ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05603533AMUSEDUpdated Oct 9, 2024

Adherence by Music to Exercise in Dementia: Group Therapy

An interventional study of Music and video-based group exercise therapy in Dementia, sponsored by Hasselt University. Recruiting at 4 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-09.

Sponsored by Hasselt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to asses the effect of a music and video-based group exercise therapy on motivation, physical functioning, cognition and well-being in older adults with moderate dementia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dementia

Keywords

  • Exercise therapy
  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical therapy
  • Frailty
  • Treatment Adherence and Compliance
  • Cognition
  • Physical functioning
03

In context

Dementia

2,230 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 549 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 83 across 1,669 interventional studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hasselt University is the lead sponsor of 203 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women with moderate dementia (MMSE between 12 and 20)
  • Age 65 years or older
  • Resident in nursing home for at least 30 days
  • Able to stand (supported) for 10 seconds with supervision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inadequate functional hearing
  • Uncorrected visual problems
  • Rehabilitating from an orthopedic or neurologic insult
  • Known disability that significantly influences 6 month prognosis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    On top of the regular physical therapy, the participants in the intervention group will receive a music and video-based group exercise therapy in small groups of 5. On a big screen, a video of an older woman performing exercises will be shown, the participants will have to copy these exercises. In the beginning of each session, the participants will be able to choose the music they want to move to.

    Other: Music and video-based group exercise therapy

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The participants in the control group will receive no additional therapy.

Interventions

  • OtherMusic and video-based group exercise therapy

    Each exercise session will last up to 45min. The participants will follow this group exercise therapy twice a week for four months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in motivation between 1,2,3 and 4 months into the intervention will be measured using the observed emotion rating scale (OERS)

    The OERS evaluates the positive (pleasure, interest/alertness) and negative mood (anger, anxiety, sadness) by observing the extent or duration of facial expressions and body movements and has a moderate to high interrater reliability. To evaluate the OERS, two exercise sessions will be recorded each month and results will be averaged to compensate for daily fluctuations.

    Time frame: 1,2,3 and 4 months of intervention

  2. The change in muscle strength between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be measured using the modified timed chair stand test.

    The timed chair stand test is a valid and reliable test to evaluate muscle strength in older adults. The participant will be asked to stand up and sit back down on a chair five times without using their hands. The time it takes to perform this task will be measured.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

  3. The change in muscle strength between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be measured using a hand-held dynamometer

    When using the hand-held dynamometer to measure strength, the break technique will be used. The examiner will apply resistance in a fixed position and the person being tested exerts a maximum effort against the dynamometer for 3-5 seconds. At the last second, the examiner applies a resistance sufficient to overcome the maximum effort of the person being tested and cause the subject's joint to move.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

  4. The change in compliance between 1,2,3 and 4 months into the intervention will be measured

    Compliance will be measured by assessing whether the participants exercised at the prescribed intensity. To evaluate compliance, two exercises sessions will be recorded and results will be averaged to compensate for daily fluctuations. Both quality and quantity of the participants' performances will be scored. To measure the quantity, the amount of repetitions the participant performed will be rated from zero (no repetitions) to three (all repetitions). A score of two was chosen as cut-off score, indicating that more than half of the exercises were performed. To measure quality, the recorded performances will be compared with the visual instructions on the TV-screen and will be scored on a scale from zero (no repetitions) to three (the performance matched completely with the instructions). A score of two was chosen as cut-off score, indicating that more than half of the exercises were matched with the instructions.

    Time frame: 1,2,3 and 4 months of intervention

  5. The change in adherence between 1,2,3 and 4 months into the intervention will be measured

    Adherence will be measured by counting the amount of therapy sessions each participant completed (%)

    Time frame: 1,2,3 and 4 months of intervention

  6. Attrition rate

    The amount of participants that discontinued the program

    Time frame: Twice a week for 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change in balance and gait between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be measured using the Tinetti test

    The Tinetti test was developed to assess gait and balance in older adults and to assess perception of balance and stability during activities of daily living and fear of falling. It's also used as an indicator of the fall risk of an individual. During the test, the participant will be asked to perform certain tasks. The examiner will look at certain key points to score these tasks.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

  2. The change in activity level and sleep between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be measured using an Actigraph

    The actigraph is a validated, 3 axis accelerometer that will be used to measure activity level (inactivity/sedentary behavior as well as general restlessness and wandering behavior) and sleep. The device will be worn for five consecutive days. During the day, the actigraph will be worn at the hip to measure activity and during the night, the actigraph will be worn at the wrist to measure sleep.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

  3. The change in cognition between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

    The MoCA is a tool used to determine if cognitive impairment is present. It takes around ten minutes to complete. It evaluates visuospatial skills, attention, language, abstract reasoning, delayed recall, executive function, and orientation.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

  4. The change in quality of life between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be assessed using the ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people (ICECAP-O)

    The ICECAP-O questionnaire is validated self-report measure for quality of life in older adults with mild and moderate dementia. The ICECAP-O focuses on a broader sense of wellbeing, rather than only health related quality of life. The measure covers attributes of wellbeing that were found to be important to older adults.

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

  5. The change in behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia between baseline, mid-intervention and at the end of intervention will be evaluated using the Dutch version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-D)

    The CMAI-D is a 29-item scale to assess agitation. The participants are rated by the staff of the nursing home regarding the frequency with which, over the past two weeks, they manifested agitated behaviors. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from "Never" to "Several times per hour".

    Time frame: At baseline, after 2 and 4 months

07

Study locations

2 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Aquamarijn
    Kasterlee, Antwerpen 2460, Belgium
    Recruiting
  • Woonzorgcentrum Beversthuis
    Beverst, Limburg 3740, Belgium
    Completed
  • Woonzorgcentrum St.Elisabeth
    Hasselt, Limburg 3500, Belgium
    Completed
  • Woonzorgcentrum Kimpenhof
    Opglabbeek, Limburg 3660, Belgium
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Relevant data will be shared among collaborating researchers within Hasselt University via Google Drive. Within Google Drive, there is a division into 3 categories for access rights to personal data. To category 1 belongs only the responsible local researcher who has access to all personal data, including the log of subjects with the link between the identity and the encrypted data. To category 2 belong all employees of the research team. They have access to the pseudonymized data. To category 3 belong the master's thesis students. They only have access to the pseudonymized data relevant to their master's thesis.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05603533
Lead sponsor
Hasselt University
Collaborators
Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek
Responsible party
Tinne Plattiau (Msc, Hasselt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2022
Start date
Jan 9, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2024

Study contacts

Tine Plattiau, Msc
Contact
tine.plattiau@uhasselt.be
+3211268323
Joke Spildooren, Prof. dr.
Contact
joke.spildooren@uhasselt.be
+3211269178
Joke Spildooren, Prof. dr.
study director · Hasselt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion