ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05633121RHEO-CUAUpdated Dec 7, 2023

Retrospective Study Evaluating the Contribution of Rheopheresis in the Treatment of Uremic Calciphylaxis (RHEO-CUA)

An observational study in Rheopheresis, Calcifying Uremic Arteriolopathy and Uremic Calciphylaxis, sponsored by Association ECHO. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-07.

Sponsored by Association ECHO · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
55
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Calcifying uremic arteriolopathy (or uremic calciphylaxis) is a rare disease (prevalence \<1% of dialysis patients), but the prognosis is often catastrophic. The main non-modifiable risk factors are age, female gender, diabetes, obesity and length of time on dialysis. Today, there is no specific treatment for this pathology, and the therapeutic management is poorly codified. However, it is commonly accepted that the treatment is based on the control of risk factors, local care, and the possible addition of treatment with sodium thiosulfate. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has also been proposed by some authors, but remains not very accessible in practice.

Recently, it has been proposed to use Rheopheresis as an adjuvant treatment for severe forms of uraemic calciphylaxis. It is a technique of apheresis in double filtration, allowing the extraction of molecules of high molecular weight, and thus the improvement of the rheological conditions of microcirculation. The expected effect is the improvement of tissue oxygenation and the acceleration of the healing of skin lesions, with the consequent reduction of infectious complications.

The aim of this study is to propose a large national retrospective study, studying the evolution of patients with uremic calciphylaxis and treated by rheopheresis, compared to a control group. This will allow to have a more precise idea of the contribution of Rheopheresis in this indication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheopheresis
  • Calcifying Uremic Arteriolopathy
  • Uremic Calciphylaxis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Calciphylaxis

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Calciphylaxis; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 450 across 10 observational studies indexed under Calciphylaxis.

Browse Calciphylaxis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Association ECHO as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patient on chronic hemodialysis and suffering from uraemic calciphylaxis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient
  • Chronic hemodialysis
  • Uraemic calciphylaxis (clinical or histological diagnosis) diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2022,
  • Rheopheresis treatment initiated within one month of calciphylaxis diagnosis (for the exposed group)
  • Patient informed and not opposed to the use of their health data.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • minor patient,
  • Advanced cognitive disorders.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient suffering from uremic calciphylaxis treated with rheopheresis

    Procedure: Rheopheresis

  • Patient suffering from uremic calciphylaxis not treated with rheopheresis

Interventions

  • ProcedureRheopheresis

    Technique of apheresis in double filtration, allowing the extraction of molecules of high molecular weight, and thus the improvement of the rheological conditions of microcirculation. The expected effect is the improvement of tissue oxygenation and the acceleration of the healing of skin lesions, with the consequent reduction of infectious complications.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients fully recovered 6 months after diagnosis.

    Complete healing will be defined by the healing of all skin lesions without the appearance of new ones.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • ECHO - Pole Santé Sud
    Le Mans, 72000, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05633121
Lead sponsor
Association ECHO
Collaborators
European Clinical Trial Experts Network, Elsan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2022
Start date
May 20, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Sep 30, 2023
Last update
Dec 7, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion