000000
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate

Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-baseline visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · beats/min
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate
beats/minPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate0.3 ± 13.711.0 ± 7.14-0.6 ± 6.48-1.6 ± 9.08-2.4 ± 7.66-0.6 ± 11.38
SecondaryPart A and B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval

Triplicate 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position for at least 5 minutes. Changes in ECG parameters were defined according to protocol-specified criteria for change from baseline values as determined by the Investigator. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 76
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Part A and B: Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters: PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval and Interval Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Interval
millisecondsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
PR Interval-0.9 ± 12.403.8 ± 11.481.9 ± 13.460.7 ± 10.883.6 ± 13.612.7 ± 11.94
QRS Duration-0.5 ± 5.161.4 ± 5.851.2 ± 11.23-0.5 ± 7.361.3 ± 7.97-0.4 ± 5.24
QT Interval-3.5 ± 32.13-1.0 ± 17.802.7 ± 14.42-0.5 ± 22.533.8 ± 20.822.3 ± 26.81
QTcF Interval-5.5 ± 16.191.3 ± 13.982.1 ± 13.24-3.7 ± 12.26-1.4 ± 11.930.7 ± 12.22
SecondaryPart A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in any participant partaking in a clinical investigation, regardless of the suspected cause. An AE was therefore can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, concurrent illness, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding that emerged or worsened during the study. AESIs included injection site reactions, systemic injection reactions (e.g., hypersensitivity, systemic inflammatory response), and infection.

Time frame:
Up to Week 80
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
ParticipantsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)61515515563
SecondaryPart A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing - 12 (MMT-12) Score at Week 76

Manual Muscle Testing - 12 assessed the muscle strength across the muscle groups that included neck flexion and both right and left shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, elbow extension, wrist extension, wrist flexion, flexor pollicis longus, hip flexors, hip abduction, hip extension, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. Scores were calculated by summing the outcomes, with the Investigator providing the score, on a scale of 0 (no contraction) to 5 (normal strength), which is then converted by a standard procedure to a Kendall score equivalent on a scale of 0 to 10. Individual scores are summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 60. A higher score reflects better muscle strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing - 12 (MMT-12) Score at Week 76
score on a scalePart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Manual Muscle Testing - 12 (MMT-12) Score at Week 76-3.6 (-14.6 to 7.4)-1.7 (-9.8 to 6.5)-5.9 (-14.0 to 2.3)-7.9 (-11.7 to -4.1)-3.6 (-7.4 to 0.3)-7.1 (-10.9 to -3.3)
SecondaryPart A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Hand Grip Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76

Grip strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer which provided a precise measurement of the force that a muscle can exert and reflects muscle strength of the hand. Positive values indicated increased grip strength and negative values indicated decreased grip strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kilograms
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Hand Grip Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76
kilogramsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Hand Grip Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 760.6 (-2.1 to 3.2)0.1 (-1.9 to 2.0)-1.9 (-3.9 to 0.0)-1.2 (-1.9 to -0.6)-0.6 (-1.3 to 0.1)-0.8 (-1.4 to -0.1)
SecondaryPart A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Quadriceps Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76

Quadriceps strength was measured using a dynamometer which provided the applied force of leg extension and reflects muscle strength of the dominant leg. Positive values indicated increased strength and negative values indicated decreased strength. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kilograms
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Quadriceps Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 76
kilogramsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in the Quadriceps Strength Score by Dynamometry at Week 761.2 (-1.7 to 4.1)1.0 (-1.2 to 3.3)0.9 (-1.3 to 3.1)-1.5 (-2.5 to -0.5)-0.6 (-1.6 to 0.4)-1.6 (-2.6 to -0.6)
SecondaryPart A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Timed Up and Go Test (mTUG) at Week 76

The mTUG assessed functional mobility by measuring the time required for a participant to rise from a standard armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down (assistive devices permitted after standing, but no support from a caregiver, or a wall). Negative values indicated faster performance and positive values indicated slower performance. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing valid value prior to first administration of study treatment (on Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the data collected at post-randomization visits minus the Baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 76
Reported as:
Least squares mean · seconds
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Timed Up and Go Test (mTUG) at Week 76
secondsPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg
Part A and B: Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Timed Up and Go Test (mTUG) at Week 763.5 (-7.2 to 14.2)6.9 (-1.7 to 15.6)4.4 (-4.1 to 13.0)4.4 (-0.6 to 9.4)7.1 (1.8 to 12.4)6.3 (0.4 to 12.2)

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 through Week 80. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part A: Placebo0/9 (0%)2/9 (22.2%)8/9 (88.9%)
Part A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kg0/17 (0%)2/17 (11.8%)17/17 (100%)
Part A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg0/17 (0%)3/17 (17.6%)17/17 (100%)
Part B: Placebo2/77 (2.6%)16/77 (20.8%)76/77 (98.7%)
Part B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kg0/75 (0%)6/75 (8%)75/75 (100%)
Part B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kg1/77 (1.3%)9/77 (11.7%)74/77 (96.1%)
Part C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 57
Most frequent serious events
EventPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/90/172/170/770/750/770/4
Appendicitis perforatedInfections and infestations1/90/170/170/770/750/770/4
Pneumonia aspirationInfections and infestations1/90/170/172/770/751/770/4
OsteomyelitisInfections and infestations0/90/171/170/770/750/770/4
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/91/170/170/770/750/770/4
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders0/91/170/170/770/750/770/4
Bile duct stoneHepatobiliary disorders0/91/170/170/770/750/770/4
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/90/170/170/772/750/770/4
Ankle fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/90/170/172/771/750/770/4
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/90/170/172/770/750/770/4
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 163
Most frequent other events
EventPart A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart C: PD Recovery and Safety Follow-Up
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/99/1710/1740/7739/7542/771/4
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/98/176/179/7719/7516/770/4
COVID-19Infections and infestations1/96/175/178/779/7511/770/4
ChillsGeneral disorders0/93/175/173/7718/7525/770/4
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/95/174/1718/7715/7515/770/4
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/91/172/1711/7713/7512/771/4
Skin abrasionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/90/171/1711/774/759/771/4
Limb injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/90/170/172/773/754/771/4
Bone contusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/90/170/171/770/752/771/4
Joint injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/90/170/170/771/751/771/4

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set comprised of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgTotal
Mean68.6 ± 10.4865.2 ± 7.0468.6 ± 6.3268.5 ± 7.3168.5 ± 6.8367.7 ± 9.1768.1 ± 7.78
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgTotal
Female44622272386
Male51311554854186
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgTotal
Asian0002215
Black or African American0111227
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000011
White91615647069243
Multiple0001023
Other0011002
Unknown0002002
Missing0006129
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Part A: PlaceboPart A: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart A: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgPart B: PlaceboPart B: Ulviprubart 0.5 mg/kgPart B: Ulviprubart 2.0 mg/kgTotal
Hispanic or Latino0011125
Not Hispanic or Latino91716727371258
Unknown0000101
Not Reported0004048
08

Study locations

45 sites
  • Neuromuscular Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • University of California Irvine Medical Center (UCIMC) - Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Neuromuscular Center
    Irvine, California 92868, United States
  • Keck Hosptial of USC
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Stanford Neuroscience Medical Center
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Outpatient Pavillion
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Yale School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Department of Neurology (Clinic)
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Neuromuscular Diagnostic Center - Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Brigham and Womens Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 021158, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 98198, United States
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center / The Neurological Institute of New York
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Duke Neurological Disorders Clinic -1L
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Wake Forrest School of Medicine
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • UPMC Arthritis and Autoimmunity Center, Falk Clinic
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Austin Neuromuscular Center
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Texas Neurology
    Dallas, Texas 75206, United States
  • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Henrico, Virginia 23233, United States
  • University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
    Saint Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
    Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
  • Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science
    Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
  • AZ Sint-Lucas & Volkskliniek
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
  • Heritage Medical Research Clinic - University of Calgary
    Calgary, Alberta 3M 1M4, Canada
  • Genge Partners Inc.
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3T2, Canada
  • Hospital Pitie-Salpetriere - AP-HP
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Krankenhaus und Poliklinik Rüdersdorf GmbH
    Berlin, 15562, Germany
  • University Hosptial Duesseldorf
    Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN)
    London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
  • Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
    Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 1, 2025
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 13, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Oct 1, 2026
Also revised
primary outcomes
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Results posted
    Primary outcomes Revised (11 changes)
    + 4 other changes: verification date, secondary outcomes, index terms and documents

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05721573
Lead sponsor
Abcuro, Inc.
Collaborators
Syneos Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2023
Start date
Feb 28, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2025
Completion
Nov 27, 2025
Results posted
Oct 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion