ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05640440Updated Dec 7, 2022

Executive Function Performance in Children Who Stutter

An observational study in Stuttering, Childhood and Executive Dysfunction, sponsored by Sohag University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 15 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-07.

Sponsored by Sohag University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
45
Ages
7 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to asses the executive function in children who stutter for better management of those children

Read the detailed description

It is a case control study which will be done on 30 child who stutter and 15 normal child as a control group. Executive function testing will be done using computerized program called PEPL . Also, total intelligence quation(IQ) , verbal IQ, non verbal IQ will be assessed in both groups. stuttering severity will be assessed in case group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stuttering, Childhood
  • Executive Dysfunction

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stuttering

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Stuttering; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 60 across 15 observational studies indexed under Stuttering.

Browse Stuttering studies →

Lead sponsor

Sohag University is the lead sponsor of 1,230 studies on the registry; 636 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

30 case group, 15 control group age range 7 yrs old and 15 yrs old

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient and volunteers age between 7 years and 15 years.
  2. IQ ≥ 85.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of secondary stuttering.
  • Language impairment and other speech problem.
  • Concurrent or history of psychiatric, cognitive, neurological disorders or hearing impairment.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • children who stutter

    assessment executive function and stuttering severity in 30 child with stuttering

    Diagnostic Test: Executive function testing

  • children who don't stutter

    assessment executive function in 30 child with stuttering

    Diagnostic Test: Executive function testing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testExecutive function testing

    Assessment of executive function subdivision

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PEPL numerical stroop test

    Using the Psychological Experimental Building Language (PEBL) current version 2.1 released at 2018 (Muller \& Piper, 2014). The test measuring inhibitory function It asses the reaction time in seconds, the total numbers of errors ranging between 0-200

    Time frame: one year

  2. Cognitive flexibility function (sub-division of executive function testing)

    PEPL Berg's Card Sorting Test 64 version of Berg's (1948) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The child is asked to sort multi-attribute cards into piles according to an unknown and changing rule. It provides an indication of which rule (shape, color or number) is easiest for the individual. It aims to asses Number of Correct Responses: ranging between 0-64 Number of Total Errors ranging between 0-64 Percent of Perseverative Responses Percent of Perseverative Errors Percent of Non-Perseverative Errors Number of Unique Errors

    Time frame: one year

  3. Working memory score

    Sub-test of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition (SB5) The score ranging between 40-130

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non word Repetation score(Fawzy et al., 2012)

    To test the working memory abilities. the child is asked to repeat a number of non sense words. The score ranges between 0 to 30

    Time frame: one year

  2. Backward digit span score (Aboras et al., 2008)

    It test the working memory. The child is asked to retell a number of digit in backward manner. The score ranges between 0 to 14.

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05640440
Lead sponsor
Sohag University
Responsible party
Rasha Mohamed Hashem (Assistant lecturer, Sohag University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 7, 2022
Start date
Dec 1, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 7, 2022

Study contacts

Rasha Mo Hashem, Assistant lecture
Contact
rasha.hashem@med.sohag.edu.eg
01061966022 ext. 002
Eman M Mostafa, lectural
Contact
rody.saif87@yahoo.com
01029945463 ext. 002
Ahlam A Nabieh, professor
study director · ahlaama@yahoo.com

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion