ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05615584MRM-OREXUpdated Jul 9, 2026

Spectrometry (MRM) Versus I 125 Radioimmunoassay (RIA) for Quantification of Orexin-A of Patients With Hypersomnolence

An interventional study of Quantitative mass spectrometry assay in Narcolepsy, Idiopathic Hypersomnia and Cataplexy, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-09.

Primary conditionCataplexyRegistry: NarcolepsyReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Narcolepsy — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Cataplexy
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Cataplexy, a narrower term within Narcolepsy.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
117
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In humans, selective loss of orexin neurons is responsible for type 1 narcolepsy (NT1), or narcolepsy with cataplexy, or orexin deficiency syndrome.

The International Classification of Sleep Disorders 3rd edition (ICSD-3) distinguishes between hypersomnolence of central origin: NT1, narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), or narcolepsy without cataplexy, and idiopathic hypersomnia (HI). These rare conditions are all characterised by hypersomnolence (excessive daytime sleepiness, or excessive need for sleep), which is the primary and often most disabling symptom. A level of ORX-A in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (\<110 pg/mL) is a very sensitive and specific biomarker of NT1, currently sufficient for the diagnosis of this condition. In contrast, ORX neurons are thought to be intact in IH and NT2, and the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these diseases remain unknown. Thus, their diagnosis is based solely on clinical and electrophysiological criteria.

The objective of this project is to determine the validity of a mass spectrometric technique for the determination of ORX-A in the cerebral spinal fluid of patients suffering from hypersomnolence in comparison with the radioimmunoassay which is the reference technique.

02

Conditions studied

  • Narcolepsy
  • Idiopathic Hypersomnia
  • Cataplexy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • orexin/hypocretin
  • sleepiness
03

In context

Cataplexy Reclassified

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataplexy; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 117 is close to the median of 117 across 27 interventional studies indexed under Cataplexy.

Browse Cataplexy studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,261 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Compared within Cataplexy, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Narcolepsy. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 8 years
  • Complaint of hypersomnolence and suspected central hypersomnolence
  • Benefiting from a standardised assessment: clinical, biological and neurophysiological
  • Lumbar puncture necessary for the assessment
  • Sufficient cerebrospinal fluid taken for biological analysis (at least 1 ml)
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to lumbar puncture
  • Secondary hypersomnolence
  • Refusal to participate in the study or refusal of the lumbar puncture
  • Adult protected by law, or subject deprived of liberty, by judicial or administrative decision or patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Subject not affiliated to the French social security system
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
117 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testQuantitative mass spectrometry assay

    ORX-A determination by quantitative mass spectrometry

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Orexin-A dosage by Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry

    Multiple Reaction Monitoring mass spectrometry for orexin-A dosage in cerebrospinal fluid

    Time frame: Day 1 (=day of inclusion)

  2. Orexin-A dosage by radioimmunoassay

    Radioimmunoassay for orexin-A dosage in cerebrospinal fluid

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Age of onset of hypersomnia symptoms

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Frequency of cataplexy

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  3. Characteristics of cataplexy

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  4. Average duration of cataplexy

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  5. Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS)

    the score will be between 0 and 24, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Narcolepsy severity scale (NSS)

    the score will be between 0 and 57, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Hypersomnolence severity scale (IHSS)

    the score will be between 0 and 50, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Insomnia severity index

    the score will be between 0 and 32, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Iterative sleep latency tests (TILE)

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  10. Presence of the HLA allele DQB1*06:02

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital of Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2023 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 19 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 26, 2022
First posted
Nov 14, 2022
StartActual
Feb 15, 2023
Primary completionActual
Oct 9, 2024
CompletionActual
Oct 9, 2024
Last update
Jul 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05615584
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 14, 2022
Start date
Feb 15, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 9, 2024
Completion
Oct 9, 2024
Last update
Jul 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion