ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05627154CABINUpdated May 21, 2024

Combined Antidepressant and Behavioural Intervention

An interventional study of Citalopram and Behavioural Activation in Low Mood, Depression and Anxiety, sponsored by University of Oxford. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by University of Oxford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2021, registered May 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A body of evidence from both animal and human research suggests that antidepressant drugs may induce early changes in emotional processing that interact with environmental factors to produce a later change in mood. This experimental medicine study will examine the effect of citalopram on emotional cognition under different environmental conditions (as manipulated by the presence or absence of behavioural activation training). Participants will be administered either citalopram or placebo over the course of two weeks. Citalopram will be taken either alone or in combination with behavioural activation training.

Read the detailed description

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition characterised by pervasive low mood as well as changes in sleep, appetite and cognition. In the UK, it is estimated that 3 in 100 people meet criteria for MDD every week, costing the economy £20.2-23.8 billion every year in health service, lost earnings and lower productivity.

A variety of pharmacological and psychological interventions for MDD are available. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the first-choice medication for depression in the UK, as recommended by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Whilst SSRIs have been demonstrated to be more effective than placebo, only about 50% of patients respond to their first-prescribed antidepressant. Understanding the mechanism through which SSRIs exert their antidepressant effect could explain why their effectiveness is not universal and allow for personalised treatments.

Experimental medicine studies conducted over the last 15-20 years have shown that SSRIs have early effects on emotional cognition, and that these precede clinically significant changes in depressive symptomatology. For example, one week of treatment with citalopram was found to decrease recognition of negative facial expressions and increase the relative recall of positive vs negative words. The switch from implicit changes in cognitive bias to explicit changes in mood is thought to occur through interaction with the environment and re-learning of positive associations. Indeed, rodent studies suggest that SSRIs only induce a positive bias in memory when administered before learning and that SSRI-induced neuroplasticity only occurs in the presence of an positive/enriched environment.

These findings imply that an enriched environment from which patients can derive positive and meaningful reinforcement may be important for antidepressant function. This hypothesis is indirectly supported by multiple reports of a positive correlation between antidepressant treatment outcome and patients' socioeconomic status as a proxy for environmental enrichment, but to our knowledge this has not been experimentally tested in humans.

This experimental medicine study will explore whether the early cognitive effects of the SSRI citalopram are modulated by different levels of environmental enrichment. The presence/absence of environmental enrichment will be modulated through provision of two weeks of behavioural activation (BA) training to a third of our sample; BA is a psychological intervention aimed to increase levels of environmental reinforcement by monitoring and adjusting an individual's daily activities. By comparing the combined effects of citalopram and BA to those of citalopram alone and placebo alone on performance of emotional cognition tasks (Emotional Test Battery (ETB)), the investigators will test whether the early cognitive changes induced by antidepressants are increased in the context of a more rewarding environment. The investigators hypothesise that the participant group receiving citalopram and BA will show greater changes in emotional cognition in the expected direction (decrease in negative bias/increase in positive bias) compared to the citalopram alone and placebo alone groups after the two-week intervention.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Consciousness Disorders

244 studies on the registry are indexed under Consciousness Disorders; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 134 is above the median of 44 across 155 interventional studies indexed under Consciousness Disorders.

Browse Consciousness Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 812 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-65 years inclusive
  • Resident in the UK for the duration of the study
  • Fluent in English
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
  • Experiencing subjective low mood (score of 10 or above on the BDI-II)
  • Experiencing low activity levels (self-reported)
  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the research
  • Access to a computer or laptop with a functioning keyboard and a reliable internet connection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antidepressant treatment or medication prescribed to treat depression/low mood, currently or in the last six months
  • Current psychological therapy of any kind
  • Current or past probable diagnosis of psychosis, bipolar disorder, OCD, PTSD, substance abuse disorder or any eating disorder, as indicated by the SCID-5
  • Current or past diagnosis of any personality disorder (e.g. borderline personality disorder) according to self-report
  • Judged to be at clinical high risk of suicide
  • Past suicide attempt
  • Current or past hospitalisation for mental health reasons
  • 1st degree relative with diagnosis of bipolar disorder
  • Diagnosis of a developmental disorder (e.g. ASD, ADHD, Tourette's syndrome, severe learning disability) according to self-report; this excludes cases of mild dyslexia or dyscalculia where in the opinion of the study team such difficulties would not interfere with the performance of the tasks required in this study
  • Diagnosis of a neurological disorder (e.g. epilepsy, MS) according to self-report
  • Score of >30 on the BDI-II
  • Current use of medication that might interact with the effects of citalopram (except for the contraceptive pill)
  • Known contraindication to citalopram including: past allergic reaction to citalopram or any other medicines, diagnosis of a cardiovascular condition, glaucoma, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, diagnosis of epilepsy, undergoing electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), or current use of any other medication that is associated with prolonged QT-interval
  • Any other current or past medical conditions which in the opinion of the study medic may interfere with the safety of the participant or the scientific integrity of the study
  • Heavy use of cigarettes (smoke > 20 cigarettes per day)
  • Heavy use of caffeine (drink > 4 250ml cups/cans of coffee/energy drinks per day)
  • Severely underweight or overweight in a manner that renders them unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the study medic
  • Lactose intolerance (due to the study involving administration of a lactose placebo tablet)
  • Pregnancy (as determined by urine pregnancy test taken during the Part 2 screening visit), breast feeding or plans to become pregnant
  • Participation in an ETB study in the past 6 months
  • Participation in another drug study in the past 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
134 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo only

    Participants randomised to the Placebo condition will be taking a lactose placebo capsule daily for 14 days.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Citalopram only

    Participants randomised to the Citalopram only condition will be taking 20mg of citalopram in capsule form daily for 14 days.

    Drug: Citalopram

  • Experimental
    Citalopram and Behavioural Activation

    Participants randomised to the Citalopram only condition will be taking 20mg of citalopram in capsule form daily for 14 days. Over the two weeks of taking citalopram, they will also receive \~3h of behavioural activation therapy split into 3 sessions.

    Drug: Citalopram · Behavioral: Behavioural Activation

Interventions

  • Serotonin-reuptake inhibitor commonly used to treat depressive and anxiety disorders.

  • BehavioralBehavioural Activation

    A NICE recommended psychological intervention for mild to moderate depression. In behavioural activation, the person with depression and the therapist work together to identify the relationships between the activities the person undertakes and their mood. It encourages people to become less mood-dependent when planning activities and doing constructive things that they would usually avoid doing.

  • DrugPlacebo

    A lactose-based tablet.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in emotional cognition

    Accuracy and reaction times on computer-based measures of emotional cognition (facial expression recognition task, emotional word categorisation task, emotional word recall task, emotional word recognition task).

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and 13-15 days after the start of the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in reward processing

    Accuracy, consistency, reaction times, monetary wins and losses, learning rate and decision temperature on the Probabilistic Instrumental Learning Task.

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and 13-15 days after the start of the intervention

  2. Changes in motor activity

    Acceleration, light and temperature data measured at 25 Hz using GENEActiv actigraphy watches

    Time frame: 7 days pre-intervention compared to last 7 days of intervention

  3. Changes in salivary cortisol

    Waking cortisol levels assayed using a Salimetrics Salivary Cortisol ELISA Kit from 6 saliva samples (3 pre- and 3 post-intervention) collected using Sarstedt Salivette® Cortisol tubes

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and 13-14 days after the start of the intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in daily mood

    Fluctuations in daily mood measures using a Mood Zoom format, comprising six items on a 7-point Likert scale

    Time frame: 7 days pre-intervention compared to last 7 days of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Neurosciences Building, Warneford Hospital
    Oxford, Oxfordshire OX3 7JX, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 31, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Mar 23, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Nov 2023, 29 months.

Of 71 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Consciousness Disorders, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52. This study's 29 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 73 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 31, 2022
First posted
Nov 25, 2022
StartActual
May 28, 2021
Primary completionActual
Nov 17, 2023
CompletionActual
Nov 17, 2023
Last update
May 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05627154
Collaborators
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 25, 2022
Start date
May 28, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 17, 2023
Completion
Nov 17, 2023
Last update
May 21, 2024

Study contacts

Catherine J Harmer, DPhil
principal investigator · Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Citalopram

Start the discussion