CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05698368Updated Feb 13, 2025Results posted

Digital Knee Osteoarthritis Mindset Intervention

An interventional study of Mindset intervention and Active comparator in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-13.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
458
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of our clinical trial is to test if an online mindset intervention improves mindsets and physical activity levels more than an education intervention in individuals with knee osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

Osteoarthritis affects 7% of the global population and is a leading cause of disability globally. Physical activity improves health outcomes, weight management, and knee function for people with knee osteoarthritis and should be considered first-line treatment. Yet, physical activity levels in this population are low compared to those without knee osteoarthritis.

Existing knowledge: Emerging research has highlighted the powerful influence of mindsets about exercise on engagement in physical activity. Mindsets are core assumptions about a domain or category that orient individuals to a particular set of attributions, expectations, and goals (a "meaning system"). In individuals with knee osteoarthritis, mindsets about the appeal of physical activity relate to future physical activity levels and one's chosen symptom management strategy, and mindsets about osteoarthritis relate to knee symptoms.

The investigators developed a digital mindset intervention to improve mindsets about exercise and osteoarthritis in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. The investigators piloted the intervention on 21 individuals with knee osteoarthritis throughout the United States. Participants improved in exercise and osteoarthritis mindsets. However, this was a small sample size, a control group was not used, and it was cross-sectional, thus, not able to evaluate changes in physical activity and osteoarthritis symptoms.

Need for a trial: A digital, low-cost, and, thus, scalable intervention to improve mindsets about osteoarthritis and exercise may improve pain and function and physical activity levels for the millions of individuals affected with knee osteoarthritis. A large randomized trial is therefore needed to evaluate if our mindset intervention leads to improvements in physical activity levels and osteoarthritis symptoms and, further, if these changes are due to more adaptive mindsets about exercise and osteoarthritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Mindset
  • Physical Activity
  • Exercise
  • Psychology
  • Pain
  • Digital Health
  • Osteoarthritis
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 583 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 458 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 45 years of age
  • Self-reported doctor's diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis OR meets the National Institute for - - Health and Care Excellence osteoarthritis clinical criteria (activity-related knee pain and no knee morning stiffness lasting ≥ 30 minutes)
  • Knee pain for at least 3 months
  • Ability to walk unaided
  • Can read and write in English
  • Consistent internet access
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the study requirements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Past total knee arthroplasty or scheduled surgical procedure on any back or lower limb with osteoarthritis within the next 12 months
  • Recent serious injury (within the past 2 months) on the knee(s) with osteoarthritis
  • Any condition making it unsafe to participate in physical activity
  • Intra-articular therapy within the past 6 months (e.g. injections such as corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid)
  • Participates in physical exercise for 30 minutes or more 5 days per week
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
458 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active comparator group

    A series of educational videos and reflective questions of the same duration and required attention as the mindset intervention program. The videos are sourced videos from YouTube that educate about osteoarthritis. The content consists of information about osteoarthritis that patients would typically receive if looking for more information about the disease, including disease pathology, risks, symptoms, and treatment strategies. The included videos contain factual content with a similar format to the mindset intervention videos, including live experts sharing information with animations and supplementary b-roll footage.

    Other: Active comparator

  • Experimental
    Mindset intervention group

    Four modules, each with a series of videos and reflective questions. Each module takes approximately 20-60 minutes to complete, with a total of about two hours to complete the entire program. Participants have one week to complete the program at their own pace. Participants are suggested to complete one module per day but are encouraged to go at the pace that works best for them.

    Behavioral: Mindset intervention

  • No intervention
    Waitlist control group

    This group will take the same surveys as the other groups at the same time points but will not receive any additional content.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMindset intervention

    Participants receive a digital mindset intervention to improve mindsets about osteoarthritis and exercise.

  • OtherActive comparator

    Participants receive a series of osteoarthritis education videos and reflective questions that matches the digital mindset intervention in duration and attention.

    Also known as: Educational content

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Knee pain scored from 0 - 10 (0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  2. Change From Baseline in Physical Activity Measured by Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly

    The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) asks respondents about the frequency of light, moderate, and strenuous work and leisure activities and is a validated measure of self-reported physical activity for individuals with osteoarthritis. The scale is scored from 0 (no physical activity) to 793 (very high physical activity).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  3. Change From Baseline in Mindset About the Process of Health - Physical Activity (MPH-Physical Activity) Scale

    The Process of Health Mindset -- Exercise measure is a one-factor scale developed and validated to assess mindset about the process of engaging in physical activity (e.g., physical activity is difficult/easy, unpleasant/pleasurable, boring/fun). The scale consists of 7 items scored from 1 to 4, with a higher score reflecting a more appeal-focused mindset about physical activity, and then averaged for a total score between 1 to 4.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)

  4. Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Mindset by the Illness Mindset Inventory

    The Illness Mindset Inventory measures three mindsets about the nature and meaning of illness: that it is a catastrophe, manageable, or an opportunity. The scale consists of 20 items measured on a 6-point scale and scored from 1 to 6, with 10 of those questions capturing mindsets about osteoarthritis. The extent to which a participant endorses a particular mindset can be obtained by calculating the mean score for each mindset. A higher score indicates greater agreement with the mindset. The investigators adapted the scale to focus on mindsets about "knee osteoarthritis" as opposed to "chronic disease." There are three subscales, Osteoarthritis is Castrophic, Osteoarthritis is Manageable, and Osteoarthritis is Opportunistic. The questions pertaining to each subscale are averaged for a total score from 1 to 6 for each subscale.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Knee Pain and Functioning by the Short Version of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (shortMAC)

    The short-version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (ShortMAC) is a disease-specific 12-item measure of knee pain, stiffness, and function. It has been validated and shown to be reliable in patients with knee osteoarthritis. It is measured on the Likert scale and can be divided into two subscales: pain and function. Pain subscore range, 0 (low pain) to 20 (high pain); Function subscore range, 0 (low difficulty) to 28 (high difficulty).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  2. Change From Baseline in Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge by the Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale

    The Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale is scored from 11-55 and measures knowledge about osteoarthritis in individuals with knee or hip osteoarthritis.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)

  3. Change From Baseline in Perceived Need for Surgery by a Surgery Perception Question

    Perceived need for surgery will be assessed by the single question, "How likely do you think you are of needing knee replacement surgery in the future?" It is answered on the Likert scale from 1 (very unlikely) to 5 (very likely). All items are averaged together for a final score between 1 to 5.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  4. Change From Baseline in Symptom Management Strategy by an Osteoarthritis Symptom Management Question. The Variable is Reported as a % of Participants Who Reported Using the Symptom Management Strategy.

    Chosen symptom management strategy(ies) will be assessed by the single question, "Which of the following are ways in which you manage and/or improve your osteoarthritis symptoms? Please select all that apply." It is answer via multiple choice with multiple selection option. The options available are the most common strategies as determined by previous studies with an additional option for fill in. The reported value is the percentage of participants that selected the management strategy as a strategy they implement.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  5. Change From Baseline in Fear of Movement by the Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis

    The Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis is a 6-item scale validated to assess fear of movement in individuals with osteoarthritis. All items are averaged for a final score range of 1 (low fear) to 4 (high fear).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  6. Change From Baseline in Arthritis Self-efficacy: Pain and Other Symptoms by the Arthritis Self-efficacy Pain and Other Symptoms Subscales

    The Arthritis-Self Efficacy Scale is scored from a 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. The scale will be divided into the "pain" and "other symptoms" subscales. The items on each subscale are averaged for a final score from 1 to 10.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  7. Change From Baseline in Physical and Mental Health: Global Health: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 - Global Health (Physical and Mental Health Sub-scales)

    The PROMIS v.1.1 Global Health Short Form is a 10-item survey that measures overall physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health in healthy and clinical adult populations. It will be divided into two subscales: physical health and mental health. The Physical Health subscore ranges from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The Mental Health subscore ranges from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month

  8. Change From Baseline in Body Mindset by the Illness Mindset Inventory

    The Illness Mindset Inventory measures three mindsets about the nature of the body in the context of a chronic illness: that it is adversarial, responsive, or resilient. The scale consists of 20 items measured on a 6-point scale and scored from 1 to 6, with 10 of those questions capturing mindsets about the body. The extent to which a participant endorses a particular mindset can be obtained by calculating the mean score for each mindset. A higher score indicates greater agreement with the mindset. The investigators adapted the scale to focus on mindsets about "knee osteoarthritis" as opposed to "chronic disease." The three subscales are The Body is Adversarial, The Body is Capable, and the Body is Responsive. The items from each subscale are averaged for a final score between 1-6.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)

  9. Change From Baseline in Adequacy Mindset by the Adequacy of Activity Mindset Measure

    The Adequacy of Activity Mindset Measure is a scale developed to assess mindsets about the adequacy and benefits of ones' physical activity as it relates to health. The scale consists of 5 items measured on a 7-point scale and scored from 1 to 7, with a higher score reflecting a more adaptive mindset about the benefits and risks associated with current levels of physical activity. All items are averaged for a final score between 1 to 7.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)

07

Results

Posted Feb 13, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Started151152155
Completed130135143
Not completed211712

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Knee Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale

Knee pain scored from 0 - 10 (0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain)

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale
units on a scaleActive Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only Group
Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale-0.2 (-0.5 to 0.0)-0.5 (-0.8 to -0.1)-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.2)
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Physical Activity Measured by Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly

The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) asks respondents about the frequency of light, moderate, and strenuous work and leisure activities and is a validated measure of self-reported physical activity for individuals with osteoarthritis. The scale is scored from 0 (no physical activity) to 793 (very high physical activity).

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity Measured by Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
units on a scaleActive Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only Group
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity Measured by Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly32.6 (18.7 to 46.3)38.9 (24.3 to 53.6)10.3 (2.0 to 22.6)
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mindset About the Process of Health - Physical Activity (MPH-Physical Activity) Scale

The Process of Health Mindset -- Exercise measure is a one-factor scale developed and validated to assess mindset about the process of engaging in physical activity (e.g., physical activity is difficult/easy, unpleasant/pleasurable, boring/fun). The scale consists of 7 items scored from 1 to 4, with a higher score reflecting a more appeal-focused mindset about physical activity, and then averaged for a total score between 1 to 4.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mindset About the Process of Health - Physical Activity (MPH-Physical Activity) Scale
units on a scaleActive Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only Group
Change From Baseline in Mindset About the Process of Health - Physical Activity (MPH-Physical Activity) Scale0.3 (0.2 to 0.3)0.5 (0.4 to 0.6)0.1 (0.0 to 0.1)
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Mindset by the Illness Mindset Inventory

The Illness Mindset Inventory measures three mindsets about the nature and meaning of illness: that it is a catastrophe, manageable, or an opportunity. The scale consists of 20 items measured on a 6-point scale and scored from 1 to 6, with 10 of those questions capturing mindsets about osteoarthritis. The extent to which a participant endorses a particular mindset can be obtained by calculating the mean score for each mindset. A higher score indicates greater agreement with the mindset. The investigators adapted the scale to focus on mindsets about "knee osteoarthritis" as opposed to "chronic disease." There are three subscales, Osteoarthritis is Castrophic, Osteoarthritis is Manageable, and Osteoarthritis is Opportunistic. The questions pertaining to each subscale are averaged for a total score from 1 to 6 for each subscale.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Mindset by the Illness Mindset Inventory
units on a scaleActive Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only Group
Osteoarthritis is Catastrophic-0.5 (-0.6 to -0.3)-1.1 (-1.3 to -1.0)-0.2 (-0.3 to -0.1)
Osteoarthritis is Manageable0.7 (0.5 to 0.8)1.1 (0.9 to 1.2)0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)
Osteoarthritis is Opportunistic0.7 (0.6 to 0.8)1.1 (1.0 to 1.2)0.2 (0.0 to 0.3)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Knee Pain and Functioning by the Short Version of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (shortMAC)

The short-version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (ShortMAC) is a disease-specific 12-item measure of knee pain, stiffness, and function. It has been validated and shown to be reliable in patients with knee osteoarthritis. It is measured on the Likert scale and can be divided into two subscales: pain and function. Pain subscore range, 0 (low pain) to 20 (high pain); Function subscore range, 0 (low difficulty) to 28 (high difficulty).

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Knee Pain and Functioning by the Short Version of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (shortMAC)
score on a scaleActive Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupWaitlist Control Group
Pain-0.6 (-1.0 to -0.2)-0.8 (-1.2 to -0.4)-0.4 (-0.7 to 0.0)
Function-0.7 (-1.3 to -0.2)-1.0 (-1.5 to -0.4)-0.5 (-1.1 to 0.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge by the Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale

The Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale is scored from 11-55 and measures knowledge about osteoarthritis in individuals with knee or hip osteoarthritis.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge by the Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Change From Baseline in Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge by the Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale10.5 (9.4 to 11.6)3.1 (2.2 to 4.0)0.6 (-0.1 to 1.4)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Perceived Need for Surgery by a Surgery Perception Question

Perceived need for surgery will be assessed by the single question, "How likely do you think you are of needing knee replacement surgery in the future?" It is answered on the Likert scale from 1 (very unlikely) to 5 (very likely). All items are averaged together for a final score between 1 to 5.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Perceived Need for Surgery by a Surgery Perception Question
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Change From Baseline in Perceived Need for Surgery by a Surgery Perception Question-0.6 (-0.7 to -0.4)-0.2 (-0.4 to 0.0)0.0 (-0.2 to 0.1)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Symptom Management Strategy by an Osteoarthritis Symptom Management Question. The Variable is Reported as a % of Participants Who Reported Using the Symptom Management Strategy.

Chosen symptom management strategy(ies) will be assessed by the single question, "Which of the following are ways in which you manage and/or improve your osteoarthritis symptoms? Please select all that apply." It is answer via multiple choice with multiple selection option. The options available are the most common strategies as determined by previous studies with an additional option for fill in. The reported value is the percentage of participants that selected the management strategy as a strategy they implement.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Change From Baseline in Symptom Management Strategy by an Osteoarthritis Symptom Management Question. The Variable is Reported as a % of Participants Who Reported Using the Symptom Management Strategy.
percentageMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Pain medications-3.8 (-12.5 to 4.8)4.4 (-0.1 to 9.0)-9.1 (-16.1 to -2.1)
Injections-6.2 (-13.8 to 1.5)3.7 (-4.1 to 11.5)0.7 (-5.9 to 7.3)
Exercise20.8 (12.8 to 28.7)16.3 (7.2 to 25.3)6.3 (-1.5 to 14.1)
Supervised physical therapy-2.3 (-9.2 to 4.6)4.4 (-2.7 to 11.5)-2.8 (-10.3 to 4.7)
Rest-1.5 (-10.7 to 7.0)11.1 (3.2 to 19.0)-1.4 (-8.9 to 6.1)
Imposing physical limitations-19.2 (-28.3 to -10.1)5.2 (-4.3 to 14.7)-7.7 (-16.8 to 1.4)
Diet or weight management17.7 (8.2 to 27.0)14.8 (7.0 to 22.7)11.2 (3.1 to 19.2)
Self-soothing10.0 (1.0 to 19.0)0.7 (-8.6 to 10.1)-2.1 (-10.0 to 5.8)
Mindset7.7 (-1.5 to 16.9)-2.2 (-11.3 to 6.9)-6.3 (-14.8 to 2.2)
Nothing0.0 (-4.3 to 4.3)-0.7 (-5.1 to 3.6)-2.1 (-5.2 to 1.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fear of Movement by the Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis

The Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis is a 6-item scale validated to assess fear of movement in individuals with osteoarthritis. All items are averaged for a final score range of 1 (low fear) to 4 (high fear).

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Fear of Movement by the Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Change From Baseline in Fear of Movement by the Brief Fear of Movement Scale for Osteoarthritis-0.4 (-0.5 to -0.3)-0.2 (-0.7 to 0.5)0.0 (0.0 to 0.1)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Arthritis Self-efficacy: Pain and Other Symptoms by the Arthritis Self-efficacy Pain and Other Symptoms Subscales

The Arthritis-Self Efficacy Scale is scored from a 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. The scale will be divided into the "pain" and "other symptoms" subscales. The items on each subscale are averaged for a final score from 1 to 10.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Self-efficacy: Pain and Other Symptoms by the Arthritis Self-efficacy Pain and Other Symptoms Subscales
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Pain1.4 (1.1 to 1.7)0.6 (0.4 to 0.9)0.1 (0.0 to 0.5)
Other symptoms1.1 (0.9 to 1.4)0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)0.5 (0.3 to 0.8)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physical and Mental Health: Global Health: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 - Global Health (Physical and Mental Health Sub-scales)

The PROMIS v.1.1 Global Health Short Form is a 10-item survey that measures overall physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health in healthy and clinical adult populations. It will be divided into two subscales: physical health and mental health. The Physical Health subscore ranges from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The Mental Health subscore ranges from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physical and Mental Health: Global Health: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 - Global Health (Physical and Mental Health Sub-scales)
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Physical health0.2 (0.1 to 0.2)0.1 (0.0 to 0.2)0.0 (0.0 to 0.1)
Mental health0.1 (0.0 to 0.2)0.0 (-0.5 to 0.5)0.0 (-0.1 to 0.06)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Mindset by the Illness Mindset Inventory

The Illness Mindset Inventory measures three mindsets about the nature of the body in the context of a chronic illness: that it is adversarial, responsive, or resilient. The scale consists of 20 items measured on a 6-point scale and scored from 1 to 6, with 10 of those questions capturing mindsets about the body. The extent to which a participant endorses a particular mindset can be obtained by calculating the mean score for each mindset. A higher score indicates greater agreement with the mindset. The investigators adapted the scale to focus on mindsets about "knee osteoarthritis" as opposed to "chronic disease." The three subscales are The Body is Adversarial, The Body is Capable, and the Body is Responsive. The items from each subscale are averaged for a final score between 1-6.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Body Mindset by the Illness Mindset Inventory
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
The Body is Adversarial-0.6 (-0.8 to -0.5)-0.4 (-0.5 to -0.2)-0.1 (-0.1 to 0.0)
The Body is Capable1.3 (1.2 to 1.5)0.6 (0.4 to 0.7)0.2 (0.0 to 0.3)
The Body is Responsive0.7 (0.5 to 0.8)0.4 (0.3 to 0.5)0.2 (0.0 to 0.2)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Adequacy Mindset by the Adequacy of Activity Mindset Measure

The Adequacy of Activity Mindset Measure is a scale developed to assess mindsets about the adequacy and benefits of ones' physical activity as it relates to health. The scale consists of 5 items measured on a 7-point scale and scored from 1 to 7, with a higher score reflecting a more adaptive mindset about the benefits and risks associated with current levels of physical activity. All items are averaged for a final score between 1 to 7.

Time frame:
Change from Baseline at Post-intervention (immediately following intervention completion)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Adequacy Mindset by the Adequacy of Activity Mindset Measure
score on a scaleMindset Intervention GroupActive Comparator (Education) GroupNo-intervention (Survey-only) Control Group
Change From Baseline in Adequacy Mindset by the Adequacy of Activity Mindset Measure0.3 (0.1 to 0.5)0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)0.0 (-0.1 to 0.1)

Adverse events

Collected over 5 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active Comparator Group0/135 (0%)0/135 (0%)0/135 (0%)
Mindset Intervention Group0/130 (0%)0/130 (0%)0/130 (0%)
Survey-Only Group0/143 (0%)0/143 (0%)0/143 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only GroupTotal
Mean63.6 ± 9.264.1 ± 8.063.0 ± 9.063.5 ± 8.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only GroupTotal
Female817985245
Male545158163
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Active Comparator GroupMindset Intervention GroupSurvey-only GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaskan NativeAmerican Indian or Alaskan Native4239
Asian77216
Black or African-American64919
Hispanic or Latino221014
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander0000
White118118128364
Other3418
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Boswell MA, Evans KM, Zion SR, Boles DZ, Hicks JL, Delp SL, Crum AJ. Mindset is associated with future physical activity and management strategies in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Nov;65(6):101634. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101634. Epub 2022 Apr 28. PubMed 35091113 ↗
  • Hinman RS, Campbell PK, Lawford BJ, Briggs AM, Gale J, Bills C, Kasza J, Harris A, French SD, Bunker SJ, Forbes A, Bennell KL. Does telephone-delivered exercise advice and support by physiotherapists improve pain and/or function in people with knee osteoarthritis? Telecare randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;54(13):790-797. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101183. Epub 2019 Nov 20. PubMed 31748198 ↗
  • Crum AJ, Salovey P, Achor S. Rethinking stress: the role of mindsets in determining the stress response. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Apr;104(4):716-33. doi: 10.1037/a0031201. Epub 2013 Feb 25. PubMed 23437923 ↗
  • Gay C, Guiguet-Auclair C, Mourgues C, Gerbaud L, Coudeyre E. Physical activity level and association with behavioral factors in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jan;62(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 2. PubMed 30290283 ↗
  • Fransen M, McConnell S. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD004376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004376.pub2. PubMed 18843657 ↗
  • Marks R. Knee osteoarthritis and exercise adherence: a review. Curr Aging Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):72-83. doi: 10.2174/1874609811205010072. PubMed 21762086 ↗
  • Hunter DJ, March L, Chew M. Osteoarthritis in 2020 and beyond: a Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020 Nov 28;396(10264):1711-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32230-3. Epub 2020 Nov 4. No abstract available. PubMed 33159851 ↗
  • Stanton TR, Karran EL, Butler DS, Hull MJ, Schwetlik SN, Braithwaite FA, Jones HG, Moseley GL, Hill CL, Tomkins-Lane C, Maher C, Bennell K. A pain science education and walking program to increase physical activity in people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a feasibility study. Pain Rep. 2020 Sep 24;5(5):e830. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000830. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct. PubMed 33490835 ↗
  • Thorstensson CA, Garellick G, Rystedt H, Dahlberg LE. Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis: Development and Nationwide Implementation of an Evidence-Based Supported Osteoarthritis Self-Management Programme. Musculoskeletal Care. 2015 Jun;13(2):67-75. doi: 10.1002/msc.1085. Epub 2014 Oct 24. PubMed 25345913 ↗
  • Pisters MF, Veenhof C, Schellevis FG, De Bakker DH, Dekker J. Long-term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized controlled trial comparing two different physical therapy interventions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Aug;18(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 May 19. PubMed 20488250 ↗
  • Skou ST, Koes BW, Gronne DT, Young J, Roos EM. Comparison of three sets of clinical classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study of 13,459 patients treated in primary care. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Feb;28(2):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 17. PubMed 31539621 ↗
  • Boles DZ, DeSousa M, Turnwald BP, Horii RI, Duarte T, Zahrt OH, Markus HR, Crum AJ. Can Exercising and Eating Healthy Be Fun and Indulgent Instead of Boring and Depriving? Targeting Mindsets About the Process of Engaging in Healthy Behaviors. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 5;12:745950. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.745950. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34712186 ↗
  • Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4. PubMed 8437031 ↗
  • Abbott JH, Hobbs C, Gwynne-Jones D; MOA Trial Team. The ShortMAC: Minimum Important Change of a Reduced Version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Feb;48(2):81-86. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7676. Epub 2017 Oct 21. PubMed 29056072 ↗
  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40. PubMed 3068365 ↗
  • Darlow B, Abbott H, Bennell K, Briggs AM, Brown M, Clark J, Dean S, French S, Hinman RS, Krageloh C, Metcalf B, O'Brien D, Stanley J, Whittaker JL. Knowledge about osteoarthritis: Development of the Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scales and protocol for testing their measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2021 Apr 9;3(2):100160. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100160. eCollection 2021 Jun. PubMed 36474995 ↗
  • Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4. PubMed 20685078 ↗
  • Shelby RA, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, DeVellis BM, Patterson C, Renner JB, Jordan JM. Brief Fear of Movement Scale for osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jun;64(6):862-71. doi: 10.1002/acr.21626. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PubMed 22290689 ↗
  • Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jan;32(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320107. PubMed 2912463 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Mar 1, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data, including participant characteristics and outcome measures, will be made available after de-identification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05698368
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Responsible party
Melissa Boswell (Study Investigator, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Start date
Apr 10, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 19, 2023
Completion
Sep 19, 2023
Results posted
Feb 13, 2025
Last update
Feb 13, 2025

Study contacts

Melissa Boswell, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University
Scott Delp, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University
Alia Crum, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion