CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05679193PeP-RALPUpdated May 29, 2024

Perioperative Propranolol During Prostatectomy to Decrease Cancer Recurrence

A Phase 2 interventional study of Propranolol in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to male participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-29.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of perioperative propranolol capsules compared with placebo capsules in decreasing recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in participants with intermediate to high-risk for prostate cancer recurrence.

Read the detailed description

PCa is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Norway (2020) and RALP is the most frequent curative treatment offered to men with non-metastatic PCa. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is estimated to occur to 40% of patients with EAU IR and HR PCa. Attempts to combat the high recurrence rates after RALP with neoadjuvant treatment, aiming to reduce the local tumor burden and treat possible micrometastasis, has of yet not proven beneficial.

The prostate is highly innervated and recent evidence has shown the importance of nerves in the development and progression of PCa. The action of particularly adrenergic nerves, in sum lead to a pro-cancerous and metastatic state by influencing key hallmarks of cancer like apoptosis resistance, angiogenesis, immune suppression, invasiveness and metastasis.

Perioperative stress caused by the cancer surgery, in this case RALP, has been found to promote cancer progression and recurrence both by enhancing growth of preexisting residual tumor/micrometastasis and facilitating formation of new metastasis. The surgical stress response cause a catecholamine-induced cancer progression where β2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) have a key role.

Our newly published pharma co-epidemiologic study indicate perioperative stress can be targeted by a non-selective ß-blocker (nsBB) like propranolol [1]. RCTs have found perioperative administration of propranolol alone, or in conjunction with COX-2 inhibition, to be safe and to reduce biomarkers associated with poor prognosis compared with the control group receiving placebo medication in patients undergoing radical surgery for breast-, ovarian- and colorectal cancer [2-7}.

The result of our register study, together with existing evidence of an effect of propranolol/nsBBs, provides foundation for PeP-RALP, a pilot study to establish the recruitment- and infrastructure feasibility of a double-blinded, placebo controlled RCT. The results of this pilot study will be used to investigate the feasibility of a formal larger RCT aiming to assess efficacy of perioperative propranolol to reduce PCa recurrence and progression after RALP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 810 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • European Association of Urology Intermediate- and High Risk for Biochemical recurrence and planned for curative RALP
  • ECOG Performance Status 0-1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical Conditions

  1. Sick sinus syndrome
  2. Atrioventricular (AV) block grade 2 and 3
  3. Recent (3 months) myocardial infarction
  4. Known unstable- or vasospastic- angina
  5. Heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] > 2)
  6. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease (e.g. intermittent claudication)
  7. Known pulmonary hypertension
  8. Known carotid artery stenosis or recent (3 months) stroke
  9. Bronchial asthma or other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  10. Kidney failure (estimated Glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]\<50)
  11. Liver failure (cirrhosis, jaundice, signs of hepatic decompression)
  12. Unregulated diabetes mellitus
  13. Untreated thyroid disorder
  14. Depressive episode within last 6 months (within last 12 months if major depressive episode)
  15. Known drug allergy against propranolol or excipients
  16. Any medical conditions considered to prohibit Propranolol use as judged by the treating physician (including frailty).
  17. Participants with known substance- or alcohol-abuse

    Prior/Concomitant Therapy

  18. Recent (\<3 month) use of systemic beta-blockers prior to screening.
  19. Patients receiving non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocking agents (eg diltiazem, verapamil)
  20. Patients receiving anti-arrhythmic agents (e.g. amiodarone, sotalol, digoxin, verapamil, flecainide)
  21. Patients receiving digoxin, rizatriptan, hydralazine, fluvoksamin, or fluoksetin
  22. Patients using daily anxiolytics (e.g. benzodiazepines), alpha-receptor adrenergic agonists (e.g. clonidine)
  23. Recommendations in the Summary of Product Characteristics for propranolol regarding concomitant use of other medications will be adhered to.

    Diagnostic assessments

  24. Sinus bradycardia (\<60 beats/minute)
  25. Resting blood pressure \<110/60mmHg OR hypertension BP >160/100
  26. AV-block 2 or 3 on ECG
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Propranolol

    Participants will receive Propranolol capsule for a period of 22-28 days, low dose (1 capsule/20mg propranolol twice daily) treatment the first- and last- three days of the treatment period. Higher dose (2 capsules/40mg propranolol twice daily) for the rest of the treatment period.

    Drug: Propranolol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will receive Propranolol capsule for a period of 22-28 days, low dose (1 capsule twice daily) treatment the first- and last- three days of the treatment period. Higher dose (2 capsules twice daily) for the rest of the treatment period.

    Drug: Propranolol

Interventions

  • DrugPropranolol

    Propranolol capsules 20mg taken orally. Day: 1-3: 20mg twice daily Day: 4-19 (25 , In cases of delayed RALP an extension of up to 6 days is allowed.in cases of delayed surgery). 2x 20mg twice daily Day 20-22 20mg twice daily

    Also known as: Pranolol

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The feasibility of conducting a formal larger RCT to compare the efficacy of propranolol vs placebo to decrease PCa recurrence following RALP.

    Numbers of eligible participants needed to screen to include 40 patients in the study, reported as % of eligible participants that subsequently were included in the study. Compliance of study intervention (defined as \>80% of doses taken). Reported as % of participants compliant to the study intervention before RALP and % of participants compliant to the study intervention after RALP.

    Time frame: The total duration of study participation from screening to end of follow-up is 50-102 days per participant. The primary outcome will be assessed when inclusion is completed, or if inclusion is not completed within 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety and tolerability of PeP-RALP intervention

    Safety: Proportion (%) of patients experiencing treatment related clinical significant hypotension and/or bradycardia. Adverse events of PeP-RALP medication as assessed by CTCAE v5.0. Tolerability: Proportion (%) of patients tolerating daily dose of 80mg propranolol.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

  2. Determine the effect of RALP on catecholamine levels

    Changes in catecholamine levels in the perioperative period.

