ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05703360Re:DriVRUpdated Dec 19, 2024

Effectiveness of AV-stimulation in Immersive VR to Improve Visual Perception and Driving Performance

An interventional study of Audiovisual Stimulation in Stroke, Visual Impairment and Low Vision, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 25 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-19.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an immersive virtual-reality (IVR) based stimulation program, in improving visual perception for people who have lost their driver's license due to perceptual or cognitive impairments.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Can the 6-week IVR stimulation program help improve driving performance?
  2. Will participants experience improvement in visual detection and perception after training?

Study Design Summary:

  • Participants will be randomized into a waitlist group or intervention-first group
  • The VR-based intervention will consist of training every 2 days for six weeks
  • Waitlist group will wait 6 weeks before starting intervention at study midpoint (week 7)
  • Intervention-first group will begin with intervention (week 1-6) and then stop intervention at study midpoint
  • Participants will complete tests related to driving performance, visual attention, and visual fields at the start of study, midpoint, and end of study

Researchers will analyze data for changes from baseline in outcome measures.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial will be an interventional, cross-over, single blind, randomized, supportive care, single-center study lasting 12 weeks with a target recruitment of 30 participants.

SCREENING AND BASELINE TESTS

Potential participants will be identified from patients receiving routine care at Toronto Western Hospital by their ophthalmologist. After obtaining informed consent and screened for inclusion, the research coordinator will set up appointments for each participant to complete baseline tests related to driving performance, visual attention, and visual fields. Participants will also practice the IVR program and be assessed for IVR sensitivity, or cybersickness, using the Virtual-Reality Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) questionnaire.

Participants will be randomized into a Waitlist group or Intervention-First group. The Intervention-First group will be given a head-mounted display (HMD) to take home for training.

INTERVENTION (Week 1 - 12)

Period 1 (Week 1-6):

  • Waitlist Group has no intervention
  • Intervention-First group trains at home every 2 days using HMD

All participants are booked for their second appointments to repeat baseline tests once Period 1 is complete. Intervention-first group will return their HMD to the researchers and Waitlist group will be given their HMD to take home.

Period 2 (Week 7-12)

  • Waitlist Group trains at home every 2 days using HMD
  • Intervention-First group has no intervention

All participants are booked for their third appointments to repeat baseline tests once Period 2 is complete. Waitlist group will return their HMD to researchers.

POST-INTERVENTION

Analysis of outcome measures:

  1. Period 1 (Waitlist Group vs Intervention-First Group)
  2. Waitlist Group (Period 1 vs Period 2)
  3. Intervention-First Group (Period 1 vs Period 2)
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Visual Impairment
  • Low Vision
  • Virtual Reality
  • Visual Spatial Processing
  • Visual Field Defect
  • Visual Processing Speed
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Driving Impaired
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,438 studies on the registry; 297 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female > 25 years old.
  • Visual field defects due to TBI or stroke
  • BCVA ≥ 20/50.
  • Previously held a valid driving license and were active drivers.
  • Ability to follow the visual and auditory stimuli and training instructions.
  • Online auditory test positive (-5dBHL to 60dBHL range) at 125 Hz (for research purposes only)
  • Home Wi-Fi access.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Both eyes with media opacity that impairs visual field testing.
  • Inability to perform during testing and training.
  • Cognitive/motor condition incompatible with driving simulator and/or VR.
  • Recreational or medicinal consumption of psychoactive drugs.
  • 3 consecutive VRISE scores \< 25 at inclusion.
  • History of vertigo or dizziness.
  • Visual neglect.
  • Prior/current vision rehabilitation interventions.
  • Photosensitive epilepsy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Waitlist Group

    Those randomly assigned to the waitlist group will complete initial inclusion tests and baseline tests at Visit 1. They will receive no intervention during Period 1 (week 1-6) and then repeat baseline tests at Visit 2. Next they will perform the VR audiovisual stimulation during Period 2 (week 7-12) and then repeat baseline tests post-intervention at Visit 3.

    Device: Audiovisual Stimulation

  • Experimental
    VR Intervention First

    Those randomly assigned to the intervention-first group will complete initial inclusion tests and baseline tests at Visit 1. They will perform the VR audiovisual stimulation during Period 1 (week 1-6) and then repeat baseline tests at Visit 2. They will receive no intervention during Period 2 (week 7-12) and then repeat baseline tests at Visit 3.

    Device: Audiovisual Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceAudiovisual Stimulation

    The device application involves the 3D multiple-object-tracking (3D-MOT) paradigm composed of 8 high-contrast spheres which are adapted to the visual ability of participant (luminosity and size). The initial speed of the spheres is adjustable and determined during the inclusion visit. One or more of the spheres is temporarily highlighted (target). Then all 8 spheres move for 20 seconds following random linear paths, bouncing on one another and on the walls of a virtual 3D cube when collisions occur. After 20 seconds, the movement stops and the participant is asked to select, using the hand controller, the initially highlighted target(s) among the 8 spheres. If the selection is correct the speed of the spheres in the next trial is increased. If the selection is incorrect the speed of the spheres in the next trial is decreased. Based on performance, stimulations will be adjusted to change difficulty level (e.g. changing backgrounds, number of cued balls, etc.)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in braking response (sec)

    Driving performance will be assessed at the DriverLab, a driving simulator located at KITE-UHN under the supervision of the research team members.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  2. Changes from baseline in collisions (total #)

    Driving performance will be assessed at the DriverLab, a driving simulator located at KITE-UHN under the supervision of the research team members.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  3. Changes from baseline in lane keeping (meters of deviations/departures)

    Driving performance will be assessed at the DriverLab, a driving simulator located at KITE-UHN under the supervision of the research team members.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  4. Changes from baseline in speed variability (km/h)

    Driving performance will be assessed at the DriverLab, a driving simulator located at KITE-UHN under the supervision of the research team members.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  5. Changes from baseline in road rule violations (# and type)

    Driving performance will be assessed at the DriverLab, a driving simulator located at KITE-UHN under the supervision of the research team members.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in visual attention and speed using Re:ViewD

    This vision test will be completed within the VR headset and will measure visual processing speed, sustained visual attention, and divided visual attention. This is a VR version of the Useful Field of View (UFoV) test which has been extensively used to measure visual attention in healthy individuals and older adults with low vision. Outcome measures are time of display (ms) for 75% of correct responses.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  2. Changes from baseline in visual fields

    Visual fields are evaluated with the automated Humphrey Field Analysis III using Esterman binocular field test procedure at Toronto Western Hospital. Outcome measures are number of points seen among 120 points.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  3. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)

    The SSQ will be administered after each driving session to capture any feelings related to simulator sickness. The SSQ is a validated 16-item questionnaire that assesses various symptom categories of simulator sickness. Responses are made on a 4-point scale ranging from "not at all" (total score = 0) to "severe" (total score =235.62). A total score (TS) ≥ 150 corresponds to mild to severe symptoms. Three subscales within the SSQ specifically targeting feelings of nausea (SSQ-N), oculomotor disturbances (SSQ-O), and disorientation (SSQ-D) as well as a total score (SSQ-TS) can be calculated based on pre-defined factor weightings.

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0), End of Period 1 (day 43), End of Period 2 (day 86)

  4. Virtual-Reality Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) - initial screening

    This questionnaire is made up of five (5) questions related to possible cybersickness symptoms and will be completed within the VR headset by using the hand controller. Participants will complete the VRISE immediately after being trained on how to use the VR intervention at the initial visit. The VRISE score ranges from 5 (very intense level of symptoms and effects) to 35 (very low level of symptom and effects).

    Time frame: Initial visit (day 0)

  5. Virtual-Reality Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) - intervention period

    This questionnaire is made up of five (5) questions related to possible cybersickness symptoms and will be completed within the VR headset by using the hand controller. Participants will complete the VRISE immediately after being trained on how to use the VR intervention at the initial visit. The VRISE score ranges from 5 (very intense level of symptoms and effects) to 35 (very low level of symptom and effects).

    Time frame: Every other day with training session (Weeks 1-6 for Intervention-First Group, Weeks 7-12 for Waitlist Group)

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Saredakis D, Szpak A, Birckhead B, Keage HAD, Rizzo A, Loetscher T. Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 31;14:96. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32300295 ↗
  • Richards E, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB. Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view. Vision Res. 2006 Nov;46(25):4217-31. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Oct 5. PubMed 17027061 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2025; primary completion for Dec 2025, 10 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2023
First posted
Jan 30, 2023
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Dec 19, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05703360
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 19, 2024

Study contacts

Danielle Tchao
Contact
danielle.tchao@uhn.com
647-408-9638
Lora Appel, PhD
Contact
lora.appel@uhn.ca
Michael Reber, PhD
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto
Lora Appel, PhD
principal investigator · York University
Jennifer Campos, PhD
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion