ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05716945Updated Oct 6, 2025

The OPTIMISE Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp and Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension in Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy and Intraocular Pressure, sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center. Recruiting at 8 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
342
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale:

The cornea is the most transplanted tissue in the Netherlands, with more than 1,500 procedures performed each year. A minimally invasive technique called Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the preferred method in the past decade. The main advantage of DMEK over previous techniques is a low graft rejection rate (1-2% per year). Despite this, rejection prophylaxis after DMEK follows the same high potency regimen as previous techniques in the first year, and patients are burdened with indefinite immunosuppression. The current project, OPTIMISE, aims to establish an evidence-based, cost-effective regimen that effectively prevents rejection and minimizes side effects.

Corticosteroid eye drops are the mainstay of ocular immunomodulatory therapy. Their main side effect is a steroid-induced increase in intraocular pressure (IOP). It manifests in about one-fourth of patients within the first year after surgery and can lead to irreversible optic nerve damage and vision loss. Patients with IOP elevation require additional medications and hospital visits resulting in reduced quality of life and increased costs. The optimal dosing regimen in the first year after DMEK and whether patients may safely stop steroids after one year remains unknown. As a result, protocols in the Netherlands vary considerably from surgeon to surgeon. Patients are potentially over-treated in the short and long-term, resulting in undue burden for the patient and increased costs. Consequently, the Dutch Ophthalmology Society (NOG) identified the optimal short- and long-term immunosuppressive protocol for corneal transplantation as one of its Top 10 knowledge gaps, underscoring relevance for clinical practice. With this work, the investigators expect to address this knowledge gap to the benefit of our patients and society.

Objective:

The OPTIMISE study aims to establish an evidence-based, cost-effective regimen that effectively prevents rejection and minimizes side effects. The hypothesis of this study is that Fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year and discontinuing medication in the second year is a cost-effective treatment strategy after DMEK.

Study design:

The design of this study is a randomized, controlled multicentre trial with a duration of 24 months.

Study population:

The study population will consist of 342 patients aged 21 years or older undergoing DMEK surgery in one eye.

Intervention:

All patients will receive Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Following this procedure, patients will be randomized into the following post-operative regime in two stages:

STEP-I (Year 1):

Control group: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month tapered off to once daily within 6 months and then once a day for 6 months.

Intervention group: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month followed by FML 0.1% 4 times a day for two months tapered off to once daily within four months and then once a day for 6 months.

STEP-II (Year 2):

Control Group: Half the patients in each study arm will use FML 0.1% daily. Intervention Group: Half the patients in each study arm will discontinue steroids.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary outcomes:

Step-I: IOP elevation compared to baseline Step-II: Endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the second year

Secondary outcomes are:

  • Rejection free graft survival.
  • Patient reported outcome measures.
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, including a short term trial-based economic evaluation (TBEE) and a life-long model-based economic evaluation (MBEE)
  • Structural outcomes including corneal, central macular and retinal nerve fibre layer thicknesses, and optic nerve head imaging.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy
  • Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy
  • Intraocular Pressure

Keywords

  • Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
  • Cornea
03

In context

Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 342 is above the median of 50 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy.

Browse Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

Maastricht University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 853 studies on the registry; 114 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Patients aged 21 years or older registered on the NOTR as candidates for DMEK corneal transplantation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to complete follow up or comply with study procedures
  • The participant is vulnerable
  • Previous corneal graft in the study eye
  • Known sensitivity or to the ingredients in the study medications
  • History of uveitis
  • History of any herpes simplex infection
  • Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typed allograft
  • Pregnancy (current and planned) or lactation
  • Use of other local or systemic drugs
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
342 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK)

    Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp · Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension

  • Active comparator
    Control STEP I (Year 1 after DMEK)

    Drug: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic suspension

  • Experimental
    Intervention STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK)

    Other: Stop steroids

  • Active comparator
    Control STEP II (Year 2 after DMEK)

    Drug: Fluorometholone 0.1% Oph Susp

Interventions

  • Year 1: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month followed by FML 0.1% 4 times a day for two months tapered off to once daily within four months and then once a day for 6 months. Year 2: Half the patients in each study arm will use FML 0.1% daily.

  • Year 1: DMS 0.1% 6 times a day for 1 month tapered off to once daily within 6 months and then once a day for 6 months.

  • OtherStop steroids

    Half the patients in each study arm will discontinue steroids.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference of intraocular pressure elevation between the two arms

    Time frame: Year 1

  2. Difference of endothelial cell loss (ECL) in the second year

    Time frame: Year 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference of rejection free graft survival between arms

    Time frame: 1-2 years

  2. Differences of patient reported outcome measures between groups

    Time frame: 1-2 years

  3. Differences of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, including a short term trial-based economic evaluation (TBEE) and a life-long model-based economic evaluation (MBEE)

    Time frame: 1-2 years

07

Study locations

6 of 8 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05716945
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2023
Start date
Jul 29, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Study contacts

Yexin Ye, MD
Contact
yexin.ye@mumc.nl
+31 43 387 5406

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Fluorometholone · Dexamethasone

Start the discussion