    Time frame: Up to 5 weeks

  3. Determine the bioavailability of propranolol

    Serum levels of propranolol pre-operatively and at end of PeP-RALP medication.

    Time frame: Up to 5 weeks

  4. Determine the effect of preoperative propranolol treatment on the serum level of PSA

    Changes in PSA levels after 7-14 days of PeP-RALP medication.

    Time frame: 7-14 days

  5. To determine the effect of propranolol on post-operative biochemical failure

    Proportion of patients with serum PSA levels above 0.1 ng/ml at 6 weeks post-RALP.

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

  6. Intraoperative anesthesiological and surgical challenges Surgical complications in PeP RALP patients

    Anesthesiological challenges are assed by: Proportion of patients (%) in each intervention group requiring vasopressors to maintain an acceptable mean arterial pressure (MAP \>60mmhg). Amount of vasopressor needed. Surgical challenges are assed by: The surgical procedure time (minutes) and estimated intraoperative blood loss (milliliters).

    Time frame: 1 day

  7. Surgical complications

    Frequence (n=) and severity of surgical complications as classified by the Clavian-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change in perceived distress during the study.

    Investigate alterations in perioperative perceived distress, assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

  2. Immunohistochemistry and Image mass cytometry of tumor to assess for differences between treatment arms. Flow cytometry to assess of periferal blood to assess for differences between treatment arms.

    Immunohistochemistry and image mass cytometry to assess for differences between treatment arms in intra-tumor immune cell infiltration. Flow cytometry to assess differences between treament arms in systemic immune cell acitivity.

    Time frame: Up to 9 weeks

  3. Difference in prognostic markers (e.g. Decipher GRID transcriptome analysis) between treatment arms. Identify predictive biomarkers for propranolol responsiveness (e.g. Decipher GRID transcriptome analysis)

    Determine the effect of pre-operative propranolol treatment on prognostic markers and assess for predictive biomarkers. Identify predictive biomarkers for propranolol responsiveness.

    Time frame: up to 1 year

  4. Differences between intervention arms with regard to intraoperative alterations in cerebral autoregulation and intracranial pressure, measured by transcranial doppler (TCD) floe velocity.

    Intraoperative alterations in cerebral autoregulation and intracranial pressure by Transcranial Doppler flow velocity measurement of the middle cerebral artery.

    Time frame: up to 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Oslo University Hospital The Norwegian Radium Hospital
    Oslo, 4953, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sivanesan S, Tasken KA, Grytli HH. Association of beta-Blocker Use at Time of Radical Prostatectomy With Rate of Treatment for Prostate Cancer Recurrence. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2145230. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45230. PubMed 35080602 ↗
  • Zhou L, Li Y, Li X, Chen G, Liang H, Wu Y, Tong J, Ouyang W. Propranolol Attenuates Surgical Stress-Induced Elevation of the Regulatory T Cell Response in Patients Undergoing Radical Mastectomy. J Immunol. 2016 Apr 15;196(8):3460-9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501677. Epub 2016 Mar 11. PubMed 26969754 ↗
  • Hiller JG, Cole SW, Crone EM, Byrne DJ, Shackleford DM, Pang JB, Henderson MA, Nightingale SS, Ho KM, Myles PS, Fox S, Riedel B, Sloan EK. Preoperative beta-Blockade with Propranolol Reduces Biomarkers of Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Phase II Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 15;26(8):1803-1811. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2641. Epub 2019 Nov 21. PubMed 31754048 ↗
  • Shaashua L, Shabat-Simon M, Haldar R, Matzner P, Zmora O, Shabtai M, Sharon E, Allweis T, Barshack I, Hayman L, Arevalo J, Ma J, Horowitz M, Cole S, Ben-Eliyahu S. Perioperative COX-2 and beta-Adrenergic Blockade Improves Metastatic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Patients in a Phase-II Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;23(16):4651-4661. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0152. Epub 2017 May 10. PubMed 28490464 ↗
  • Haldar R, Shaashua L, Lavon H, Lyons YA, Zmora O, Sharon E, Birnbaum Y, Allweis T, Sood AK, Barshack I, Cole S, Ben-Eliyahu S. Perioperative inhibition of beta-adrenergic and COX2 signaling in a clinical trial in breast cancer patients improves tumor Ki-67 expression, serum cytokine levels, and PBMCs transcriptome. Brain Behav Immun. 2018 Oct;73:294-309. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 22. PubMed 29800703 ↗
  • Jang HI, Lim SH, Lee YY, Kim TJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS. Perioperative administration of propranolol to women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery: A pilot study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017 Mar;60(2):170-177. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.2.170. Epub 2017 Mar 16. PubMed 28344958 ↗
  • Haldar R, Ricon-Becker I, Radin A, Gutman M, Cole SW, Zmora O, Ben-Eliyahu S. Perioperative COX2 and beta-adrenergic blockade improves biomarkers of tumor metastasis, immunity, and inflammation in colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2020 Sep 1;126(17):3991-4001. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32950. Epub 2020 Jun 13. PubMed 32533792 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD that underlie the results reported in a published articles based on this study, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05679193
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Collaborators
Ivar, Ragna og Morten Holes legat til fremme av kreftforskningen i Norge, Fondsstiftelsen ved Oslo Universitetssykehus
Responsible party
Shivanthe Sivanesan (Urologist and General Surgeon, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2023
Start date
Jan 2, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2023
Completion
Jan 27, 2024
Last update
May 29, 2024

Study contacts

Shivanthe Sivanesan, MD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion