ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05650567Updated Sep 9, 2026Results posted

Study of M5049 in DM and PM Participants (NEPTUNIA)

A Phase 2 interventional study of M5049 dose and Placebo in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis, sponsored by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.. Terminated at 31 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. (part of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Based on interim analyses for futility
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered M5049 in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, specifically dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) participants for 24 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatomyositis
  • Polymyositis

Keywords

  • Toll-like Receptor 7
  • Toll-like Receptor 8
  • Anti-synthetase syndrome
  • Idiopathic immune myopathies
  • Myositis
  • M5049
03

In context

Dermatomyositis

184 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatomyositis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 35 across 130 interventional studies indexed under Dermatomyositis.

Browse Dermatomyositis studies →

Lead sponsor

EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 47 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 38 (81%) have results posted.

First submitted after EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. became part of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of probable or definite DM or PM as per 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, with positive autoantibody status. Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) participants that meet classification criteria are allowed
  • Active disease on standard of care (SoC), must meet 1 of the criteria within 6 months prior to Screening: Pathological evidence of active myositis in muscle ; Evidence of active myositis by Electromyography (EMG); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with evidence of active myositis; or any muscle enzyme greater than or equal to (>=) 4 × (ULN) at time of Screening; Active PM/DM skin rash as per cutaneous dermatomyositis area and severity index-A (CDASI-A) >= 7 at time of Screening
  • Minimum disease severity defined by: moderate to severe myopathy with manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8) >= 80 and less than or equal to (\<=) 142 AND at least 2 of the following core set measures (CSM) abnormalities: Patient Global Activity (PtGA) >= 2 centimeters (cm); Physician Global Activity (PGA) derived from myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT) >= 2 cm; Extramuscular Activity Assessment derived from MDAAT >2 cm; At least 1 muscle enzyme > 1.5 times ULN; health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) >= 0.25
  • Stable doses of oral (CS) and/or maximum of 1 non-corticosteroid /immunomodulatory medications (methotrexate, 6 mercaptopurine, sulfasalazine, mycophenolate mofetil or sodium, azathioprine, leflunomide, cyclosporine, oral tacrolimus) for DM or PM
  • Participants have a (BMI) lower or Equal to 40.0 kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2)
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary diagnosis of inclusion body myositis (IBM), -associated myositis (defined as diagnosis of myositis within 3 years of cancer), immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) with a characterized as necrotizing biopsy or IMNM with positive anti-signal recognition particle antibody (SRP) or anti 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) auto antibodies. Participants with anti-transcription intermediary factor 1 (TIF1) gamma antibody or newly diagnosed (within 1 year) anti MDAT5 antibody should have had adequate screening for cancer within 12 months of Day 1. Adequate screening of cancer is defined as up-to-date age and gender appropriate screening as per national guidelines
  • Primary diagnosis of juvenile DM, or adult participants previously diagnosed with juvenile DM
  • Any other active concurrent connective tissue disease associated with inflammatory myopathy in the Investigator's opinion. Eligibility of participants with diagnosis of concurrent connective tissue disease(s) will be reviewed and approved by an idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) expert committee
  • Severe interstitial lung disease defined as supplemental oxygen required at rest, or forced vital capacity (FVC) of \<60 percent (%) predicted. Participants within 1 year of PM/DM diagnosis and anti-MDA5 antibody, should have been evaluated for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) Chest
  • Any uncontrolled disease (for example [e.g.], severe respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, neurological, psychiatric, hematological, metabolic [including thyroiditis with increased/decreased thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)], renal [Estimated \< 40 milliliter per minute/1.73 m\^2 as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation by the central laboratory], hepatic, endocrine/reproductive organ disease) other than DM/PM, that in the Investigator's or Sponsor/designee's opinion constitutes an inappropriate risk or for participation in the study or that could interfere with the study objectives, conduct, or evaluation
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Double-blind Placebo Controlled (DBPC) Period: M5049 dose

    Drug: M5049 dose

  • Placebo comparator
    DBPC Period: Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Open Label Extension (OLE) Period: M5049 dose

    Drug: M5049 dose

Interventions

  • Participants will receive film-coated tablets of M5049 dose orally, twice daily up to 24 weeks.

    Also known as: Enpatoran

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants will receive placebo matched to M5049 orally, twice daily up to 24 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Double Blind Placebo Control Period (DBPC): American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 24

    The ACR/EULAR TIS was derived from evaluation of results from 6 Core Set Measures(CSMs) of myositis disease activity in participants with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.TIS was determined by summing scores for each CSM,based on improvement in absolute percent change which is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the final value,dividing difference by the range, and then multiplying the result by100 and relative weight of each core set measure. The TIS scale ranges from 0 to 100 with thresholds for minimal \[more than or equal to(\>= 20)\],moderate(\>= 40) and major(\>= 60)improvement in combined 6 CSM.The CSMs include,physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index(0-3) along with checks for most abnormal muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

    Time frame: At Week 24 (end of DBPC period)

  2. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.

    Time frame: Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)

  3. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters

    Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and reflex testing for HBV DNA. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)

  4. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, weight, height and body mass index. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)

  5. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters

    12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in ECG parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. DBPC Period: Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20, >= 40 and >= 60

    The ACR/EULAR TIS was derived from evaluation of results from 6 Core Set Measures(CSMs) of myositis disease activity in participants with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.TIS was determined by summing scores for each CSM,based on improvement in absolute percent change which is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the final value,dividing difference by the range, and then multiplying the result by100 and relative weight of each core set measure. The TIS scale ranges from 0 to 100 with thresholds for minimal \[more than or equal to(\>= 20)\],moderate(\>=40) and major(\>=60)improvement in combined 6 CSM.The CSMs include,physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index(0-3) along with checks for most abnormal muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

    Time frame: At Week 16 and Week 24

  2. DBPC Period: Participant's Total Improvement Score (TIS)

    The ACR/EULAR TIS was derived from evaluation of results from 6 Core Set Measures(CSMs) of myositis disease activity in participants with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.TIS was determined by summing scores for each CSM,based on improvement in absolute percent change which is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the final value,dividing difference by the range, and then multiplying the result by100 and relative weight of each core set measure. The TIS scale ranges from 0 to 100 with thresholds for minimal \[more than or equal to(\>= 20)\],moderate(\>=40) and major(\>=60)improvement in combined 6 CSM.The CSMs include,physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index(0-3) along with checks for most abnormal muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

    Time frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  3. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PGA) Scores From Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT)

    The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was an assessment of overall global disease activity by the physician that was taken from Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT). Physician rated participant's disease activity on a 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS). Extra-muscular activity ranged between 0 and 10, where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  4. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Activity (PtGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    PtGA was the assessment of the severity of disease by the participant/participant's guardian, using a VAS from 0 mm (no evidence of disease activity) to 100 mm (extremely active or severe disease activity). Higher score indicated worse status.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  5. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Extra Muscular Global Assessment From Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Score

    MDAAT was a combined tool capturing physician's assessment of disease activity of various organ systems- constitutional, cutaneous, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, joints and cardiovascular, muscular using: Myositis Intention to Treat Activity Index (MITAX), a scale from 0("Not present in the last 4 weeks") to 4("New - in the last 4 weeks \[compared to the previous 4 weeks\]") and Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Visual Analogue Scales (MYOACT), a 10 cm VAS assessing disease activity in the last 4 weeks of various organ systems from 0 cm("No evidence of disease activity") to 10 cm("Extremely active or severe disease activity"), disease activity being defined as potentially reversible pathology or physiology resulting from the myositis. Left end of line = no evidence of disease activity, midpoint of line = moderate disease activity, and right end of line = extreme or maximum disease activity. An assessment of extramuscular activity assessment was taken from MDAAT using a 10cm VAS scale.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  6. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8) Score

    MMT-8 was an International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Core Set Measure used in the calculation of the IMACS Definition of Improvement (DOI) and ACR/EULAR TIS. It is a set of 8 designated muscles tested unilaterally (generally on right side) -which include 1 axial, 5 proximal (2 upper extremity, 3 lower extremity), and 2 distal muscles (1 upper, 1 lower extremity). Total score for unilateral testing ranges from 0 to 80, and bilateral testing ranges from 0 to 150 with normal strength represented by a higher score at or near the top of the scale. The total score for bilateral testing (item "MMT8 score (0 - 150)" from the MANUAL MUSCLE TESTING-8 (mmt8) form) is used in the derivation of the Total Improvement Score.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  7. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire -Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

    HAQ-DI was an IMACS Core Set Measure used in the calculation of the IMACS DOI and ACR/EULAR TIS. It is a generic rather than a disease-specific instrument comprised of 8 sections (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities), with 2 to 3 questions per section. Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). For each section the score given to that section is the worst score within the section. The 8 scores of the 8 sections are summed and divided by 8. Overall score ranges from 0-3.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  8. DBPC Period: Relative Change From Baseline in Most Abnormal Muscle-associated Enzyme

    For each participant, the most abnormal muscle-associated enzyme was defined as the baseline muscle-associated enzyme with the highest ratio of the observed value to the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) among creatinine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and aldolase. The relative abnormality could be expressed as a percentage of ULN, calculated as (enzyme value divided by ULN) multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  9. DBPC Period: Number of Participants Who Achieved International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Response

    A participant was defined as an International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Responder if 3 of any 6 IMACS Core Set Measures (CSMs) have been improved by more than equal to (\>= 20) percent (%), with no more than 2 IMACS CSMs worse by \>= 25%. The CSMs include, physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (0-3) along with checks for muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

    Time frame: At Week 16 and 24

  10. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area and Severity Index-A (CDASI-A) and Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area and Severity Index-D (CDASI-D) Subscale Score

    CDASI is a clinician-scored single page instrument that separately measures activity and damage in the skin of DM participants. CDASI has 3 activity measures (CDASI-A: erythema, scale, and erosion/ulceration) and 2 damage measures (CDASI-D: poikiloderma and calcinosis) which are assessed over 15 body areas. In addition, Gottron's papules on the hands, periungual changes and alopecia are evaluated separately both for activity and damage. Activity and Damage Subscale scores range from 0 to 100 and 0 to 32, respectively, where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  11. DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Skin Activity Score

    The IGA skin activity is a five-point score that defines the level of disease severity based on overall lesion characteristics where 0 is "clear" and "4" is severe.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  12. Open-label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.

    Time frame: From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)

  13. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters

    Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and reflex testing for HBV DNA. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)

  14. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, weight, height and body mass index. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)

  15. OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters

    12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in ECG parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

    Time frame: From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)

07

Results

Posted Sep 9, 2026

Participant flow

Double-blind Placebo Controlled (DBPC)
Participant flow — Double-blind Placebo Controlled (DBPC)
MilestonePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Started911
Completed66
Not completed35
Withdrew: Adverse event22
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Other12
Open-label Extension (OLE) Period
Participant flow — Open-label Extension (OLE) Period
MilestonePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Started56
Completed44
Not completed12
Withdrew: Other12

Outcome measures

PrimaryDouble Blind Placebo Control Period (DBPC): American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 24

The ACR/EULAR TIS was derived from evaluation of results from 6 Core Set Measures(CSMs) of myositis disease activity in participants with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.TIS was determined by summing scores for each CSM,based on improvement in absolute percent change which is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the final value,dividing difference by the range, and then multiplying the result by100 and relative weight of each core set measure. The TIS scale ranges from 0 to 100 with thresholds for minimal \[more than or equal to(\>= 20)\],moderate(\>= 40) and major(\>= 60)improvement in combined 6 CSM.The CSMs include,physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index(0-3) along with checks for most abnormal muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

Time frame:
At Week 24 (end of DBPC period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Double Blind Placebo Control Period (DBPC): American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 24
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Double Blind Placebo Control Period (DBPC): American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 2451.3 ± 26.9630.4 ± 20.76
PrimaryDBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.

Time frame:
Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
ParticipantsPlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
TEAEs77
Serious TEAEs02
AESI01
PrimaryDBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters

Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and reflex testing for HBV DNA. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters
ParticipantsPlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters00
PrimaryDBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, weight, height and body mass index. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
ParticipantsPlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs00
PrimaryDBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters

12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in ECG parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
Up to Week 26 (Safety follow up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters
ParticipantsPlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters00
SecondaryDBPC Period: Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20, >= 40 and >= 60

The ACR/EULAR TIS was derived from evaluation of results from 6 Core Set Measures(CSMs) of myositis disease activity in participants with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.TIS was determined by summing scores for each CSM,based on improvement in absolute percent change which is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the final value,dividing difference by the range, and then multiplying the result by100 and relative weight of each core set measure. The TIS scale ranges from 0 to 100 with thresholds for minimal \[more than or equal to(\>= 20)\],moderate(\>=40) and major(\>=60)improvement in combined 6 CSM.The CSMs include,physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index(0-3) along with checks for most abnormal muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

Time frame:
At Week 16 and Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DBPC Period: Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20, >= 40 and >= 60
ParticipantsPlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
TIS >= 20: Week 1654
TIS >= 40: Week 1643
TIS >= 60: Week 1621
TIS >= 20: Week 2441
TIS >= 40: Week 2421
TIS >= 60: Week 2411
SecondaryDBPC Period: Participant's Total Improvement Score (TIS)

The ACR/EULAR TIS was derived from evaluation of results from 6 Core Set Measures(CSMs) of myositis disease activity in participants with Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.TIS was determined by summing scores for each CSM,based on improvement in absolute percent change which is calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the final value,dividing difference by the range, and then multiplying the result by100 and relative weight of each core set measure. The TIS scale ranges from 0 to 100 with thresholds for minimal \[more than or equal to(\>= 20)\],moderate(\>=40) and major(\>=60)improvement in combined 6 CSM.The CSMs include,physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index(0-3) along with checks for most abnormal muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

Time frame:
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Participant's Total Improvement Score (TIS)
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Week 427.5 ± 23.7817.3 ± 19.60
Week 836.1 ± 28.4625.4 ± 23.43
Week 1248.2 ± 27.8731.9 ± 18.06
Week 1646.4 ± 29.3338.0 ± 23.61
Week 2051.4 ± 25.6136.5 ± 16.45
Week 2451.3 ± 26.9630.4 ± 20.76
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PGA) Scores From Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT)

The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was an assessment of overall global disease activity by the physician that was taken from Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT). Physician rated participant's disease activity on a 0-10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS). Extra-muscular activity ranged between 0 and 10, where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · centimeter (cm)
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PGA) Scores From Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT)
centimeter (cm)PlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Change at Week 4-1.2 ± 1.65-0.1 ± 1.74
Change at Week 8-1.3 ± 1.50-1.0 ± 1.74
Change at Week 12-2.0 ± 1.60-1.0 ± 1.52
Change at Week 16-2.1 ± 1.20-1.2 ± 1.73
Change at Week 20-2.5 ± 1.58-0.7 ± 1.36
Change at Week 24-1.3 ± 2.39-1.0 ± 1.52
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Activity (PtGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

PtGA was the assessment of the severity of disease by the participant/participant's guardian, using a VAS from 0 mm (no evidence of disease activity) to 100 mm (extremely active or severe disease activity). Higher score indicated worse status.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Patient Global Activity (PtGA) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Change at Week 4-1.1 ± 1.54-0.5 ± 2.31
Change at Week 8-0.2 ± 2.31-0.9 ± 1.82
Change at Week 12-2.5 ± 3.78-1.3 ± 1.52
Change at Week 16-2.1 ± 3.19-2.4 ± 1.62
Change at Week 20-2.9 ± 2.99-1.9 ± 1.96
Change at Week 24-2.0 ± 3.17-1.5 ± 2.64
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Extra Muscular Global Assessment From Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Score

MDAAT was a combined tool capturing physician's assessment of disease activity of various organ systems- constitutional, cutaneous, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, joints and cardiovascular, muscular using: Myositis Intention to Treat Activity Index (MITAX), a scale from 0("Not present in the last 4 weeks") to 4("New - in the last 4 weeks \[compared to the previous 4 weeks\]") and Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Visual Analogue Scales (MYOACT), a 10 cm VAS assessing disease activity in the last 4 weeks of various organ systems from 0 cm("No evidence of disease activity") to 10 cm("Extremely active or severe disease activity"), disease activity being defined as potentially reversible pathology or physiology resulting from the myositis. Left end of line = no evidence of disease activity, midpoint of line = moderate disease activity, and right end of line = extreme or maximum disease activity. An assessment of extramuscular activity assessment was taken from MDAAT using a 10cm VAS scale.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Extra Muscular Global Assessment From Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Score
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Change at Week 4-0.4 ± 2.200.0 ± 2.02
Change at Week 8-1.3 ± 3.18-0.3 ± 1.44
Change at Week 12-2.2 ± 2.07-0.3 ± 1.42
Change at Week 16-2.4 ± 2.09-0.5 ± 1.68
Change at Week 20-2.6 ± 1.68-0.3 ± 1.60
Change at Week 24-1.9 ± 2.24-0.4 ± 1.72
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8) Score

MMT-8 was an International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Core Set Measure used in the calculation of the IMACS Definition of Improvement (DOI) and ACR/EULAR TIS. It is a set of 8 designated muscles tested unilaterally (generally on right side) -which include 1 axial, 5 proximal (2 upper extremity, 3 lower extremity), and 2 distal muscles (1 upper, 1 lower extremity). Total score for unilateral testing ranges from 0 to 80, and bilateral testing ranges from 0 to 150 with normal strength represented by a higher score at or near the top of the scale. The total score for bilateral testing (item "MMT8 score (0 - 150)" from the MANUAL MUSCLE TESTING-8 (mmt8) form) is used in the derivation of the Total Improvement Score.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8) Score
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Change at Week 46.6 ± 7.724.1 ± 9.91
Change at Week 89.3 ± 8.409.1 ± 9.70
Change at Week 1215.0 ± 8.9410.6 ± 10.03
Change at Week 1614.4 ± 10.499.9 ± 9.81
Change at Week 2015.7 ± 9.168.0 ± 5.39
Change at Week 2416.0 ± 10.0310.9 ± 9.48
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire -Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

HAQ-DI was an IMACS Core Set Measure used in the calculation of the IMACS DOI and ACR/EULAR TIS. It is a generic rather than a disease-specific instrument comprised of 8 sections (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities), with 2 to 3 questions per section. Scoring within each section is from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). For each section the score given to that section is the worst score within the section. The 8 scores of the 8 sections are summed and divided by 8. Overall score ranges from 0-3.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire -Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Change at Week 4-0.2 ± 0.390.2 ± 0.48
Change at Week 8-0.2 ± 0.40-0.1 ± 0.28
Change at Week 12-0.4 ± 0.59-0.2 ± 0.33
Change at Week 16-0.4 ± 0.60-0.2 ± 0.42
Change at Week 20-0.5 ± 0.56-0.3 ± 0.34
Change at Week 24-0.4 ± 0.54-0.1 ± 0.35
SecondaryDBPC Period: Relative Change From Baseline in Most Abnormal Muscle-associated Enzyme

For each participant, the most abnormal muscle-associated enzyme was defined as the baseline muscle-associated enzyme with the highest ratio of the observed value to the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) among creatinine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and aldolase. The relative abnormality could be expressed as a percentage of ULN, calculated as (enzyme value divided by ULN) multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
DBPC Period: Relative Change From Baseline in Most Abnormal Muscle-associated Enzyme
percent changePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Change at Week 4-5.8 ± 14.82-3.4 ± 17.04
Change at Week 8-2.6 ± 26.83-11.4 ± 32.32
Change at Week 12-13.9 ± 29.30-4.7 ± 21.11
Change at Week 162.6 ± 40.80-24.6 ± 39.36
Change at Week 20-18.0 ± 32.39-11.5 ± 39.60
Change at Week 24-4.0 ± 40.31-16.8 ± 37.57
SecondaryDBPC Period: Number of Participants Who Achieved International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Response

A participant was defined as an International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Responder if 3 of any 6 IMACS Core Set Measures (CSMs) have been improved by more than equal to (\>= 20) percent (%), with no more than 2 IMACS CSMs worse by \>= 25%. The CSMs include, physician global activity visual analogue scale(VAS) score(0-10), patient global activity VAS score(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 score(0-150), health assessment questionnaire-disability index (0-3) along with checks for muscle-associated enzymes and extra muscular activity assessment derived using myositis disease activity assessment tool(0-10).

Time frame:
At Week 16 and 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
DBPC Period: Number of Participants Who Achieved International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Response
ParticipantsPlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Week 1622
Week 2411
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area and Severity Index-A (CDASI-A) and Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area and Severity Index-D (CDASI-D) Subscale Score

CDASI is a clinician-scored single page instrument that separately measures activity and damage in the skin of DM participants. CDASI has 3 activity measures (CDASI-A: erythema, scale, and erosion/ulceration) and 2 damage measures (CDASI-D: poikiloderma and calcinosis) which are assessed over 15 body areas. In addition, Gottron's papules on the hands, periungual changes and alopecia are evaluated separately both for activity and damage. Activity and Damage Subscale scores range from 0 to 100 and 0 to 32, respectively, where higher scores indicate greater disease severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area and Severity Index-A (CDASI-A) and Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Area and Severity Index-D (CDASI-D) Subscale Score
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
CDASI-A Week 4-3.8 ± 7.59-3.7 ± 9.53
CDASI-A Week 8-6.8 ± 6.24-8.1 ± 10.68
CDASI-A Week 12-11.5 ± 9.69-9.4 ± 9.07
CDASI-A Week 16-12.3 ± 10.15-5.3 ± 8.36
CLASI-A Week 20-12.3 ± 9.56-3.5 ± 6.38
CDASI-A Week 24-11.2 ± 9.06-4.7 ± 8.98
CDASI-D Week 4-0.8 ± 1.390.6 ± 1.71
CDASI-D Week 8-0.3 ± 0.520.3 ± 1.41
CDASI-D Week 12-1.5 ± 2.070.1 ± 0.90
CDASI-D Week 16-1.5 ± 2.071.0 ± 1.26
CDASI-D Week 20-1.5 ± 2.071.3 ± 2.07
CDASI-D Week 24-0.7 ± 1.211.2 ± 2.04
SecondaryDBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Skin Activity Score

The IGA skin activity is a five-point score that defines the level of disease severity based on overall lesion characteristics where 0 is "clear" and "4" is severe.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
DBPC Period: Change From Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Skin Activity Score
scores on a scalePlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BID
Week 4-0.3 ± 0.46-0.2 ± 0.79
Week 8-0.3 ± 0.52-0.4 ± 0.73
Week 12-0.8 ± 0.98-0.9 ± 0.90
Week 16-0.8 ± 0.98-0.3 ± 1.03
Week 20-1.0 ± 0.89-0.3 ± 1.03
Week 24-0.7 ± 1.03-0.3 ± 0.82
SecondaryOpen-label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Serious AE was defined AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as events with onset date or worsening during the on-treatment period. TEAEs included serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) are serious or non-serious AEs that are of clinical interest and were closely followed.

Time frame:
From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Open-label Extension (OLE) Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
ParticipantsPlacebo to Enpatoran 100 mgEnpatoran 100 mg BID
TEAEs44
Serious TEAEs00
AESI10
SecondaryOLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters

Laboratory parameters included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and reflex testing for HBV DNA. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters
ParticipantsPlacebo to Enpatoran 100 mgEnpatoran 100 mg
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters00
SecondaryOLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, weight, height and body mass index. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
ParticipantsPlacebo to Enpatoran 100 mgEnpatoran 100 mg
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs00
SecondaryOLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters

12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. Number of participants with clinically meaningful changes from baseline in ECG parameters were reported. Clinical meaningfulness was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame:
From start of OLE period (Week 1) up to safety follow up (Week 26)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters
ParticipantsPlacebo to Enpatoran 100 mgEnpatoran 100 mg
OLE Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters00

Adverse events

Collected over From 24-week DBPC Treatment Period followed by a 2-week Safety Follow-up period. OLE period: 26 weeks (24-week treatment period + 2 weeks Safety Follow-up), approximately 57 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo: DBPC Period0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)7/9 (77.8%)
Enpatoran 100mg: Double Blind Placebo Controlled Period0/11 (0%)2/11 (18.2%)7/11 (63.6%)
Enpatoran 100mg: Open-label Expension Period0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)8/11 (72.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo: DBPC PeriodEnpatoran 100mg: Double Blind Placebo Controlled PeriodEnpatoran 100mg: Open-label Expension Period
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/91/110/11
SepsisInfections and infestations0/91/110/11
Glomerulonephritis membranousRenal and urinary disorders0/91/110/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 59
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo: DBPC PeriodEnpatoran 100mg: Double Blind Placebo Controlled PeriodEnpatoran 100mg: Open-label Expension Period
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/90/111/11
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/93/110/11
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/90/111/11
SinusitisInfections and infestations2/91/110/11
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/90/110/11
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders0/92/110/11
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/90/112/11
LymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/90/110/11
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/90/110/11
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/90/110/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)PlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BIDTotal
Mean53 ± 11.555 ± 11.354 ± 11.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BIDTotal
Female7815
Male235
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BIDTotal
Hispanic or Latino213
Not Hispanic or Latino71017
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboEnpatoran 100 mg BIDTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White9918
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

31 sites
  • Neuromuscular Research Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • HonorHealth Research Institute - Bob Bove Neuroscience Institute-Neuroscience Research
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale (6365)
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • Barbara Davis Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • HMD Research LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32819, United States
  • Bolanos Clinical Research
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33026, United States
  • Augusta University-Rheumatology
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University - Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • University of Minnesota-Dermatology
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center-Neuromuscular
    Kansas City, Missouri 66103, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Austin Neuromuscular Center
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas-Clinical research
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Institute of Rheumatology - Rheumatology
    Prague, Czechia
  • Hippokration Hospital - 2nd Department of Medicine and Laboratory
    Athens, Greece
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Egnitio Hospital)
    Athens, Greece
  • University General Hospital of Larissa
    Larissa, Greece
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco Di Catania (Vittorio Emanuele) - Reumatologia
    Catania, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco Di Catania
    Catania, Italy
  • Azienda Usl Toscana Centro
    Florence, Italy
  • Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova
    Reggio Emilia, Italy
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, UCSC - Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche
    Rome, Italy
  • Instytut Reumatologii im. Eleonory Reicher - Department of Connective Tissue Diseases
    Warsaw, Poland
  • CHUAC - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña - Rheumatology
    A Coruña, Spain
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid - Rheumatology Department
    Madrid, Spain
  • Doncaster Royal Infirmary (3466)
    Doncaster, United Kingdom
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    London, United Kingdom
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust- Neuromuscular Diseases
    London, United Kingdom
  • Salford Royal Hospital, Barnes Clinical Research Facility
    Salford, United Kingdom
  • Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals (6493)
    Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD supporting publicly available results will be evaluated for sharing.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: IPD from completed trials will be publicly available within 6 months after all of the following events: Approval of a product/new indication by major authorities (FDA, EMA, PMDA if requested) with no pending submissions Public results via primary manuscript or trial registry disclosure Legal authority to share data Privacy protections are in place If approval is not sought or development is globally discontinued, data will be publicly available within 18 months after global trial completion. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21

Access criteria: Qualified researchers may propose access to IPD from sponsored trials via https://vivli.org/members/ourmembers/.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 29 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2026, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 6, 2022
First posted
Dec 14, 2022
StartActual
Jan 19, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jun 25, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 25, 2025
Results first posted
Sep 9, 2026
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05650567
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2022
Start date
Jan 19, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 25, 2025
Completion
Jun 25, 2025
Results posted
Sep 9, 2026
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Medical Responsible
study director · Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Enpatoran

Start the discussion