CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05699226Updated Jan 26, 2026

Amplitude Titration to Improve ECT Clinical Outcomes

An interventional study of Soterix Medical Incorporated 4x1 adapter and Traditional ECT device in Depression, ECT and Cognitive Change, sponsored by University of New Mexico. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-26.

Sponsored by University of New Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized controlled trial will compare hippocampal neuroplasticity, antidepressant, and cognitive outcomes between individualized amplitude and fixed 800 mA amplitude ECT in older depressed subjects (n = 25 per group, n = 50 total). Relative to fixed 800 mA ECT:

H1: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved RUL antidepressant outcome (IDS-C30 response rates and reduced BT electrode placement switch at V2).

H2: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved cognitive outcomes (DKEFS-Verbal Fluency

Read the detailed description

ECT dosing can be divided into three categories for the ECT responder: insufficient (no antidepressant response, no cognitive impairment), optimal (antidepressant response, no cognitive impairment), or excessive (antidepressant response, cognitive impairment). Traditional fixed amplitude ECT dosing with 800 mA adjusts pulse train duration and frequency based on seizure titration or demographic factors (age, sex). Fixed amplitude produces variable electric fields and ECT dosing secondary to individual neuroanatomic differences. Adjustments to pulse width, pulse train duration, and frequency do not improve the efficacy of insufficient dosing or mitigate the cognitive risk of excessive dosing. In contrast, individualized amplitude based on electric field modeling or amplitude seizure titration produces consistent electric fields and ECT dosing. Based on our results from the R61 investigation, individualized amplitude with right unilateral electrode placement has the potential to reliably achieve optimal dosing and will be tested with the R33 phase of the investigation.

Subjects will receive baseline imaging, clinical (primary outcome: clinician rated Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, IDS-C30), and neuropsychological assessment (primary outcome: Delis Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency, DKEFS) 24 to 48 hours prior to the first ECT session (V1). Subjects will receive their second assessment (V2) one day after the sixth ECT treatment and the final assessment (V3) one day after the ECT series. If the subject fails to demonstrate improvement at V2 (\< 25% reduction from baseline IDS-C30 total score, the primary antidepressant outcome), the subject will then receive bitemporal (BT) electrode placement for the remainder of the ECT series. The transition to BT will be a secondary antidepressant outcome. Subjects will be randomized to receive right unilateral (RUL) electrode placement with an individualized amplitude (n = 25) or traditional fixed 800 mA amplitude (n = 25, 1:1 ratio). Subjects and Raters will be blinded to subject assignment. Subjects in both arms will receive fixed pulse width (1.0 milliseconds), frequency (20 hertz), and pulse train duration (8 seconds).

For the individualized amplitude arm, subjects will receive RUL amplitude determined seizure titration during the first treatment like the R61 phase of the investigation (IDE for Soterix adapter: G200123). Subsequent RUL treatments will be completed with an individualized amplitude. To determine the individualized amplitude, we will use Ebrain. The individualized amplitude can be determined from the optimal E-field (V/m) / baseline E-field (V/m per mA). If a discrepancy exists between the amplitude seizure and E-field modeling methods that results in amplitude difference > 100 mA, we will use the E-field modeling method to determine the individualized amplitude. We will round the amplitude to the nearest 100 mA from 500 to 900 mA (the current dosing range of the FDA approved ECT device).

For the fixed 800 mA amplitude arm, subjects will receive RUL amplitude determined seizure titration during the first treatment. The rationale for amplitude titration with the fixed amplitude arm is to 1) improve the goodness of fit of the amplitude-seizure and Ebrain relationship; and 2) control for a sub-therapeutic stimulation associated with the first treatment for both arms. RUL amplitude seizure titration will be conducted during the first treatment like the individualized amplitude arm. Subsequent RUL treatments will be completed with 800 mA amplitude. The only difference between the arms will be individualized versus fixed 800 mA amplitude after amplitude titration.

A randomized controlled trial will compare hippocampal neuroplasticity, antidepressant, and cognitive outcomes between individualized amplitude and fixed 800 mA amplitude ECT in older depressed subjects (n = 25 per group, n = 50 total). Relative to fixed 800 mA ECT:

H1: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved RUL antidepressant outcome (IDS-C30 response rates and reduced BT electrode placement switch at V2).

H2: Individualized amplitude arm will have improved cognitive outcomes (DKEFS-Verbal Fluency

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • ECT
  • Cognitive Change

Browse trials for

03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of New Mexico is the lead sponsor of 306 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder or bipolar II
  • Clinical indications for ECT with right unilateral electrode placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Defined neurological or neurodegenerative disorder (e.g., traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease)
  • Other psychiatric conditions (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder)
  • Current drug or alcohol use disorder (except for nicotine)
  • Contraindications to MRI.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Variable amplitude

    Individualized amplitude

    Device: Soterix Medical Incorporated 4x1 adapter

  • Active comparator
    Fixed amplitude

    Fixed (800 milliamperes) amplitude

    Device: Traditional ECT device

Interventions

  • DeviceSoterix Medical Incorporated 4x1 adapter

    Device permits individualized amplitudes

  • DeviceTraditional ECT device

    FDA approved ECT device with fixed amplitude.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated

    Depression severity, scores from 0 to 84, higher scores indicate more depression severity

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Delis Kaplan Executive Function System Letter Fluency

    Cognitive measure, scale scores range from 0 to 20, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of New Mexico Health Science Center
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be uploaded to National Data Archive.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05699226
Lead sponsor
University of New Mexico
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Start date
Sep 14, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 26, 2026

Study contacts

Chris Abbott, MD
Contact
cabbott@salud.unm.edu
5052720406
Megan Lloyd, MS
Contact
meglloyd@salud.unm.edu
‭(505) 272-3507‬
Chris Abbott, MD
principal investigator · University of New Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion