ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05615272Updated Nov 14, 2022

Treatment of Alveolar Osteitis: Traditional or Regenerative?

An interventional study of Bio-PRF and Alveogyl in Alveolar Osteitis, Dry Socket and Pain, sponsored by University of Dublin, Trinity College. Status unknown at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-14.

Sponsored by University of Dublin, Trinity College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alveolar osteitis, commonly referred to as dry socket, is a common painful postoperative complication following tooth extraction. It is defined as pain in and around an extraction socket which increases at any time between one and three days following extraction, accompanied by partial or total loss of the blood clot from the socket, with or without halitosis (Blum, 2002).

The incidence of the complication varies from 1-5% for routine extractions up to approximately 30% for third molar extractions. There are a variety of factors that contribute to the incidence of dry socket including tissue trauma, smoking in the early postoperative period and the oral contraceptive pill. Although it is a self- limiting condition, symptoms can be very debilitating for patients and therefore following diagnosis, immediate treatment should be provided to expedite resolution and to their improve quality of life during the healing period. Treatment options for dry socket vary from rinsing of the socket, regular analgesia and sometimes placement of an obtundent, sedative dressing such as Alveogyl or a zinc oxide eugenol alternative.

This study will aim to compare two treatments for patients who present with alveolar osteitis (dry socket) to Dublin Dental University Hospital after tooth extraction. Following randomisation, one of two treatment modalities will be used, either a experimental treatment (Bio-PRF) or a positive control (Alveogyl).

The results of this study will enable us to learn more about the efficacy of these treatment options for dry socket and how they affect patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alveolar Osteitis
  • Dry Socket
  • Pain
  • Healing
  • Tooth Extraction

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dry Socket

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Socket; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 58 is close to the median of 60 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Dry Socket.

Browse Dry Socket studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Dublin, Trinity College is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and females adults at least 18 years old
  • A diagnosis of alveolar osteitis following tooth extraction based on patients having both pain and exposed bone
  • Good command of the English language
  • Willingness to keep a diary of symptoms and travel for the review appointment on day 7 following intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Current or previous bisphosphonate used or history of radiotherapy to the jaws
  • Allergy or intolerance to study materials
  • Lack of capacity to consent to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bio-PRF

    This is a blood-derived platelet rich concentrate from the patient's whole blood sample. The patient typically donates two 9ml (1.5 tablespoons) vials of blood that is then spun in a centrifuge.

    Biological: Bio-PRF

  • Active comparator
    Alveogyl

    Alveogyl is an intraalveolar sedative, obtundent dressing, which contains the active ingredient eugenol.

    Drug: Alveogyl

Interventions

  • BiologicalBio-PRF

    Intervention group

    Also known as: Blood Sample

  • DrugAlveogyl

    Control group

    Also known as: Intraalveolar Dressing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in postoperative pain levels: Day 0 to Day 3

    Pain will be measured using a pain diary with VAS scale (0-100) at baseline and Day 3. The changes in patient pain levels from baseline will be compared to Day 3 for each group.

    Time frame: Day 3 following intervention

  2. Change in postoperative pain levels: Day 0 to Day 7

    Pain will be measured using a pain diary with VAS scale (0-100) at baseline and Day 7. The changes in patient pain levels from baseline will be compared to Day 7 for each group.

    Time frame: Day 7 following intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Healing

    Healing will be measured clinically by second blinded assessor using a modified version of the Landry Healing Index

    Time frame: Day 7 following intervention

  2. Quality of Life Measurements (QoL)

    The patient's QoL will be assessed using a questionnaire modified from the postoperative symptom severity scale (PoSSe) ranging from 1-5, where 1 correlates to no impact on their quality of life and 5 signifies major impact on their quality of life. Higher scores will mean worse outcome if by Day 7, the patient's QoL scores remain high.

    Time frame: Day 7 following intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dublin Dental University Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
    Recruiting
    • Maeve Cooney · Contact
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2024, 17 months after the start.

Of 22 interventional studies with no phase under Dry Socket, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 24. This study's planned 17 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2022
First posted
Nov 14, 2022
StartActual
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2024
CompletionEst.
Jul 2024
Last update
Nov 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05615272
Lead sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Responsible party
Maeve Cooney (Postgraduate Student in Oral Surgery, University of Dublin, Trinity College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2022
Start date
Oct 1, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 14, 2022

Study contacts

Maeve Cooney
Contact
maeve.cooney@dental.tcd.ie
+353872529024
Anna Dr Beattie
study director · Specialist Oral Surgeon
John Ed Mr O'Connell
study director · Consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion