CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05605132Updated Aug 25, 2023

SENSORY RE-TRAINING IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NECK PAIN

An interventional study of Proprioceptive Training Exercise and Tactile Acuity Training in Neck Pain, Cervical Pain and Neck Muscle Issue, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Status unknown at 2 sites in Turkey. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-25.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is known that tactile acuity and proprioceptive sense decrease in patients with chronic neck pain. However, sensory re-training in patients with chronic neck pain has not been given sufficient importance. The effects of proprioceptive and tactile acuity training on pain intensity in patients with chronic neck pain will be compared in this study. Eligible participants will be divided into three groups as follows: Proprioceptive Training Group (PTG), Tactile Acuity Training Group (TAG), and Control Group (CG). The randomization will be performed using the block randomization method to obtain an equal number of participants in the groups. Each participant will be evaluated two times at a 4-week interval. Participants will be evaluated regarding subjective pain intensity by using a Numerical Rating Scale, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation using an algometer (JTECH Medical-Algometer Commander, USA). Neck proprioception exercises will be applied to the patients in the PTG at 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Tactile acuity training will be applied to the patients in the TAG 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Between the two assessments, the Control Group will not receive any treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Cervical Pain
  • Neck Muscle Issue
  • Neck Pain, Posterior
  • Cervical Pain, Posterior

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • oculomotor exercises
  • neck pain
  • cervical pain
  • sensory re-training
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • to be aged between 20-60 years old
  • Pain limited to the posterior of the cervical region.
  • Pain that lasts longer than 3 months
  • Pain severity of 3 or higher on the Visual Analog Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malignant tumor in any part of the body (no screening will be performed for the presence of tumor and patients diagnosed with tumors before the study will not be included).
  • Vertebral fractures
  • Fibromyalgia
  • chronic fatigue syndrome
  • History of surgery in the neck or shoulder area
  • Radicular pain
  • Neurological deficit of disc pathologies
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Pronounced cervical kyphosis
  • Significant scoliosis involving the cervical region
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
57 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Proprioceptive Training Group

    oculomotor exercises will be applied to the participants three times a week for four weeks. oculomotor exercises: head relocation gaze stability eye follow saccadic eye movement head and eye coordination

    Other: Proprioceptive Training Exercise

  • Experimental
    Tactile Acuity Training

    Participants will be requested to lie face down. Five points will be marked in the painful areas on the right and left sides of the neck. The distance between the points will equal the two-point discrimination value. A photograph of the neck will be taken. The patient will not see his/her own neck during the application but see the photograph of his/her neck. The points will be touched lightly with two different stimuli (a pen with a 2 mm diameter and a mushroom probe with an 11 mm diameter). Participants will be asked about the location and type of the stimuli. The interstimulus interval will be 15 seconds. If more than 90% of correct answers are obtained, the distance between the points will be reduced by 10%. The training will be performed in three separate blocks, a total of 72 stimuli (block duration = 6 minutes, rest time between blocks = 3 minutes, number of stimuli applied in each block = 24 stimuli). The treatment time will be 24 minutes.

    Other: Tactile Acuity Training

  • Sham comparator
    Control Group

    The participants will be evaluated two times at 4-week intervals. No intervention will be applied during the time frame.

    Other: Control Group

Interventions

  • OtherProprioceptive Training Exercise

    oculomotor exercises will be applied to the participants three times a week for four weeks. oculomotor exercises: * head relocation * gaze stability * eye follow * saccadic eye movement * head and eye coordination

  • OtherTactile Acuity Training

    Participants will be requested to lie face down. Five points will be marked in the painful areas on the right and left sides of the neck. The distance between the points will equal the two-point discrimination value. A photograph of the neck will be taken. The patient will not see his/her own neck during the application but see the photograph of his/her neck. The points will be touched lightly with two different stimuli (a pen with a 2 mm diameter and a mushroom probe with an 11 mm diameter). Participants will be asked about the location and type of the stimuli. The interstimulus interval will be 15 seconds. If more than 90% of correct answers are obtained, the distance between the points will be reduced by 10%. The training will be performed in three separate blocks, a total of 72 stimuli (block duration = 6 minutes, rest time between blocks = 3 minutes, number of stimuli applied in each block = 24 stimuli). The treatment time will be 24 minutes.

  • OtherControl Group

    The participants will be evaluated two times at 4-week intervals. No intervention will be applied during the time frame.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain intensity

    It will be evaluated using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicate no pain, 10 indicate most vulnerable pain)

    Time frame: Change form baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. pressure pain threshold

    It will be evaluated in the middle of the upper trapezius muscle and the dominant side of the tibialis anterior muscle. It will be evaluated two times at 30-second intervals. The average of value will be recorded.

    Time frame: Change form baseline at 4 weeks

  2. temporal summation

    It will be evaluated in the middle of the upper trapezius muscle. 10 subsequent stimuli with a 1-second application at the level of pressure pain threshold and 1-second rest. Pain intensity at 1, 5 and 10th stimuli will be asked based on the Numerical Rating Scale.

    Time frame: Change form baseline at 4 weeks

  3. conditioned pain modulation

    The sphygmomanometer will be applied on the arm which is the contralateral side of the upper trapezius. It will be inflated at a rate of 20 mm/Hg and held at this value for 30 seconds. Then, the patient's pain intensity will be questioned according to the numerical pain scale.

    Time frame: Change form baseline at 4 weeks

  4. neck disability

    A neck disability questionnaire (NDI) will be used

    Time frame: Change form baseline at 4 weeks

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Hacettepe Universty
    Ankara, Sıhhıye 06100, Turkey
    • Kübra Canlı, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Kübra
    Ankara, Sıhhıye 06230, Turkey
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05605132
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Kübra Canli (Research Assistant, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2022
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2023

Study contacts

Kübra canlı
Contact
kbrac91@gmail.com
90 312 305 25 25 ext. 187
Kübra Canlı
Contact
90 312 305 25 25
Kübra canlı
study chair · Hacettepe University
Filiz Can
study director · Hacettepe University
Gökhan Demirkıran
principal investigator · Hacettepe University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion