An interventional study of Citalopram and Behavioural Activation in Low Mood, Depression and Anxiety, sponsored by University of Oxford. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.
Sponsored by University of Oxford · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
A body of evidence from both animal and human research suggests that antidepressant drugs may induce early changes in emotional processing that interact with environmental factors to produce a later change in mood. This experimental medicine study will examine the effect of citalopram on emotional cognition under different environmental conditions (as manipulated by the presence or absence of behavioural activation training). Participants will be administered either citalopram or placebo over the course of two weeks. Citalopram will be taken either alone or in combination with behavioural activation training.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric condition characterised by pervasive low mood as well as changes in sleep, appetite and cognition. In the UK, it is estimated that 3 in 100 people meet criteria for MDD every week, costing the economy £20.2-23.8 billion every year in health service, lost earnings and lower productivity.
A variety of pharmacological and psychological interventions for MDD are available. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the first-choice medication for depression in the UK, as recommended by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Whilst SSRIs have been demonstrated to be more effective than placebo, only about 50% of patients respond to their first-prescribed antidepressant. Understanding the mechanism through which SSRIs exert their antidepressant effect could explain why their effectiveness is not universal and allow for personalised treatments.
Experimental medicine studies conducted over the last 15-20 years have shown that SSRIs have early effects on emotional cognition, and that these precede clinically significant changes in depressive symptomatology. For example, one week of treatment with citalopram was found to decrease recognition of negative facial expressions and increase the relative recall of positive vs negative words. The switch from implicit changes in cognitive bias to explicit changes in mood is thought to occur through interaction with the environment and re-learning of positive associations. Indeed, rodent studies suggest that SSRIs only induce a positive bias in memory when administered before learning and that SSRI-induced neuroplasticity only occurs in the presence of an positive/enriched environment.
These findings imply that an enriched environment from which patients can derive positive and meaningful reinforcement may be important for antidepressant function. This hypothesis is indirectly supported by multiple reports of a positive correlation between antidepressant treatment outcome and patients' socioeconomic status as a proxy for environmental enrichment, but to our knowledge this has not been experimentally tested in humans.
This experimental medicine study will explore whether the early cognitive effects of the SSRI citalopram are modulated by different levels of environmental enrichment. The presence/absence of environmental enrichment will be modulated through provision of two weeks of behavioural activation (BA) training to a third of our sample; BA is a psychological intervention aimed to increase levels of environmental reinforcement by monitoring and adjusting an individual's daily activities. By comparing the combined effects of citalopram and BA to those of citalopram alone and placebo alone on performance of emotional cognition tasks (Emotional Test Battery (ETB)), the investigators will test whether the early cognitive changes induced by antidepressants are increased in the context of a more rewarding environment. The investigators hypothesise that the participant group receiving citalopram and BA will show greater changes in emotional cognition in the expected direction (decrease in negative bias/increase in positive bias) compared to the citalopram alone and placebo alone groups after the two-week intervention.
244 studies on the registry are indexed under Consciousness Disorders; 104 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 134 is above the median of 44 across 155 interventional studies indexed under Consciousness Disorders.
Browse Consciousness Disorders studies →University of Oxford is the lead sponsor of 812 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants randomised to the Placebo condition will be taking a lactose placebo capsule daily for 14 days.
Drug: Placebo
Participants randomised to the Citalopram only condition will be taking 20mg of citalopram in capsule form daily for 14 days.
Drug: Citalopram
Participants randomised to the Citalopram only condition will be taking 20mg of citalopram in capsule form daily for 14 days. Over the two weeks of taking citalopram, they will also receive \~3h of behavioural activation therapy split into 3 sessions.
Drug: Citalopram · Behavioral: Behavioural Activation
Serotonin-reuptake inhibitor commonly used to treat depressive and anxiety disorders.
A NICE recommended psychological intervention for mild to moderate depression. In behavioural activation, the person with depression and the therapist work together to identify the relationships between the activities the person undertakes and their mood. It encourages people to become less mood-dependent when planning activities and doing constructive things that they would usually avoid doing.
A lactose-based tablet.
Changes in emotional cognition
Accuracy and reaction times on computer-based measures of emotional cognition (facial expression recognition task, emotional word categorisation task, emotional word recall task, emotional word recognition task).
Time frame: Pre-intervention and 13-15 days after the start of the intervention
Changes in reward processing
Accuracy, consistency, reaction times, monetary wins and losses, learning rate and decision temperature on the Probabilistic Instrumental Learning Task.
Time frame: Pre-intervention and 13-15 days after the start of the intervention
Changes in motor activity
Acceleration, light and temperature data measured at 25 Hz using GENEActiv actigraphy watches
Time frame: 7 days pre-intervention compared to last 7 days of intervention
Changes in salivary cortisol
Waking cortisol levels assayed using a Salimetrics Salivary Cortisol ELISA Kit from 6 saliva samples (3 pre- and 3 post-intervention) collected using Sarstedt Salivette® Cortisol tubes
Time frame: Pre-intervention and 13-14 days after the start of the intervention
Changes in daily mood
Fluctuations in daily mood measures using a Mood Zoom format, comprising six items on a 7-point Likert scale
Time frame: 7 days pre-intervention compared to last 7 days of intervention
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Nov 2023, 29 months.
Of 71 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Consciousness Disorders, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52. This study's 29 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 73 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Citalopram