ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05675371MEASURE-ASD1Updated Sep 15, 2025

Treatment Monitoring in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Children

An observational study in Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism and Developmental Delay, sponsored by EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Months to 84 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-15.

Primary conditionAutistic DisorderRegistry: Autism Spectrum DisorderReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Autism Spectrum Disorder — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Autistic Disorder
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Autistic Disorder, a narrower term within Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
325
Ages
15 Months to 84 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical study is to learn about the utility and performance of the EarliPoint(™) System: Evaluation for Autism Spectrum Disorder to monitor changes in a child's verbal ability, non-verbal learning, and social disability over time in children ages 15-84 months with autism spectrum disorder or related developmental delays (DD) and in those who are typically developing.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • To estimate the change in each of the EarliPoint index scores in typically developing children ages 15-84 months from baseline through 180 days as a function of the child's age.
  • To estimate the change in the EarliPoint verbal and non-verbal index scores in ASD/DD children ages 15-84 months from baseline through 180 days as a function of the child's age in: a) those who showed clinical improvement, and b) those who did not show clinical improvement.
  • To estimate the relationship of the EarliPoint verbal and non-verbal index scores to clinical reference assessments in ASD/DD children as a function of their age from baseline through 180 days.
  • To estimate the degree of change, if change occurs, month-to-month in the EarliPoint Social Disability Index score from baseline through 180 days.
  • To estimate the incidence of behavioral events (e.g., tantrums, etc.) which limit the subject from completing an eye-tracking session.
  • To estimate the incidence of adverse device effects associated with the use of the study device.
Read the detailed description

This study seeks to evaluate the utility and performance of the EarliPoint(™) System: Evaluation for Autism Spectrum Disorder in monitoring changes in a child's verbal ability, non-verbal learning, and social disability over time in children ages 15-84 months with autism spectrum disorder and in those who are typically developing.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • To estimate the change in each of the EarliPoint index scores in typically developing children ages 15-84 months from baseline through 180 days as a function of the child's age.
  • To estimate the change in the EarliPoint verbal and non-verbal index scores in ASD/DD children ages 15-84 months from baseline through 180 days as a function of the child's age in: a) those who showed clinical improvement, and b) those who did not show clinical improvement.
  • To estimate the relationship of the EarliPoint verbal and non-verbal index scores to clinical reference assessments in ASD/DD children as a function of their age from baseline through 180 days.
  • To estimate the degree of change, if change occurs, month-to-month in the EarliPoint Social Disability Index score from baseline through 180 days.
  • To estimate the incidence of behavioral events (e.g., tantrums, etc.) which limit the subject from completing an eye-tracking session.
  • To estimate the incidence of adverse device effects associated with the use of the study device.
02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Autism
  • Developmental Delay
  • Autism, Early Infantile
  • Autism, Infantile

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ASD
  • autism
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • developmental delay
  • autism in children
  • autism spectrum disorder in children
  • autism spectrum disorder in toddlers
  • autism in toddlers
  • EarliPoint System: Evaluation for Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • EarliPoint
  • DQSVE
03

In context

Autistic Disorder Reclassified

1,030 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 325 is above the median of 101 across 189 observational studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Autistic Disorder, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Autism Spectrum Disorder. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Months to 84 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children ages 15-84 months (at time of enrollment) who have a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder/related developmental delay and are actively undergoing applied behavioral analysis or related therapy or those who are typically-developing.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (cohort 1a):

Subjects must meet all the following inclusion criteria to participate in Cohort 1a.

  1. Male or female individuals between the ages of 15-30 months (chronological age) at the time of consent who have autism spectrum disorder and/or related developmental delays or those who are typically developing.
  2. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision with visual acuity and oculomotor function sufficient to watch short videos.
  3. Hearing adequate to hear information presented in age-appropriate videos of social interactions.
  4. For individuals who have autism spectrum disorder and/or related developmental delays, the subject must be established in treatment (e.g., a treatment plan has been developed and child is undergoing treatment or will immediately begin treatment) and intends to remain in treatment continuously throughout the duration of the study. Additionally, individuals must provide a diagnostic report documenting a positive diagnosis of ASD/DD available for review. If a report is not available, subjects must undergo diagnostic evaluation prior to enrolling into the study.
  5. For individuals who are typically developing, the parent, referring clinician and/or daycare center have indicated that the child is not suspected of, nor has he/she exhibited signs of, developmental delays. NOTE: If, at screening, the investigator suspects the typically developing (TD) subject of having a developmental delay (based on feedback from referring clinician and/or daycare center along with expert clinician opinion), the subject shall be screen failed. He/she should be referred for diagnosis and then may be re-screened for the study.
  6. Subject and parent (or legally authorized representative) are able and agree to attend each required study visit and complete the full battery of psychometric assessments and questionnaires (electronically or in-person where required).
  7. Subject's parent (or legally authorized representative) can understand information, instructions, and videos presented in the English language.
  8. Subject's parent (or legally authorized representative) can read and understand the Form (ICF).
  9. Subject's parent (or legally authorized representative) provides written informed consent allowing the child subject to participate in the study. NOTE: where able, the child subject should also provide assent.

Exclusion criteria (cohort 1a):

Subjects who meet any of the following exclusion criteria are not eligible to participate in Cohort 1a:

  1. Severe hearing or visual impairment (e.g., congenital nystagmus, congenital cataracts, previous diagnosis of severe hearing deficits by otoacoustic emissions or auditory brainstem response), which in the opinion of the investigator, would limit the child from completing the EarliPoint eye-tracking procedure or clinical reference assessments.

    Note: Corrective lenses are allowable up to a prescription of +/- 5.0.

  2. Subject has an uncontrolled seizure disorder.
  3. Subject is unable or unwilling to undergo DQSVE testing for up to 15 minutes per assessment (e.g., child has frequent tantrums and tantrums do not subside within 5 minutes).
  4. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject and/or parent (or legally authorized representative) are unable, unwilling, or unlikely to comply with all study required procedures and follow-up assessments or to complete the full battery of psychometric assessments (electronically or in-person where required).
  5. Subject is receiving or plans to receive any drug or device for the duration of this study.
  6. In the opinion of the Investigator, subject is not a suitable candidate for participation in a research study (NOTE: reason must be specified).
  7. Typically developing children who have a 1st degree relative with a diagnosis of autism and/or related developmental delay.

Inclusion criteria (module 1b):

Subjects must meet all the following inclusion criteria to participate in this Cohort 1b.

  1. Male or female individuals between the ages of 31-78 months (chronological age) at the time of consent who have autism spectrum disorder and/or related developmental delays or those who are typically developing.

    Note: The EarliPoint system is currently configured to monitor children between the ages of 31-84 months. Therefore, at the time of enrollment, participants must be 78 months to facilitate monitoring through 6 months of follow-up.

  2. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision with visual acuity and oculomotor function sufficient to watch short videos.
  3. Hearing adequate to hear information presented in age-appropriate videos of social interactions.
  4. For individuals who have autism spectrum disorder and/or related developmental delays, the subject must be established in treatment (e.g., a treatment plan has been developed and child is undergoing treatment or will immediately begin treatment) and intends to remain in treatment continuously throughout the duration of the study. Additionally, individuals must provide a diagnostic report documenting a positive diagnosis of ASD/DD available for review. If a report is not available, subjects must undergo diagnostic evaluation prior to enrolling into the study.
  5. For individuals who are typically developing, the parent, referring clinician and/or daycare center have indicated that the child is not suspected of, nor has he/she exhibited signs of, developmental delays. NOTE: If, at screening, the investigator suspects the TD subject of having a developmental delay (based on feedback from referring clinician and/or daycare center along with expert clinician opinion), the subject shall be screen failed. He/she should be referred for diagnosis and then may be re-screened for the study.
  6. Subject and parent (or legally authorized representative) are able and agree to attend each required study visit and complete the full battery of psychometric assessments and questionnaires (electronically or in-person where required).
  7. Subject's parent (or legally authorized representative) can understand information, instructions, and videos presented in the English language.
  8. Subject's parent (or legally authorized representative) can read and understand the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  9. Subject's parent (or legally authorized representative) provides written informed consent allowing the child subject to participate in the study. NOTE: where able, the child subject should also provide assent.

Exclusion criteria (module 1b):

Subjects who meet any of the following exclusion criteria are not eligible to participate in Cohort 1b:

  1. Severe hearing or visual impairment (e.g., congenital nystagmus, congenital cataracts, previous diagnosis of severe hearing deficits by otoacoustic emissions or auditory brainstem response), which in the opinion of the investigator, would limit the child from completing the EarliPoint eye-tracking procedure or clinical reference assessments.

    Note: Corrective lenses are allowable up to a prescription of +/- 5.0.

  2. Subject has an uncontrolled seizure disorder.
  3. Subject is unable or unwilling to undergo DQSVE testing for up to 15 minutes per assessment (e.g., child has frequent tantrums and tantrums do not subside within 5 minutes).
  4. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject and/or parent (or legally authorized representative) are unable, unwilling, or unlikely to comply with all study required procedures and follow-up assessments or to complete the full battery of psychometric assessments (electronically or in-person where required).
  5. Subject is receiving or plans to receive any investigational drug or device for the duration of this study.
  6. In the opinion of the Investigator, subject is not a suitable candidate for participation in a research study (NOTE: reason must be specified).
  7. Typically developing children who have a 1st degree relative with a diagnosis of autism and/or related developmental delay.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
325 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 1a - Typically developing (ages 16-30 months)

    Typically developing toddlers ages 16 - 30 months (chronological age).

    Behavioral: Assessment by Expert Clinician During Behavioral Intervention (ABA or similar) · Device: Assessment by the EarliPoint Assessment For Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • 1a - ASD/DD (ages 16-30 months)

    Toddlers ages 16-30 months with autism spectrum disorder and/or related developmental delay who are undergoing applied behavioral analysis (ABA) or related therapies.

    Behavioral: Assessment by Expert Clinician During Behavioral Intervention (ABA or similar) · Device: Assessment by the EarliPoint Assessment For Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • 1b - Typically developing (ages 31-84 months)

    Typically developing children ages 31-84 months (chronological age).

    Behavioral: Assessment by Expert Clinician During Behavioral Intervention (ABA or similar) · Device: Assessment by the EarliPoint Assessment For Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • 1b - ASD/DD (ages 31-84 months)

    Children ages 31-84 months with autism spectrum disorder and/or related developmental delay who are undergoing applied behavioral analysis (ABA) or related therapies.

    Behavioral: Assessment by Expert Clinician During Behavioral Intervention (ABA or similar) · Device: Assessment by the EarliPoint Assessment For Autism Spectrum Disorder

Interventions

  • BehavioralAssessment by Expert Clinician During Behavioral Intervention (ABA or similar)

    Assessment (e.g., responder vs. non-responder status) utilizing gold-standard clinical reference assessments performed by expert clinicians as the subject undergoes Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) or similar intervention for autism spectrum disorder and related developmental delays

    Also known as: Applied Behavior Analysis

  • DeviceAssessment by the EarliPoint Assessment For Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Assessment by The EarliPoint™ Evaluation for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a medical device which employs Dynamic Quantification of Social-Visual Engagement (DQSVE) to aid clinicians in the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment monitoring of ASD related developmental delays, is a diagnostic tool which measures an individual's visual preferential attention to social information in the environment relative to normative age-specific benchmarks.

    Also known as: EarliPoint System: Assessment for Autism Spectrum Disorder

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in EarliPoint Index Scores in typically developing children

    To estimate the change in each of the EarliPoint index scores in typically developing children ages 16-30 months form baseline through 180 days as a function of the child's age.

    Time frame: 180 days

  2. Change in EarliPoint Index Scores in ASD/DD children

    To estimate the change in the EarliPoint verbal and nonverbal index scores in ASD/DD children ages 16-30 months from baseline through 180 days as a function of the child's age in a) those who showed clinical improvement, and b) those who did not show clinical improvement.

    Time frame: 180 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relationship of the EarliPoint index scores to clinical reference assessments

    To estimate the relationship of the EarliPoint verbal and nonverbal index scores to the Mullen Scales of Early Learning scores in ASD/DD children as a function of their age from baseline though 180-days.

    Time frame: 180 days

  2. Incidence of behavioral events which limit completion of an eye-tracking session.

    To estimate the incidence of behavioral events (e.g., tantrums, inability to calibrate device to child, etc.) which limit the subject from completing an eye-tracking session.

    Time frame: 180 days

  3. Incidence of adverse device effects associated with use of the study device

    To estimate the incidence of adverse device effects associated with the use of the study device.

    Time frame: 180 days

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • Southwest Autism Research and Resource Center (SARRC)
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Cortica - Glendale
    Glendale, California 91203, United States
  • Cortica - Marin
    San Rafael, California 94903, United States
  • Cortica - Torrance
    Torrance, California 90503, United States
  • Cortica - Weslake Village
    Westlake Village, California 91361, United States
  • Emory University/Marcus Autism Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30329, United States
  • Munroe-Meyer Institute / University of Nebraska
    Omaha, Nebraska 68106, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • AJ Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Aoki C, Smith C, Minjarez M, Bernier R, Pedapati E, Bishop S, Ence W, Wainer A, Moriuchi J, Tay SW, Klin A. Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism. JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):854-865. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13295. PubMed 37668621 ↗
  • Jones W, Klaiman C, Richardson S, Lambha M, Reid M, Hamner T, Beacham C, Lewis P, Paredes J, Edwards L, Marrus N, Constantino JN, Shultz S, Klin A. Development and Replication of Objective Measurements of Social Visual Engagement to Aid in Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Autism. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2330145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145. PubMed 37669054 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2023 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 29 months.

Of 65 observational studies under Autistic Disorder, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 120. This study's 29 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 21, 2022
First posted
Jan 9, 2023
StartActual
Mar 31, 2023
Primary completionActual
Sep 8, 2025
CompletionActual
Sep 8, 2025
Last update
Sep 15, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05675371
Lead sponsor
EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2023
Start date
Mar 31, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2025
Completion
Sep 8, 2025
Last update
Sep 15, 2025

Study contacts

John Reviere
study director · Vice President, Clinical Affairs

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion