ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05712395NICEUpdated May 29, 2026

The Effects of a Novel, Non-ischemic and Pain-free Exercise Intervention in Peripheral Artery Disease

An interventional study of Exercise in Claudication and Peripheral Artery Disease, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a 3-month, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to address the efficacy of the Non-Ischemic Exercise (NICE) program to improve exercise and vascular outcome measures in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Read the detailed description

Specific Aims. The investigator proposes to test our central hypothesis that the NICE intervention performed without inducing leg ischemia and its' damaging sequela will be a superior exercise paradigm to increase peak walking time and HRQoL more than the Standard ischemic and painful exercise paradigm via greater improvement in microvascular mechanisms. This clinically relevant hypothesis will be tested through the following aims:

Aim 1 (Exercise Outcomes) To compare the changes in ambulation and HRQoL in PAD patients randomized to either the NICE slow walking program or to the Standard program of ischemic and painful exercise.

Aim 2a (Vascular Outcomes) To compare the changes in local microvascular function of the lower extremities, inflammation and oxidative stress in patients following the NICE program, and following the Standard ischemic and painful program.

Aim 2b (Exploratory Aim) To explore whether the changes in local microvascular function and systemic vascular biomarkers are associated with the changes in peak walking time following the NICE and Standard programs, and whether the association is stronger following the NICE program.

Methods. This is a 3-month, patient-oriented, translational, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial. One-hundred patients will be randomized into either the NICE program (N=50) or the Standard exercise program (N=50). All patients will perform supervised treadmill walking for 3 months. Patients randomized to the NICE program will walk intermittently at a slow speed of approximately 1.4 mph for only 2-3 minute bouts that do not elicit claudication pain. Patients randomized to the Standard program will walk intermittently at a speed of approximately two mph to near maximal claudication pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Claudication
  • Peripheral Artery Disease
03

In context

Intermittent Claudication

309 studies on the registry are indexed under Intermittent Claudication; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 74 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Intermittent Claudication.

Browse Intermittent Claudication studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 432 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. history of claudication assessed by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire,
  2. ambulatory leg pain in either one or both legs consistent with intermittent claudication confirmed during a screening graded treadmill test using the Gardner-Skinner protocol,
  3. an ABI \<= 0.90 at rest or > 20% decrease in ankle systolic blood pressure in either one or both legs immediately following the treadmill exercise test.
  4. age >= 40 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. absence of PAD (ABI > 0.90 at rest and ankle systolic blood pressure \< 20% decrease after exercise,
  2. inability to obtain an ABI measure due to non-compressible vessels (ABI > 1.40),
  3. asymptomatic PAD (Fontaine Stage I) determined from the medical history and verified during the graded treadmill test,
  4. rest pain due to PAD (Fontaine stage III)
  5. tissue loss due to PAD (Fontaine stage IV)
  6. use of medications indicated for the treatment of intermittent claudication (cilostazol and pentoxifylline) initiated within three months prior to investigation,
  7. peripheral revascularization within one month prior to investigation, or peripheral revascularization performed during the study,
  8. exercise tolerance limited by any disease process other than PAD,
  9. active cancer,
  10. kidney failure defined as stage 5 chronic kidney disease,
  11. a calf skin fold measurement > 25 mm, because of potential interference with the light path of the NIRS probe from penetrating the subcutaneous tissue,
  12. pulse arterial oxygen saturation of the index finger \< 95% because of potential deleterious effect on calf muscle StO2 from poor pulmonary gas exchange, and
  13. failure to complete the baseline run-in phase within three weeks.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Non-Ischemic Exercise (NICE) exercise program

    Patients will perform supervised treadmill walking for 3 months. Patients randomized to the NICE program will walk intermittently at a slow speed of approximately 1.4 mph for only 2-3 minute bouts that do not elicit claudication pain.

    Behavioral: Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Standard exercise program

    Patients will perform supervised treadmill walking for 3 months. Patients randomized to the Standard program will walk intermittently at a speed of approximately two mph to near maximal claudication pain.

    Behavioral: Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise

    Non-Ischemic Exercise (NICE), pain-free exercise program will be compared to the Standard painful exercise program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak Walking Time

    The change in peak walking time from the pre-test value to the post-test value (seconds)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Calf Muscle Oxygen Saturation

    The change in calf muscle oxygen saturation value during exercise from the pre-test value to the post-test value (% saturation)

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. 6-Minute Walk Distance

    The change in 6-minute walk distance from the pre-test value to the post-test value (meters)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. plasma C-Reactive Protein

    The change in plasma C-reactive protein from the pre-test value to the post-test value (mg/L)

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS, Scott KJ, Blevins SM. Efficacy of quantified home-based exercise and supervised exercise in patients with intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2011 Feb 8;123(5):491-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.963066. Epub 2011 Jan 24. PubMed 21262997 ↗
  • Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS, Blevins SM. Step-monitored home exercise improves ambulation, vascular function, and inflammation in symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Sep 18;3(5):e001107. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001107. PubMed 25237048 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2029, 58 months after the start.

Of 73 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Intermittent Claudication, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 77. This study's planned 58 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 84 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 77.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 25, 2023
First posted
Feb 3, 2023
StartActual
Sep 9, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2029
Last update
May 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05712395
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2023
Start date
Sep 9, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Andrew W. Gardner, Ph.D.
Contact
andrew-gardner@ouhsc.edu
405-271-4742
Andrew W. Gardner, Ph.D
principal investigator · Professor, Department of Medicine, Cardiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion