CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05641415FIMAGEUpdated Jun 20, 2024

Finnish Imaging of Shoulder Study

An observational study in Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tears and Glenoid Labrum Tear, sponsored by University of Helsinki. Completed at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-20.

Sponsored by University of Helsinki · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
603
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the Finnish Imaging of Shoulder study we will recruit 600 participants from a nationally representative general population sample. Participants aged 40 to 75 years will be invited to a clinical visit that includes assessment of general health, shoulder history and symptoms, and bilateral clinical examination and shoulder imaging (both plain radiography and MRI). We aim to assess the prevalence of abnormal imaging findings in both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals and explore possible risk factors for abnormal imaging findings and shoulder symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Pain
  • Rotator Cuff Tears
  • Glenoid Labrum Tear
  • Osteo Arthritis Shoulders

Keywords

  • Prevalence
  • Imaging
  • Shoulder
  • Clinical Examination
  • Asymptomatic
  • General population
  • Shoulder Function
03

In context

Shoulder Pain

707 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Pain; 152 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 603 is above the median of 82 across 130 observational studies indexed under Shoulder Pain.

Browse Shoulder Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Helsinki is the lead sponsor of 129 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Population-based sample

Inclusion criteria

  • Ambulatory
  • Participation in the Health 2000 Survey
  • Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia
  • Terminal Cancer
  • Previous shoulder joint replacement
  • Contraindications for MRI
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
603 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • General population sample

    600 participants aged 40 to 75 years will be randomly selected from a nationally representative general population sample of 9,922 individuals

    Other: Imaging

Interventions

  • OtherImaging

    MRI and x-ray of both shoulders

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

    Patient reported outcome measure. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was developed to measure current shoulder pain and disability in an outpatient setting. The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability. A SPADI total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst) is produced by averaging the two subscale scores.

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Constant -Murley Score

    The Constant-Murley Score was designed to assess the functional state of a shoulder and contains both physician-completed and patient-reported portions. The four domains include pain (15 possible points), activities of daily living (20 possible points), mobility (40 possible points), and strength (25 possible points). Scores range from 0 points (most disability) to 100 points (least disability).

    Time frame: At baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)

    The SSV score is defined as the subjective evaluation by the patient of shoulder function, expressed as a percentage of a normal shoulder. This score ranges from 0 to 100%.

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Pain NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable".

    Time frame: At baseline

  3. EQ-5D-5L

    EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal.

    Time frame: At baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    3T bilateral shoulder MRI

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Shoulder Radiography

    Plain radiographs (three projections) of both shoulders

    Time frame: At baseline

  3. Clinical Shoulder Examination

    The clinical examination will include measurement of height, weight, active and passive range-of-motion (ROM) of both shoulders using an inclinometer and isometric muscle strength of shoulder abduction, internal, and external rotation. In addition, we will perform special shoulder tests following a structured assessment protocol

    Time frame: At baseline

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    A self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic. Each item is answered by the patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression (higher scores indicating a more severe disorder).

    Time frame: At baseline

  5. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The PCS was developed to help quantify an individual's pain experience, asking about how they feel and what they think about when they are in pain. The PCS asks 13 questions on thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain, on 5-point scales with the end points (0) not at all and (4) all the time. PCS total scores range from 0 - 52.

    Time frame: At baseline

  6. Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PESQ)

    The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a 10-item questionnaire developed to assess the confidence people with ongoing pain have in performing activities while in pain. A raw score is presented with a range from 0 - 60, where high scores indicate greater levels of confidence in dealing with pain. High scores are strongly associated with clinically-significant functional levels and provide a useful gauge for evaluating outcomes in chronic pain patients.

    Time frame: At baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Helsinki University
    Helsinki, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ibounig T, Buchbinder R, Sillanpaa N, Ramo L, Toivonen P, Raatikainen S, Koskinen S, Harkanen T, Rissanen H, Czuba T, Paavola M, Jarvinen T, Taimela S; FIMAGE investigators. Concordance of shoulder symptoms and imaging findings: a protocol for the Finnish Imaging of Shoulder (FIMAGE) study. BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 28;13(12):e074457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074457. PubMed 38154899 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05641415
Lead sponsor
University of Helsinki
Collaborators
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Responsible party
Simo Taimela (Adjunct Professor, University of Helsinki) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 7, 2022
Start date
Feb 16, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2024
Completion
Mar 30, 2024
Last update
Jun 20, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion