ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05621161Updated Sep 21, 2023

ESPB vs FICB for Pain Management Following Total Hip Prosthesis Surgery

An interventional study of Postoperative analgesia management in Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Disease and Knee Arthritis, sponsored by Mursel Ekinci. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-21.

Sponsored by Mursel Ekinci · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hip arthroplasty surgery is frequently performed on elderly patients in the community and it is associated with long-term postoperative hospital stays and high mortality.

Postoperative pain management is a multimodal process that includes intravenous and regional anesthesia methods. The ultrasound(US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is injected with a local anesthetic into the deep fascia of the erector spinae. In the literature, it has been reported that ESPB provides effective analgesia after a hip surgery. The fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a safe method used for postoperative analgesia following hip, femoral, and knee surgeries.

The aim of this study is to compare US-guided FICB and ESPB for postoperative analgesia management after total hip prosthesis surgery.

Read the detailed description

Hip arthroplasty surgery is frequently performed on elderly patients in the community and it is associated with long-term postoperative hospital stays and high mortality. Severe postoperative pain may further reduce the limited cardiopulmonary capacity, especially in the elderly population. Postoperative effective pain treatment provides early mobilization and shorter hospital stay, thus complications due to hospitalization such as infection and thromboembolism may be reduced.

Postoperative pain management is a multimodal process that includes intravenous and regional anesthesia methods. Parenteral opioids are generally preferred in the management of acute postoperative pain. However, opioids have undesired adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, itching, sedation, and respiratory depression (opioid-related adverse events). Regional anesthesia techniques are frequently preferred as a part of multimodal analgesia in hip surgeries. Various methods may be performed to reduce the use of systemic opioids and for effective pain treatment. US-guided interfascial plane blocks have been used increasingly due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice.

The ultrasound(US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is injected with a local anesthetic into the deep fascia of the erector spinae. Visualization of sonoanatomy with the US is simple and the spread of local anesthetic solution can be seen easily in the deep fascia of the erector spinae. Visualization of sonoanatomy in the US is easy, and the spread of local anesthetic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. Cadaveric studies have shown that the injection spreads to the ventral and dorsal roots of the spinal nerves. In the literature, it has been reported that ESPB provides effective analgesia after a hip surgery. The fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a safe method used for postoperative analgesia following hip, femoral, and knee surgeries.

The aim of this study is to compare US-guided FICB and ESPB for postoperative analgesia management after total hip prosthesis surgery. The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), and adverse effects related to opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Knee Disease
  • Knee Arthritis

Keywords

  • Total hip prosthesis surgery
  • Postoperative analgesia
  • Erector spina plan block
  • Fascia iliaca compartment block
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,391 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 628 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 69 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Mursel Ekinci is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with ASA classification I-III
  • Aged 18-80 years
  • Who will be scheduled for total hip prosthesis surgery under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of bleeding diathesis
  • Take anticoagulant therapy
  • History of chronic pain before surgery
  • Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Infection at the site of block
  • Patients who do not accept the procedure
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    GroupFICB= fascia iliaca compartment block

    ESP block will be performed. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the L3 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle (100 mm, 22G) will be inserted cranio-caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 2 ml saline will be injected deep into the erector spinae muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for the block.

    Drug: Postoperative analgesia management

  • Active comparator
    Group ESPB = erector spina plan block

    FIC block will be performed in the supine position. The linear probe is placed transversely to identify the femoral artery, iliopsoas muscle, and fascia iliaca at the inguinal crease. The probe will be tilted cranially and caudally until optimal images of the fascia iliaca are obtained. Block needle (50 mm, 22G) will be passed through the iliac fascia via the in-plane method. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 30 mL will be injected.

    Drug: Postoperative analgesia management

Interventions

  • DrugPostoperative analgesia management

    Intravenous paracetamol 1 gr and a dose of 0,5 mg/kg-1 tramadol intravenously will be performed on all patients 30 min before the end of the surgery for postoperative analgesia. Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient-controlled device prepared with 5 mg/ ml tramadol will be attached to all patients with a protocol including 10 mg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time, and 4-hour limit. If the VAS score will be ≥ 4, 0,5 mg/kg-1 meperidine IV will be administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid consumption

    The tramadol consumption on PCA device will be evaluated

    Time frame: Changes from baseline opioid consumption at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain score

    Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)

    Time frame: Postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mursel Ekinci
    Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gao Y, Tan H, Sun R, Zhu J. Fascia iliaca compartment block reduces pain and opioid consumption after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019 May;65:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 25. PubMed 30922995 ↗
  • Tulgar S, Senturk O. Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block at L-4 transverse process level provides effective postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Feb;44:68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 14. No abstract available. PubMed 29149734 ↗
  • Deniz S, Atim A, Kurklu M, Cayci T, Kurt E. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus 3 in 1 block in hip prosthesis surgery. Agri. 2014;26(4):151-7. doi: 10.5505/agri.2014.76993. PubMed 25551810 ↗
  • Kaciroglu A, Ekinci M, Dikici M, Aydemir O, Demiroluk O, Erdogan D, Golboyu BE, Alver S, Ciftci B, Gurbuz H. Lumbar erector spinae plane block versus infrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Pain Med. 2024 Apr 3;25(4):257-262. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad166. PubMed 38127974 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2022 to primary completion in Aug 2023, 8 months.

Of 1,143 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,285 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2022
First posted
Nov 17, 2022
StartActual
Nov 28, 2022
Primary completionActual
Aug 15, 2023
CompletionActual
Sep 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05621161
Lead sponsor
Mursel Ekinci
Responsible party
Mursel Ekinci (Principal Investigator, Bursa City Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2022
Start date
Nov 28, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2023
Completion
Sep 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 21, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion