ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04686097PESIVUpdated Jul 24, 2026

Percutaneous Electrocoagulation Versus Sclerosing Foam for Patients With Incompetent Perforating Veins

An interventional study of treatment: puncture of coagulation and treatment: sclerosing agent injected in Incompetent Perforating Veins, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Recruiting at 5 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2021; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of punctured electrocoagulation and sclerotherapy in the treatment of incompetent perforator veins.

Read the detailed description

Background: Incompetent perforating vein (IPV) is one of the important causes of persistent venous ulcers of lower extremities and recurrence after operation of varices which is a hot button issue worth discussing in clinical practice. Minimally invasive surgery has become the trend of IPVs' treatment. Currently, sclerotherapy can be performed to treat incompetent perforating veins, which showed a 90% occlusion rate after three or fewer sessions, the recurrence was present nearly 1/3 of cases. While electrocoagulation has a reliable effect on the closure of incompetent perforating veins and simplify treatment. No comparative studies of different PAPS modalities are currently available. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of punctured electrocoagulation and sclerotherapy in the treatment of incompetent perforating veins. Methods:This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 84 patients with IPVs from five hospitals. Moreover, these patients will be randomized to either the experimental group (electrocoagulation) or the control group (sclerotherapy). The primary outcome is incompetent perforating veins occlusion rate in the 12th month. Secondary outcomes are quality of life scale survey results (CEAP classification, VCSS score, CIVIQ-14 score), skin ulcer recurrence rate, deep venous Thrombosis, hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, and other vascular events and serious complications.Discussion:This study will provide reliable, evidence-based clinical evidence for the efficacy of electrocoagulation therapy for incompetent perforating veins.

02

Conditions studied

  • Incompetent Perforating Veins

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Perforating veins
  • Venous disease
  • Venous ulcer
  • Sclerotherapy
  • Electrocoagulationt
03

In context

Varicose Ulcer

369 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Ulcer; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 60 across 309 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Ulcer.

Browse Varicose Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 1,047 studies on the registry; 502 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

(1) outward flow of less than 500 ms duration, with a diameter of >3.5 mm; (2) According to the CEAP classification method specified by the International Venous Federation, patients with C4b\~C6 grades are included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

(1)age \< 18 years or age > 80 years; (2)with malignant tumors and \< 1 year; (3)with past or current history of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in the lower extremities; (4)with congenital venous malformations (K-T syndrome, arteriovenous fistula and etc.; (5)inability to walk, long-term braking, restrictive bed rest; severe ischemia of lower extremities or diagnosed severity of peripheral artery occlusive disease; (6)according to the researcher's judgment, it is not suitable for foam hardener and puncture coagulation treatment; (7)allergic to the drugs and equipment materials involved in the research; (8)with inferior vena cava and/or iliac vein stenosis or occlusion; (9)with disease, receiving chemotherapy, hormone therapy or immunomodulatory treatment; (10)other underlying severe diseases; women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or have pregnancy plans during the study period; (11)the patient cannot cooperate to complete the inspection and follow-up required by the study.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    experimental group (electrocoagulation)

    Participants in the experimental group will receive ultrasound-guided puncture of coagulation incompetent perforator veins.

    Procedure: treatment: puncture of coagulation

  • Active comparator
    control group (sclerotherapy)

    Participants in the control group will receive an ultrasound-guided sclerosing agent injected.

    Procedure: treatment: sclerosing agent injected

Interventions

  • Proceduretreatment: puncture of coagulation

    ultrasound-guided puncture of coagulation

  • Proceduretreatment: sclerosing agent injected

    ultrasound-guided sclerosing agent injected

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. IPVs occlusion rate in the 12th month.

    IPVs occlusion rate is defined as DS \> 50% for each modality with no procedure no procedure performed on the treated segment

    Time frame: 12 months after operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life scale survey results

    quality of life scale survey results (CEAP classification, VCSS score, CIVIQ-14 score).Quality of life will be assessed by MOS item short-form health survey scale (SF-36). SF-36 includes eight subscales: physical functioning (PF, 10 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (RL-P, 4 items), bodily pain (BP, 2 items), general health (GH, 5 items), vitality (V, 4 items), social functioning (SF, 2 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (RL-E, 3 items) and mental health (MH, 5 items). The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (worst) - 100 (best).

    Time frame: 1-month,6-month,12-month

  2. Skin ulcer recurrence rate

    Skin ulcer recurrence

    Time frame: 1-month,6-month,12-month

  3. Proportion of participants with deep venous Thrombosis

    deep venous Thrombosis

    Time frame: 1-month,6-month,12-month

  4. Proportion of participants with hemorrhage

    Including hemorrhagic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, hematuria, mucocutaneous hemorrhage and other visceral bleeding

    Time frame: 1-month,6-month,12-month

  5. All-cause mortality and other vascular events and serious complications.

    Percentage of participants with all deaths

    Time frame: 1-month,6-month,12-month

07

Study locations

1 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cooper DG, Hillman-Cooper CS, Barker SG, Hollingsworth SJ. Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Jan;25(1):53-9. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1782. PubMed 12525812 ↗
  • Sakurai T, Matsushita M, Nishikimi N, Nimura Y. Hemodynamic assessment of femoropopliteal venous reflux in patients with primary varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 1997 Aug;26(2):260-4. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70187-3. PubMed 9279313 ↗
  • Guex JJ. Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy (USGS) for perforating veins (PV). Hawaii Med J. 2000 Jun;59(6):261-2. No abstract available. PubMed 10916243 ↗
  • Masuda EM, Kessler DM, Lurie F, Puggioni A, Kistner RL, Eklof B. The effect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins on venous clinical severity and disability scores. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;43(3):551-6; discussion 556-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.11.038. PubMed 16520171 ↗
  • Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Gloviczki ML, Lohr JM, McLafferty RB, Meissner MH, Murad MH, Padberg FT, Pappas PJ, Passman MA, Raffetto JD, Vasquez MA, Wakefield TW; Society for Vascular Surgery; American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5 Suppl):2S-48S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.079. PubMed 21536172 ↗
  • Hager ES, Washington C, Steinmetz A, Wu T, Singh M, Dillavou E. Factors that influence perforator vein closure rates using radiofrequency ablation, laser ablation, or foam sclerotherapy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Jan;4(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.08.004. PubMed 26946896 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 83 months after the start.

Of 67 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Varicose Ulcer, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 83 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 23, 2020
First posted
Dec 28, 2020
StartActual
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Jul 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04686097
Responsible party
Zhenjie Liu (Principal Investigator, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 28, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

Zhen jie Liu
Contact
lawson4001@zju.edu.cn
86-0571-87913706
Zhen jie Liu, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion