ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05710809SaVeUpdated Apr 6, 2025

The SaVe Project-Sarcopenia and Vertigo in Aging Patients With Colorectal Cancer

An interventional study of Targeted specialized physical group-based exercise and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessement in Colorectal Cancer, Oncologic Complications and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Recruiting at 2 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-06.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the cause of dizziness and decline in walking ability in in older adults ≥65 years during chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. Another goal is to investigate if a comprehensive geriatric assessment and three months' specialized physical group-based exercise three times/week can counteract muscle weakness, vertigo, instability, impaired walking balance, and neuropathy

Read the detailed description

Frequent adverse effects of chemotherapy in older adults are nausea and fatigue, but our research group have discovered a problem with many also suffering from sarcopenia, vertigo, dizziness, and peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) leading to balance and walking impairments causing increased risk of falls. Moreover, these symptoms are often underreported with inadequate awareness among health professionals leading to deficient focus on the need for targeted rehabilitation. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can increase the number of frail, older patients completing chemotherapy and CGA-based interventions can decrease chemotherapy toxicity and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Physical exercise has been shown to reduce muscle weakness, vertigo, dizziness, and impaired balance among older adults requiring limited resources. Therefore, this project aims to investigate the effectiveness of CGA and physical exercise to counteract muscle weakness, vertigo, instability, and impaired walking balance, during chemotherapy and to investigate the interaction between vertigo, postural stability and walking performance, and neuropathy and the prevalence of sarcopenia. The activities of specialized physical exercise planned in this intervention will, as hypothesized, result in a change in muscle strength, walking balance, self-perceived balance disabilities/dizziness, and fear of falling along with changes in peripheral nerve function and autonomic function and severity of CIPN which are the outcomes of this study. Accordingly, expectations are that this intervention will affect the HRQoL among older cancer patients with vertigo and walking impairments and reduce the number of falls and hospital admissions leading to a socioeconomic benefit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Oncologic Complications
  • Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
  • Vestibular Rehabilitation
  • Geriatric Oncology
  • Sarcopenia
  • Vertigo
  • Cancer
  • Rehabilitation
  • Exercise
  • Geriatric
  • Elderly
  • Frail
  • Older Adults
  • Chemotherapy
  • Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
  • Resistance Training
  • Balance Training
  • Postural Stability
  • Pragmatic Trial
  • Personal Medicine
  • Individualised
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 76 across 4,800 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet the criteria of the oncological departments of receiving , adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer
  • ≥65 years of age at the time of signing the form
  • Able to speak and read Danish, and to provide a signed informed consent form
  • Have an (ECOG) performance status score of ≤2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chemotherapy treatment within two years and sequelae of neuropathy, or symptoms of dizziness or vertigo, or balance disturbance
  • Severe physical disability that hinders physical exercise
  • Dementia, psychotic disorders, or other cognitive diseases or conditions that hinder participation in a clinical exercise-based trial
  • Inability to sign informed content
  • Patients who have had a consultation in the geriatric outpatient clinic within the past six months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Patients in the intervention groups will receive neoadjuvant, adjuvant or first line palliative chemotherapy (for metastatic disease). In addition, all patients will undergo three months' targeted specialized physical group-based exercise and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment with corresponding interventions

    Other: Targeted specialized physical group-based exercise and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessement

  • No intervention
    Usual care group

    Patients in the usual care groups will receive standard treatment with neoadjuvant, adjuvant or first line palliative chemotherapy (for metastatic disease). If the patients have other health complaints, these will, as current standard procedure, be treated by oncologist or by referral to general practitioner

Interventions

  • OtherTargeted specialized physical group-based exercise and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessement

    Vestibular rehabilitation, balance- and progressive resistance training for three months' three times/week and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessement including corresponding interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI)

    Between-group difference in change in walking balance assessed with Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) scored on a 0-24 point total scale. Higher score means better outcome

    Time frame: Three months

  2. 30 second Sit-to-Stand Test (30STS)

    Between-group difference in lower limb muscle strength and endurance

    Time frame: Three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Falls

    Self-reported falls

    Time frame: Baseline, two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve, fourteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty, twenty-two, and twenty-four weeks

  2. Hospital contacts due to falls

    Hospital contacts due to falls

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  3. Balance disabilities/dizziness

    Changes in self-perceived balance disabilities/dizziness using the patient reported outcome measure Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scored on a 0-100 point total scale. Higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  4. Fear of falling

    Changes in fear of falling using the patient reported outcome measure Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (Short FES-I) scored on a 0-28 point total scale. Higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  5. Health related quality of life

    Changes in health related quality of life using the patient reported outcome measure EORTC QLQ-C30. The total score is converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher score means better outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  6. Peripheral nerve function

    Changes in peripheral nerve function using biothesiometer mesured in 0-50 volts. Higher volts means worse outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  7. Autonomic function

    Changes in autonomic function using Vagus device

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  8. Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy

    Severity of chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy using the patient reported outcome measure EORTC QLQ-CIPN-20. The total score is converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  9. Muscle strength

    Changes in muscle strength using HUR Leg Press Rehab performance recorder measuring weight in kilograms

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  10. Body composition

    Changes in body composition using DXA

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  11. Muscle strength

    Changes in muscle strength using handgrip test measuring weight in kilograms

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

Other outcomes

  1. Walking speed

    Changes in walking speed using 10 meter walk test measuring gaitspeed in meters per second

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  2. Postural control

    Changes in postural control (standing balance) using HUR SmartBalance platform

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  3. Vestibular function

    Changes in peripheral vestibular function using Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT)

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  4. Orthostatic blood pressure

    Changes in orthostatic blood pressure measured from lying to standing and every minute for five minutes

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  5. Body composition

    Changes in body composition using bioimpedance (BIA)

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  6. Muscle quality

    Changes in muscle quality using ultrasound

    Time frame: Baseline and three months

  7. Frailty

    Presence of frailty using Geriatric-8 (G8) scored on a 0-17 point scale. Higher score means better outcome

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Frailty

    Presence of frailty using Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scored on a 1-9 point scale. Higher score means worse outcome

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Activity level

    Description of activity level using activity tracker

    Time frame: Baseline and three months

  10. Cessation of chemotherapy

    Description of cessation of chemotherapy

    Time frame: After 6, 12, and 24 weeks (from baseline)

  11. Prescribed rehabilitation plan

    Recording of exercise through a prescribed rehabilitation plan

    Time frame: Follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years

  12. Overall survival

    Recording of overall survival

    Time frame: Follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years

  13. Hospitalisations

    Recording of hospitalisations

    Time frame: Follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years

  14. Progression of cancer

    Recording of progression of cancer

    Time frame: Follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years

  15. Recurrence of cancer

    Recording of recurrence of cancer

    Time frame: Follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years

  16. Biomarkers of sarcopenia and inflammation

    Biomarkers of sarcopenia and inflammation collected through blood samples. To determine concentration of inflammatory cytokines; High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF- α), interleukin 6 (IL6), interleukin 13 (IL-13), and of muscle atrophy and muscle wasting (growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11), and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15). Blood samples are analysed by standard ELISA-analyses for plasma samples.

    Time frame: Baseline, three and six months

  17. Vision

    Measurement of vision using a Snellen chart

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — On reasonable request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 50 months after the start.

Of 898 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colorectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 50 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 955 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 16, 2023
First posted
Feb 2, 2023
StartActual
Feb 20, 2023
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Apr 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05710809
Collaborators
Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre Hospital
Responsible party
Jan Christensen (Senior researcher, Head of research, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2023
Start date
Feb 20, 2023
Primary completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 6, 2025

Study contacts

Katrine S Piper, PhD-Student
Contact
katrine.storm.piper@regionh.dk
+4551156140
Jan Christensen, PhD
Contact
jan.christensen.02@regionh.dk

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion