ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05596643Updated Oct 27, 2022

Investigation of Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever

An observational study in Familial Mediterranean Fever and Autonomic Dysfunction, sponsored by Marmara University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-27.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is the most common inherited autoinflammatory disease affecting 150,000 patients worldwide. Periodic febrile exacerbations, peritonitis, and pleuritis are characteristic disease features. Dysregulation of IL-1β secretion has an important role in the pathophysiology of the disease, and IL-1β also serves as a therapeutic target. Chronic inflammation has been associated with early atherosclerotic and cardiovascular disease in various rheumatic diseases. An increased risk for cardiovascular events associated with disease activity has been described in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. In addition, autonomic nervous system dysfunction may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in patients with inflammatory disease. For example, decreased heart rate variability is an important feature of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and is an isolated risk factor for cardiovascular events. Autonomic dysfunction studies related to FMF have conflicting results.

The aim of this study was to determine autonomic dysfunction symptoms and objective findings in patients with FMF; Demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, inflammatory burden, fatigue level, sleep quality, presence of fibromyalgia and their relationship with quality of life were evaluated and compared with healthy controls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Familial Mediterranean Fever
  • Autonomic Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Familial Mediterranean Fever
  • Autonomic Dysfunction
  • r-r interval variability
  • sympathetic skin response
03

In context

Familial Mediterranean Fever

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Familial Mediterranean Fever; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 84 across 33 observational studies indexed under Familial Mediterranean Fever.

Browse Familial Mediterranean Fever studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 590 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with FMF Healthy control group

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Familial Mediterranean Fever group;

  1. Being between the ages of 18-65
  2. Having a definite diagnosis of Familial Mediterranean Fever according to Livneh criteria

Healthy control group;

  1. Being between the ages of 18-65
  2. Absence of any disease diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Liver or kidney failure
  2. Pregnancy
  3. Diabetes mellitus
  4. Thyroid diseases
  5. Those who use neuroprotective or antihypertensive drugs
  6. Vitamin B12 deficiency
  7. Anemia
  8. Paraneoplastic neuropathy
  9. Alcoholism
  10. Cardiac failure
  11. Cardiac arrhythmia
  12. Acute thrombosis
  13. Having a diagnosis of another systemic rheumatic disease
  14. Persons who did not give consent to participate in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients diagnosed with Familial Mediterranean Fever

    Diagnostic Test: Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 · Diagnostic Test: r-r interval variability with normal breathing · Diagnostic Test: r-r interval variability with deep breathing · Diagnostic Test: Valsalva ratio · Diagnostic Test: 30:15 ratio · Diagnostic Test: sympathetic skin response · Diagnostic Test: blood pressure response to standing · Diagnostic Test: blood pressure response to sustained handgrip test · Other: Hospital anxiety and depression scale · Diagnostic Test: Fibromyalgia rapid screening tool · Other: Familial Mediterranean Fever Quality of life scale · Other: Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale · Other: The Fatigue Severity Scale

  • Healthy Controls

    Diagnostic Test: Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 · Diagnostic Test: r-r interval variability with normal breathing · Diagnostic Test: r-r interval variability with deep breathing · Diagnostic Test: Valsalva ratio · Diagnostic Test: 30:15 ratio · Diagnostic Test: sympathetic skin response · Diagnostic Test: blood pressure response to standing · Diagnostic Test: blood pressure response to sustained handgrip test · Other: Hospital anxiety and depression scale · Diagnostic Test: Fibromyalgia rapid screening tool · Other: Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale · Other: The Fatigue Severity Scale

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testComposite Autonomic Symptom Score-31

    Standardized questionnaire to determine the level of autonomic dysfunction

    Also known as: COMPASS-31

  • Diagnostic testr-r interval variability with normal breathing

    electrophysiological test to detect parasympathetic dysfunction

  • Diagnostic testr-r interval variability with deep breathing

    electrophysiological test to detect parasympathetic dysfunction

  • Diagnostic testValsalva ratio

    electrophysiological test to detect parasympathetic dysfunction

  • Diagnostic test30:15 ratio

    electrophysiological test to detect parasympathetic dysfunction

  • Diagnostic testsympathetic skin response

    electrophysiological test to detect sympathetic dysfunction

    Also known as: SSR

  • Diagnostic testblood pressure response to standing

    clinical test to detect sympathetic dysfunction

  • Diagnostic testblood pressure response to sustained handgrip test

    clinical test to detect sympathetic dysfunction

  • OtherHospital anxiety and depression scale

    Standardized questionnaire to investigate the depression and anxiety

    Also known as: HADS

  • Diagnostic testFibromyalgia rapid screening tool

    Standardized questionnaire to determine the presence of fibromyalgia

    Also known as: FIRST

  • OtherFamilial Mediterranean Fever Quality of life scale

    Standardized questionnaire to investigate the quality of life in Familial Mediterranean Fever patients

    Also known as: FMFQoL

  • OtherJenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale

    Standardized questionnaire to investigate the sleep quality and disturbance

  • OtherThe Fatigue Severity Scale

    Standardized questionnaire to investigate the fatigue severity

    Also known as: FSS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31

    It is a widely applicable, up-to-date, easy-to-apply and scientifically-based test that evaluates autonomic symptoms and functions by the person himself. It consists of 31 multiple-choice questions in 6 autonomic areas: orthostatic intolerance, vasomotor, secretomotor, gastrointestinal, bladder function and pupillomotor areas. A score in the range of 0-100 is obtained as a result of multiplying each area by the weight factor determined by the study. High score indicates presence and severity of autonomic dysfunction.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. r-r interval variability with normal breathing

    The active and reference superficial recording electrodes are on the dorsal side of both hands, and the ground electrode is placed on the wrist. The R-R interval variability is calculated automatically by the electromyography device over a 1-minute recording.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. r-r interval variability with deep breathing

    The active and reference superficial recording electrodes are on the dorsal side of both hands, and the ground electrode is placed on the wrist. In order to determine the R-R interval variability with deep breathing, the patient is given 6 to 8 deep breaths, consisting of 5 seconds of inspiration followed by 5 seconds of expiration, and the result is automatically calculated by the electromyography device.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Valsalva ratio

    The active and reference superficial recording electrodes are on the dorsal side of both hands, and the ground electrode is placed on the wrist. The test was performed by asking the subject to sit quietly and then blow into a mouthpiece attached to an aneroid pressure gauge at a pressure of 40 mmHg for 15 seconds. The ratio of the longest R-R interval shortly after the manoeuver (within about 20 beats) and the shortest R-R interval during the manoeuver is then measured. The result was expressed as the Valsalva ratio that is taken as the mean ratio from three successive Valsalva manoeuvers.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. 30:15 ratio

    The active and reference superficial recording electrodes are on the dorsal side of both hands, and the ground electrode is placed on the wrist.The R-R interval on the ECG was recorded and used to determine the instantaneous HR at rest and then on the 15th and 30th beats after standing. The HR should normally rise after about 30 seconds as part of the response to return the blood pressure (BP) to normal. After standing up, the 30:15 ratio obtained by dividing the longest R-R distance around the 30th beat by the shortest R-R distance around the 15th beat was calculated automatically by the EMG device.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. sympathetic skin response

    Sweating that occurs in response to many different stimuli, electrolyte in the skin triggers changes in skin conductivity, resulting in instantaneous changes in skin conductivity. Sympathetic skin response evaluates these instantaneous changes in the skin in response to sweating. Sympathetic skin response reflects the function of sympathetic nerve fibers.Active recording electrodes on palm and sole; reference electrodes is placed on the back of the hand and the back of the foot. Responses obtained by applying electrical current over the median nerve trace are evaluated.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. blood pressure response to standing

    Participants were asked to stand up for 3 minutes after a 10-minute resting period in a supine position. The systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) just before standing, and 3 minutes after active standing were determined, in order to define postural change in BP and to evaluate orthostatic intolerance.

    Time frame: 6 months

  8. blood pressure response to sustained handgrip

    Blood pressure measurement is continued at 1-minute intervals while patients perform sustained handgip at 30% of their maximum volitional strength for 5 minutes.The absolute difference between the highest DBP during handgrip and the basal DBP just before the handgrip was noted.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Familial Mediterranean Fever Quality of Life Scale (FMF-QoL)

    FMF-QoL was developed to evaluate the quality of life in FMF patients. This scale consists of 20 questions in the form of a Likert scale and the total scoring is between 0-80. High scores indicate a decrease in quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    This scale consists of 14 questions in total, and anxiety symptoms are questioned in half of the questions and depression-related complaints in the other half. A subscore of 8 or higher for depression or anxiety is considered a clinical case.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FIRST)

    This scale consists of 6 questions investigating the most relevant clinical features of fibromyalgia. The questions are answered as yes/no and 5 or more out of 6 points in total are in favor of fibromyalgia.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    It consists of a total of 9 questions in which complaints related to fatigue are scored between 0 and 7, taking into account the fatigue in the last week. The mean score is obtained by dividing the total score by 9, and it is defined as \<4.0 points as no fatigue, 4.0-5.0 points at the border, and \>5.0 points as fatigue.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS)

    It is a scale in which scores between 0 and 5 are made for each symptom by questioning how many days in a month 4 sleep-related symptoms are experienced considering the last 1 month. The total score is between 0-20, and as the score increases, sleep quality deteriorates.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Marmara University School of Medicine, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • İmran Kalkan · Contact · imrankalkann55@gmail.com · +90 530 340 5594
    • Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz, Prof · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2022, 7 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2022
First posted
Oct 27, 2022
StartActual
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2022
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2022
Last update
Oct 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05596643
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2022
Start date
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2022

Study contacts

İmran Kalkan
Contact
imrankalkann55@gmail.com
+90 530 340 5594
Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz, Prof
principal investigator · Marmara University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion