CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05689216Updated Jan 19, 2023

Timed Awake Prone and Repositioning for Patients With Covid-19-induced Hypoxic Respiratory Failure.

An interventional study of Awake timed prone and repositioning in Corona Virus Infection and Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Status unknown at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-19.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2023), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
286
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Awake prone positioning has been reported to improve oxygenation for patients with COVID-19. Awake timed and repositioning is a novel method to improve patients' compliance and prolong the prone time. This study aims to explore the impact of timed prone and repositioning on the intubation rate and prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypoxic respiratory failure.

Read the detailed description

Patients with COVID-19 may develop severe illness characterized by progressive hypoxic respiratory failure, resulting in the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure can be beneficial to the prognosis, economize iatrical resources and reduce sanitary investment. Some studies have shown that prone positioning can improve oxygenation to some extent in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation due to severe ARDS.

Whether awake prone positioning can reduce endotracheal intubation and mortality in COVID-19 patients with hypoxic respiratory failure is still controversial. A meta-analysis found that the awake prone positioning was safe and feasible to reduce the risk of intubation or death. However, the multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted by Alhazzani et al pointed out that the awake prone positioning group did not significantly reduce the rate of endotracheal intubation when compared with the standard of care.

Some researchers thought the time of prone positioning is an important factor for the different results. In previous studies, the median duration of prone positioning was only 4.8-5 hours per day but some guidelines recommend the duration should be more than 8 hours. Therefore, increasing patient adherence in the awake prone positioning and extending prone positioning time are of great importance.

Awake timed prone and repositioning is a novel method proposed in recent years, which can improve patients' compliance and prolong the time of treatment. This study intends to ask whether awake timed prone and repositioning could impact the intubation rate and prognosis of unincubated patients with hypoxic respiratory failure induced by COVID-19.

02

Conditions studied

  • Corona Virus Infection
  • Hypoxic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Awake prone positioning
03

In context

Coronavirus Infections

929 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronavirus Infections; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 286 is above the median of 107 across 541 interventional studies indexed under Coronavirus Infections.

Browse Coronavirus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 1,058 studies on the registry; 511 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ≥ 18 years of age
  • Awake patients without endotracheal intubation
  • Suspected or confirmed infection of COVID-19
  • Hypoxemia requiring oxygen supplementation ≥ 0.4 FiO2 or ≥ 5L/min via nasal cannula
  • Bilateral or unilateral chest infiltrates on x-ray or HRCT
  • Admitted to the ICU or an acute care unit where hemodynamic and respiratory
  • Willingness to comply with the protocol and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Risk of airway obstruction or even asphyxia
  • Need for emergent intubation after admission
  • Respiratory failure caused by cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • Unable to implement timed prone and repositioning due to any cause
  • Injury or wound on the ventral body surface affecting the prone position
  • Unstable fracture of cervical vertebra and spine
  • Glaucoma or other sharp increases in intraocular pressure
  • Intracranial hypertension caused by traumatic brain injury etc.
  • Significantly high risk of pulmonary embolism
  • Acute hemorrhagic disease
  • Respiratory rate >40 breaths/min, with significant dyspnea
  • Transcutaneous oxygen saturation can not be continuously monitored
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring vasoactive drugs (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation)
  • Awareness disorder or inability to accept instructions, communication barrier with the nursing team, inability to use language or pager to call for help
  • Difficulty or limitation in autonomous movement, inability to adjust the position without assistance from others
  • Body mass index > 37 kg/m2
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
286 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Awake timed prone and repositioning group

    Patients' cumulative prone and repositioning time is encouraged to reach 8-10 hours per day for 4 days following a timed prone and repositioning strategy.

    Behavioral: Awake timed prone and repositioning

  • No intervention
    Standard care group

    Patients can change their positions freely according to their own needs. Health providers do not take the initiative to give guidance on prone and repositioning.

Interventions

  • BehavioralAwake timed prone and repositioning

    Patients were instructed to adopt a timed prone and repositioning strategy with 4 sessions for four consecutive days. Session 1, lying on the belly; Session 2, lying on the right side; Session 3, sitting up; Session 4, lying on the left side; then back to session 1 (30 minutes to two hours for each session). The daily duration of timed prone and repositioning is strongly recommended for 8-10 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Endotracheal Intubation rate

    The incidence of endotracheal Intubation within 30 days of study enrollment

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    All-cause death within 30 days of study enrollment

    Time frame: Day 30

  2. Days of non-invasive ventilation

    Number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within 30 days of study enrollment

    Time frame: Day 30

  3. Days alive and outside the ICU

    Number of days alive and outside the ICU within 30 days of study enrollment

    Time frame: Day 30

  4. Clinical events

    Clinical events include time to treatment failure( treatment failure defined as intubation or death); time to intubation; time to death; duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in intubated patients surviving to day 30; mortality in invasively mechanically ventilated patients; and physiological response to awake prone positioning, including the ratio of SpO2:FiO2 to respiratory rate, known as the ROX index.

    Time frame: Day 30

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Changxing People's Hospital
    Changxing, Zhejiang 313199, China
    • jingfen Jin · Contact · +86-13757118239
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
  • Lishui Municipal Central Hospital
    Lishui, Zhejiang 323020, China
    • Meifen Chen, Doctor · Contact · +86-13567618608
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fralick M, Colacci M, Munshi L, Venus K, Fidler L, Hussein H, Britto K, Fowler R, da Costa BR, Dhalla I, Dunbar-Yaffe R, Branfield Day L, MacMillan TE, Zipursky J, Carpenter T, Tang T, Cooke A, Hensel R, Bregger M, Gordon A, Worndl E, Go S, Mandelzweig K, Castellucci LA, Tamming D, Razak F, Verma AA; COVID Prone Study Investigators. Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxaemia due to covid-19: multicentre pragmatic randomised trial (COVID-PRONE). BMJ. 2022 Mar 23;376:e068585. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068585. PubMed 35321918 ↗
  • Sun Q, Qiu H, Huang M, Yang Y. Lower mortality of COVID-19 by early recognition and intervention: experience from Jiangsu Province. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00650-2. No abstract available. PubMed 32189136 ↗
  • Wright AD, Flynn M. Using the prone position for ventilated patients with respiratory failure: a review. Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):19-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00425.x. PubMed 21199551 ↗
  • Murray TA, Patterson LA. Prone positioning of trauma patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and open abdominal incisions. Crit Care Nurse. 2002 Jun;22(3):52-6. No abstract available. PubMed 12092293 ↗
  • Langer T, Brioni M, Guzzardella A, Carlesso E, Cabrini L, Castelli G, Dalla Corte F, De Robertis E, Favarato M, Forastieri A, Forlini C, Girardis M, Grieco DL, Mirabella L, Noseda V, Previtali P, Protti A, Rona R, Tardini F, Tonetti T, Zannoni F, Antonelli M, Foti G, Ranieri M, Pesenti A, Fumagalli R, Grasselli G; PRONA-COVID Group. Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients. Crit Care. 2021 Apr 6;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2. PubMed 33823862 ↗
  • Tasaka S, Ohshimo S, Takeuchi M, Yasuda H, Ichikado K, Tsushima K, Egi M, Hashimoto S, Shime N, Saito O, Matsumoto S, Nango E, Okada Y, Hayashi K, Sakuraya M, Nakajima M, Okamori S, Miura S, Fukuda T, Ishihara T, Kamo T, Yatabe T, Norisue Y, Aoki Y, Iizuka Y, Kondo Y, Narita C, Kawakami D, Okano H, Takeshita J, Anan K, Okazaki SR, Taito S, Hayashi T, Mayumi T, Terayama T, Kubota Y, Abe Y, Iwasaki Y, Kishihara Y, Kataoka J, Nishimura T, Yonekura H, Ando K, Yoshida T, Masuyama T, Sanui M; ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 committee from the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the Japanese Respiratory Society, and the Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine. ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021. J Intensive Care. 2022 Jul 8;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00615-6. PubMed 35799288 ↗
  • Serpa Neto A, Checkley W, Sivakorn C, Hashmi M, Papali A, Schultz MJ; COVID-LMIC Task Force and the Mahidol-Oxford Research Unit (MORU). Pragmatic Recommendations for the Management of Acute Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jan 13;104(3_Suppl):60-71. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0796. PubMed 33534774 ↗
  • Ehrmann S, Li J, Ibarra-Estrada M, Perez Y, Pavlov I, McNicholas B, Roca O, Mirza S, Vines D, Garcia-Salcido R, Aguirre-Avalos G, Trump MW, Nay MA, Dellamonica J, Nseir S, Mogri I, Cosgrave D, Jayaraman D, Masclans JR, Laffey JG, Tavernier E; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Trial Group. Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20. PubMed 34425070 ↗
  • Alhazzani W, Parhar KKS, Weatherald J, Al Duhailib Z, Alshahrani M, Al-Fares A, Buabbas S, Cherian SV, Munshi L, Fan E, Al-Hameed F, Chalabi J, Rahmatullah AA, Duan E, Tsang JLY, Lewis K, Lauzier F, Centofanti J, Rochwerg B, Culgin S, Nelson K, Abdukahil SA, Fiest KM, Stelfox HT, Tlayjeh H, Meade MO, Perri D, Solverson K, Niven DJ, Lim R, Moller MH, Belley-Cote E, Thabane L, Tamim H, Cook DJ, Arabi YM; COVI-PRONE Trial Investigators and the Saudi Critical Care Trials Group. Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2104-2113. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7993. PubMed 35569448 ↗
  • Li J, Luo J, Pavlov I, Perez Y, Tan W, Roca O, Tavernier E, Kharat A, McNicholas B, Ibarra-Estrada M, Vines DL, Bosch NA, Rampon G, Simpson SQ, Walkey AJ, Fralick M, Verma A, Razak F, Harris T, Laffey JG, Guerin C, Ehrmann S; Awake Prone Positioning Meta-Analysis Group. Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jun;10(6):573-583. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00043-1. Epub 2022 Mar 16. PubMed 35305308 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05689216
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Responsible party
Min Yan (Chief of Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 19, 2023
Start date
Jan 18, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 18, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 18, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 19, 2023

Study contacts

Yuanyuan Yao, M.D.
Contact
yuanyuan58@126.com
+86-18058783258
Min Yan, M.D.
study chair · Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion