CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07400146Updated Sep 30, 2026

Bupivacaine With Epinephrine Over Diaphragm in Laparoscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Instillation of Bupivacaine with epinephrine over the diaphragm in Postoperative Pain and Shoulder Pain, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Postoperative shoulder pain is often reported to be particularly bothersome after laparoscopy. The benefits of local anesthetic, such as bupivacaine, applied to subcutaneous tissue for general postoperative pain management after surgery is well established. However, there have been no studies on sprayed bupivacaine over the diaphragm to reduce shoulder pain in laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of the study is to evaluate if sprayed infra-diaphragmatic bupivacaine compared to placebo (saline) will improve postoperative shoulder pain in patients undergoing benign laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. The entire study will be conducted at Cedar Sinai Medical Center.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Shoulder Pain

Keywords

  • Laparoscopy
  • Gynecologic surgery
  • Bupivacaine
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide a signed and dated informed consent form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • 8 years of age or older
  • Undergoing laparoscopic surgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center with a surgeon in the Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery division.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Urgent/non-scheduled surgery
  • Scheduled for planned or possible concomitant non-gynecologic surgery (e.g., urologic or colorectal procedure)
  • Baseline shoulder pain
  • Baseline opioid use
  • Baseline of chronic pain syndrome
  • Conversion to open surgery
  • Allergy or intolerance to bupivacaine, lidocaine (or amide class of anesthetics), oxycodone, acetaminophen, or ibuprofen
  • Planned post-operative admission
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bupivacaine with epinephrine

    Participants randomized to this arm will have 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (total of 75 mg) placed over the diaphragm laparoscopically at the conclusion of the laparoscopic gynecologic procedure.

    Drug: Instillation of Bupivacaine with epinephrine over the diaphragm

  • No intervention
    No intervention

    No additional intervention will be performed.

Interventions

  • DrugInstillation of Bupivacaine with epinephrine over the diaphragm

    Prior to desufflation of the abdomen during the laparoscopic gynecologic procedure, the surgeon will instill 30mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (total of 75 mg) laparoscopically aiming to cover the diaphragm with liquid.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-operative shoulder pain scores

    Reported right shoulder pain score using visual analog score (VAS) 24 hours postoperatively Null hypothesis = pain scores will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis = pain scores will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group Assessed using the validated 100-mm scale with a range of 0-10 (11-point numerical rating scale), an ordinal scale Analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis test (as the data from the scale is typically not normally distributed); pairwise analyses will then be conducted using the Dunn post-hoc test if statistically significant Assuming non-normality, data will be presented as median (range) Patients without any postoperative documentation of pain scores will be withdrawn from the study and thus excluded from the analysis

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-operative generalized pain scores

    Post-operative generalized pain scores (superiority): Null hypothesis = pain scores will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis= pain scores will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group First and last reported generalized pain score in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) using numerical rating score Assessed using the validated 11-point numerical rating scale (0-10), an ordinal scale Analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis test (as the data from the scale is typically not normally distributed); pairwise analyses will then be conducted using the Dunn post-hoc test if statistically significant Assuming non-normality, data will be presented as median (range) Patients without any postoperative documentation of pain scores will be withdrawn from the study and thus excluded from the analysis

    Time frame: up to 6 hours in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)

  2. Total analgesic requirements in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) in morphine equivalents

    Calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (continuous data) Analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis test (assuming non-normal data) Data will be presented as median (range)

    Time frame: up to 6 hours in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)

  3. Length of stay in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)

    Length of stay in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (superiority): Null hypothesis = PACU length of stay will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis= PACU length of stay will be shorter in the bupivacaine with epinephrine groups Documented in minutes (continuous data) Analyzed using ANOVA if normally distributed, Kruskall-Wallis test if not normally distributed

    Time frame: up to 6 hours in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)

  4. Post-operative shoulder pain scores at home

    Daily reported post-operative shoulder pain scores at home (superiority): Null hypothesis = pain scores will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis = pain scores will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group Assessed using the validated 100-mm scale with a range of 0-10 (11-point numerical rating scale), an ordinal scale Analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis test (as the data from the scale is typically not normally distributed); pairwise analyses will then be conducted using the Dunn post-hoc test if statistically significant Assuming non-normality, data will be presented as median (range) Patients without any postoperative documentation of pain scores will be withdrawn from the study and thus excluded from the analysis

    Time frame: 7 days postoperatively

  5. Post-operative opioid use

    Post-operative opioid use (superiority): Null hypothesis = post-op opioid use will not differ among the bupivacaine with epinephrine vs no intervention group Alternative hypothesis= post-op opioid use will be lower among the bupivacaine with epinephrine group Number of pills used reported by patient (interval data) Analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis test Data will be presented as median (range)

    Time frame: 1 week postoperative

  6. Surgical outcome: EBL

    Surgical outcomes: EBL (mL) Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Continuous variables: estimated blood loss Analyzed using ANOVA if normally distributed, Kruskall-Wallis test if not normally distributed

    Time frame: up to 8 hours

  7. Surgical outcome: operative time

    Surgical outcomes: operative time (minutes) Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Continuous variables: operative time, estimated blood loss Analyzed using ANOVA if normally distributed, Kruskall-Wallis test if not normally distributed

    Time frame: up to 8 hours

  8. Surgical outcome: intraoperative complications

    Surgical outcomes: intraoperative complications Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Binary data: Surgical complications (yes/no) Analyzed using chi-square test

    Time frame: within 1 week of surgery

  9. Surgical outcomes: conversion to laparotomy

    Surgical outcomes: conversion to laparotomy Null hypothesis = outcome will not differ between groups Alternative hypothesis = outcome will be improved in bupivacaine with epinephrine group Binary data: conversion to laparotomy (yes/no) Analyzed using chi-square test

    Time frame: within 6 hours of surgery start time

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
    • Ogechukwu Ezike, MD · Contact · ogechukwu.ezike@cshs.org · 3473371181
    • Ogechukwu Ezike, MD · Sub investigator
    • Kelly Wright, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Hammer A, Rositch AF, Kahlert J, Gravitt PE, Blaakaer J, Sogaard M. Global epidemiology of hysterectomy: possible impact on gynecological cancer rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Feb 25. PubMed 25724402 ↗
  • Alperin M, Kivnick S, Poon KY. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.06.007. PubMed 23084671 ↗
  • Driessen SR, Baden NL, van Zwet EW, Twijnstra AR, Jansen FW. Trends in the implementation of advanced minimally invasive gynecologic surgical procedures in the Netherlands. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PubMed 25655043 ↗
  • Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3. PubMed 16625589 ↗
  • Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 15;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3. PubMed 25884671 ↗
  • Lirk P, Thiry J, Bonnet MP, Joshi GP, Bonnet F; PROSPECT Working Group. Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr;44(4):425-436. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100024. Epub 2019 Feb 3. PubMed 30914471 ↗
  • Vadivelu N, Mitra S, Narayan D. Recent advances in postoperative pain management. Yale J Biol Med. 2010 Mar;83(1):11-25. PubMed 20351978 ↗
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):248-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030. No abstract available. PubMed 22227789 ↗
  • Bougie O, Blom J, Zhou G, Murji A, Thurston J. Use and misuse of opioid after gynecologic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Dec;85(Pt B):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 18. PubMed 35973919 ↗
  • Blanton E, Lamvu G, Patanwala I, Barron KI, Witzeman K, Tu FF, As-Sanie S. Non-opioid pain management in benign minimally invasive hysterectomy: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):557-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.175. Epub 2016 Dec 30. PubMed 28043841 ↗
  • Clark NV, Moore K, Maghsoudlou P, North A, Ajao MO, Einarsson JI, Louie M, Schiff L, Moawad G, Cohen SL, Carey ET. Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block to Reduce Pain After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;137(4):648-656. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004329. PubMed 33706344 ↗
  • Miao L, Chen Q, Wang Y, Wang D, Zhou M. Effect of intraperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a single-center randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1387-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07020-w. Epub 2023 Apr 1. PubMed 37004537 ↗
  • Patel R, Carvalho JC, Downey K, Kanczuk M, Bernstein P, Siddiqui N. Intraperitoneal Instillation of Lidocaine Improves Postoperative Analgesia at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):554-559. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001799. PubMed 27984226 ↗
  • Cho M, Kim CJ, Hahm TS, Lee YY, Kim TJ, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS, Choi CH. Combination of a pulmonary recruitment maneuver and intraperitoneal bupivacaine for the reduction of postoperative shoulder pain in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Mar;63(2):187-194. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.2.187. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PubMed 32206659 ↗
  • Sutchritpongsa P, Chaipakdi P, Sirimai K, Chalermchokcharoenkit A, Tanmahasamut P. Intraperitoneal sub-diaphragmatic instillation of bupivacaine plus morphine for reducing postoperative shoulder pain after gynecologic endoscopy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 May;96(5):513-8. PubMed 23745303 ↗
  • Roy KK, Subbaiah M, Naha M, Kumar S, Sharma JB, Jahagirdar N. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine for pain relief after minilaparoscopy in patients with infertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):337-40. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2994-6. Epub 2013 Aug 8. PubMed 23925646 ↗
  • Ruiz-Tovar J, Gonzalez J, Garcia A, Cruz C, Rivas S, Jimenez M, Ferrigni C, Duran M. Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine Irrigation in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Obes Surg. 2016 Nov;26(11):2616-2621. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2142-z. PubMed 27007272 ↗
  • Yong L, Guang B. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation versus no intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:229-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jun 30. PubMed 28669869 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 23, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Jan 23, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07400146
Lead sponsor
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Responsible party
Kelly Wright (Division Director of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Mar 2, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Ogechukwu Ezike, MD
Contact
ogechukwu.ezike@cshs.org
3473371181
Kelly Wright, MD
Contact
kelly.wright@cshs.org

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion