ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07393880NITESGON-ADTUpdated Apr 3, 2026

Bimodal Electrical-Sound Stimulation and Auditory Training for Chronic Tonal Tinnitus

An interventional study of Real NITESGON and Sham NITESGON in Tinnitus, Subjective, Tinnitus and Chronic Tinnitus, sponsored by University of Dublin, Trinity College. Recruiting at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-03.

Sponsored by University of Dublin, Trinity College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study tests whether pairing non-invasive stimulation of the greater occipital nerve (NITESGON) with an attentionally demanding auditory frequency discrimination training task reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress. One hundred adults with chronic tonal tinnitus will be randomised to one of four groups in a 2×2 factorial design: real versus sham NITESGON and active versus passive listening during auditory stimulation. Participants complete eight sessions across four weeks, with outcomes assessed at baseline, end of treatment, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-centre, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial conducted at Trinity College Dublin. The intervention combines transcutaneous electrical stimulation targeting the greater occipital nerve (NITESGON) with auditory stimulation delivered during a structured training paradigm. The two between-subjects factors are stimulation condition (real NITESGON vs sham NITESGON) and listening condition (active listening: auditory frequency discrimination training vs passive listening: visual distractor task while auditory stimuli are presented). One hundred adults with chronic tonal tinnitus will be randomised 1:1:1:1 to one of four arms. Participants complete eight sessions (two per week for four weeks). Primary outcomes-tinnitus loudness (VAS 0-100), tinnitus-related functional impact (TFI 0-100), and tinnitus handicap (THI 0-100)-and secondary outcomes are assessed at baseline (T0), end of treatment (T1), 28 days after treatment completion (T2), and 6 months after treatment completion (T3). Secondary outcomes include tinnitus psychoacoustics, extended high-frequency audiometry, speech-in-noise performance, EEG (resting-state and auditory oddball), autonomic/biomarker measures (pupillometry, heart rate, saliva), patient global impression of change, quality of life, and safety/blinding assessments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tinnitus, Subjective
  • Tinnitus
  • Chronic Tinnitus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tinnitus
03

In context

Tinnitus

444 studies on the registry are indexed under Tinnitus; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 368 interventional studies indexed under Tinnitus.

Browse Tinnitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Dublin, Trinity College is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-80 years
  • Continuous subjective tinnitus for >3 months and ≤5 years
  • Predominantly tonal tinnitus (unilateral or bilateral)
  • Screening THI score 28-76
  • Minimum Masking Level (MML) 20-80 dB HL
  • No prior tinnitus neuromodulation treatment
  • Able to comply with eight sessions over four weeks and follow-up assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Objective tinnitus or predominantly somatic tinnitus
  • Pulsatile tinnitus
  • Evidence of conductive hearing loss (abnormal otoscopy or tympanometry)
  • Pure-tone audiometry exclusions: >40 dB HL at any frequency 250 Hz-1 kHz OR >80 dB HL at any frequency 2-8 kHz in either ear
  • Hearing aid use initiated within the past 90 days
  • Active implantable medical device (e.g., pacemaker, DBS, cochlear implant)
  • LDL \<30 dB SL at 500 Hz in either ear
  • Diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorder or occipital neuralgia
  • Severe anxiety (STAI >120/160)
  • Cognitive impairment ( \<25)
  • Severe depressive symptoms (BDI ≥30)
  • Diagnosis of Menière's disease
  • Current pregnancy
  • Involvement in medicolegal cases
  • History of auditory hallucinations
  • Current prescription of central nervous system drugs likely to alter neuromodulatory function (e.g., noradrenergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic, benzodiazepine, cholinergic, or other psychoactive medications)
  • Currently enrolled in another interventional study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Real Stimulation + Active Listening (ADT)

    Real stimulation delivered during active auditory frequency discrimination training.

    Device: Real NITESGON · Behavioral: Active Listening

  • Active comparator
    Real Stimulation + Passive Listening

    Real stimulation delivered while participants perform a visual distractor task and are instructed to ignore auditory stimuli.

    Device: Real NITESGON · Behavioral: Passive Listening (Control)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation + Active Listening (ADT)

    Sham stimulation delivered during active auditory frequency discrimination training.

    Device: Sham NITESGON · Behavioral: Active Listening

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation + Passive Listening

    Sham stimulation delivered while participants perform a visual distractor task and are instructed to ignore auditory stimuli.

    Device: Sham NITESGON · Behavioral: Passive Listening (Control)

Interventions

  • DeviceReal NITESGON

    Real NITESGON is delivered transcutaneously via two saline-soaked sponge electrodes (35 cm² each) positioned bilaterally over the C2 dermatomes to target the greater occipital nerve. Stimulation consists of a 20 Hz sinusoidal current at 1.5 mA peak-to-peak, ramped up over 30 seconds and ramped down over 5 seconds. It is administered concurrently with the task for \~45 minutes per session, across eight sessions (2/week) over 4 weeks.

  • DeviceSham NITESGON

    Sham NITESGON is delivered using two saline-soaked sponge electrodes (35 cm² each) positioned bilaterally over the C2 dermatomes. The sham condition mimics real stimulation sensations via a 30-second ramp-up followed by a brief ramp-down, with no sustained current thereafter. Sham is administered concurrently with the task for \~45 minutes per session, across eight sessions (2/week) over 4 weeks.

  • BehavioralActive Listening

    ADT is delivered using a three-interval, three-alternative forced-choice (3I-3AFC) frequency discrimination task. Standard tone frequencies are individually selected using ERB/critical-band spacing, centered one octave below each participant's dominant tinnitus pitch and extending to lower frequencies; the highest standard is kept below the tinnitus pitch region. Tones are presented binaurally via headphones, with presentation levels calibrated to individual audiometric thresholds and matched for equal SPL in both ears.

    Also known as: Auditory frequency discrimination training (ADT)

  • BehavioralPassive Listening (Control)

    VisDT uses a three-interval, three-alternative forced-choice (3I-3AFC) paradigm with Gabor patches (sinusoidal gratings windowed by a Gaussian envelope) of fixed spatial frequency (6 cycles/degree) and fixed spatial spread; on each trial, one interval contains an orientation deviant relative to the standard. During VisDT, participants attend to the visual task while concurrent binaural tones are presented passively using a predetermined, non-adaptive schedule. Auditory tones are individually calibrated to audiometric thresholds and drawn from ERB-spaced frequencies centered one octave below the dominant tinnitus pitch and extending to lower frequencies, with the highest frequency kept below the tinnitus pitch region.

    Also known as: Visual distractor task (VisDT)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tinnitus Loudness (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS 0-100)

    0-100 mm VAS anchored from "not audible" to "extremely loud"; higher scores indicate greater perceived tinnitus loudness.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  2. Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI, 0-100)

    25-item self-report measure of tinnitus-related functional impact; total score 0-100, higher scores indicate greater impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  3. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI, 0-100)

    25-item measure of tinnitus-related handicap; total score 0-100, higher scores indicate greater handicap.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Audiometry (Extended High-Frequency Thresholds up to 13 kHz)

    Air-conduction pure-tone audiometry thresholds will be measured from 250 Hz up to 13 kHz (extended high-frequency audiometry) to characterise hearing status and support calibration of stimulus sensation levels.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  2. Speech-in-Noise Performance (e.g., QuickSIN)

    Speech perception in noise will be assessed using a standardised speech-in-noise test administered in a controlled environment.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  3. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Participant-rated global change since baseline using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale (-3 = very much worse to +3 = very much improved; higher scores indicate greater improvement).

    Time frame: End of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  4. Quality of Life (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire)

    Quality of life assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), yielding domain scores and an overall score (0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  5. Adverse Events (Stimulation Side-Effects Questionnaire)

    Stimulation tolerability assessed each visit using a Stimulation Side-Effects Questionnaire recording presence and severity of side effects (e.g., tingling, itching, headache) rated on a numeric severity scale (0-10; higher scores indicate worse side effects), plus event frequency.

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (Sessions 1-8)

  6. Tinnitus Pitch Matching

    Dominant tinnitus pitch estimated by psychoacoustic pitch matching and recorded as frequency in hertz (Hz).

    Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  7. Tinnitus Loudness Matching and Discomfort Levels

    Loudness matching and discomfort levels: Tinnitus loudness matching recorded in decibels sensation level (dB SL; dB above audiometric threshold) at the matched frequency, and loudness discomfort levels recorded in decibels sensation level (dB SL; dB above threshold) at tested frequencies.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  8. Minimum Masking Level (MML)

    Broadband noise level required to fully mask tinnitus, recorded in decibels hearing level (dB HL).

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment at 4 weeks, 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  9. Resting-State EEG Spectral Power (Eyes Closed)

    Resting-state eyes-closed electroencephalography (EEG) spectral power averaged within prespecified frequency bands and electrode/network regions, reported in decibels (dB); higher values indicate greater spectral power.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  10. Resting-State EEG Functional Connectivity (Eyes Closed)

    Resting-state eyes-closed EEG functional connectivity within prespecified networks, quantified as phase-locking value (PLV; unitless, 0-1); higher values indicate stronger phase synchronization.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  11. Auditory Oddball Task-Evoked Response Amplitude

    Auditory oddball event-related potential (ERP) amplitude (e.g., P300) averaged over prespecified electrodes/time windows, reported in microvolts (µV); higher absolute amplitude indicates larger task-evoked response.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  12. Auditory Oddball Task-Evoked Response Latency

    Auditory oddball ERP component latency (e.g., P300 peak latency) within prespecified time windows, reported in milliseconds (ms); lower values indicate faster evoked responses.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  13. Pupillometry

    Task-related pupil diameter during pupillometry, summarized as mean (or peak) pupil size change from baseline, reported in millimeters (mm); larger values indicate greater pupil dilation.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  14. Heart Rate

    Electrocardiography (ECG)-derived heart rate, reported in beats per minute (bpm); higher values indicate faster heart rate.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  15. Saliva Biomarkers

    Concentration of prespecified salivary biomarkers of arousal/neuromodulatory engagement, reported in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (or assay-specific units); higher values indicate higher biomarker concentration.

    Time frame: Baseline visit, end of treatment (4 weeks), 28 days post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN)
    Dublin, Dublin D02, Ireland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 32 months after the start.

Of 133 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tinnitus, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 151 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2026
First posted
Feb 6, 2026
StartActual
Jan 30, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jan 30, 2029
Last update
Apr 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07393880
Lead sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Responsible party
Sven Vanneste (Professor, University of Dublin, Trinity College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2026
Start date
Jan 30, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2026

Study contacts

Sven Vanneste, PhD
Contact
sven.vanneste@tcd.ie
+353 87 470 2835.
Anusha Mohan, PhD
Contact
anusha.mohan@tcd.ie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion