ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05700981CACODIUpdated Sep 11, 2023

Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Patients With Colonic Diverticulitis

An interventional study of colon capsule endoscopy in Diverticulitis, Colonic, sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-11.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2023), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Introduction: Follow-up after colonic diverticulitis is a common indication for colonoscopy, even though studies have shown a low risk of positive findings in this population. The objective is to investigate colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) as a follow-up examination in patients with colonic diverticulitis compared to colonoscopy, on patient satisfaction and clinical performance.

Methods and Analysis: The investigators will conduct a single centre prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients seen at Odense University Hospital with acute diverticulitis confirmed by CT will be included and randomized to either follow-up by colonoscopy or CCE. Detection of suspected cancer, more than two polyps or any number of polyps larger than 9mm in CCE will generate an invitation to a diagnostic colonoscopy for biopsies or polyp removal. The investigators will compare colonoscopy and CCE regarding patient satisfaction and tolerance, the number of complete examinations, the number of patients referred to a subsequent colonoscopy after CCE and the prevalence of diverticula, polyps, cancers and other abnormal findings.

Read the detailed description

Colon diverticulosis (CD) is extremely common and the prevalence seems to increase globally. The prevalence of CD increases with age and two-thirds of the adult population eventually develop CD. In the US the prevalence of CD was 32.6 % in patients aged 50-59 years and 71.4% in patients > 80 years of age. CD is often detected incidentally during optical colonoscopy (OC) or by computer tomography (CT). In approximately 25 % of patients with CD symptomatic colon diverticular disease develop typically comprising bloating, abdominal pain and change in bowel habits. Progression to diverticulitis is estimated to appear in approximately 1%. Most patients present with uncomplicated diverticulitis and are managed by general practitioners (GP) with the use of painkillers and oral antibiotics. Complicated diverticulitis due to perforation can be classified according to Hinchey et al. as a guidance to surgeon as to how conservative they can be. Hinchey level 1-2 can be managed conservatively. In the case of Hinchey level 3 and 4 it requires a laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage or laparotomy with colon resection and stoma formation, respectively. In patients presenting at the GP with intractable pain or signs of sepsis admission to hospital services is mandatory. Upon hospitalization, CT is the preferred diagnostic imaging modality in patients presenting with abdominal pain and suspected diverticulitis. If colonic diverticulitis is described as the symptoms-eliciting pathology without complications comprising abscess or bowel perforation patients are typically discharged from hospital with painkillers and offered an OC within 4-6 weeks, when the inflammation has resolved, to confirm the diverticulitis diagnosis. Routine OC after an episode of diverticulitis is recommended by the majority of international guidelines including Danish guidelines on handling of patients with diverticulitis. Due to a very low risk of malignancy in patients with diverticulitis the relevance of routine OC has been questioned in a recent review. The research in Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has evolved substantially since the introduction in 2006. More studies have reported a diagnostic yield equal to OC also in regard to larger polyps > 9 mm. In contrast to OC, CCE does not offer the possibility of biopsy or removal polyp. Hence, the ideal population for CCE needs to have low risk of findings with the need of endoscopic intervention. CCE is without pain and the risk of complications is extremely low compared to colonoscopy for which the estimated risk of major bleeding or perforation is 12 per 10,000 patients.

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of introducing CCE on patient satisfaction and discomfort compared to colonoscopy as a follow-up examination in patients with diverticulitis and the impact of introducing CCE on the need for subsequent colonoscopy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diverticulitis, Colonic

Keywords

  • colonic diverticulitis
  • capsule endoscopy
  • colonoscopy
03

In context

Diverticulitis, Colonic

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Diverticulitis, Colonic; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is below the median of 142 across 10 interventional studies indexed under Diverticulitis, Colonic.

Browse Diverticulitis, Colonic studies →

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 479 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients above the age of 18 with in-hospital CT-diagnosed diverticulitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent imaging of the colonic mucosa and therefore no indication for renewed endoscopy, evaluated by the attending physician.
  2. Colonic CT findings that require (suspected cancer) or polyp removal.
  3. CT-verified stenosis in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
  4. Cardiac pacemaker
  5. Renal insufficiency
  6. Pregnancy/breastfeeding
  7. Allergies towards active substances administered in the trial
  8. Unable to provide oral and written
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Colon capsule endoscopy

    Patients randomized to colon capsule endoscopy

    Diagnostic Test: colon capsule endoscopy

  • No intervention
    Colonoscopy

    Patients randomized to colonoscopy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testcolon capsule endoscopy

    Patient allocated for the intervention arm will have a CCE using the PillCam Colon 2 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Upon inclusion and allocation to the intervention arm patients are contacted by a dedicated CCE nurse. The course of the CCE procedure and preparations are explained thoroughly. In case of additional questions patients can contact the nurses by telephone during office hours (Monday-Friday, 8am-3pm). Before the CCE participants will have to undergo a bowel preparation procedure. The bowel preparation kit will be distributed by mail and is to be completed at home, beginning 72 hours before the CCE. The kit contains polyethylene glycol (PEG) sachets (Movicol, Norgine Danmark A/S, Herlev, Denmark), PEG solutions (MoviPrep, Norgine Danmark A/S, Herlev Denmark) and instructions on how to properly perform the preparation procedures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient discomfort and preference

    These patient-reported outcomes as well as an evaluation on patient preferences will be investigated using questionnaires

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Re-investigation rate

    The number of patients randomized to colon capsule endoscopy that need to undergo a subsequent colonoscopy due to neoplastic findings or incomplete examination

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Number of neoplastic lesions

    Neoplastic lesions detected by colon capsule endoscopy or colonoscopy

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Funen 5000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Relevant anonymized data are available upon reasonable request. Data requesters should do the following to obtain data: Email the corresponding author for the paper to request the relevant data.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: 1/1-2023 - 31/12-2023

Access criteria: Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 10 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2023
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
StartActual
Feb 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2023
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2024
Last update
Sep 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05700981
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2023

Study contacts

Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer, M.D., PhD
principal investigator · Odense University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion